https://www.rotowire.com/basketball/nba-lineups.php
Game 55: Dallas Mavericks (28-26) @ Utah Jazz (27-27)
Moderators: Inigo Montoya, FJS
Game 55: Dallas Mavericks (28-26) @ Utah Jazz (27-27)
-
Crunch 99
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,873
- And1: 3,867
- Joined: Jan 05, 2017
-
Game 55: Dallas Mavericks (28-26) @ Utah Jazz (27-27)
Utah Jazz face an undermanned Mavericks' team. Trap game?

https://www.rotowire.com/basketball/nba-lineups.php
https://www.rotowire.com/basketball/nba-lineups.php
Re: Game 55: Dallas Mavericks (28-26) @ Utah Jazz (27-27)
- FJS
- Senior Mod - Jazz

- Posts: 18,811
- And1: 2,182
- Joined: Sep 19, 2002
- Location: Barcelona, Spain
-
Re: Game 55: Dallas Mavericks (28-26) @ Utah Jazz (27-27)
Simply, we have to win. Nothing more, nothing less.

Re: Game 55: Dallas Mavericks (28-26) @ Utah Jazz (27-27)
- Inigo Montoya
- Forum Mod - Jazz

- Posts: 17,189
- And1: 8,460
- Joined: May 31, 2012
Re: Game 55: Dallas Mavericks (28-26) @ Utah Jazz (27-27)
Kessler should feast in this game.
Draft Nate Wolters - FAILED
Keep Nate Wolters - FAILED

Keep Nate Wolters - FAILED

KqWIN wrote:Why are we talking about Middleton, Harris, and Porter?
The real decision the Jazz FO is making is between Continuity, Cap Flexibility, and Cash Considerations.
Re: Game 55: Dallas Mavericks (28-26) @ Utah Jazz (27-27)
-
red4hf
- Jazz Forum GTS Champion 2019-2020
- Posts: 10,838
- And1: 1,098
- Joined: Jul 04, 2002
Re: Game 55: Dallas Mavericks (28-26) @ Utah Jazz (27-27)
Actually, all the Mavericks' stars being out basically guarantees that we will lose this game......
Re: Game 55: Dallas Mavericks (28-26) @ Utah Jazz (27-27)
- Cappy_Smurf
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,323
- And1: 9,811
- Joined: Apr 26, 2015
-
Re: Game 55: Dallas Mavericks (28-26) @ Utah Jazz (27-27)
Well, if Danny Ainge was on the fence as to pulling the trigger on a trade/s in the next few days, maybe this game will be enough to help that decision.
Utah is smack dab in the middle of no man's land where they should cash in on some assets but are in position to get some playoff experience if they stand pat.
I'm guessing we'll see one trade(Vanderbilt?) but not enough to pull the plug on the playoffs.
Utah is smack dab in the middle of no man's land where they should cash in on some assets but are in position to get some playoff experience if they stand pat.
I'm guessing we'll see one trade(Vanderbilt?) but not enough to pull the plug on the playoffs.
New York said Mitchell wasn't the guy you trade the sink for, then they traded it for Mikal, lol.
Re: Game 55: Dallas Mavericks (28-26) @ Utah Jazz (27-27)
- Inigo Montoya
- Forum Mod - Jazz

- Posts: 17,189
- And1: 8,460
- Joined: May 31, 2012
Re: Game 55: Dallas Mavericks (28-26) @ Utah Jazz (27-27)
No excuse for losing this game. Jazz really dropped the ball on this one.
Draft Nate Wolters - FAILED
Keep Nate Wolters - FAILED

Keep Nate Wolters - FAILED

KqWIN wrote:Why are we talking about Middleton, Harris, and Porter?
The real decision the Jazz FO is making is between Continuity, Cap Flexibility, and Cash Considerations.
Re: Game 55: Dallas Mavericks (28-26) @ Utah Jazz (27-27)
-
red4hf
- Jazz Forum GTS Champion 2019-2020
- Posts: 10,838
- And1: 1,098
- Joined: Jul 04, 2002
Re: Game 55: Dallas Mavericks (28-26) @ Utah Jazz (27-27)
We need a wing defender...... We can't have Kessler be the only one capable of playing defense......
Re: Game 55: Dallas Mavericks (28-26) @ Utah Jazz (27-27)
- FJS
- Senior Mod - Jazz

- Posts: 18,811
- And1: 2,182
- Joined: Sep 19, 2002
- Location: Barcelona, Spain
-
Re: Game 55: Dallas Mavericks (28-26) @ Utah Jazz (27-27)
-
arkuo
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,835
- And1: 2,294
- Joined: Jun 16, 2004
Re: Game 55: Dallas Mavericks (28-26) @ Utah Jazz (27-27)
Cappy_Smurf wrote:Well, if Danny Ainge was on the fence as to pulling the trigger on a trade/s in the next few days, maybe this game will be enough to help that decision.
Utah is smack dab in the middle of no man's land where they should cash in on some assets but are in position to get some playoff experience if they stand pat.
I'm guessing we'll see one trade(Vanderbilt?) but not enough to pull the plug on the playoffs.
This is one of Ainge's weaknesses. Back in Boston, he held on to his assets too long waiting for that home run trade of the century type of deal to a point where the assets/picks have devalued.
Re: Game 55: Dallas Mavericks (28-26) @ Utah Jazz (27-27)
-
red4hf
- Jazz Forum GTS Champion 2019-2020
- Posts: 10,838
- And1: 1,098
- Joined: Jul 04, 2002
Re: Game 55: Dallas Mavericks (28-26) @ Utah Jazz (27-27)
arkuo wrote:Cappy_Smurf wrote:Well, if Danny Ainge was on the fence as to pulling the trigger on a trade/s in the next few days, maybe this game will be enough to help that decision.
Utah is smack dab in the middle of no man's land where they should cash in on some assets but are in position to get some playoff experience if they stand pat.
I'm guessing we'll see one trade(Vanderbilt?) but not enough to pull the plug on the playoffs.
This is one of Ainge's weaknesses. Back in Boston, he held on to his assets too long waiting for that home run trade of the century type of deal to a point where the assets/picks have devalued.
To be fair, he's already made 2 of those trades here.......
Re: Game 55: Dallas Mavericks (28-26) @ Utah Jazz (27-27)
-
SoCalJazzFan
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,479
- And1: 1,078
- Joined: Jul 29, 2009
Re: Game 55: Dallas Mavericks (28-26) @ Utah Jazz (27-27)
arkuo wrote:Cappy_Smurf wrote:Well, if Danny Ainge was on the fence as to pulling the trigger on a trade/s in the next few days, maybe this game will be enough to help that decision.
Utah is smack dab in the middle of no man's land where they should cash in on some assets but are in position to get some playoff experience if they stand pat.
I'm guessing we'll see one trade(Vanderbilt?) but not enough to pull the plug on the playoffs.
This is one of Ainge's weaknesses. Back in Boston, he held on to his assets too long waiting for that home run trade of the century type of deal to a point where the assets/picks have devalued.
He already hit two home runs in the offseason, but arguably he has already done what you have mentioned. Unloading some of the vets earlier this year would have pretty much guaranteed a top 5 pick, which in this draft is much more valuable than a couple of extra first round picks in the future, some of which could be protected or from teams that will have picks in the 20s.


