ImageImage

2023 NFL Draft Thread - Round 1 Thursday 7:00 PM

Moderators: paulpressey25, MickeyDavis, humanrefutation

wege1988
Freshman
Posts: 61
And1: 26
Joined: Oct 30, 2013
     

Re: 2023 NFL Draft Discussion 

Post#401 » by wege1988 » Thu Mar 9, 2023 3:04 pm

TroyD92 wrote:I'm expecting more mock drafts from everyone post Rodgers


I did Aaron Rodgers to Jets for #43 + 2024 3rd.

15 - Jaxon Smith-Njigba, WR Ohio State
43 - Ed Ojulari, ED LSU
45 - Luke Musgrave, TE Oregon State
78 - Jammie Robinson, S Florida State
116 - Tre'Vius Hodges-Tomlinson, CB TCU
151 - Dorian Williams, LB Tulane
171 - Cam Jones, LB Indiana
234 - Justin Shorter, WR Florida
237 - Cameron Young, DL Mississippi State
244 - Leonard Taylor, TE Cincinnati
256 - Brandon Hill, S Pittsburgh
259 - Max Duggan, QB TCU
User avatar
Matches Malone
RealGM
Posts: 36,452
And1: 26,683
Joined: Nov 23, 2005
     

Re: 2023 NFL Draft Discussion 

Post#402 » by Matches Malone » Thu Mar 9, 2023 3:47 pm

Read on Twitter
Gery Woelfel wrote:Got a time big boy?
User avatar
LUKE23
RealGM
Posts: 72,765
And1: 6,963
Joined: May 26, 2005
Location: Stunville
       

Re: 2023 NFL Draft Discussion 

Post#403 » by LUKE23 » Thu Mar 9, 2023 8:33 pm

I hear the "don't take a TE in the 1st" argument, but I feel like the guys we want will be gone by 47. Assuming we get 13 from the Jets, I want Kincaid or Washington with one of our 1sts. I like both a ton. Neither is there for our 2nd or anywhere close.

Van Ness and one of those two TE is my ideal realistic 1st round right now. I also love Witherspoon if he slips.
User avatar
ReasonablySober
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 108,066
And1: 42,315
Joined: Dec 02, 2001
Location: Cheap dinner. Watch basketball. Bone down.
Contact:

Re: 2023 NFL Draft Discussion 

Post#404 » by ReasonablySober » Thu Mar 9, 2023 8:49 pm

PFF's latest mock has the Packers going with JSN at #13 and Kincaid at #15. That'd be fun.
User avatar
LUKE23
RealGM
Posts: 72,765
And1: 6,963
Joined: May 26, 2005
Location: Stunville
       

Re: 2023 NFL Draft Discussion 

Post#405 » by LUKE23 » Thu Mar 9, 2023 8:53 pm

ReasonablySober wrote:PFF's latest mock has the Packers going with JSN at #13 and Kincaid at #15. That'd be fun.


Not against that either. I think Edge is a MASSIVE need if its in line with BPA given our roster and Gary's injury, but it would also be fun to load up for Love.
User avatar
MoMM
RealGM
Posts: 10,574
And1: 1,772
Joined: Jan 08, 2002
Location: Brazilian in Barcelona
Contact:
       

Re: 2023 NFL Draft Discussion 

Post#406 » by MoMM » Thu Mar 9, 2023 8:55 pm

LUKE23 wrote:I hear the "don't take a TE in the 1st" argument, but I feel like the guys we want will be gone by 47. Assuming we get 13 from the Jets, I want Kincaid or Washington with one of our 1sts. I like both a ton. Neither is there for our 2nd or anywhere close.

Van Ness and one of those two TE is my ideal realistic 1st round right now. I also love Witherspoon if he slips.

Well, we can trade down from #13 or #15 and still get one of those TEs... For example, we gave #30 and a 4th for #26 (Love), maybe we can get some extra 3rd/4th by trading down 5-10 spots.
User avatar
IrishRainbow
Veteran
Posts: 2,856
And1: 928
Joined: Oct 24, 2006
Location: @ the drawing table
     

Re: 2023 NFL Draft Discussion 

Post#407 » by IrishRainbow » Thu Mar 9, 2023 8:55 pm

ReasonablySober wrote:PFF's latest mock has the Packers going with JSN at #13 and Kincaid at #15. That'd be fun.


