2023 NBA Draft

Draft talk all year round

Moderators: Marcus, Duke4life831

Big J
RealGM
Posts: 11,625
And1: 8,757
Joined: May 26, 2020

Re: 2023 NBA Draft 

Post#1741 » by Big J » Fri Mar 24, 2023 8:56 am

GSWFan1994 wrote:
Duke4life831 wrote:I swear Timme gets less and less athletic with each passing year. But he gets funner and funner to watch. Not a guy that’s going to get drafted, but this is somewhat of a college thread as well and the dude is so damn elite at college basketball. Crazy to think he has another year of eligibility as well.


How is it possible that he has another year of eligibility? Isn't he a senior?

Please explain it to me, I don't know how that works as I'm not from the US.


I’m guessing it’s because he played during the COVID season.
User avatar
EvanZ
RealGM
Posts: 14,864
And1: 4,153
Joined: Apr 06, 2011

Re: 2023 NBA Draft 

Post#1742 » by EvanZ » Fri Mar 24, 2023 2:15 pm

There are guys playing 6 years now, so it's not surprising at all he has a 5th year of eligibility.
User avatar
TheSuzerain
RealGM
Posts: 17,389
And1: 11,404
Joined: Mar 29, 2012

Re: 2023 NBA Draft 

Post#1743 » by TheSuzerain » Fri Mar 24, 2023 3:04 pm

The-Power wrote:
eminence wrote:Is there anyone who’d consider Walker at #2?

Not me. But I can see a solid argument for #3.

What is that argument?

I just don't see the offensive ceiling being all that high.

And even defensively, he doesn't seem to likely have an elite impact either (as that's generally reserved for stud rim protectors).
User avatar
TheSuzerain
RealGM
Posts: 17,389
And1: 11,404
Joined: Mar 29, 2012

Re: 2023 NBA Draft 

Post#1744 » by TheSuzerain » Fri Mar 24, 2023 3:07 pm

916fan wrote:
eminence wrote:Is there anyone who’d consider Walker at #2?

I don't think he has the scoring acumen to go as high as #2 in this draft. The only team I could possibly see having interest in him that high is maybe the Pacers because they already have a franchise player and other guys who they really like. Hali-Mathurin-Turner. Walker would be a really good fit with them at PF. However, I think they'd easily rather draft someone like Brandon Miller instead.

Why not just take Miller though? Seems like a much better fit at PF for them.
User avatar
TheSuzerain
RealGM
Posts: 17,389
And1: 11,404
Joined: Mar 29, 2012

Re: 2023 NBA Draft 

Post#1745 » by TheSuzerain » Fri Mar 24, 2023 3:12 pm

GSWFan1994 wrote:
Duke4life831 wrote:I swear Timme gets less and less athletic with each passing year. But he gets funner and funner to watch. Not a guy that’s going to get drafted, but this is somewhat of a college thread as well and the dude is so damn elite at college basketball. Crazy to think he has another year of eligibility as well.


How is it possible that he has another year of eligibility? Isn't he a senior?

Please explain it to me, I don't know how that works as I'm not from the US.

He's played 4-years, but as one of those years was 2019-20 (the COVID year), he gets an extra year of eligibility.

In retrospect, I think it was a dumb decision to give everybody that extra year, but here we are.
The-Power
RealGM
Posts: 10,513
And1: 9,938
Joined: Jan 03, 2014
Location: Germany
   

Re: 2023 NBA Draft 

Post#1746 » by The-Power » Sat Mar 25, 2023 12:19 am

TheSuzerain wrote:
The-Power wrote:
eminence wrote:Is there anyone who’d consider Walker at #2?

Not me. But I can see a solid argument for #3.

What is that argument?

I just don't see the offensive ceiling being all that high.

And even defensively, he doesn't seem to likely have an elite impact either (as that's generally reserved for stud rim protectors).

It would be based on him having a fairly high floor and the competition for the spot being underwhelming. I agree that his offense has clear limitations but an optimistic view would believe in his passing ability as a potential path to considerable impact. As for defense, I think the current NBA moves away from elite rim protectors as the only source of elite impact. I'm not saying Walker will be an elite defender (I think it's more likely that he'll just end up good and versatile) but in today's NBA, being able to switch onto the perimeter, hold up against bigger players and defend the rim with length and strength provides prime value. That combination plus elite defensive IQ and motor is what turned Draymond Green – not the classic elite rim protector type – into the best defensive player of his generation.
User avatar
eminence
RealGM
Posts: 17,067
And1: 11,880
Joined: Mar 07, 2015

Re: 2023 NBA Draft 

Post#1747 » by eminence » Sat Mar 25, 2023 12:24 am

My consideration for him at #2 was certainly 90% defense focused and envisioning him as at least a fringe DPOY contender.

