-Luke- wrote:"You know, he's the career you want to look at and try to, you know, emulate if you're a player."
Attempt failed, Kevin.
Dirks won one is more impressive than Durants two for joining a previous championship team
Moderators: bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285, Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake
-Luke- wrote:"You know, he's the career you want to look at and try to, you know, emulate if you're a player."
Attempt failed, Kevin.
YamaChan wrote:Blame Rasho wrote:So you think you are right no matter what… that is cute and funny…hahaha
When it comes to basketball, I'm right far more often than I'm not. Certainly more credible than someone saying Durant isn't close to Kobe, Shaq or Duncan, despite:
- Two-time Finals MVP/Champion
- League MVP
- 4-time Scoring Champion
- Multiple All-NBA 1st team selections
- Greatest Olympics player in Team U.S. history
- Most efficient volume scorer in the history of basketball
- Best player on arguably the best team in the history of basketball
- Either matched or eclipsed LeBron in every Finals matchup
- Highest average game score in the history of the NBA Finals
- Member of the 50/40/90 club and on pace to do it again and be the first player to ever do it while averaging 30 PPG
- Currently having the best mid-range shooting season in the history of basketball
- Easiest superstar to fit into any offensive system in the history of basketball
I'm far from unbiased when it comes to ranking KD, but this board far too often swings way too much on the opposite side of the spectrum, just because he's the main reason LeBron's legitimate shot at becoming GOAT crumbled into pieces.
Hsker4Life wrote:alebaba wrote:CometGM wrote:
What?! The NBA itself should build a statue for KD.
This is a transcendent, all-time mostly consensus top 10 talent, and IMO best scorer ever.
B.S. drama aside, enjoy him while you can because you will definitely not find many KDs around, if any.
He ain't in the top 10 of all time and hes def not the best scorer ever, Celtics playoff series shows that.
A series in which he struggled, yet still averaged 26/6/5, is all the proof you need? Don’t forget the NBA Finals series where he averaged 35 PPG.
cpower wrote:YamaChan wrote:Blame Rasho wrote:So you think you are right no matter what… that is cute and funny…hahaha
When it comes to basketball, I'm right far more often than I'm not. Certainly more credible than someone saying Durant isn't close to Kobe, Shaq or Duncan, despite:
- Two-time Finals MVP/Champion
- League MVP
- 4-time Scoring Champion
- Multiple All-NBA 1st team selections
- Greatest Olympics player in Team U.S. history
- Most efficient volume scorer in the history of basketball
- Best player on arguably the best team in the history of basketball
- Either matched or eclipsed LeBron in every Finals matchup
- Highest average game score in the history of the NBA Finals
- Member of the 50/40/90 club and on pace to do it again and be the first player to ever do it while averaging 30 PPG
- Currently having the best mid-range shooting season in the history of basketball
- Easiest superstar to fit into any offensive system in the history of basketball
I'm far from unbiased when it comes to ranking KD, but this board far too often swings way too much on the opposite side of the spectrum, just because he's the main reason LeBron's legitimate shot at becoming GOAT crumbled into pieces.
if you actually look into impact not PPG then KD is not that good, at least not that good on paper. If he is that good then he would have crushed all advance stats but he has not been in the top tier for his career, which says something to his actual impact.
Blame Rasho wrote:YamaChan wrote:Blame Rasho wrote:
Oh cool…we are going to do what ifs for him too just like every stan does for their player…
Everyone likes to do that because you are always right when you do that.
Yes, we are, because it's blatantly obvious the 2019 Warriors wouldn't have lost to the likes of the Raptors if KD was healthy. He looked like the best player on the court even in the game he got injured in.
And do you honestly think the 2021 Nets don't win the title, when KD almost soloed the eventual champions by himself?
It doesn't take great intellect to see how those situations would've played out if health wasn't an issue.
You do realize for every “what if you put”another team or player can do the exact same thing for them to trump “your what if”…
I guess some people don’t grasp the obtuse logic when using “what if” scenarios, but it is ok… been here long enough to read enough absurdities that I am never surprised by what people say and post.
CIN-C-STAR wrote:hardenASG13 wrote:MavfanAus wrote:
Yep, that's pretty much it.
You don't think it'd change if he led Phoenix to a title this year? The team that barely beat Zionless New Orleans, then lost to Dallas (who had no business in the conference finals) last year, and had to give up Bridges and Cam Johnson to get him?
Wouldn't he be the big difference that turns them from pretenders (they also beat 0 remotely healthy teams on their finals run the previous year) into champions, if they were to win it? They're replacing Bridges and Johnson with KD, if they win it its a major statement to his dominance as a player.
Over the previous two seasons Phoenix has had the most wins in the league and played a very competitive Finals against a healthy Bucks squad.
"Major statement to his dominance" seems like an overstatement to me.
LakersLegacy wrote:-Luke- wrote:"You know, he's the career you want to look at and try to, you know, emulate if you're a player."
Attempt failed, Kevin.
Dirks won one is more impressive than Durants two for joining a previous championship team
alebaba wrote:Hsker4Life wrote:alebaba wrote:
He ain't in the top 10 of all time and hes def not the best scorer ever, Celtics playoff series shows that.
A series in which he struggled, yet still averaged 26/6/5, is all the proof you need? Don’t forget the NBA Finals series where he averaged 35 PPG.
He shot freaking 42% for the series..Do I have to remind you Westbrook average a triple doubles. You talking about the finals where the Cavs was busy guarding Klay and Curry at the three point line and giving Durant open lane to the hoop, that finals? If he was top 10 why does he demanded the Nets trade him? Dude has been playing on a stack team since his 3rd year and only got 2 rings to show for it.
Invictus88 wrote:maverick_41 wrote:Invictus88 wrote:So at least from a numbers standpoint (looking at FG% by distance, how much of his fgs are assisted, etc) Durant has better shooting numbers in basically every area except from 16 feet to the 3 point line (.451 vs .474).
Looks like if they shoot 20 times per game both players will hit 9 shots.
In they shoot 150 times (a 6 or 7 game playoff series) one player will hit 68 shots and the other - 71.
A good mathematician will say it’s a tremendous margin and definitely one player is superior over the other.
The best mathematician will say that a player’s influence on the game and his team overall success is so much more complicated that 3 shots difference over the playoff series.
I was responding to a claim about shooting alone and provided concrete numbers as best as I could.
I'd welcome it if you had numbers or even further reasoning behind your implication that Dirk had more influence on the game than Durant.
kan_t wrote:KD paid tribute to Dirk and somehow people are arguing who's better and how KD is overrated.
chuck_wagon44 wrote:Dirk is great. But KD is in another league of his own compared to Dirk.
Dirk is vastly overrated these days. It's crazy