Knicks trade for Josh Hart
Moderators: dakomish23, mpharris36, j4remi, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, HerSports85, Deeeez Knicks
Re: Knicks trade for Josh Hart
- F N 11
- RealGM
- Posts: 95,339
- And1: 68,099
- Joined: Jun 27, 2006
- Location: Getting over screens with Gusto.
- Contact:
-
Re: Knicks trade for Josh Hart
Slept on it, he will help a lot. Concerned with Thibs and front office still.
CEO of the not trading RJ Club
Re: Knicks trade for Josh Hart
- Deeeez Knicks
- Forum Mod - Knicks

- Posts: 49,386
- And1: 55,391
- Joined: Nov 12, 2004
Re: Knicks trade for Josh Hart
?t=NY1ZY4M9Ytgqpl9fzyK3nw&s=19
Mavs
C: Horford | Goga | Paul Reed |
PF: Lauri Markkanen | Randle | Tucker
SF: Trey Murphy | Trent | Anderson | Simone
SG: Vassell | Trent | Livingston
PG: Spida | Mann | Deuce
C: Horford | Goga | Paul Reed |
PF: Lauri Markkanen | Randle | Tucker
SF: Trey Murphy | Trent | Anderson | Simone
SG: Vassell | Trent | Livingston
PG: Spida | Mann | Deuce
Re: Knicks trade for Josh Hart
- KnicksGadfly
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,809
- And1: 19,368
- Joined: Jul 29, 2007
-
Re: Knicks trade for Josh Hart
Man, had no idea that it was this important to get destroyed by the 3rd seed instead of the 2nd seed in the playoffs.
Re: Knicks trade for Josh Hart
- Fury
- RealGM
- Posts: 24,727
- And1: 18,732
- Joined: Mar 07, 2007
-
Re: Knicks trade for Josh Hart
Deeeez Knicks wrote:?t=NY1ZY4M9Ytgqpl9fzyK3nw&s=19
Hart about to play 45 minutes a game
11.pg 13.3 rpg 3.2 apg 48% from the field
Re: Knicks trade for Josh Hart
-
ag3
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,824
- And1: 2,510
- Joined: Mar 27, 2012
-
Re: Knicks trade for Josh Hart
KnicksGadfly wrote:Man, had no idea that it was this important to get destroyed by the 3rd seed instead of the 2nd seed in the playoffs.
You are under rating how good Brunson is. And he proved last year that he is a monster in the playoffs as well.
The guy is a borderline star and NY fans just can't appreciate it yet.
Re: Knicks trade for Josh Hart
- Fury
- RealGM
- Posts: 24,727
- And1: 18,732
- Joined: Mar 07, 2007
-
Re: Knicks trade for Josh Hart
KnicksGadfly wrote:Man, had no idea that it was this important to get destroyed by the 3rd seed instead of the 2nd seed in the playoffs.
After the Bucks and Celtics, what team is scary in the East
Re: Knicks trade for Josh Hart
- DOT
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 31,588
- And1: 61,553
- Joined: Nov 25, 2016
-
Re: Knicks trade for Josh Hart
Fury wrote:KnicksGadfly wrote:Man, had no idea that it was this important to get destroyed by the 3rd seed instead of the 2nd seed in the playoffs.
After the Bucks and Celtics, what team is scary in the East
Philly would wreck our sh*t, especially if Mitch misses time
Cleveland is a bad matchup for us
There's 4 teams right there who are guaranteed to be higher seeds than us
Brunson is damn good, and played like it last playoffs, but the rest of the roster is suspect come playoff time, and we're already not good defensively, so we're not gonna have another gear to kick it into in the postseason
We'd be lucky to win 2 games.
BaF Lakers:
Nikola Topic/Kasparas Jakucionis
VJ Edgecombe/Jrue Holiday
Shaedon Sharpe/Cedric Coward
Kyle Filipowski/Collin Murray-Boyles
Alex Sarr/Clint Capela
Bench: Malcolm Brogdon/Hansen Yang/Rocco Zikarsky/RJ Luis Jr.