No amount of darkness ayahuasca can stop the speed at which an “MFer!” is the soundtrack (for some reason tuned to a dubstep) to the closest inanimate object that is sent hurling through the air amid AR doing his best oppressed Ricky LaFleur impression.
User avatar
Ron Swanson
RealGM
Posts: 25,726
And1: 29,558
Joined: May 15, 2013

Re: 2023 NFL Draft Discussion 

Post#408 » by Ron Swanson » Thu Mar 9, 2023 8:58 pm

The "don't take a TE in the 1st round" argument is a relic from past eras where the pass-catching TE position was never prioritized or valued by NFL teams in favor of RB's and WR's. Look around right now and most of the best offenses are utilizing versatile/athletic TE's that can line up anywhere (Kittle in San Fran, Kelce in KC, Goedtert in Philly, Hockenson in Minny, Noah Fant in Seattle, etc.). That a bunch of those guys went in the later rounds of the draft, or in some historical cases weren't drafted at all (Antonio Gates, Jimmy Graham) isn't evidence that you should stick to that stubborn philosophy. It's evidence that those guys should have been drafted a lot higher than they were, and teams are now figuring out the value of having an awesome TE that can open up the middle of the field in the passing game.
User avatar
M-C-G
RealGM
Posts: 23,525
And1: 9,849
Joined: Jan 13, 2013
     

Re: 2023 NFL Draft Discussion 

Post#409 » by M-C-G » Thu Mar 9, 2023 9:39 pm

ReasonablySober wrote:PFF's latest mock has the Packers going with JSN at #13 and Kincaid at #15. That'd be fun.


I feel complete. Very possible that Kincaid is a star in the making and JSN is every bit as good or better (albeit probably slower) than Wilson/Olave.

Our offense would have absolutely incredibly pieces to work with, maybe add a new Swervin Ervin guy like Nate Dell, Deuce Vaughn or Devon Achane too while we are at it.
sdn40
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,368
And1: 1,418
Joined: Jun 23, 2010

Re: 2023 NFL Draft Discussion 

Post#410 » by sdn40 » Thu Mar 9, 2023 10:01 pm

The data is out there for not wasting a First Round pick on a TE. A link was even posted. Why fans just ignore it is hilarious to me. And there are TE's available after the First Round. It's been proven you can pretty much throw them in a hat and pick one out
User avatar
LUKE23
RealGM
Posts: 72,765
And1: 6,963
Joined: May 26, 2005
Location: Stunville
       

Re: 2023 NFL Draft Discussion 

Post#411 » by LUKE23 » Thu Mar 9, 2023 10:06 pm

sdn40 wrote:The data is out there for not wasting a First Round pick on a TE. A link was even posted. Why fans just ignore it is hilarious to me. And there are TE's available after the First Round. It's been proven you can pretty much throw them in a hat and pick one out


You can't just say every draft is the same for a position, it's based on the actual prospects. Like this year - the TE prospects are better than the WR prospects in terms of how they rank verses players already in the NFL. You don't draft based on position, you draft based on the prospect. Yes, need also factors in, but you don't pigeon-hole positions.
sdn40
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,368
And1: 1,418
Joined: Jun 23, 2010

Re: 2023 NFL Draft Discussion 

Post#412 » by sdn40 » Thu Mar 9, 2023 10:14 pm

LUKE23 wrote:
sdn40 wrote:The data is out there for not wasting a First Round pick on a TE. A link was even posted. Why fans just ignore it is hilarious to me. And there are TE's available after the First Round. It's been proven you can pretty much throw them in a hat and pick one out


You can't just say every draft is the same for a position, it's based on the actual prospects. Like this year - the TE prospects are better than the WR prospects in terms of how they rank verses players already in the NFL. You don't draft based on position, you draft based on the prospect. Yes, need also factors in, but you don't pigeon-hole positions.


Ok. The data for the last 10 years (minimum) says don't take a TE in the First Round. Madden has melted fans brains. They will find a way to justify a gadget guy - like with Amari, and now a TE. Who needs Edge Rushers or DL anyway, right ? TE is not a premium position, and one of the slowest to make an impact. Those are not opinions - they are facts.
User avatar
LUKE23
RealGM
Posts: 72,765
And1: 6,963
Joined: May 26, 2005
Location: Stunville
       

Re: 2023 NFL Draft Discussion 

Post#413 » by LUKE23 » Thu Mar 9, 2023 10:15 pm

sdn40 wrote:
Ok. The data for the last 10 years (minimum) says don't take a TE in the First Round. Madden has melted fans brains. They will find a way to justify a gadget guy - like with Amari, and now a TE. Who needs Edge Rushers or DL anyway, right ? TE is not a premium position, and one of the slowest to make an impact. Those are not opinions - they are facts.


