Sixerscan wrote:Ferry Avenue wrote:Sixerscan wrote:
I mean yeah if all of Maxey Harris and Harden have bad games while teams are focusing on taking out Embiid they will probably lose that night.
If all three of them have bad games on any night they'll likely lose.
The issue isn't whether Maxey and Harris are going to have bad games -- it's that when Embiid is being limited and Harden is "hungover," it forces Maxey and Harris to have uncharacteristic and unlikely good games -- both of them. That won't happen often.
Harden has to pick up far more of the Embiid slack when teams are focusing on limiting him. He can't just be "a passer" under those conditions.
Charles Barkley said it well at the half. Said essentially the same thing.
The real question is why Harden doesn't take note of a game like last night's early on and take it upon himself to pour in 30+ points. When you see the opposing team going all out to shut down your MVP-level superstar and far and away high-scorer, anybody with any drive at all would experience it as an opportunity to capitalize and help carry the team with an all-out effort of one's own. That's conspicuously absent in Harden, however. Instead it was a third-year guy with hardly the resume'.
Well he basically did that in game 1.
I feel like you're acting like it's a coincidence that he wasn't very aggressive on a night that Maxey and Harris when off when those two things are fairly related.
But yeah I'm sure they'll have games where they lose because Harden doesn't step up enough. They play 7 game series luckily so hopefully not too many.
The fact that there is a mere single playoff game in which Embiid is the subject of double- and triple-teams and Harden doesn't respond with an aggressive scoring effort is problematic. There should be zero playoff games of that ilk.