Let’s clear up Mavs Warriors ref stuff

Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285

Mephariel
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,998
And1: 2,106
Joined: Jun 24, 2018
   

Re: Let’s clear up Mavs Warriors ref stuff 

Post#41 » by Mephariel » Thu Mar 23, 2023 7:50 am

azcatz11 wrote:
mademan wrote:Refs may be in the right, but it's bad officiating. Youre making calls, you have to be clear. If an entire team thinks you made a different call than you did, you clear that up. Even the announcers thought it was Mavs ball


Correct. The NBA should rule the game a tie. I expect that decision to come tomorrow morning.


LOL. You are right, because that one possession cost them the game. Let's just forget about this one:

Read on Twitter
styLesdavis
Rookie
Posts: 1,125
And1: 715
Joined: Oct 10, 2008
Location: Germany
Contact:
 

Re: Let’s clear up Mavs Warriors ref stuff 

Post#42 » by styLesdavis » Thu Mar 23, 2023 8:23 am

Mephariel wrote:
Lucky Clover wrote:
dockingsched wrote:I can’t for the life of me figure out why all the mavs were on the other side of the court? Even if they thought it was their ball, where are the players trying to take out the ball under the basket? What I missing?


Exactly this whole this stupid. It's almost insulting people's intelligence :lol:

Literally nobody on the Mavs.. not Cuban, not the players, not their fans have a single argument to refute the above.


Exactly. Why aren't they getting ready to inbound the ball then?


The moment the ref gave Poole the ball two Mavericks (Hardy and Bullock) were already running to the base line and were at mid court.
Don`t get me wrong: this should still be on the Mavs.

What i don`get get: IF the call was "crystal clear" - why was the 3rd ref on the other side of the court?
User avatar
PharmD
Head Coach
Posts: 6,964
And1: 5,559
Joined: Aug 21, 2015
 

Re: Let’s clear up Mavs Warriors ref stuff 

Post#43 » by PharmD » Thu Mar 23, 2023 8:29 am

carlquincy wrote:
CIN-C-STAR wrote:
carlquincy wrote:Do teams call TO when they don't have possession? Seems like a waste.


It was a mandatory timeout, automatically charged to the home team (apparently that's a thing in the NBA, lol)


Ah i see. Pretty obscure rule.

I mean, these mandatory timeouts occur 8 times in most NBA games. Kind of astounding to me that people don't notice them.
dhsilv2
RealGM
Posts: 50,553
And1: 27,276
Joined: Oct 04, 2015

Re: Let’s clear up Mavs Warriors ref stuff 

Post#44 » by dhsilv2 » Thu Mar 23, 2023 8:37 am

mademan wrote:Refs may be in the right, but it's bad officiating. Youre making calls, you have to be clear. If an entire team thinks you made a different call than you did, you clear that up. Even the announcers thought it was Mavs ball


It's seemingly pretty clear that the announcer is the only person the players and team are listening to. That's not he ref's fault. That's the fault of the guy with full access to rewatch it and a team of people to correct him. And the players and entire team for listening to him and not paying attention to their damn job.
blackcosmos
Junior
Posts: 366
And1: 449
Joined: Nov 20, 2019
     

Re: Let’s clear up Mavs Warriors ref stuff 

Post#45 » by blackcosmos » Thu Mar 23, 2023 9:09 am

the ball went out of bound under the Mavs basket. Regardless who has possession, the in bound play will occur underneath Mavs basket. Dallas simply f'ed up.
Goon
Pro Prospect
Posts: 975
And1: 1,347
Joined: Nov 27, 2012

Re: Let’s clear up Mavs Warriors ref stuff 

Post#46 » by Goon » Thu Mar 23, 2023 12:32 pm

Worst thing out of that clip is the blatant no-call on a clear foul by Looney on Doncic. Amazing how 3 refs manage to miss that. He complains about refereeing like an idiot but dude gets clobbered with no calls every game, its a joke.
Mavrelous
Forum Mod - Mavericks
Forum Mod - Mavericks
Posts: 19,861
And1: 17,780
Joined: Aug 20, 2020

Re: Let’s clear up Mavs Warriors ref stuff 

Post#47 » by Mavrelous » Thu Mar 23, 2023 12:44 pm

blackcosmos wrote:the ball went out of bound under the Mavs basket. Regardless who has possession, the in bound play will occur underneath Mavs basket. Dallas simply f'ed up.