Nikola Topic/Kasparas Jakucionis
VJ Edgecombe/Jrue Holiday
Shaedon Sharpe/Cedric Coward
Kyle Filipowski/Collin Murray-Boyles
Alex Sarr/Clint Capela
Bench: Malcolm Brogdon/Hansen Yang/Rocco Zikarsky/RJ Luis Jr.
Re: Knicks trade for Josh Hart
- Fury
- RealGM
- Posts: 24,727
- And1: 18,732
- Joined: Mar 07, 2007
-
Re: Knicks trade for Josh Hart
DOT wrote:Fury wrote:KnicksGadfly wrote:Man, had no idea that it was this important to get destroyed by the 3rd seed instead of the 2nd seed in the playoffs.
After the Bucks and Celtics, what team is scary in the East
Philly would wreck our sh*t, especially if Mitch misses time
Cleveland is a bad matchup for us
There's 4 teams right there who are guaranteed to be higher seeds than us
Brunson is damn good, and played like it last playoffs, but the rest of the roster is suspect come playoff time, and we're already not good defensively, so we're not gonna have another gear to kick it into in the postseason
We'd be lucky to win 2 games.
Meh, Philly is a chokejob waiting to happen
Re: Knicks trade for Josh Hart
-
HEZI
- RealGM
- Posts: 43,542
- And1: 29,687
- Joined: Nov 16, 2004
-
Re: Knicks trade for Josh Hart
Hard not to like Josh Hart. Really hope his Knicks tenure is a success.
DENVER NUGGETS
Jamal Murray/Ty Jerome/Dante Exum
Zach Lavine/Ochai Agbaji/Corey Kispert
Aaron Gordon/Josh Okogie/Javonte Green
Jakob Poeltl/Moussa Diabate/Karlo Matkovic
Ivica Zubac/Nick Richards/Oscar Tshiebwe
Jamal Murray/Ty Jerome/Dante Exum
Zach Lavine/Ochai Agbaji/Corey Kispert
Aaron Gordon/Josh Okogie/Javonte Green
Jakob Poeltl/Moussa Diabate/Karlo Matkovic
Ivica Zubac/Nick Richards/Oscar Tshiebwe
Re: Knicks trade for Josh Hart
- robillionaire
- RealGM
- Posts: 40,302
- And1: 57,939
- Joined: Jul 12, 2015
- Location: Asheville
-
Re: Knicks trade for Josh Hart
Fury wrote:DOT wrote:Fury wrote:
After the Bucks and Celtics, what team is scary in the East
Philly would wreck our sh*t, especially if Mitch misses time
Cleveland is a bad matchup for us
There's 4 teams right there who are guaranteed to be higher seeds than us
Brunson is damn good, and played like it last playoffs, but the rest of the roster is suspect come playoff time, and we're already not good defensively, so we're not gonna have another gear to kick it into in the postseason
We'd be lucky to win 2 games.
Meh, Philly is a chokejob waiting to happen
I mean we beat these guys twice already. Maybe embiid/harden gets hurt. Easy to imagine. Idk. You have to put yourself in the position. If we lose we lose good try good effort
Re: Knicks trade for Josh Hart
- DOT
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 31,588
- And1: 61,553
- Joined: Nov 25, 2016
-
Re: Knicks trade for Josh Hart
Fury wrote:Meh, Philly is a chokejob waiting to happen
I agree
But not against us
They've made it past the 1st round 4 of the last 5 years. They've lost in the 2nd round each of those years, but they always take care of business in the 1st.
BaF Lakers:
Nikola Topic/Kasparas Jakucionis
VJ Edgecombe/Jrue Holiday
Shaedon Sharpe/Cedric Coward
Kyle Filipowski/Collin Murray-Boyles
Alex Sarr/Clint Capela
Bench: Malcolm Brogdon/Hansen Yang/Rocco Zikarsky/RJ Luis Jr.
