PG: KNICKS cool the Heat

[stuporman]

So we all agree? Trade Randle while his value is at an all time high before the train derails once again....

[Iron Mantis]

So we all agree? Trade Randle while his value is at an all time high before the train derails once again....

In a package for Luka, Embiid, or Giannis?





For a lesser player?

[robillionaire]

Randle gives us top 10 in the NBA production but doesn't get top 10 in the nba respect (well MVP ladder has him 7th and he's been all-nba 2nd team before, but I digress) and isn't paid a top 10 in the nba salary. If fact I think we looked it up earlier in the year and he's paid something like 44th. So at this point I'd say his value to the knicks is much higher than it would be to any other team and there's no reason we should trade him at all because we wouldn't get fair value.

[WargamesX]

Randle gives us top 10 in the NBA production but doesn't get top 10 in the nba respect (well MVP ladder has him 7th and he's been all-nba 2nd team before, but I digress) and isn't paid a top 10 in the nba salary. If fact I think we looked it up earlier in the year and he's paid something like 44th. So at this point I'd say his value to the knicks is much higher than it would be to any other team and there's no reason we should trade him at all because we wouldn't get fair value.

I use to say this in all the trade Randle threads. As bad as he was last season the FO wouldn’t trade him because he was still averaging a near double/double and his contract was still good in comparison to his production.

[Iron Mantis]

Randle gives us top 10 in the NBA production but doesn't get top 10 in the nba respect (well MVP ladder has him 7th and he's been all-nba 2nd team before, but I digress) and isn't paid a top 10 in the nba salary. If fact I think we looked it up earlier in the year and he's paid something like 44th. So at this point I'd say his value to the knicks is much higher than it would be to any other team and there's no reason we should trade him at all because we wouldn't get fair value.

Knicks need a superstar...pick any superstar and you'll know from among which teams the next championship is going to.

[RHODEY]

In hindsight it's a good game but an aberration. Heat outplayed us second half. Randle made many crazy shots. The refs did their usual screw the Knicks job. Standard by now.

The most impressive thing was the run and our D at the end of the first half.

We can't rely on Randle saving us with such tough shots.

We had no answer for Funk Master Flop and the Refs. But allwe did was make shots and that's what carried us through.

[RHODEY]

Randle gives us top 10 in the NBA production but doesn't get top 10 in the nba respect (well MVP ladder has him 7th and he's been all-nba 2nd team before, but I digress) and isn't paid a top 10 in the nba salary. If fact I think we looked it up earlier in the year and he's paid something like 44th. So at this point I'd say his value to the knicks is much higher than it would be to any other team and there's no reason we should trade him at all because we wouldn't get fair value.

Knicks need a superstar...pick any superstar and you'll know from among which teams the next championship is going to.

True but we need a superstar at non knicks tax rates. If KD can be had for role players (albeit elite ones) and Kyrie for evev less of the same we need to be patient for that type of deal. Nobody made PHX have to give up Ayton and he's not as good as Randle.

[Iron Mantis]

Randle gives us top 10 in the NBA production but doesn't get top 10 in the nba respect (well MVP ladder has him 7th and he's been all-nba 2nd team before, but I digress) and isn't paid a top 10 in the nba salary. If fact I think we looked it up earlier in the year and he's paid something like 44th. So at this point I'd say his value to the knicks is much higher than it would be to any other team and there's no reason we should trade him at all because we wouldn't get fair value.

Knicks need a superstar...pick any superstar and you'll know from among which teams the next championship is going to.

True but we need a superstar at non knicks tax rates. If KD can be had for role players (albeit elite ones) and Kyrie for evev less of the same we need to be patient for that type of deal. Nobody made PHX have to give up Ayton and he's not as good as Randle.

Brooklyn completely blew up their team to rebuild.

If a superstar becomes available, and the team is completely blowing it up and liquidating multiple stars like NJ, Jazz, Houston with Harden... young pieces/spare parts and picks can get it done.

If the team trading the star wants to remain competitive, it will be like DeRozan(all-star) for Kawhi, or Simmons(all-star) for Harden, Chris Paul(all-star) for Westbrook, etc.

[nykballa2k4]

Dur dur dur.

I just have no idea who he was trying to critique.
Mitch? Not his best outing, but effective enough.
Grimes? When his offense isn't going he still plays on defense.
Crowd? We had 1/2 the fans there.

Nice try at revisionist history like the usuals.
Who even are you dude seem extremely random to me.
Anyways it feels like amateur hour man you trying to say I’m critique when the point of the post is saying I’m NOT or WONT.

Sure I am random, but I still have no idea what your point even is. Who were you talking about? what was the context? You might have a valid point, but if I don't know what that point is we can't talk about it.