ImageImageImageImageImage

Poll - Yak deal. Good or bad. Top 6 protected 2024-26

Moderators: HiJiNX, 7 Footer, DG88, niQ, Duffman100, tsherkin, Reeko, Morris_Shatford, lebron stopper

Good, bad, or abyssal

Good
132
46%
Bad
93
32%
Abysmal
65
22%
 
Total votes: 290

User avatar
ItsDanger
RealGM
Posts: 28,842
And1: 26,050
Joined: Nov 01, 2008

Re: Poll - Yak deal. Good or bad. Top 6 protected 2024-26 

Post#141 » by ItsDanger » Thu Feb 9, 2023 5:49 pm

Steelo Green wrote:2 of those picks are second rounders but there is no difference between the 20th pick and Koloko either.

There are so many contradictions presented on this board, its hard to keep track.
Organization can be defined as an organized body of people with a particular purpose. Not random.
User avatar
Mack11
RealGM
Posts: 21,174
And1: 57,056
Joined: May 15, 2006

Re: Poll - Yak deal. Good or bad. Top 6 protected 2024-26 

Post#142 » by Mack11 » Thu Feb 9, 2023 5:51 pm

Lets add a willing passer to a team of inefficient chuckers to balance out the roster.. classic realgm.
FreshyFlames
Rookie
Posts: 1,175
And1: 1,063
Joined: Feb 29, 2012
         

Re: Poll - Yak deal. Good or bad. Top 6 protected 2024-26 

Post#143 » by FreshyFlames » Thu Feb 9, 2023 5:54 pm

Trading away 1st round picks for scrubs will never be good especially when you could easily draft someone better with that pick and have a good track record doing so.
Raps in 6ix
User avatar
redeye514
Analyst
Posts: 3,342
And1: 4,933
Joined: Jun 05, 2006
Location: Peel
 

Re: Poll - Yak deal. Good or bad. Top 6 protected 2024-26 

Post#144 » by redeye514 » Thu Feb 9, 2023 5:57 pm

Jak is a former top 10 pick who averages 12+ Pts, 9+ Brds, 3+ Asts, 2+ Stocks in 27 min a game. He plays D the way we want, can guard the perimeter, and plugs a hole we've had since Gasol / Ibaka left. Were trading a future, likely, 14-20 pick and couple seconds. its a fine deal, even though many on this board wanted something completely different.

My view was that masai was never looking to make this team worse, and wants the raps to be in the second tier of contention next year. He wants a competitive team around Scotty, so we were never going to fill out the roster with 3-5 guys under 3 years in the league.. so getting a guy who is still relatively young, albeit not rookie young, who can play for you for 4-7 years and fills a need, makes sense.

Our shooting will continue to be an achilles heal.. especially if we also trade one of FVV / GTJ... so we need to find a way to improve this. I'm sure management knows this, hence the Otto signing this off season... but were still to shallow there, clearly, as one injury (ie Otto) makes our shooting depth look atrocious.
User avatar
Childs
RealGM
Posts: 13,055
And1: 29,238
Joined: Jun 23, 2010
 

Re: Poll - Yak deal. Good or bad. Top 6 protected 2024-26 

Post#145 » by Childs » Thu Feb 9, 2023 6:04 pm

I feel like this team is from 2003 trying to compete in 2023. We only have 3 shooters on the team....
JN
RealGM
Posts: 20,647
And1: 10,957
Joined: Feb 02, 2007
   

Re: Poll - Yak deal. Good or bad. Top 6 protected 2024-26 

Post#146 » by JN » Thu Feb 9, 2023 6:07 pm

If this trade happens before the season starts I am very happy about it.

But now that we have more information about this team, about the way it is coached, about Scottie, OG happiness, FVV.... probably would not have done this -- especially with this level of protection.
dgr81
General Manager
Posts: 7,665
And1: 10,889
Joined: Feb 07, 2004
 

Re: Poll - Yak deal. Good or bad. Top 6 protected 2024-26 

Post#147 » by dgr81 » Thu Feb 9, 2023 6:07 pm

Top 6 protection is **** abysmal. Can’t believe some of you think this was a good trade :lol:
baller16
Head Coach
Posts: 6,050
And1: 10,825
Joined: Feb 23, 2016
 