Nikola Topic/Kasparas Jakucionis
VJ Edgecombe/Jrue Holiday
Shaedon Sharpe/Cedric Coward
Kyle Filipowski/Collin Murray-Boyles
Alex Sarr/Clint Capela
Bench: Malcolm Brogdon/Hansen Yang/Rocco Zikarsky/RJ Luis Jr.
Re: Knicks trade for Josh Hart
- god shammgod
- RealGM
- Posts: 138,873
- And1: 137,995
- Joined: Feb 18, 2006
Re: Knicks trade for Josh Hart
i don't see anyway we beat philly in a series. the one team i would give us a punchers chance against is cleveland. lots of young guys without experience. and we seem to play well against them. all their scoring comes mostly from small guards and we have guys who can defend them well. we struggle against wings more because we don't have wing defenders.
Re: Knicks trade for Josh Hart
- NoDopeOnSundays
- RealGM
- Posts: 27,384
- And1: 56,974
- Joined: Nov 22, 2005
-
Re: Knicks trade for Josh Hart
robillionaire wrote:Fury wrote:DOT wrote:Philly would wreck our sh*t, especially if Mitch misses time
Cleveland is a bad matchup for us
There's 4 teams right there who are guaranteed to be higher seeds than us
Brunson is damn good, and played like it last playoffs, but the rest of the roster is suspect come playoff time, and we're already not good defensively, so we're not gonna have another gear to kick it into in the postseason
We'd be lucky to win 2 games.
Meh, Philly is a chokejob waiting to happen
I mean we beat these guys twice already. Maybe embiid/harden gets hurt. Easy to imagine. Idk. You have to put yourself in the position. If we lose we lose good try good effort
We were 3-0 against the Hawks before they chin checked us in the playoffs. The playoff ceiling for this team is very low because we play our starters heavy minutes and we don't really run any type of offense. So when everyone else decides it's time to give their guys 38-42 mpg we run into a brick wall.
Re: Knicks trade for Josh Hart
- robillionaire
- RealGM
- Posts: 40,302
- And1: 57,939
- Joined: Jul 12, 2015
- Location: Asheville
-
Re: Knicks trade for Josh Hart
NoDopeOnSundays wrote:robillionaire wrote:Fury wrote:
Meh, Philly is a chokejob waiting to happen
I mean we beat these guys twice already. Maybe embiid/harden gets hurt. Easy to imagine. Idk. You have to put yourself in the position. If we lose we lose good try good effort
We were 3-0 against the Hawks before they chin checked us in the playoffs. The playoff ceiling for this team is very low because we play our starters heavy minutes and we don't really run any type of offense. So when everyone else decides it's time to give their guys 38-42 mpg we run into a brick wall.
Yes and we will likely lose in the first round if we even get in the playoffs at all. This was supposed to be at best maybe a .500 play-in team so I’m keeping my expectations in line with where they were to start the season. But I hope they go as far as possible. Who knows. We have Brunson. I saw him beat the jazz almost by himself last year. Maybe an injury happens. That’s about all we can hope for as far as this season
Re: Knicks trade for Josh Hart
-
ag3
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,824
- And1: 2,510
- Joined: Mar 27, 2012
-
Re: Knicks trade for Josh Hart
NoDopeOnSundays wrote:robillionaire wrote:Fury wrote:
Meh, Philly is a chokejob waiting to happen
I mean we beat these guys twice already. Maybe embiid/harden gets hurt. Easy to imagine. Idk. You have to put yourself in the position. If we lose we lose good try good effort
We were 3-0 against the Hawks before they chin checked us in the playoffs. The playoff ceiling for this team is very low because we play our starters heavy minutes and we don't really run any type of offense. So when everyone else decides it's time to give their guys 38-42 mpg we run into a brick wall.
Not the same. We didn't have Brunson. Brunson is a stud and performs in the playoffs.
