Duke4life831 wrote:prophet_of_rage wrote:TGW wrote:
that's probably true, although the wnba makes themselves an easy target. it's like they refuse to accept that the product isn't good and the players and the league are unrepetent about it. the way they run that league INVITES HATERS. that's just my 2 cents.
The product is good, though. It is very fundamentally sound basketball. It simply isn't as theatrical as the NBA.
It all depends on how you view it though. Just straight forward if Im looking to watch basketball be played at its highest levels, aka the best players and the best teams. The WNBA isnt a good basketball product. Its behind
NBA
Europe/China/Australia pro leagues
G League
College Basketball
OTE
High level mens high school basketball
This is always going to be the struggle for the WNBA to gain any ground in the casual sports fan viewing schedule. There is an abundance of supply when it comes to basketball to watch. Most people are just going to watch the elite level (aka NBA) and the only reason college basketball has a significant fan base is because they have a built in fanbase with people who go to college and become fans of their college teams.
The WNBA is basketball at the highest level. It's the highest level of women's basketball in the world.
It's like saying you wouldn't watch Simone Biles and the women's US gymnastics team in the Olympics because it's not elite compared to the men's team.
That may be true, but it's also a different event altogether and you still get the opportunity to witness greatness amongst someone's peers.
I get that maybe some people do just want to watch the men's event or whatever, but I wouldn't say it's not an elite level of competition just because it's not the same level as the men's league. There are physical disadvantages that women have but the women's game has also become quite skilled and great teamwork + skill in a competitive event is still fun to watch.