ALCS: Boston Red Sox vs Cleveland Indians (Red Sox win 4-3)

Moderator: TyCobb

Who will win this series?

 
Total votes: 0

SportsWorld
RealGM
Posts: 51,601
And1: 133
Joined: Dec 03, 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Contact:
       

ALCS: Boston Red Sox vs Cleveland Indians (Red Sox win 4-3) 

Post#1 » by SportsWorld » Tue Oct 9, 2007 4:59 am

Game 1
Image 3
Image 10

Game 2
Image 13
Image 6
11 innings

Game 3
Image 4
Image 2

Game 4
Image 7
Image 3

Game 5
Image 1
Image 7

Game 6
Image 2
Image 12

Game 7
Image 2
Image 11

Games 1 and 2 will be played at Fenway Park in Boston.
Games 3-5 will be played at Jacobs Field in Cleveland.
Games 6 and 7 will be played at Fenway Park in Boston.
User avatar
David Robinson
Inactive user
Inactive user
Posts: 157
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 17, 2007
Location: Mr. Robinson's neighborhood. MY SPURS > YOUR INFERIOR SQUAD !!

 

Post#2 » by David Robinson » Tue Oct 9, 2007 5:55 am

Cleveland in 6.

They play a style of baseball that is conducive for winning a world series. I love their pitching, and I like the balance of their lineup.
Image
User avatar
Bleeding Green
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 24,178
And1: 13,875
Joined: Feb 28, 2005
Location: Atlantic Champs OMG OMG OMG!

 

Post#3 » by Bleeding Green » Tue Oct 9, 2007 5:57 am

I'm curious how the teams will set up the rotations. Just as a guess:

1 Beckett/Sabathia
2 Schilling/Carmona
3 Matsuzaka/Westbrook
4 Beckett/Sabathia
5 Wakefield/Carmona
6 Schilling/Westbrook
7 Beckett/Sabathia

If the Indians get out to a 2-0 lead, I think they'd probably give Sabathia and Carmona an extra day rest. Same with Beckett if the Red Sox get out to a 2-0 lead. Should be an exciting series. If it's lined up like this, games 1, 4 and 7 should be awesome games.

I can't wait to see Ortiz in this series. He has been so **** ridiculous since mid-August. He ended the last 40 games of the season on a .389/.503/.840 (AVG/OBP/SLG) tear and just put up a .714/.846/1.571 line in the ALDS. Just when you think it's impossible for him to get better, he says, "Hey mang, watch this." He's been steroids-Bonds for the last 43 games he's played.
Manocad wrote:I have an engineering degree, an exceptionally high IQ, and can point to the exact location/area of any country on an unlabeled globe.
The Rondo Show
Analyst
Posts: 3,588
And1: 327
Joined: Mar 16, 2006

 

Post#4 » by The Rondo Show » Tue Oct 9, 2007 6:05 am

**** Wakefield. Free Clay Buchholz.
Image
User avatar
Bleeding Green
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 24,178
And1: 13,875
Joined: Feb 28, 2005
Location: Atlantic Champs OMG OMG OMG!

 

Post#5 » by Bleeding Green » Tue Oct 9, 2007 6:12 am

Yeah, that would be nice, but apparently he's shut down.

Don't know why he can't make one start. I don't see the Yankees shutting down Phil Hughes. Well, not voluntarily at least.
Manocad wrote:I have an engineering degree, an exceptionally high IQ, and can point to the exact location/area of any country on an unlabeled globe.
The Rondo Show
Analyst
Posts: 3,588
And1: 327
Joined: Mar 16, 2006

 

Post#6 » by The Rondo Show » Tue Oct 9, 2007 6:16 am

Bleeding Green wrote:Yeah, that would be nice, but apparently he's shut down.

Don't know why he can't make one start. I don't see the Yankees shutting down Phil Hughes. Well, not voluntarily at least.
Well, Hughes is nowhere near his innings limit due to injury.

Still, I don't think another start or two and 10 innings would kill him. And I think he'd help the team out a hell of a lot more than Tim Wakefield...and maybe even Daisuke with how **** he has been lately (save the Minny start). Oh well.