Re: Knicks trade for Josh Hart
-
Knicksfan1992
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,087
- And1: 14,582
- Joined: Jun 14, 2012
-
Re: Knicks trade for Josh Hart
Don't buy that Cleveland is a bad matchup for us.
Grimes has bothered Mitchell every time we've played them and it's much easier to gameplan against 2 shot creators who are under 6'5" than it is against say Milwaukee with Giannis and Middleton or the Celtics with Tatum and Brown.
They have a designated player in every ideation of their rotation that we can hide Brunson on since they don't really have a consistent shot creating or shooting wing. On top.of that we know athletic lengthy guys are Brunsons Achilles heel and Cavs are really devoid of any outside of Okoro who is an offensive minus at this point. And if they put Okoro on Brunson it means RJ gets one of Mitchell or Garland on him which should allow him to either get downhill or post.
The Cavs will give us issues because of the size of their frontcourt for sure though and the fact that their shot makers are more efficient than ours but out of the top 4 they are the team that scares me the least given their deficiencies on the wing.
Grimes has bothered Mitchell every time we've played them and it's much easier to gameplan against 2 shot creators who are under 6'5" than it is against say Milwaukee with Giannis and Middleton or the Celtics with Tatum and Brown.
They have a designated player in every ideation of their rotation that we can hide Brunson on since they don't really have a consistent shot creating or shooting wing. On top.of that we know athletic lengthy guys are Brunsons Achilles heel and Cavs are really devoid of any outside of Okoro who is an offensive minus at this point. And if they put Okoro on Brunson it means RJ gets one of Mitchell or Garland on him which should allow him to either get downhill or post.
The Cavs will give us issues because of the size of their frontcourt for sure though and the fact that their shot makers are more efficient than ours but out of the top 4 they are the team that scares me the least given their deficiencies on the wing.
Re: Knicks trade for Josh Hart
- god shammgod
- RealGM
- Posts: 138,873
- And1: 137,995
- Joined: Feb 18, 2006
Re: Knicks trade for Josh Hart
Knicksfan1992 wrote:Don't buy that Cleveland is a bad matchup for us.
Grimes has bothered Mitchell every time we've played them and it's much easier to gameplan against 2 shot creators who are under 6'5" than it is against say Milwaukee with Giannis and Middleton or the Celtics with Tatum and Brown.
They have a designated player in every ideation of their rotation that we can hide Brunson on since they don't really have a consistent shot creating or shooting wing. On top.of that we know athletic lengthy guys are Brunsons Achilles heel and Cavs are really devoid of any outside of Okoro who is an offensive minus at this point. And if they put Okoro on Brunson it means RJ gets one of Mitchell or Garland on him which should allow him to either get downhill or post.
The Cavs will give us issues because of the size of their frontcourt for sure though and the fact that their shot makers are more efficient than ours but out of the top 4 they are the team that scares me the least given their deficiencies on the wing.
yep. just said something similar. they would still probably win but i would rather play them.
Re: Knicks trade for Josh Hart
- DOT
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 31,588
- And1: 61,553
- Joined: Nov 25, 2016
-
Re: Knicks trade for Josh Hart
Knicksfan1992 wrote:Grimes has bothered Mitchell every time we've played them and it's much easier to gameplan against 2 shot creators who are under 6'5" than it is against say Milwaukee with Giannis and Middleton or the Celtics with Tatum and Brown.
Who's guarding Garland in this scenario?
Brunson? RJ?
The only viable lineup would be to bench RJ for Hart, but then that gives them a favorable matchup on defense because they can put Garland/Mitchell on Grimes/Hart and not worry about it cause those guys aren't creating with the ball in their hands. Then it's either Okoro or LeVert on Brunson, and vice-versa. Okoro for defense when they need to stop Brunson, LeVert for offense when they need to take advantage of him. At best, it's a wash
And then you're hoping that Randle doesn't melt down again, which you need him to do against a great defensive frontcourt in Mobley/Allen
The only way it works in our favor is if we accept that Brunson is gonna have to go against Garland on both ends, and hope he's able to outduel him, and even then, he's likely not getting much help from the rest of the roster while Garland can lose more than he wins and still have the better support
Plus, Thibs is Thibs. He isn't gonna be able to adjust when things start going awry.
