DreamTeam09 wrote:Psubs wrote:REJECTEDBYCLARK wrote:Ya I called BS on George, Smith Jr. and Terquavion a while ago.
If you want a losing brand of heroball gameplay you can pick your poison.
George is the best prospect out of all of them but if he doesn't fix his shooting he'll be out of the NBA fast. If he improves his shot selection and overall shooting efficiency then I can see him being a quality starter but there's a lot that needs to happen for him to get there and I don't feel he has any special qualities as a player. There's also a good chance if he becomes a good shooter he'll be a guy that loses you games with boneheaded turnovers.
Terquavion last year yes, he's a chucker and still a chucker but he's gotten stronger and more of a playmaker this year. Leave all the SG's alone.
Not you, but the person you quoted is all over the place. But these guys who are misacted as go to guys for their programs won't be go to guys in the NBA, but that shouldn't diminish their overall talent level because of it. I don't think he's giving that any credence at all.
I was pretty high on George at the beginning of the season but now I don't know what to make of him, much less the other guys, seeing that George is better than them both.
But I do agree on this - they are definitely being miscasted on their respective teams as go-to guys when they clearly aren't. However, it's worth considering that just because they aren't that, doesn't mean they can't be productive NBA players, seeing as they won't be in that role at the next level.
At some point, you have to admit that it isn't a fair assessment of the player's talent if you only view them through the lens of whether or not they're going to be a star.
That being said, I still don't know how to feel about these guys.