nedleeds wrote:shtolky wrote:nedleeds wrote:Charlotte 1st and our 1st for Josh Hart.
Do you clown sheep lords know Josh Hart is a CAA client
EXTEND AND PAY LEONS SON HIS MONEY!

That Charlotte pick is lotto protected through 2025 and then it would become two seconds. With the way that franchise is being run that pick is probably never a first rounder. Our pick is lotto protected so even if we miss the playoffs (still very plausible), we wouldn’t have given up a first for Hart.
But that's not how picks work as assets. It's still a potential 1st round pick and can be packaged and traded and has moderate value. If you want to drag the timeline left and right we gave up
9th Pick 2018 Draft
Charlotte future 1st
Knicks 2023 1st
for Josh Hart. Which not on the scale of Gobert or the raping the Nets just gave Phoenix but it's a horrific trade.
The sole reason Josh Hart is targeted is because he's a CAA client up for extension. Leon Rose works for CAA. We'll extend Hart (like Randle ... who we extended early to get CAA paid) for no basketball reason and Sam Rose will get his new Lambo.
I know how picks work as assets, but you still have to take into account that the value of the protected assets take a hit when you factor in the protection and the team that owns the pick, in this case, Charlotte, who has shown a recent history of not sniffing the playoffs. You're saying we traded the 9th pick in the 2018 draft, Charlotte future 1st, and Knicks 2023 first, when that sounds 1000x worse than saying we traded Kevin Knox, a lotto protected Charlotte first which only has two years left of 1st round possibilities, and a lotto protected Knicks 1st. We still have the Dallas pick, all our picks, the Washington, Detroit, and Milwaukee picks which have much lower protections than the Charlotte pick we gave up for Reddish.
Also, I get the CAA thing, but two guys you mentioned, Brunson and Randle are all-stars, so there must have been some basketball reason to get those guys.