You think they start JD Drew against Sabathia in game 1? I'm not so sure I wouldn't go with Ellsbury or Kielty (I like Ellsbury more). Drew looked absolutely horrible in the 1-0 Red Sox win against the Indians earlier this year. Something like 3 AB's vs. him and 3 K's and he just looked totally lost on that slider. Not to mention, his numbers against lefties this year are just pathetic.
Image
User avatar
wigglestrue
RealGM
Posts: 24,124
And1: 170
Joined: Feb 06, 2003
Location: Wiggling, after hitting a four-pointer of Truth

 

Post#7 » by wigglestrue » Tue Oct 9, 2007 6:56 am

I don't see why the matchups wouldn't be this:

1 Beckett/Sabathia
2 Matsuzaka/Carmona
3 Schilling/Westbrook
4 Beckett/Sabathia
5 Matsuzaka/Carmona
6 Schilling/Westbrook
7 Beckett/Sabathia

Schilling would have his normal rest. Don't mess with success, having Schilling for game 3 (whether down 0-2, or split 1-1, or up 2-0) and game 6 will be huge. Wakefield is there as a super-long-reliever just in case.
0:01.8 A. Walker makes 3-pt shot from 28 ft (assist by E. Williams) +3 109-108
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D_9qvmXiEuU
User avatar
EvadedHavoc
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,582
And1: 1
Joined: Nov 16, 2006
Location: New York

 

Post#8 » by EvadedHavoc » Tue Oct 9, 2007 6:57 am

Sox in 4
User avatar
Markos
Starter
Posts: 2,236
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 18, 2003
Location: New Zealand

 

Post#9 » by Markos » Tue Oct 9, 2007 7:39 am

wigglestrue wrote:I don't see why the matchups wouldn't be this:

1 Beckett/Sabathia
2 Matsuzaka/Carmona
3 Schilling/Westbrook
4 Beckett/Sabathia
5 Matsuzaka/Carmona
6 Schilling/Westbrook
7 Beckett/Sabathia

Schilling would have his normal rest. Don't mess with success, having Schilling for game 3 (whether down 0-2, or split 1-1, or up 2-0) and game 6 will be huge. Wakefield is there as a super-long-reliever just in case.


I would put Dice-K as game 3 because a) he pitches better away and b) the more rest for him the better
Image
User avatar
mr_sunshine
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,430
And1: 482
Joined: Jun 30, 2007

 

Post#10 » by mr_sunshine » Tue Oct 9, 2007 8:54 am

David Robinson wrote:Cleveland in 6.

They play a style of baseball that is conducive for winning a world series. I love their pitching, and I like the balance of their lineup.


I don't think so. Sox pen > Indians pen and the Boston's offense has been on a tear lately. I think they'll be VERY hard to beat if Manny and Ortiz keep it up, and someone besides Beckett gives them quality starts.
User avatar
David Robinson
Inactive user
Inactive user
Posts: 157
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 17, 2007
Location: Mr. Robinson's neighborhood. MY SPURS > YOUR INFERIOR SQUAD !!

 

Post#11 » by David Robinson » Tue Oct 9, 2007 9:18 am

mr_sunshine wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



I don't think so. Sox pen > Indians pen and the Boston's offense has been on a tear lately. I think they'll be VERY hard to beat if Manny and Ortiz keep it up, and someone besides Beckett gives them quality starts.
Of course you don't think so, you're a Boston fan. As a neutral fan, I do think so.

And imo it's only Papelbon> Borowski. Otherwise, I like Cleveland's pen better with Perez, Lewis and Betancourt.
The Rondo Show
Analyst
Posts: 3,588
And1: 327
Joined: Mar 16, 2006

 

Post#12 » by The Rondo Show » Tue Oct 9, 2007 10:23 am

David Robinson wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

Of course you don't think so, you're a Boston fan. As a neutral fan, I do think so.

And imo it's only Papelbon> Borowski. Otherwise, I like Cleveland's pen better with Perez, Lewis and Betancourt.
Okajima, Delcarmen and Timlin are pretty damn good. I'd say the middle relief is pretty close as both teams are very good there with the Indians being a little better. The massive difference between Papelbon and Borowski gives Boston's pen the advantage. I'd say the Red Sox have a better lineup as well, especially with the way Ortiz and Ramirez are hitting in these playoffs (and how Ortiz is hitting about the last 50 games).

