TakeYourHeart wrote:
Too steep on the Suns end. Love it for us though.
Moderators: DG88, niQ, Duffman100, tsherkin, Reeko, lebron stopper, HiJiNX, 7 Footer, Morris_Shatford
TakeYourHeart wrote:
douggood wrote:vulture wrote:this is just pathetic. I guess this guy doesn't think defense counts.
?s=20&t=1_-xzoB6eIbtYmQH0X32Ng
he is very very very plugged into the Arizona sports scene. consider it a tempering of expectations by the suns organization.
phanman wrote:Los_29 wrote:phanman wrote:Ahh thanks for pointing that out, I guess it makes it a bit more comforting, but still a pretty underwhelming package imo. I can't see the Pelicans eager to toss many FRPs if any if with these prospects and a guy who fits OG's profile in Herb already.
Honestly i'd rather we just go embrace the tank and go:
With both the Lakers first rounders please
Lakers don't have any picks to trade.
They have their '27 and '29.
I mean its been in the news the entire offseason/season.
MikeM wrote:MoneyBall wrote:MikeM wrote:Are we sure Johnson is worse than Anunoby? Guy shoots mid 40s from 3 from anywhere on the court.
That's the thing, some of these advanced stats are showing Cam to be a bigger net positive than OG. There shouldn't be that big of a drop off assuming we can get him clean shots.
Here's my thing. Are we sure he even needs clean shots? Like, what kind of shooter are we dealing with here because it seems like if you give Johnson the Nick Nurse 35 mpg and empty the clip recipe, is he a 20+ ppg guy?
TRik wrote:Seriously, how is it not obvious. It’s more about the players you are playing behind then it is about usage. I don’t think many starters in this league would be happy running up and down the court watching Fred chuck. I dare say OG will be far happier in the 3&D role while playing behind someone like Booker.
Los_29 wrote:phanman wrote:Los_29 wrote:
Lakers don't have any picks to trade.
They have their '27 and '29.
I mean its been in the news the entire offseason/season.
Well I know that. But why on earth would we want their picks 5 years down the road? LOL.
That's an atrocious deal.

JRoy wrote:mtcan wrote:JRoy wrote:
No thanks from POR.
You are obviously curious about OG as you are in this thread. Realistically...I can't see a trade with OG to Portland unless Sharpe is going out. Hart's salary makes it work.
I do like OG. I think he’s a fine player.
As I said earlier it will take more than OG to fix POR, and if he wants to go somewhere where he will get more shots it won’t be there.
Also not trading Sharpe (who has a chance to be a star) for the Cadillac of roleplayers in OG.
If POR were a real contender I might make that trade, but making that trade with this iteration of the Blazers is a big mistake.
vulture wrote:this is just pathetic. I guess this guy doesn't think defense counts.
?s=20&t=1_-xzoB6eIbtYmQH0X32Ng
Madvillainy2004 wrote:douggood wrote:vulture wrote:this is just pathetic. I guess this guy doesn't think defense counts.
?s=20&t=1_-xzoB6eIbtYmQH0X32Ng
he is very very very plugged into the Arizona sports scene. consider it a tempering of expectations by the suns organization.
Lmao wants off the Anunoby contract is definitely a way to frame this conversation.
ATLTimekeeper wrote:TRik wrote:Seriously, how is it not obvious. It’s more about the players you are playing behind then it is about usage. I don’t think many starters in this league would be happy running up and down the court watching Fred chuck. I dare say OG will be far happier in the 3&D role while playing behind someone like Booker.
Grass is always greener. I'm sure the Raptors have the most accurate read of the situation. Maybe he doesn't want to sit through a rebuild while his ticket comes up.
Bruin wrote:Los_29 wrote:phanman wrote:They have their '27 and '29.
I mean its been in the news the entire offseason/season.
Well I know that. But why on earth would we want their picks 5 years down the road? LOL.
That's an atrocious deal.
The incentive is in the fact that the Lakers will likely be a horrible team in those years.
There’s a reason why those picks are considered to be intriguing assets across the league. Teams know the Lakers are desperate for a win now move and would likely part with those picks for the right move
sidsid wrote:If you're trading OG, then you might as well trade Siakam because you're giving up on the near term.
There's no way you'll get enough value to trade for a star without him, and you've also traded away an irreplaceable part of your playoff core.