If it was DAL ball (which is what they though), they advance the ball, and inbound from mid court, that's why they were nowhere near.
Defense wins draft lotteries!
rtiff68
Veteran
Posts: 2,921
And1: 3,764
Joined: May 25, 2019

Re: Let’s clear up Mavs Warriors ref stuff 

Post#48 » by rtiff68 » Thu Mar 23, 2023 12:49 pm

Goon wrote:Worst thing out of that clip is the blatant no-call on a clear foul by Looney on Doncic. Amazing how 3 refs manage to miss that. He complains about refereeing like an idiot but dude gets clobbered with no calls every game, its a joke.


Luka Doncic is a great, great player.

He’s also not only always complaining about the officiating all game, he’s also out there initiating more contact than almost anyone while trying to sell foul calls.

He’s currently 5th in FTA per game, so he’s succeeding.

Claiming that he “gets clobbered every game with no calls” is the actual joke, man.

C’mon. lol.
ellobo
Veteran
Posts: 2,937
And1: 4,828
Joined: Aug 06, 2017

Re: Let’s clear up Mavs Warriors ref stuff 

Post#49 » by ellobo » Thu Mar 23, 2023 1:00 pm

zimpy27 wrote:
dockingsched wrote:I can’t for the life of me figure out why all the mavs were on the other side of the court? Even if they thought it was their ball, where are the players trying to take out the ball under the basket? What I missing?


The baseline ball advances to half court after a timeout doesn't it?

Mavrelous wrote:
blackcosmos wrote:the ball went out of bound under the Mavs basket. Regardless who has possession, the in bound play will occur underneath Mavs basket. Dallas simply f'ed up.

If it was DAL ball (which is what they though), they advance the ball, and inbound from mid court, that's why they were nowhere near.

You can only advance the ball to midcourt on a timeout in the last 2 minutes of the 4th quarter or overtime.

Regardless of any confusion about whose ball is was, the inbound spot would be the same. If the Mavs thought it was their ball, they should have been trying to inbound it from that spot. If the Mavs knew it was the Warrior's ball, they should have been trying to defend the inbounds from that spot. But the Mavs approached it in a way that didn't make sense regardless of which way they thought the call had gone.

Anyone remember this:
Just because it happened to you, doesn't make it interesting.

In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice, there is.

Yesterday I was lying; today I'm telling the truth.
blackcosmos
Junior
Posts: 366
And1: 449
Joined: Nov 20, 2019
     

Re: Let’s clear up Mavs Warriors ref stuff 

Post#50 » by blackcosmos » Thu Mar 23, 2023 1:13 pm

Mavrelous wrote:
blackcosmos wrote:the ball went out of bound under the Mavs basket. Regardless who has possession, the in bound play will occur underneath Mavs basket. Dallas simply f'ed up.

If it was DAL ball (which is what they though), they advance the ball, and inbound from mid court, that's why they were nowhere near.


This happen in the third quarter. They can’t advance the ball.
Myth
RealGM
Posts: 11,830
And1: 10,471
Joined: Oct 01, 2008
   

Re: Let’s clear up Mavs Warriors ref stuff 

Post#51 » by Myth » Thu Mar 23, 2023 1:33 pm

carlquincy wrote:
CIN-C-STAR wrote:
carlquincy wrote:Do teams call TO when they don't have possession? Seems like a waste.


It was a mandatory timeout, automatically charged to the home team (apparently that's a thing in the NBA, lol)


Ah i see. Pretty obscure rule.

