King Ken wrote:GopherIt! wrote:King Ken wrote:Believe me, they won't. I don't even consider KAT tradable until the price is lowered. Mikal Bridges been looking great for Brooklyn and he's extremely reliable. They would love to add KAT but for Claxton and draft picks, not Bridges. I don't believe anyone would be interested in trading their key franchise players for KAT. They would want to add to their key players with KAT. Not remove them for KAT. I heard someone mention Toronto. Maybe something could be done for KAT using OG but zero chance they move Barnes. Adding KAT is to help Barnes
If you want a star in return, you gotta trade Ant. Teams will be willing to trade a star for Ant.
Without getting into a big debate, I think you are severely undervaluing Kat my friend. He’s a true #1 option on offense. I like SloMo next to him at 4. Hopefully we see that more. He’s making $36M next year and then the cap jumps again.
The only trade that makes sense is for a player of similar value or a high upside player. Not breaking Kat down into nickles, dimes and quarters. Trading Ant would be absurdly stupid. That would make David Kahn look like a genius.
Mikal is also getting overrated on the forum. Is he a 1b or #2 on a finals team? Idk. I don’t think the Suns move him if he had that upside.
I have zero belief you can get a better prospect than modern KAT for KAT. Whereas, I believe you can get a clearly better player for Bridges, Barnes, or Mobley than they are right now. A legit older superstar.
KAT just got too many issues and his value isn't high enough. Doesn't really impact winning and his best role is to complement someone who's already the superstar or at least the engine.
I'll be honest with you. There is zero chance you will trade KAT for the value you covet and yes, I do believe in KAT. Just not in regards to his trade value. His supermax is starting after next year. That's a significant amount of money and the new CBA basically has a hard cap no teams really want to touch. That's gonna make getting max value difficult and lower the mid tier market trade value as well as teams will be really on top of how they spend on mid tier players.
The NBA is gonna change in a couple of years. Idk know if KAT is worth that. I know he's not worth that for MIN but he could be for others if put in a better personnel fit. That said, I don't see it.
If you guys go to Toronto, Brooklyn, or Cleveland and bring up KAT, they would all be interested. Willing to offer Siakam, Allen, or Claxton but hardly any will be interested in offering Barnes, Bridges, or Mobley. If you want one of those guys, Ant is your best option by far to get one of them.
Is this how you try to make a case? A lot of words and hand-waving about how you feel, and very little to support your feelings?
KAT doesn’t have value because he doesn’t impact winning? Then no individual Hawks have value, since they’re TEAM doesn’t have enough talent to be mediocre. Both teams have typically done a lousy job surrounding their stars with good enough supporting talent to give them a chance to “impact winning.”
Oh no - the new CBA will have a hard cap? Oh no. You realize that the there is a going to be a huge influx of money from the new tv deal, right? And that Towns’s extension is based on pre-TV deal maxes? And that leap in BRI will make that super-luxury threshold extremely high, and affect only teams that are collecting multiple max players. Even if they put it in next year, before the cap spike, only three teams would be affected. You are reading this completely backwards.
Towns regularly is one of the NBA’s best scorers, inside and outside, and only a handful of teams have a player who can defend him. He creates terrific gravity for his other teammates. He’s usually a top ten rebounder, and a surprising passer.
“KAT is untradable on his contract?” You are a buffoon.