Re: Poll - Yak deal. Good or bad. Top 6 protected 2024-26 

Post#148 » by baller16 » Thu Feb 9, 2023 6:10 pm

Half this board is braindead. They think every Masai trade is a W
User avatar
Jcity08
RealGM
Posts: 12,979
And1: 18,140
Joined: May 06, 2018
       

Re: Poll - Yak deal. Good or bad. Top 6 protected 2024-26 

Post#149 » by Jcity08 » Thu Feb 9, 2023 6:15 pm

baller16 wrote:Half this board is brainhead. They think every Masai trade is a W


And they will gaslight you to thinking you're insane for having any other opinion.
Image
Image

Signed with team T.W.O for the 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 season.
User avatar
kleatius_01
Pro Prospect
Posts: 766
And1: 319
Joined: Apr 10, 2006
 

Re: Poll - Yak deal. Good or bad. Top 6 protected 2024-26 

Post#150 » by kleatius_01 » Thu Feb 9, 2023 6:20 pm

https://www.poundingtherock.com/2021/3/26/22349444/jakob-poeltl-san-antonio-overall-impact

Nice write up on Poeltl from last year. A limited player, but he definitely has value. The move signals FO intentions, no tank for us. We desperately need more shooting on the team, and the bench is still in tatters. The more things change the more they remain the same!
Klayforspicy
Head Coach
Posts: 7,225
And1: 7,250
Joined: Nov 05, 2016

Re: Poll - Yak deal. Good or bad. Top 6 protected 2024-26 

Post#151 » by Klayforspicy » Thu Feb 9, 2023 6:25 pm

Childs wrote:I feel like this team is from 2003 trying to compete in 2023. We only have 3 shooters on the team....

Then you look at the Nets and 99% of their team are shooters lol

watching the Raptors really do remind me of a 2000’s constructed team the way they struggle to generate open shots, let alone make them.
User avatar
TheWave
Rookie
Posts: 1,125
And1: 800
Joined: Nov 21, 2019
   

Re: Poll - Yak deal. Good or bad. Top 6 protected 2024-26 

Post#152 » by TheWave » Thu Feb 9, 2023 6:37 pm

There has got to be more to this. I mean.
OhCanada1091
Veteran
Posts: 2,955
And1: 2,122
Joined: Oct 16, 2014

Re: Poll - Yak deal. Good or bad. Top 6 protected 2024-26 

Post#153 » by OhCanada1091 » Thu Feb 9, 2023 6:39 pm

Poeltl is the perfect fit. He's a raptor. We know he is one of the guys that can thrive in this environment. Not many players will fit in with this group. Anytime something good happens this board is upset about it.
User avatar
ItsDanger
RealGM
Posts: 28,842
And1: 26,050
Joined: Nov 01, 2008

Re: Poll - Yak deal. Good or bad. Top 6 protected 2024-26 

Post#154 » by ItsDanger » Thu Feb 9, 2023 6:40 pm

This remains, a flawed roster. Needle hasn't moved. Your bench pieces don't fit either.

Image
Organization can be defined as an organized body of people with a particular purpose. Not random.
KrazyP
General Manager
Posts: 9,510
And1: 5,718
Joined: Jun 03, 2001
 

Re: Poll - Yak deal. Good or bad. Top 6 protected 2024-26 

Post#155 » by KrazyP » Thu Feb 9, 2023 6:44 pm

I think the protection on the pick should have been top 10.

If the Raps lose a player in free agency OR some unexpected injury occurs, they could easily flop again next year. If the picks ends up between 7-10, it wont look good.

That said, when evaluating the actual worth of a future draft pick, people need to understand worth is based on expected value, not best case scenario value or hindsight value. Many people dont seem to understand this.

On paper, the deal makes sense. You've added a starting C without giving anything off the roster up. Kind of like when the Celtics traded 1st for Horford, or 1st for Brogdan or 1st for White. '

My main concern is luxury tax. If the Raps pay VanVleet, Trent and Poeltl.....they'll end up a few mill over the expected tax.

I also think they need another rebalancing trade before the 3pm deadline......Boucher/Thad/Precious/Poeltl/Koloko are all PF/C. Barnes/OG/Siakam can also play PF. THey need to trade Boucher or Thad for a guard that can shoot.
Rapsfan07
RealGM
Posts: 15,006
And1: 6,042
Joined: Nov 19, 2010
 

Re: Poll - Yak deal. Good or bad. Top 6 protected 2024-26 

Post#156 » by Rapsfan07 » Thu Feb 9, 2023 6:44 pm

This is pretty bad. There just simply isn't any way to justify this.