I'm surprised more people don't know it. I've heard them called TV timeouts and more commonly Officials Timeouts my whole life. They happen a lot and you tend to hear the commentators call them Officials Timeouts and then they go to commercial breaks. It isn't every game, but I would guess that it happens about once per day or more that there is a fair amount of games on. It just is mentioned casually and never seemingly explained on the air.
Myth
RealGM
Posts: 11,830
And1: 10,471
Joined: Oct 01, 2008
   

Re: Let’s clear up Mavs Warriors ref stuff 

Post#52 » by Myth » Thu Mar 23, 2023 1:35 pm

blackcosmos wrote:
Mavrelous wrote:
blackcosmos wrote:the ball went out of bound under the Mavs basket. Regardless who has possession, the in bound play will occur underneath Mavs basket. Dallas simply f'ed up.

If it was DAL ball (which is what they though), they advance the ball, and inbound from mid court, that's why they were nowhere near.


This happen in the third quarter. They can’t advance the ball.

Holy ****. The Mavs made this big fuss about protesting the game due to something that happened in the 3rd quarter? Lol, no way the NBA rules in their favor. I just assumed it was 4th based on how they acted.
User avatar
MoneyTalks41890
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 32,800
And1: 25,094
Joined: Oct 13, 2009
 

Re: Let’s clear up Mavs Warriors ref stuff 

Post#53 » by MoneyTalks41890 » Thu Mar 23, 2023 1:46 pm

dhsilv2 wrote:
mademan wrote:Refs may be in the right, but it's bad officiating. Youre making calls, you have to be clear. If an entire team thinks you made a different call than you did, you clear that up. Even the announcers thought it was Mavs ball


It's seemingly pretty clear that the announcer is the only person the players and team are listening to. That's not he ref's fault. That's the fault of the guy with full access to rewatch it and a team of people to correct him. And the players and entire team for listening to him and not paying attention to their damn job.


Eh, sure, everyone should be more attentive here. But the hand motions obviously sparked confusion and the refs should've gone over to each bench and said "Warriors ball after the timeout, announcer got it wrong"
User avatar
Jerry Maine
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,592
And1: 746
Joined: May 13, 2007
Location: Fremantle
 

Re: Let’s clear up Mavs Warriors ref stuff 

Post#54 » by Jerry Maine » Thu Mar 23, 2023 2:16 pm

MoneyTalks41890 wrote:
dhsilv2 wrote:
mademan wrote:Refs may be in the right, but it's bad officiating. Youre making calls, you have to be clear. If an entire team thinks you made a different call than you did, you clear that up. Even the announcers thought it was Mavs ball


It's seemingly pretty clear that the announcer is the only person the players and team are listening to. That's not he ref's fault. That's the fault of the guy with full access to rewatch it and a team of people to correct him. And the players and entire team for listening to him and not paying attention to their damn job.


Eh, sure, everyone should be more attentive here. But the hand motions obviously sparked confusion and the refs should've gone over to each bench and said "Warriors ball after the timeout, announcer got it wrong"


That's true, the refs could have handled it better.

It's also true the Dallas bench dropped the ball and are paid to be all over stuff just like this.
"What're they gonna say now, boy?" - Wardell Stephen Curry, 16th June 2022
dhsilv2
RealGM
Posts: 50,553
And1: 27,276
Joined: Oct 04, 2015

Re: Let’s clear up Mavs Warriors ref stuff 

Post#55 » by dhsilv2 » Thu Mar 23, 2023 2:30 pm

MoneyTalks41890 wrote:
dhsilv2 wrote:
mademan wrote:Refs may be in the right, but it's bad officiating. Youre making calls, you have to be clear. If an entire team thinks you made a different call than you did, you clear that up. Even the announcers thought it was Mavs ball


It's seemingly pretty clear that the announcer is the only person the players and team are listening to. That's not he ref's fault. That's the fault of the guy with full access to rewatch it and a team of people to correct him. And the players and entire team for listening to him and not paying attention to their damn job.


