[Shams] - Raptors Now Taking Calls for OG

[OakleyDokely]

I'd rather have Dyson than Sharpe. Sharpe looks way too one dimensional for my tastes.

[PhilBlackson]

I'd rather have Dyson than Sharpe. Sharpe looks way too one dimensional for my tastes.

I'd love either.

Shaedon has the long term scoring potential I think the team desperately needs, not to mention will have a TON of fun/electric plays (can only imagine Scottie throwing him some crazy passes) to get the crowd going & team the kinda media attention we all want that the team hasn't received since VC (obviously prob not quite that level -- aside would be a fun moment at the dunk contest, basically a direct product of VC's inspiration and time here).

BUT I certainly won't complain with Dyson's elite defence and playmaking. It's a bit redundant IF Pascal is still here with Scottie too but if not, it would be great to have another ballhandler and facilitator. I'm sure there's still some really nice upside to him offensively even if it's not as a go-to scorer.

[_MidNight_]

The two deals I'd pull the trigger on is Sharpe and Hart plus pick or Daniels and Murphy plus Laker pick.

[mtcan]

I'd rather have Dyson than Sharpe. Sharpe looks way too one dimensional for my tastes.

Scottie drive and kick to Sharpe for 3s and Scottie lobs to Sharpe for years...ya I like this

[_MidNight_]

I'd rather have Dyson than Sharpe. Sharpe looks way too one dimensional for my tastes.

That's a tough one. PG of the future with the size we all want, or that dynamic scorer we've lacked for ages.

Either would be a nice directional change from what OG is trying to do here with his more touches.

[Bruin]

If we come out of this deadline with either Daniels or Sharpe to pair with Scottie and our 2023 pick, we’ll be in a good position moving forward

[YogurtProducer]

Sharpe could be wearing a raps jersey in dunk contest

LOL the overreactions from the casuals will be amazing.

If hes good he is the next Vince. If he sucks they will be calling for Masai's head

[YogurtProducer]

I'd rather have Dyson than Sharpe. Sharpe looks way too one dimensional for my tastes.

Why not both?

[PhilBlackson]

I'd rather have Dyson than Sharpe. Sharpe looks way too one dimensional for my tastes.

Scottie drive and kick to Sharpe for 3s and Scottie lobs to Sharpe for years...ya I like this

I'm probably just as happy with Dyson....BUT the one thing about a Scottie/Shaedon is you're GUARANTEED to have an exciting duo (even though yes ofc there will be ups & downs along the way lol). A highlight reel passer, a highlight reel dunker, at bare minimum, even in the down times, you'll be entertained lol and if they do reach the heights of their potentials and become dynamic then it's hard to match that kind of excitement that would be imo (and that's not even factoring whoever our high 23' pick would be, imagine if it were Vic or Scoot though?! Oh lawwwd but we won't even go that far).

[raptor jesus]

I was on board with trading OG for the #7 pick at the draft, w/ Daniels and Sharpe as the primary targets. I would be happy with landing either of them.

[mtcan]

I'd rather have Dyson than Sharpe. Sharpe looks way too one dimensional for my tastes.

Scottie drive and kick to Sharpe for 3s and Scottie lobs to Sharpe for years...ya I like this

I'm probably just as happy with Dyson....BUT the one thing about a Scottie/Shaedon is you're GUARANTEED to have an exciting duo (even though yes ofc there will be ups & downs along the way lol). A highlight reel passer, a highlight reel dunker, at bare minimum, even in the down times, you'll be entertained lol and if they do reach the heights of their potentials and become dynamic then it's hard to match that kind of excitement that would be imo (and that's not even factoring whoever our high 23' pick would be, imagine if it were Vic or Scoot though?! Oh lawwwd but we won't even go that far).