BaF Lakers:
Nikola Topic/Kasparas Jakucionis
VJ Edgecombe/Jrue Holiday
Shaedon Sharpe/Cedric Coward
Kyle Filipowski/Collin Murray-Boyles
Alex Sarr/Clint Capela
Bench: Malcolm Brogdon/Hansen Yang/Rocco Zikarsky/RJ Luis Jr.
Nikola Topic/Kasparas Jakucionis
VJ Edgecombe/Jrue Holiday
Shaedon Sharpe/Cedric Coward
Kyle Filipowski/Collin Murray-Boyles
Alex Sarr/Clint Capela
Bench: Malcolm Brogdon/Hansen Yang/Rocco Zikarsky/RJ Luis Jr.
Re: Knicks trade for Josh Hart
- Deeeez Knicks
- Forum Mod - Knicks

- Posts: 49,386
- And1: 55,391
- Joined: Nov 12, 2004
Re: Knicks trade for Josh Hart
We are still probably first round exit playoff team but you never know.
Thibs might be a liability in the playoffs too
Thibs might be a liability in the playoffs too
Mavs
C: Horford | Goga | Paul Reed |
PF: Lauri Markkanen | Randle | Tucker
SF: Trey Murphy | Trent | Anderson | Simone
SG: Vassell | Trent | Livingston
PG: Spida | Mann | Deuce
C: Horford | Goga | Paul Reed |
PF: Lauri Markkanen | Randle | Tucker
SF: Trey Murphy | Trent | Anderson | Simone
SG: Vassell | Trent | Livingston
PG: Spida | Mann | Deuce
Re: Knicks trade for Josh Hart
-
Knicksfan1992
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,087
- And1: 14,582
- Joined: Jun 14, 2012
-
Re: Knicks trade for Josh Hart
DOT wrote:Knicksfan1992 wrote:Grimes has bothered Mitchell every time we've played them and it's much easier to gameplan against 2 shot creators who are under 6'5" than it is against say Milwaukee with Giannis and Middleton or the Celtics with Tatum and Brown.
Who's guarding Garland in this scenario?
Brunson? RJ?
The only viable lineup would be to bench RJ for Hart, but then that gives them a favorable matchup on defense because they can put Garland/Mitchell on Grimes/Hart and not worry about it cause those guys aren't creating with the ball in their hands. Then it's either Okoro or LeVert on Brunson, and vice-versa. Okoro for defense when they need to stop Brunson, LeVert for offense when they need to take advantage of him. At best, it's a wash
And then you're hoping that Randle doesn't melt down again, which you need him to do against a great defensive frontcourt in Mobley/Allen
The only way it works in our favor is if we accept that Brunson is gonna have to go against Garland on both ends, and hope he's able to outduel him, and even then, he's likely not getting much help from the rest of the roster while Garland can lose more than he wins and still have the better support
Plus, Thibs is Thibs. He isn't gonna be able to adjust when things start going awry.
We've seen Thibs go Brunson/IQ/Grimes late in games plenty of times before. Also Hart now gives us another POA option that we did not have previously. Like I said you'll always be able to hide Brunson on someone given the Cavs rotation.
The thing that bothers the Knicks most is length and teams that can rebound with them. Cavs don't have the length on the wing that the other top teams in the East do.
Mobley and Allen are great defenders but are not as physically strong as ATLs front line was. Collins and Capella when push came to shove could hold up enough against Randles bully ball mentality. Mobley and Allen are a little different in that regard. Also assuming health having Mitch would make a bigger difference here than a C rotation of Noel and Taj.
Not saying we would be favored or anything but out of the top 4 they are easily the team that I would pick to play against.