:lol: :lol: :lol:
TroyD92
RealGM
Posts: 23,679
And1: 11,354
Joined: Mar 28, 2013
Location: Renewed Hope
 

Re: 2023 NFL Draft Discussion 

Post#414 » by TroyD92 » Thu Mar 9, 2023 10:20 pm

Really think the Packers need a safety at some point. Not sure if Branch, the guy from Illinois or what.
VooDoo7 wrote:
JEIS wrote:

Kidd would have curb stomped him.

Maybe if his name was Denise instead of Dennis.


Fotis St wrote:Wherever you are David, I love you man.
WeekapaugGroove
RealGM
Posts: 24,538
And1: 20,241
Joined: Feb 07, 2010

Re: 2023 NFL Draft Discussion 

Post#415 » by WeekapaugGroove » Thu Mar 9, 2023 10:24 pm

Under Gute the Packers have drafted a RB in the 2nd round, a H-Back in the 3rd, a MLB in the 1st. I don't think they really follow the 'draft only premium positions high' manta so yeah I think a TE is a possibility.

Sent from my SM-G986U using RealGM mobile app
Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside in a cloud of smoke, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming Wow! What a Ride!-H.S.T.
sdn40
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,368
And1: 1,418
Joined: Jun 23, 2010

Re: 2023 NFL Draft Discussion 

Post#416 » by sdn40 » Thu Mar 9, 2023 10:27 pm

LUKE23 wrote:
sdn40 wrote:
Ok. The data for the last 10 years (minimum) says don't take a TE in the First Round. Madden has melted fans brains. They will find a way to justify a gadget guy - like with Amari, and now a TE. Who needs Edge Rushers or DL anyway, right ? TE is not a premium position, and one of the slowest to make an impact. Those are not opinions - they are facts.


:lol: :lol: :lol:


Can you even name our Edge Rushers ? Who starts on the DL this year ?
TroyD92
RealGM
Posts: 23,679
And1: 11,354
Joined: Mar 28, 2013
Location: Renewed Hope
 

Re: 2023 NFL Draft Discussion 

Post#417 » by TroyD92 » Thu Mar 9, 2023 10:35 pm

sdn40 wrote:
LUKE23 wrote:
sdn40 wrote:
Ok. The data for the last 10 years (minimum) says don't take a TE in the First Round. Madden has melted fans brains. They will find a way to justify a gadget guy - like with Amari, and now a TE. Who needs Edge Rushers or DL anyway, right ? TE is not a premium position, and one of the slowest to make an impact. Those are not opinions - they are facts.


:lol: :lol: :lol:


Can you even name our Edge Rushers ? Who starts on the DL this year ?


Think its about value this draft seems pretty deep at edge.
VooDoo7 wrote:
JEIS wrote:

Kidd would have curb stomped him.

Maybe if his name was Denise instead of Dennis.


Fotis St wrote:Wherever you are David, I love you man.
sdn40
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,368
And1: 1,418
Joined: Jun 23, 2010

Re: 2023 NFL Draft Discussion 

Post#418 » by sdn40 » Thu Mar 9, 2023 10:39 pm

TroyD92 wrote:
sdn40 wrote:
LUKE23 wrote:
:lol: :lol: :lol:


Can you even name our Edge Rushers ? Who starts on the DL this year ?


Think its about value this draft seems pretty deep at edge.


As it is at TE. But one is a premium position and one is not
TroyD92
RealGM
Posts: 23,679
And1: 11,354
Joined: Mar 28, 2013
Location: Renewed Hope
 

Re: 2023 NFL Draft Discussion 

Post#419 » by TroyD92 » Thu Mar 9, 2023 10:42 pm

sdn40 wrote:
TroyD92 wrote:
sdn40 wrote:
Can you even name our Edge Rushers ? Who starts on the DL this year ?


Think its about value this draft seems pretty deep at edge.


As it is at TE. But one is a premium position and one is not


Yeah I suppose. I'm not opposed to either honestly. I also think the Packers could draft two TE's with the total lack of depth/talent
VooDoo7 wrote:
JEIS wrote:

Kidd would have curb stomped him.

Maybe if his name was Denise instead of Dennis.


Fotis St wrote:Wherever you are David, I love you man.
User avatar
ReasonablySober
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 108,066
And1: 42,315
Joined: Dec 02, 2001
Location: Cheap dinner. Watch basketball. Bone down.
Contact:

Re: 2023 NFL Draft Discussion 

Post#420 » by ReasonablySober » Thu Mar 9, 2023 10:44 pm

I don't think anyone would have a problem with an edge rusher at #15. But Kincaid looks like a weapon at WR. If it makes you sleep better, just think of him as a WR, because that's what he is. He's not a blocker.

Return to Green Bay Packers