
Scott Foster felt a non-demonstrative, fairly quiet comment was grounds for two techs and an ejection with less than a minute to go in a one point game. Still, to be fair Scottie Barnes seems to be attending the famous "AAHHHH" school of foul reporting as taught by Professor Pascal

Now lots of people want to say that this is a gambling situation, and not a personal thing between the two Scotts. I'm not a gambler myself can anyone explain how, in relation to the spreads that were in play, this action by a ref made a difference on a bet?
Only one vote in the poll today.
