ImageImageImageImageImage

Early discussion on the 2023 offseason

Moderators: Rich Rane, NyCeEvO

Eatgreenz
Senior
Posts: 605
And1: 344
Joined: Feb 13, 2022
 

Re: Early discussion on the 2023 offseason 

Post#261 » by Eatgreenz » Sat Apr 15, 2023 9:51 pm

Only game he has committed on so far interesting
Read on Twitter
CalamityX12
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 15,818
And1: 2,535
Joined: Mar 15, 2012
         

Re: Early discussion on the 2023 offseason 

Post#262 » by CalamityX12 » Sat Apr 15, 2023 11:56 pm

Eatgreenz wrote:Only game he has committed on so far interesting
Read on Twitter

Probably wants to play with Embiid lol
The ModFather

My sports teams are currently experiencing suckiness. Please pardon the mess.
Eatgreenz
Senior
Posts: 605
And1: 344
Joined: Feb 13, 2022
 

Re: Early discussion on the 2023 offseason 

Post#263 » by Eatgreenz » Sun Apr 16, 2023 2:05 am

:lol: :lol:
CalamityX12 wrote:
Eatgreenz wrote:Only game he has committed on so far interesting
Read on Twitter

Probably wants to play with Embiid lol
Marvin Martian
General Manager
Posts: 9,306
And1: 7,602
Joined: Aug 13, 2012

Re: Early discussion on the 2023 offseason 

Post#264 » by Marvin Martian » Sun Apr 16, 2023 5:05 pm

Read on Twitter
?s=20

KP has to be a top trade target this offseason. Everyone except for Bridges should be on the table
User avatar
vincecarter4pres
RealGM
Posts: 51,070
And1: 3,844
Joined: May 30, 2005
Location: New Jeruz
Contact:
     

Re: Early discussion on the 2023 offseason 

Post#265 » by vincecarter4pres » Mon Apr 17, 2023 8:26 am

Marvin Martian wrote:
Read on Twitter
?s=20

KP has to be a top trade target this offseason. Everyone except for Bridges should be on the table

Man he’s super interesting at the right price.

He NEVER plays a full season though, but that’s the only reason he’s even remotely available again.

Wonder what him and Clax would look like next to each other on defense?
Image
Rich Rane wrote:I think we're all missing the point here. vc4pres needs to stop watching games.
GTR11
RealGM
Posts: 10,310
And1: 2,847
Joined: Jan 17, 2019

Re: Early discussion on the 2023 offseason 

Post#266 » by GTR11 » Mon Apr 17, 2023 12:11 pm

Great, now he telling us to go after soft, low energy and injury prone failure. Pull out a tweet where he ranked as one the worst bigs on switches. Dude allows highest rate on jumpers amongst the bigs.
User avatar
Keith Van Horn
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,976
And1: 1,217
Joined: Feb 18, 2012
   

Re: Early discussion on the 2023 offseason 

Post#267 » by Keith Van Horn » Thu Apr 20, 2023 12:38 pm

Van Vleet should be considered if he opts out. I think a steady ball handler like that, who can also create his own shots, should be heavily considered. Would be a definite improvement over Dinwiddie.
User avatar
3pt_chucker
Head Coach
Posts: 6,908
And1: 2,003
Joined: Apr 23, 2013
Location: Practicing my 3's
       

Re: Early discussion on the 2023 offseason 

Post#268 » by 3pt_chucker » Thu Apr 20, 2023 3:37 pm

Keith Van Horn wrote:Van Vleet should be considered if he opts out. I think a steady ball handler like that, who can also create his own shots, should be heavily considered. Would be a definite improvement over Dinwiddie.


I like FVV but how much do you want to may him? Seems like he wants >$25M per.

Not sure I want to pay him that much into his early 30s. (He will be 30 next season)
User avatar
Keith Van Horn
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,976
And1: 1,217
Joined: Feb 18, 2012
   

Re: Early discussion on the 2023 offseason 

Post#269 » by Keith Van Horn » Thu Apr 20, 2023 5:10 pm

3pt_chucker wrote:
Keith Van Horn wrote:Van Vleet should be considered if he opts out. I think a steady ball handler like that, who can also create his own shots, should be heavily considered. Would be a definite improvement over Dinwiddie.


I like FVV but how much do you want to may him? Seems like he wants >$25M per.

Not sure I want to pay him that much into his early 30s. (He will be 30 next season)

One thing to consider is that he'll (likely) be a FA this year, so we don't have to trade any picks/assets to get him. We save that for another trade.

He fills a position we desperately need. Dinwiddie is ok, but he's not going to be the answer for us during this next era. He can still start off ball, or even come off the bench though.

He's a littler older, but he's not as old as other guys we've discussed like Dame or Butler. But maybe that's a thing to note.

I think he's the type of veteran that would command a lot of respect from the younger guys, has championship pedigree, and can genuinely create buckets and get others involved. His fit would be ideal.

Giving him the deal while still have Simmons on the book would become tricky though... got to figure out that headache.

And then after signing him (or before), we make a move to trade Harris/CT/DFS/picks etc for another star player.