Seems like Bell/Rogers want that playoff money and MU/Bobby is trying to make that happen.
Image
Rapsfan07
RealGM
Posts: 15,006
And1: 6,042
Joined: Nov 19, 2010
 

Re: Poll - Yak deal. Good or bad. Top 6 protected 2024-26 

Post#157 » by Rapsfan07 » Thu Feb 9, 2023 6:48 pm

KrazyP wrote:I think the protection on the pick should have been top 10.

If the Raps lose a player in free agency OR some unexpected injury occurs, they could easily flop again next year. If the picks ends up between 7-10, it wont look good.

That said, when evaluating the actual worth of a future draft pick, people need to understand worth is based on expected value, not best case scenario value or hindsight value. Many people dont seem to understand this.

On paper, the deal makes sense. You've added a starting C without giving anything off the roster up. Kind of like when the Celtics traded 1st for Horford, or 1st for Brogdan or 1st for White. '

My main concern is luxury tax. If the Raps pay VanVleet, Trent and Poeltl.....they'll end up a few mill over the expected tax.


I would have said lotto protected or no deal. And that's if I was nuts enough to entertain this nonsense in the first place.

Poeltl is good at what he does but this is not a prime Tyson Chandler or prime Larry Sanders we're talking about here.

He's an above average defensive C that has no game outside of the painted area, is on an expiring deal and is looking for a $20M per salary in the offseason.

The truth about it is - San Antonio needed to get rid of him much more than we needed to overpay for him.

Plus we gave a 2nd round pick in the coming draft as well. Not sure how much attention y'all pay to the draft but this one is pretty deep. An early second rounder here has late first value as far as I'm concerned.

Boston was offering 2 seconds and fillers. Lol let Boston have him. We weren't beating them in a playoff series anyway.
Image
biblast
RealGM
Posts: 10,436
And1: 4,812
Joined: Aug 24, 2005
Location: Toronto, ON
         

Re: Poll - Yak deal. Good or bad. Top 6 protected 2023-25 

Post#158 » by biblast » Thu Feb 9, 2023 6:53 pm

Duffman100 wrote:I don't like this. Light protection on the 2024 pick after our team has been incredibly meh this year. Losing a 38th-45th second rounder that could have added depth to our much needed bench.

They MUST have a silent shake hand agreement with Poeltl that he's resigning.


100% they have an agreement in place. He’s a solid C but he can’t shoot more than 5ft away from the basket and for a team that lacks shooting, that’s a weird move tbh!
User avatar
TorontoBarneys
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,963
And1: 7,112
Joined: Dec 30, 2022
   

Re: Poll - Yak deal. Good or bad. Top 6 protected 2023-25 

Post#159 » by TorontoBarneys » Thu Feb 9, 2023 6:56 pm

biblast wrote:
Duffman100 wrote:I don't like this. Light protection on the 2024 pick after our team has been incredibly meh this year. Losing a 38th-45th second rounder that could have added depth to our much needed bench.

They MUST have a silent shake hand agreement with Poeltl that he's resigning.


100% they have an agreement in place. He’s a solid C but he can’t shoot more than 5ft away from the basket and for a team that lacks shooting, that’s a weird move tbh!


He's basically a bench big in the playoffs. He has no post game to speak of and cannot shoot 3s obviously, and is a bad FT shooter. He's going to be quickly irrelevant in the playoffs.

This has the potential to be another extremely mediocre pick-up like the Thad trade was last year.
User avatar
Raps in 4
RealGM
Posts: 67,286
And1: 62,214
Joined: Nov 01, 2008
Location: Toronto
 

Re: Poll - Yak deal. Good or bad. Top 6 protected 2024-26 

Post#160 » by Raps in 4 » Thu Feb 9, 2023 7:17 pm

It's bad.

We are not a Yak away from competing meaningfully in the playoffs.

The potential for this team to perform poorly is significant. If anyone gets injured, we're back in the lottery and the light protection on the pick means we could easily lose a lotto pick.

It also limits our flexibility to trade picks in bigger trades.

Return to Toronto Raptors