The starting pitching is close. Beckett is the pitcher I'd trust more than anyone based on stuff and his postseason track record. CC and Carmona are both definitely better than Schilling at this point, but CC looked a little shakey against the Yanks and like the playoff stage got to him while Schilling is one of the greatest postseason pitchers of all-time and has pitched great for a couple months now. With Daisuke, who knows. The guy could dominate the Tribe like he did in the regular season or he could be pulled after 4 2/3 like he was against the Angels-- still, I like him better than a Byrd or a Westbrook. I'd probably give the starting pitching advantage to the Indians, assuming Sabathia's struggles in Game 1 of the ALDS were a complete fluke and not a sign of things to come because he's in the playoffs.

Overall, these two teams are very close in talent. I think it'll come down to whichever team has more luck and hopefully, for Red Sox fans, homefield advantage. I'll take the Sox in 7, but I can definitely see why fans would pick the Indians in 6 or 7.
Image
cb4_89
RealGM
Posts: 27,650
And1: 517
Joined: Oct 02, 2004
       

 

Post#13 » by cb4_89 » Tue Oct 9, 2007 2:28 pm

sox got this
User avatar
wigglestrue
RealGM
Posts: 24,124
And1: 170
Joined: Feb 06, 2003
Location: Wiggling, after hitting a four-pointer of Truth

 

Post#14 » by wigglestrue » Tue Oct 9, 2007 4:55 pm

I would put Dice-K as game 3 because a) he pitches better away and b) the more rest for him the better


You've got a point.
But if it goes 6, then you have Dice K pitching it at home.
I'd rather have Dice K pitch game 2 at home.
0:01.8 A. Walker makes 3-pt shot from 28 ft (assist by E. Williams) +3 109-108
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D_9qvmXiEuU
User avatar
Markos
Starter
Posts: 2,236
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 18, 2003
Location: New Zealand

 

Post#15 » by Markos » Tue Oct 9, 2007 6:12 pm

wigglestrue wrote:
I would put Dice-K as game 3 because a) he pitches better away and b) the more rest for him the better


You've got a point.
But if it goes 6, then you have Dice K pitching it at home.
I'd rather have Dice K pitch game 2 at home.



You could have Lester backing him up in game 6. Cleveland has a lot of lefties if I remember correctly.

Its a moot point Schilling will be starting game 2 per ESPN
Image
stro4swift
Starter
Posts: 2,319
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 29, 2006
Location: Montreal

 

Post#16 » by stro4swift » Tue Oct 9, 2007 9:03 pm

The Sabathia/Beckett matchup will be awesome!

Cleveland in 6.
B Mac
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 11,733
And1: 540
Joined: Aug 05, 2004
Location: North Canton, Ohio
Contact:
     

 

Post#17 » by B Mac » Tue Oct 9, 2007 9:39 pm

If the Indians keep the same approach at the plate that they had during the Yankee series then watch out Boston pitching. If they start getting power happy like they have for stretches this season then Boston will take this one quickly.

Cant wait to watch CC and Carmona mow down the Boston batters though. That should be fun.

Cleveland in 6.
sunshinekids99
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 19,745
And1: 229
Joined: Apr 10, 2001

 

Post#18 » by sunshinekids99 » Tue Oct 9, 2007 10:02 pm

I think this will be a very very good series. I'll take the Sox in 7.
Image
User avatar
Bleeding Green
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 24,178
And1: 13,875
Joined: Feb 28, 2005
Location: Atlantic Champs OMG OMG OMG!

 

Post#19 » by Bleeding Green » Tue Oct 9, 2007 10:28 pm

The four Red Sox relievers most likely to receive high-leverage innings and their WXRL. Nerd alert.

Papelbon: 5.143
Okajima: 4.429
Delcarmen: 1.652
Timlin: 1.572
TOTAL: 12.796

And the Indians:

Betancourt: 6.845
Perez: 3.142
Borowski: 2.776
Mastny?: .596
TOTAL: 13.359

Pretty close. The Indians have the best reliever, but they really only go three deep as far as I can tell. The Red Sox have better bullpen depth. But I don't know how important that is in a series with 15 offdays.

Where is Jensen Lewis? He pitched really well in limited action.
Manocad wrote:I have an engineering degree, an exceptionally high IQ, and can point to the exact location/area of any country on an unlabeled globe.
cmaff051
Inactive user
Inactive user
Posts: 13,071
And1: 2
Joined: Nov 02, 2006

 

Post#20 » by cmaff051 » Wed Oct 10, 2007 12:01 am

Hopefully the Indians bloop the Red Sox as much as they blooped the Yanks.

Return to The General MLB Board


cron