Sharpe would be the most exciting offensive player since Sonny Weems...lol...no...actually Vince Carter

[Clutch0z24]

I like Sharpe as a prospect just worried a bit if he becomes a T-Ross 2.0 ....Ross rookie year looked crazy good but he became one dimensional scorer who could be hot or cold with not much else added to the team....But either way i think the Pelicans offer would be stronger if we can pry Murph & Daniels its a W

[StopitLeo]

I'd rather have Dyson than Sharpe. Sharpe looks way too one dimensional for my tastes.

Scottie drive and kick to Sharpe for 3s and Scottie lobs to Sharpe for years...ya I like this

I'm probably just as happy with Dyson....BUT the one thing about a Scottie/Shaedon is you're GUARANTEED to have an exciting duo (even though yes ofc there will be ups & downs along the way lol). A highlight reel passer, a highlight reel dunker, at bare minimum, even in the down times, you'll be entertained lol and if they do reach the heights of their potentials and become dynamic then it's hard to match that kind of excitement that would be imo (and that's not even factoring whoever our high 23' pick would be, imagine if it were Vic or Scoot though?! Oh lawwwd but we won't even go that far).

I think Sharpe would be much better for the team than Dyson. We need a dynamic perimeter scorer and he has that potential.

[Clay Davis]

I'd rather have Dyson than Sharpe. Sharpe looks way too one dimensional for my tastes.

That's a tough one. PG of the future with the size we all want, or that dynamic scorer we've lacked for ages.

Either would be a nice directional change from what OG is trying to do here with his more touches.

Should think about it in terms of what role is Scottie less likely to thrive in... He has shown flashes of being able to do both.

[YogurtProducer]

I'd rather have Dyson than Sharpe. Sharpe looks way too one dimensional for my tastes.

Scottie drive and kick to Sharpe for 3s and Scottie lobs to Sharpe for years...ya I like this

I'm probably just as happy with Dyson....BUT the one thing about a Scottie/Shaedon is you're GUARANTEED to have an exciting duo (even though yes ofc there will be ups & downs along the way lol). A highlight reel passer, a highlight reel dunker, at bare minimum, even in the down times, you'll be entertained lol and if they do reach the heights of their potentials and become dynamic then it's hard to match that kind of excitement that would be imo (and that's not even factoring whoever our high 23' pick would be, imagine if it were Vic or Scoot though?! Oh lawwwd but we won't even go that far).

In my mind is you get Sharpe for OG you might as well get super aggressive with NOP with a Siakam deal to get Dyson as well

[Clay Davis]

Scottie drive and kick to Sharpe for 3s and Scottie lobs to Sharpe for years...ya I like this

I'm probably just as happy with Dyson....BUT the one thing about a Scottie/Shaedon is you're GUARANTEED to have an exciting duo (even though yes ofc there will be ups & downs along the way lol). A highlight reel passer, a highlight reel dunker, at bare minimum, even in the down times, you'll be entertained lol and if they do reach the heights of their potentials and become dynamic then it's hard to match that kind of excitement that would be imo (and that's not even factoring whoever our high 23' pick would be, imagine if it were Vic or Scoot though?! Oh lawwwd but we won't even go that far).

In my mind is you get Sharpe for OG you might as well get super aggressive with NOP with a Siakam deal to get Dyson as well

I have a Dyson vaccuum and it sucks (in a bad way. Repairs were very expensive.).

[MoneyBall]

I'm not on board for trading OG for Terrence Ross 2.0 (Sharpe).

[Asif16]

I do not like Sharpe. He's extremely overrated. Besides the fancy dunks, he's not a good player

[Asif16]

New Orleans has to be the focus. And maybe to some extent, Indiana as well.

Trey Murphy and Dyson Daniels would be an elite coup by Masai if possible. Duarte/Mathruin/Isiah Jackson are targets from the Indiana side

[Asif16]

Raptors need to hit a home run here with this trade. Getting multiple future picks doesn't help us right now.

I think what we're lacking is true overall depth. Trading a core piece is a great way to really solidify our depth again