TheSuzerain wrote:The-Power wrote:TheSuzerain wrote:That's my hold up on Walker. I don't understand why Hendricks isn't just the better version of that type of prospect.
Unless you really buy into Walker's playmaking or defensive impact or something. But I'm skeptical.
I mean, you just said it – so you should understand. People who have Walker over Hendricks likely value his clearly superior playmaking and certain aspects of his defense. Whether you yourself arrive at the same conclusion all things considered – including aspects in which Hendricks is better – is a different question. But it shouldn't be difficult to understand where people are coming from.
Hendricks seems like a much better shooter. And a more dynamic athlete in general.
Walker has a great frame but seems very unimpressive to me as a mover. Not very explosive at all. Combine that with a lack of scoring feel, and I don't see why anybody would run offense through him in the first place to even unlock that playmaking that he supposedly has (with his basically 1:1 ast:TO ratio).
As I wrote, Hendricks has certain advantages over Walker – and vice versa. So you preferring Hendricks is completely fair, but that doesn't mean that you shouldn't be able to understand why some prefer Walker (even if you disagree).
As for ‘supposed playmaking’: I mean, it's obvious when you watch him. He makes some very advanced reads and passes that not many Freshmen combo-bigs make. We can argue how it will translate, or how important it will be to his overall game – but the ability and flashes are undeniable.
And AST:TO ratio is not a strong argument, especially for college bigs. Per 40 minutes, Draymond Green's AST:TO ratio was 2.9 to 2.3 in his Freshman season. Bam Adebayo 1.1 to 2.2. Al Horford 1.5 to 1.7. Kevin Love 2.6 to 2.7. Domantas Sabonis 1.6 to 2.9. These are some of the best big man passers in the NBA currently. Walker is at 2.5 to 2.2. That's better than anyone's ratio besides Green's. Which is not to say that he'll likely be a better playmaker than the others, of course – but it shows that looking at AST:TO ratio is a poor indicator to assess the playmaking ability of college bigs.