Eh, sure, everyone should be more attentive here. But the hand motions obviously sparked confusion and the refs should've gone over to each bench and said "Warriors ball after the timeout, announcer got it wrong"


No, they clearly weren't confusing. The announcer clearly wasn't paying attention. That's really what this all came down to. One dude missed it and nobody corrected him. And a team with near half a billion in spend a year listened to that one guy who they aren't supposed to be listening to at all. This all came down to people being lazy and one person doing a bad a job.
Invictus88
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,004
And1: 2,293
Joined: Jun 25, 2013

Re: Let’s clear up Mavs Warriors ref stuff 

Post#56 » by Invictus88 » Thu Mar 23, 2023 2:53 pm

I wonder if Kevon Looney's misunderstanding of the call tipped everyone off the wrong way. I.e. folks saw him complaining and took that to believe it was called Mavericks ball.

If so I really want to believe that Kevon Looney just jedi-mind-tricked everyone on purpose; which would be epic. It would introduce a completely new layer of tactial deception into the nba. Baseball had the hidden ball trick. Football had the statue of liberty play. For basketball it's Looney Tunes! :)

Note that I don't really think any of that happened but it's fun to think about.
Myth
RealGM
Posts: 11,830
And1: 10,471
Joined: Oct 01, 2008
   

Re: Let’s clear up Mavs Warriors ref stuff 

Post#57 » by Myth » Thu Mar 23, 2023 2:58 pm

Invictus88 wrote:I wonder if Kevon Looney's misunderstanding of the call tipped everyone off the wrong way. I.e. folks saw him complaining and took that to believe it was called Mavericks ball.


If so I really want to believe that Kevon Looney just jedi-mind-tricked everyone on purpose; which would be epic.

Note that I don't really think any of that happened but it's fun to think about :)

I'm not ready to give Looney that much credit :lol:

I suspect he saw the timeout point and said "Wait, what?" and then the ref said, "no I was just saying it is their timeout, it is still Warriors ball" and that chilled Looney out.
User avatar
DwayneSchintzus
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,405
And1: 1,933
Joined: Jul 01, 2005
 

Re: Let’s clear up Mavs Warriors ref stuff 

Post#58 » by DwayneSchintzus » Thu Mar 23, 2023 3:01 pm

Myth wrote:
Invictus88 wrote:I wonder if Kevon Looney's misunderstanding of the call tipped everyone off the wrong way. I.e. folks saw him complaining and took that to believe it was called Mavericks ball.


If so I really want to believe that Kevon Looney just jedi-mind-tricked everyone on purpose; which would be epic.

Note that I don't really think any of that happened but it's fun to think about :)

I'm not ready to give Looney that much credit :lol:

I suspect he saw the timeout point and said "Wait, what?" and then the ref said, "no I was just saying it is their timeout, it is still Warriors ball" and that chilled Looney out.


That's exactly what Kevon Looney WANTS you to think 8-)
These are the opinions of one lifelong Spurs fan, nothing more
User avatar
RunOKC
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,504
And1: 3,991
Joined: Dec 29, 2012
Location: Oklahoma
 

Re: Let’s clear up Mavs Warriors ref stuff 

Post#59 » by RunOKC » Thu Mar 23, 2023 3:12 pm

NBA refs are corrupt but of all things to complain about it's your own mistake :lol:

I'll be shocked if the league does anything here
User avatar
MoneyTalks41890
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 32,800
And1: 25,094
Joined: Oct 13, 2009
 

Re: Let’s clear up Mavs Warriors ref stuff 

Post#60 » by MoneyTalks41890 » Thu Mar 23, 2023 3:46 pm

Myth wrote:
Invictus88 wrote:I wonder if Kevon Looney's misunderstanding of the call tipped everyone off the wrong way. I.e. folks saw him complaining and took that to believe it was called Mavericks ball.


If so I really want to believe that Kevon Looney just jedi-mind-tricked everyone on purpose; which would be epic.

Note that I don't really think any of that happened but it's fun to think about :)

I'm not ready to give Looney that much credit :lol:

I suspect he saw the timeout point and said "Wait, what?" and then the ref said, "no I was just saying it is their timeout, it is still Warriors ball" and that chilled Looney out.


Isn't it the case though that the Mavs didn't call a timeout, and the pointing to the Mavs was reflecting that they were getting charged with a TV timeout? I think you can see why there was some confusion there. If the Mavs had actually called a timeout the hand gestures would've been less confusing, I think.

Return to The General Board