And what an egg from Miller so far.
I bought a boat.
User avatar
CptCrunch
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,674
And1: 4,697
Joined: Jun 30, 2016
   

Re: 2023 NBA Draft 

Post#1748 » by CptCrunch » Sat Mar 25, 2023 12:30 am

Miller is probably closer to Jabari Smith as spot up shooter than he is to being a self-creator off the dribble right now.

Best among the worst at #2 at best.
User avatar
EvanZ
RealGM
Posts: 14,864
And1: 4,153
Joined: Apr 06, 2011

Re: 2023 NBA Draft 

Post#1749 » by EvanZ » Sat Mar 25, 2023 12:59 am

The-Power wrote:
TheSuzerain wrote:
The-Power wrote:Not me. But I can see a solid argument for #3.

What is that argument?

I just don't see the offensive ceiling being all that high.

And even defensively, he doesn't seem to likely have an elite impact either (as that's generally reserved for stud rim protectors).

It would be based on him having a fairly high floor and the competition for the spot being underwhelming. I agree that his offense has clear limitations but an optimistic view would believe in his passing ability as a potential path to considerable impact. As for defense, I think the current NBA moves away from elite rim protectors as the only source of elite impact. I'm not saying Walker will be an elite defender (I think it's more likely that he'll just end up good and versatile) but in today's NBA, being able to switch onto the perimeter, hold up against bigger players and defend the rim with length and strength provides prime value. That combination plus elite defensive IQ and motor is what turned Draymond Green – not the classic elite rim protector type – into the best defensive player of his generation.

I’ll see your Jarace and raise you Taylor Hendricks at 2.


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
BostonCouchGM
Head Coach
Posts: 6,714
And1: 4,859
Joined: Jun 07, 2018

Re: 2023 NBA Draft 

Post#1750 » by BostonCouchGM » Sat Mar 25, 2023 1:02 am

Miller fell out of my top 5. At some point you have to prove it against top teams and he flopped as hard as any top guy I’ve ever seen. He’ll be a role player at the next level. There’s no path that I can see where he’s special or anywhere near an all-star
Braggins
RealGM
Posts: 14,491
And1: 9,285
Joined: Jan 05, 2014

Re: 2023 NBA Draft 

Post#1751 » by Braggins » Sat Mar 25, 2023 1:12 am

I never moved Miller, or anyone, ahead of Scoot and still think Scoot goes 2nd.
The-Power
RealGM
Posts: 10,513
And1: 9,938
Joined: Jan 03, 2014
Location: Germany
   

Re: 2023 NBA Draft 

Post#1752 » by The-Power » Sat Mar 25, 2023 1:13 am

EvanZ wrote:
The-Power wrote:
TheSuzerain wrote:What is that argument?

I just don't see the offensive ceiling being all that high.

And even defensively, he doesn't seem to likely have an elite impact either (as that's generally reserved for stud rim protectors).

It would be based on him having a fairly high floor and the competition for the spot being underwhelming. I agree that his offense has clear limitations but an optimistic view would believe in his passing ability as a potential path to considerable impact. As for defense, I think the current NBA moves away from elite rim protectors as the only source of elite impact. I'm not saying Walker will be an elite defender (I think it's more likely that he'll just end up good and versatile) but in today's NBA, being able to switch onto the perimeter, hold up against bigger players and defend the rim with length and strength provides prime value. That combination plus elite defensive IQ and motor is what turned Draymond Green – not the classic elite rim protector type – into the best defensive player of his generation.

I’ll see your Jarace and raise you Taylor Hendricks at 2.


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums

Just as for Jarace, I can personally see good arguments for Hendricks as early as #3.
User avatar
TheSuzerain
RealGM
Posts: 17,389
And1: 11,404
Joined: Mar 29, 2012

Re: 2023 NBA Draft 

Post#1753 » by TheSuzerain » Sat Mar 25, 2023 1:21 am

EvanZ wrote:
The-Power wrote:
TheSuzerain wrote:What is that argument?

