realball wrote:celticfan42487 wrote:realball wrote:While it's disappointing that we didn't rebuild, it's not like we lost on value in this trade or something. We dumped Birch's contract for a starting level player who fills our biggest need.
Why are people acting like we won't have options in the off-season? We can still trade Pascal and OG to start our rebuild. We can still sign-and-trade FVV and Trent, neither of whom would gotten anything for us this deadline. Now we even have Poetl who could bring us back something eventually. And if they all leave and we're bad next season we more than likely keep our pick.
The choice was between making a run for the playoffs and potentially failing and getting a low-end lottery pick... or just ripping apart our roster now and getting a mid-lottery pick. We have the easiest schedule in the league moving forward, obviously you pick the first option. If we fail, we can rebuild in the off-season.
I think it's more people were hoping if you rebuild you get lucky and keep your lottery tickets to get another Barnes on the roster if possible.
So if you don't think you have a way forward you keep your own picks if you can instead of give those away. And try to collect more lottery tickets basically.
While the Raptors didn't pay a high price it does seem just like an illogical move. For an asset that shouldn't appreciate in value when signed to a huge contract in the off season.
You just kind of view guys like Poetl or FVV or Gary Trent as someone that a team looks at and says we're in win now mode and we're willing to overpay market value to keep them as they mean more to us than any other team as critical depth pieces we're going into the luxury tax for as contenders... that's the kind of teams that would value them and should be trading for them.
So desperate teams like the Lakers or potentially still the Mavs. Not teams that could next season turn on the Tank World Order music.
If that's the case, then why even TEMPT fate and potentially lose a top 10 pick for losing in 7 games instead of 5 in the second round this year?
We didn't trade a pick this year, it's next year. If we're going to tank, then our pick will more than likely be safely within the the top 6.
No one was willing to overpay for Trent or FVV, they don't have that kind of value around the league. We value them as starting level players, who else does? What exactly are we missing out on if they walk out on us in the off-season? Look at the offers that were put up for FVV... Kennard and Covington. Bamba and Ross. Might as well let him walk after a half-season of good service.
I totes hear you, and it's not major. But to me it reads as this:
If true no one wanted Trent or FVV you could do
Door A: Nothing, keep your pick without potentially having it land below 6 and not having it next year when/if Trent & FVV leave. Keeping your options fully open. Potentially losing in the first round.
Door B: Trade that pick, protected only for next season then UNPROTECTED for the following seasons and open up the disaster scenario of FVV and Trent and Poetl all leave in the off season. Siakam demands a trade as they don't want to be apart of a rebuild and feel they've earned the respect to be traded as a reward for their loyalty and brining a ring to the franchise. And your pick is kept as a top 5 next year... but lost the following season as another top 5 pick.
All for the reward of losing in the second round, or perhaps just losing in like 7 games instead of 5 in the first round in the playoffs this year.
Why take that risk? Why is losing in the playoffs either a little later in the first round or just in the second round worth putting a potential landmine on a very likely and real threat of a team that will be forced to tank as soon as next season starts?
The risk doesn't seem worth the reward to me, that's what people are mostly saying. You would have gained more flexibility for the franchise by doing nothing than making a trade like that which makes Poelt a potential poison chalice of your own design.
It's just strange. It may not bite you in the ass, but again... why tempt fate for next to 0 potential reward?