HeatFanLifer wrote:MiamiLoyal926 wrote:HeatFanLifer wrote:
That you’re too lazy to prove a point? Ok bro.
At this point, BBallFreak made a good point that even common sense for most would suffice. I, for one, do not need hard evidence to see the sense in his point. Ignoring the data during Spo’s best players era and not ignoring the other coaches best player eras is what is called bias.
HeatFanLifer, remove the bias, or compare all coaches using the same bias. You can’t compare biased data with unbiased data. That should have been your job to do when bringing your data, otherwise your data was incomplete and inconclusive. BBallFreak merely pointed this deficiency out.
That’s not how this works man. It’s literally a logical fallacy to appeal to a lack of evidence and use that to claim the opposite is true. He’s welcome to pull up the data he requested. This isn’t an academic project.
Actually, dude, you're 100% wrong. You can't hold him up to other great coaches and say he lags behind without the big 3 and not tell us how they did without their top end talent. No coach does well without talent. You're not saying anything revolutionary or even interesting. You're stating the obvious. How has Popp been without TD, Manu, and Parker? How did Kerr do without Curry and Durant? These things make a difference. You cannot hold Spo to a different standard than you hold the other coaches. As I said, it makes you look petty.
I'm not doing your work for you. You set out to prove a point that Spoelstra hasn't been a top tier coach without the big 3. Fine. Show us how the other coaches outdid him without their top end talent and maybe we can actually discuss your argument. Otherwise, you're making half an argument...