I just don't see the offensive ceiling being all that high.

And even defensively, he doesn't seem to likely have an elite impact either (as that's generally reserved for stud rim protectors).

It would be based on him having a fairly high floor and the competition for the spot being underwhelming. I agree that his offense has clear limitations but an optimistic view would believe in his passing ability as a potential path to considerable impact. As for defense, I think the current NBA moves away from elite rim protectors as the only source of elite impact. I'm not saying Walker will be an elite defender (I think it's more likely that he'll just end up good and versatile) but in today's NBA, being able to switch onto the perimeter, hold up against bigger players and defend the rim with length and strength provides prime value. That combination plus elite defensive IQ and motor is what turned Draymond Green – not the classic elite rim protector type – into the best defensive player of his generation.

I’ll see your Jarace and raise you Taylor Hendricks at 2.


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums

That's my hold up on Walker. I don't understand why Hendricks isn't just the better version of that type of prospect.

Unless you really buy into Walker's playmaking or defensive impact or something. But I'm skeptical.
The-Power
RealGM
Posts: 10,513
And1: 9,938
Joined: Jan 03, 2014
Location: Germany
   

Re: 2023 NBA Draft 

Post#1754 » by The-Power » Sat Mar 25, 2023 1:23 am

TheSuzerain wrote:
EvanZ wrote:
The-Power wrote:It would be based on him having a fairly high floor and the competition for the spot being underwhelming. I agree that his offense has clear limitations but an optimistic view would believe in his passing ability as a potential path to considerable impact. As for defense, I think the current NBA moves away from elite rim protectors as the only source of elite impact. I'm not saying Walker will be an elite defender (I think it's more likely that he'll just end up good and versatile) but in today's NBA, being able to switch onto the perimeter, hold up against bigger players and defend the rim with length and strength provides prime value. That combination plus elite defensive IQ and motor is what turned Draymond Green – not the classic elite rim protector type – into the best defensive player of his generation.

I’ll see your Jarace and raise you Taylor Hendricks at 2.


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums

That's my hold up on Walker. I don't understand why Hendricks isn't just the better version of that type of prospect.

Unless you really buy into Walker's playmaking or defensive impact or something. But I'm skeptical.

I mean, you just said it – so you should understand. People who have Walker over Hendricks likely value his clearly superior playmaking and certain aspects of his defense. Whether you yourself arrive at the same conclusion all things considered – including aspects in which Hendricks is better – is a different question. But it shouldn't be difficult to understand where people are coming from.

I personally think both players have good arguments for top 5 and I can understand anyone who makes an argument for top 3, too. Both have a lot to like but also a lot of question marks. But the lottery this year is littered with players that have serious question marks. It's tough to rank and project players this year.
User avatar
eminence
RealGM
Posts: 17,067
And1: 11,880
Joined: Mar 07, 2015

Re: 2023 NBA Draft 

Post#1755 » by eminence » Sat Mar 25, 2023 1:27 am

I don't really see them as that similar of prospects. Hendricks looks like a pretty classical forward prospect with good defensive potential and looking like a pretty solid play finisher, Walker a modern 4/5 with more potential as a playmaker, but not the same level of finisher (given the significant shooting gap).
I bought a boat.
User avatar
TheSuzerain
RealGM
Posts: 17,389
And1: 11,404
Joined: Mar 29, 2012

Re: 2023 NBA Draft 

Post#1756 » by TheSuzerain » Sat Mar 25, 2023 1:28 am

The-Power wrote:
TheSuzerain wrote:
EvanZ wrote:I’ll see your Jarace and raise you Taylor Hendricks at 2.


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums

That's my hold up on Walker. I don't understand why Hendricks isn't just the better version of that type of prospect.

Unless you really buy into Walker's playmaking or defensive impact or something. But I'm skeptical.

I mean, you just said it – so you should understand. People who have Walker over Hendricks likely value his clearly superior playmaking and certain aspects of his defense. Whether you yourself arrive at the same conclusion all things considered – including aspects in which Hendricks is better – is a different question. But it shouldn't be difficult to understand where people are coming from.

Hendricks seems like a much better shooter. And a more dynamic athlete in general.