The only trade that makes sense to move forward with Siakam's timeline is to move off of your low ceiling guards.
Crives wrote:?s=46&t=4fYfi5S4N_SSGL3EyziG0g
This is the guy Suns ownership/GM feeds info into. Seems suns interest is real
ATLTimekeeper wrote:TRik wrote:Seriously, how is it not obvious. It’s more about the players you are playing behind then it is about usage. I don’t think many starters in this league would be happy running up and down the court watching Fred chuck. I dare say OG will be far happier in the 3&D role while playing behind someone like Booker.
Grass is always greener. I'm sure the Raptors have the most accurate read of the situation. Maybe he doesn't want to sit through a rebuild while his ticket comes up.
Los_29 wrote:Bruin wrote:Los_29 wrote:
Well I know that. But why on earth would we want their picks 5 years down the road? LOL.
That's an atrocious deal.
The incentive is in the fact that the Lakers will likely be a horrible team in those years.
There’s a reason why those picks are considered to be intriguing assets across the league. Teams know the Lakers are desperate for a win now move and would likely part with those picks for the right move
I'd imagine the Lakers will do whatever it takes to not be bad if they don't have any picks. They are in one of the most popular destinations in the league. They will also have a ton of time to rebuild their team once Lebron retires.
Are those picks actually intriguing? Caris Levert was able to get a FRP, Derrick White was able to get a FRP and a swap and yet Fred and GTJ can't get anything other then FRP's 5 and 7 years into the future? It's a terrible deal for us.
Los_29 wrote:phanman wrote:Los_29 wrote:
Lakers don't have any picks to trade.
They have their '27 and '29.
I mean its been in the news the entire offseason/season.
Well I know that. But why on earth would we want their picks 5 years down the road? LOL.
That's an atrocious deal.
mihaic wrote:sidsid wrote:If you're trading OG, then you might as well trade Siakam because you're giving up on the near term.
There's no way you'll get enough value to trade for a star without him, and you've also traded away an irreplaceable part of your playoff core.
The only trade that makes sense to move forward with Siakam's timeline is to move off of your low ceiling guards.
Easier said than done. Contenders would need to gut their teams...
Most big name players who command lots of salaries and picks are traded in the offseason, for this reason.
Madvillainy2004 wrote:ATLTimekeeper wrote:TRik wrote:Seriously, how is it not obvious. It’s more about the players you are playing behind then it is about usage. I don’t think many starters in this league would be happy running up and down the court watching Fred chuck. I dare say OG will be far happier in the 3&D role while playing behind someone like Booker.
Grass is always greener. I'm sure the Raptors have the most accurate read of the situation. Maybe he doesn't want to sit through a rebuild while his ticket comes up.
I just don't know what more OG can do in an efficient offense. He's an excellent defensive player that is athletic finisher in transition or off cuts. And is a solid but streaky shooter. No handle, no mid range game, no post game, no playmaking (more turnovers than assists).
On a championship team OG is a Tayshaun Prince/2010 Ron Artest. A vital role but not one that calls for many isos/mid range/post ups which I assume he means with his role. This isn't the first time OGs been unhappy either and his role was a part of it in Sept/Oct as well.

Steelo Green wrote:Even though you know somehow we all gotta go, as long as we believin' thievin' we'll be leavin' with some kind of dough.
douggood wrote:vulture wrote:this is just pathetic. I guess this guy doesn't think defense counts.
?s=20&t=1_-xzoB6eIbtYmQH0X32Ng
he is very very very plugged into the Arizona sports scene. consider it a tempering of expectations by the suns organization.
Los_29 wrote:Bruin wrote:Los_29 wrote:
Well I know that. But why on earth would we want their picks 5 years down the road? LOL.
That's an atrocious deal.
The incentive is in the fact that the Lakers will likely be a horrible team in those years.
There’s a reason why those picks are considered to be intriguing assets across the league. Teams know the Lakers are desperate for a win now move and would likely part with those picks for the right move
I'd imagine the Lakers will do whatever it takes to not be bad if they don't have any picks. They are in one of the most popular destinations in the league. They will also have a ton of time to rebuild their team once Lebron retires.
Are those picks actually intriguing? Caris Levert was able to get a FRP, Derrick White was able to get a FRP and a swap and yet Fred and GTJ can't get anything other then FRP's 5 and 7 years into the future? It's a terrible deal for us.
