JMAC3 wrote:clyde21 wrote:JMAC3 wrote:
LOL... so you think if he played another full year in gleague then went to college he could increase per 100 scoring by 4 whole points? Doesn't seem like a very large difference to me. Pretty weak stance after you went on and on about how much easier college is.
Also, weird that you praise Scoot for putting up such good numbers in the Gleague but yet Miller is putting up comparable numbers at the same age and you don't have him in your top 20.
because ranking prospects is not just about numbers - I know, crazy idea.
and I once again made the mistake of engaging your **** takes but that'll be the last time for sure. it's such a ridiculous premise to begin with that Nicholls St. would be a tougher assignment for Leonard Miller than the GL that there is not even a basis for discussion to be hand.
"NiChOlS sTaTe is the only college team I can bring up" .... you really think that is real analysis? That is the definition of a strawman argument lol.
an intentionally misrepresented proposition that is set up because it is easier to defeat than an opponent's real argumentYou have fought tooth and nail that the Gleague is so much more difficult to put up numbers than it is college. Discredited 25 examples I gave for reason a or b. Then I show an example of a guy the same age doing roughly the same numbers and now your going to shift gears and say well it's not all about numbers. You have no consistent logic when it comes to prospects, yet when others disagree we are all just flat wrong.
lmao - you can go down the fkn list of any of these players' schedules and see the schools they play...here is Keyonte's: Mississippi Valley State, Norfolk State, Northern Colorado, McNeese, Tartleton St., Nicholls St., and you can keep going. if you think this schedule is tougher for any player than playing against present and future NBA players in the GL you're more than welcome to keep holding a hilariously embarrassing take.
and you don't show the same numbers - that's why you keep weaseling back to per minute stats instead of per 100 when comping college to the GL because you know your argument gets blown out of the water every time when someone points out the per 100 metrics.
you're just recycling the same nonsense from the Scoot thread where you spent 20 pages embarrassing yourself. put this one down and walk away.