Walker has a great frame but seems very unimpressive to me as a mover. Not very explosive at all. Combine that with a lack of scoring feel, and I don't see why anybody would run offense through him in the first place to even unlock that playmaking that he supposedly has (with his basically 1:1 ast:TO ratio).
The-Power
RealGM
Posts: 10,513
And1: 9,938
Joined: Jan 03, 2014
Location: Germany
   

Re: 2023 NBA Draft 

Post#1757 » by The-Power » Sat Mar 25, 2023 1:42 am

TheSuzerain wrote:
The-Power wrote:
TheSuzerain wrote:That's my hold up on Walker. I don't understand why Hendricks isn't just the better version of that type of prospect.

Unless you really buy into Walker's playmaking or defensive impact or something. But I'm skeptical.

I mean, you just said it – so you should understand. People who have Walker over Hendricks likely value his clearly superior playmaking and certain aspects of his defense. Whether you yourself arrive at the same conclusion all things considered – including aspects in which Hendricks is better – is a different question. But it shouldn't be difficult to understand where people are coming from.

Hendricks seems like a much better shooter. And a more dynamic athlete in general.

Walker has a great frame but seems very unimpressive to me as a mover. Not very explosive at all. Combine that with a lack of scoring feel, and I don't see why anybody would run offense through him in the first place to even unlock that playmaking that he supposedly has (with his basically 1:1 ast:TO ratio).

As I wrote, Hendricks has certain advantages over Walker – and vice versa. So you preferring Hendricks is completely fair, but that doesn't mean that you shouldn't be able to understand why some prefer Walker (even if you disagree).

As for ‘supposed playmaking’: I mean, it's obvious when you watch him. He makes some very advanced reads and passes that not many Freshmen combo-bigs make. We can argue how it will translate, or how important it will be to his overall game – but the ability and flashes are undeniable.

And AST:TO ratio is not a strong argument, especially for college bigs. Per 40 minutes, Draymond Green's AST:TO ratio was 2.9 to 2.3 in his Freshman season. Bam Adebayo 1.1 to 2.2. Al Horford 1.5 to 1.7. Kevin Love 2.6 to 2.7. Domantas Sabonis 1.6 to 2.9. These are some of the best big man passers in the NBA currently. Walker is at 2.5 to 2.2. That's better than anyone's ratio besides Green's. Which is not to say that he'll likely be a better playmaker than the others, of course – but it shows that looking at AST:TO ratio is a poor indicator to assess the playmaking ability of college bigs.
User avatar
clyde21
RealGM
Posts: 64,030
And1: 70,225
Joined: Aug 20, 2014
     

Re: 2023 NBA Draft 

Post#1758 » by clyde21 » Sat Mar 25, 2023 2:05 am

the level of mental gymnastics on this board right now not to put Scoot at 2 :lol:
User avatar
clyde21
RealGM
Posts: 64,030
And1: 70,225
Joined: Aug 20, 2014
     

Re: 2023 NBA Draft 

Post#1759 » by clyde21 » Sat Mar 25, 2023 3:06 am

clyde21 wrote:Trey Alexander is a top45 guy


top 25*
EMG518
Veteran
Posts: 2,842
And1: 942
Joined: Mar 11, 2012

Re: 2023 NBA Draft 

Post#1760 » by EMG518 » Sat Mar 25, 2023 6:00 am

EvanZ wrote:
The-Power wrote:
TheSuzerain wrote:What is that argument?

I just don't see the offensive ceiling being all that high.

And even defensively, he doesn't seem to likely have an elite impact either (as that's generally reserved for stud rim protectors).

It would be based on him having a fairly high floor and the competition for the spot being underwhelming. I agree that his offense has clear limitations but an optimistic view would believe in his passing ability as a potential path to considerable impact. As for defense, I think the current NBA moves away from elite rim protectors as the only source of elite impact. I'm not saying Walker will be an elite defender (I think it's more likely that he'll just end up good and versatile) but in today's NBA, being able to switch onto the perimeter, hold up against bigger players and defend the rim with length and strength provides prime value. That combination plus elite defensive IQ and motor is what turned Draymond Green – not the classic elite rim protector type – into the best defensive player of his generation.

I’ll see your Jarace and raise you Taylor Hendricks at 2.


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums





Everyone folds, that's crazy.

Return to NBA Draft