Cappy_Smurf wrote:SoCalJazzFan wrote:I said it at the time, the Jazz should have accepted the Knicks offer, even if it was lacking a pick or swap.
Based on what, that they wouldn't have won the first game of the season?
Markkenen and Sexton are much better than the players we would have received from the Knicks. They are going to contribute to winning games this year, which is contrary to our acquiring picks/tanking to obtain one or two superstars from the future drafts. Unfortunately, Markk and Sexton would make great teammates with a superstar or two, but aren't stars themselves.
In the first game alone, Markk and Sexton combined for 37 pts, 9 rbs and 6 asts.
In the first games, the trio of Fournier, Toppin, and Quickley (Grimes is injured) combined for 16 pts, 10 rbs and 4 asts. Odds are we would have lost the game with this combo of players.
More than likely, the Cavs will win more games with DM than the Knicks would have. I believe it would have been questionable if the Knicks would have even made the playoff after acquiring DM for some combination of Fournier, Toppin, Quickly and/or Grimes. Cleveland will most likely be making the playoffs with DM. So, we might have obtained an extra swap or even a pick, but they will most likely not be as valuable. I think the negotiations got emotional, which ended up hurting the Jazz.