I really like the idea of a starting group of FVV / Bridges / star player / CJ / Claxton
User avatar
MrDollarBills
RealGM
Posts: 77,462
And1: 54,317
Joined: Feb 15, 2008
       

Re: Early discussion on the 2023 offseason 

Post#270 » by MrDollarBills » Thu Apr 20, 2023 5:27 pm

I looked at sports trac and i dunno why we're even discussing free agents. Our cap is totally f*cked until 2025.
Please consider donating blood: https://www.nybc.org/

2025-2026 Indiana Pacers

C: J. Valanciunas/C. Castleton
PF: K. Kuzma/J. Robinson-Earl
SF: T. Evbuomwan/J. Howard
SG: T. Hardaway Jr./C. Williams
PG: C. Payne/J. Springer
Eatgreenz
Senior
Posts: 605
And1: 344
Joined: Feb 13, 2022
 

Re: Early discussion on the 2023 offseason 

Post#271 » by Eatgreenz » Thu Apr 20, 2023 8:17 pm

MrDollarBills wrote:I looked at sports trac and i dunno why we're even discussing free agents. Our cap is totally f*cked until 2025.

Yea unless a player puts us as an option they want to be traded to, cant see us making any major trades this offseason. Only major move is maybe moving into the lottery but most likely seeing if we resign cam J and mid to minor free agent signings. 2025 looks like Marks is aiming to go hunting again for some stars. Plus it looks like Marks and the organization still want to see what a healthy Ben looks like on this team, his still on the posters/ads and around the team.
Marvin Martian
General Manager
Posts: 9,306
And1: 7,602
Joined: Aug 13, 2012

Re: Early discussion on the 2023 offseason 

Post#272 » by Marvin Martian » Thu Apr 20, 2023 8:49 pm

Keith Van Horn wrote:Van Vleet should be considered if he opts out. I think a steady ball handler like that, who can also create his own shots, should be heavily considered. Would be a definite improvement over Dinwiddie.

FVV is not a steady ball handler. He is just like Dinwiddle; a score first, no defense combo guard that freezes out his teammates. I would much rather stay with Dinwiddle as he won't ask for 25M a year.
Eatgreenz
Senior
Posts: 605
And1: 344
Joined: Feb 13, 2022
 

Re: Early discussion on the 2023 offseason 

Post#273 » by Eatgreenz » Thu Apr 20, 2023 11:51 pm

Read on Twitter
Marvin Martian
General Manager
Posts: 9,306
And1: 7,602
Joined: Aug 13, 2012

Re: Early discussion on the 2023 offseason 

Post#274 » by Marvin Martian » Fri Apr 21, 2023 3:39 am

As much as I would like Dame, I don't want to make this team top heavy again. That is what burned us during the KD era. If we get Dame we need to make sure that there are still enough assets left over to find a Forward/Guard.
User avatar
Rich Rane
Senior Mod - Nets
Senior Mod - Nets
Posts: 36,963
And1: 15,637
Joined: Jun 29, 2005
       

Re: Early discussion on the 2023 offseason 

Post#275 » by Rich Rane » Fri Apr 21, 2023 1:49 pm

Nick Nurse out in Toronto. Thankfully, we have Vaughn signed through next season.

Image
Eatgreenz
Senior
Posts: 605
And1: 344
Joined: Feb 13, 2022
 

Re: Early discussion on the 2023 offseason 

Post#276 » by Eatgreenz » Fri Apr 21, 2023 2:11 pm

Rich Rane wrote:Nick Nurse out in Toronto. Thankfully, we have Vaughn signed through next season.

Image

Dont know if team has ever extended then fired a coach but it looking we gotta be the first. Nurse is a top coach in the league. Vaughn looking like he doesn't know what he is doing
CalamityX12
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 15,818
And1: 2,535
Joined: Mar 15, 2012
         

Re: Early discussion on the 2023 offseason 

Post#277 » by CalamityX12 » Fri Apr 21, 2023 2:29 pm

Why be patient to see what available or any new up and coming coaching candidates come about in the next season and a half?????


WE SIGNED JV!!!!! then EXTENDED HIM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

We are soooooooooooooo SMART!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! go FRONT OFFICE!
The ModFather

My sports teams are currently experiencing suckiness. Please pardon the mess.
therealbig3
RealGM
Posts: 29,611
And1: 16,140
Joined: Jul 31, 2010

Re: Early discussion on the 2023 offseason 

Post#278 » by therealbig3 » Fri Apr 21, 2023 3:35 pm

Nick Nurse would be better than any potential trade or free agent. Just watch what he would do with this team of 3 and D hustle guys and a defensive beast in Claxton. We’d win 50 games, book it.
njnets62892
Sophomore
Posts: 109
And1: 97
Joined: May 09, 2021
     

Re: Early discussion on the 2023 offseason 

Post#279 » by njnets62892 » Fri Apr 21, 2023 4:24 pm

I'm open to the idea of getting Dame if the compensation is mostly draft picks and expiring contracts (Spencer, Joe, Royce). Not sure how feasible that is though.

A core of Dame, Mikal, Clax, and Cam J is probably a top 3 team in the East. Probably not a true contender but maybe we get lucky and Ben returns to form too (lol). At the very least we have a true first option which has been a glaring flaw since the trade deadline. Mikal is very good but not a true "bucket getter." Dame would probably help elevate his game even further.

Downside is Dame is approaching his mid 30s and has a massive contract. I also don't trust Marks to build a cohesive roster.
Marvin Martian
General Manager
Posts: 9,306
And1: 7,602
Joined: Aug 13, 2012

Re: Early discussion on the 2023 offseason 

Post#280 » by Marvin Martian » Fri Apr 21, 2023 4:26 pm

therealbig3 wrote:Nick Nurse would be better than any potential trade or free agent. Just watch what he would do with this team of 3 and D hustle guys and a defensive beast in Claxton. We’d win 50 games, book it.



He had more or less a team of "3 and D" guys and proceeded to make the playoffs only once in the past 3 seasons where he coincidentally lost to PHI

Return to Brooklyn Nets