KokoKaizer wrote:According to some Lakers stans (Memories for ex) he's a max eligible player
Take it for what it's worth
certainly not worth the max
Moderators: cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285, Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid
KokoKaizer wrote:According to some Lakers stans (Memories for ex) he's a max eligible player
Take it for what it's worth

magee wrote:Rodman was one of the greatest post defenders and rebounders in NBA history. I really like Vanderbilt, don't get me wrong, but **** are these hot take type videos just clickbait. Ugh.
I get comparisons if players show flashes of someone who's played the game before, but we are talking about someone who's never made an All-Star team, All-NBA Defense Team or led the league in rebounds compared to Dennis Rodman, a **** Hall of Famer.
Tyus Jones has led the league in Assist-to-Turnover ratio for a couple years. He's John Stockton 2.0, everyone! They both get assists and protect the ball!
AussieCeltic wrote:This is a joke right?

magee wrote:Rodman was one of the greatest post defenders and rebounders in NBA history. I really like Vanderbilt, don't get me wrong, but **** are these hot take type videos just clickbait. Ugh.
I get comparisons if players show flashes of someone who's played the game before, but we are talking about someone who's never made an All-Star team, All-NBA Defense Team or led the league in rebounds compared to Dennis Rodman, a **** Hall of Famer.
Tyus Jones has led the league in Assist-to-Turnover ratio for a couple years. He's John Stockton 2.0, everyone! They both get assists and protect the ball!
WillyJakkz wrote:OP. Do you still think this guy is a modern day Dennis Rodman lol
NickAnderson wrote:
How old are you, just curious.
by gomeziee on 21 Jul 2013 00:53
im 20, and i did grow up watching MJ play in the 90's.

70sFan wrote:God Squad wrote:Plays on Timberwolves = Roleplayer
Plays on Lakers = Modern Dennis Rodman.
Good defender though, but ya'll for real?
Ben was high about him before he went to the Lakers.
hippesthippo wrote:70sFan wrote:God Squad wrote:Plays on Timberwolves = Roleplayer
Plays on Lakers = Modern Dennis Rodman.
Good defender though, but ya'll for real?
Ben was high about him before he went to the Lakers.
A lot of us on the boards have been high on Vanderbilt for a while. Trading him for Gobert was monumentally stupid. He's a far better fit next to Kat, great value contract, and doesn't cost 5 picks.
The only way that trade makes sense is if they plan on trading KAT and building around an Antman/Gobert combo.
Back on topic, no. They look and play similarly on defense, but that's where the comparison stops. Vanderbilt is already a more effective player on offense and I highly doubt he's going to make the same leap as Rodman and suddenly transform into a rebounding savant.

SleepingDragon wrote:Jarred Vanderbilt is more like Michael Cooper.
Draymond Green is the modern day Rodman.

og15 wrote:magee wrote:Rodman was one of the greatest post defenders and rebounders in NBA history. I really like Vanderbilt, don't get me wrong, but **** are these hot take type videos just clickbait. Ugh.
I get comparisons if players show flashes of someone who's played the game before, but we are talking about someone who's never made an All-Star team, All-NBA Defense Team or led the league in rebounds compared to Dennis Rodman, a **** Hall of Famer.
Tyus Jones has led the league in Assist-to-Turnover ratio for a couple years. He's John Stockton 2.0, everyone! They both get assists and protect the ball!
I'm assuming the reason "modern day" is used is because the video maker is acknowledging that the prized defensive skills for today are different than in Rodman's day. Man to man post defense is not as sought after because there is less focus on post scoring, while defensive versatility, ability to switch and defend in space is more valued.
So modern day is probably saying that this is the type of defender that a Rodman type would or could be in the current NBA, the multiple position guy who rebounds and is energetic on the floor.
Vanderbilt of course has not found a way to get teams to keep him in the floor for starters minutes, but of course Vanderbilt is also younger than rookie Rodman, and Rodman (on a good team) played 24.4 mpg his first 4 seasons (25-28 years old) averaging 9 ppg/8rpg, and his rebound rate didn't become the legendary level until he was 30 years old. Vanderbilt so far in his career (ages 19-23) has had a 17.3% TRB%. Rodman was at 17.5% his first two seasons at 25 and 26 years old.
I'm not suggesting Vanderbilt will become what Rodman was, but what Rodman is known for as a rebounder and even all he became known for defensively didn't fully surface until he was 30 years and older, so technically, Vanderbilt still has 7 years.
Anyways, I think people always try to overanalyze when comparisons are made and need it to be almost exact, but comparisons many times are just to give people a reference point of how to think about the player.

hippesthippo wrote:og15 wrote:magee wrote:Rodman was one of the greatest post defenders and rebounders in NBA history. I really like Vanderbilt, don't get me wrong, but **** are these hot take type videos just clickbait. Ugh.
I get comparisons if players show flashes of someone who's played the game before, but we are talking about someone who's never made an All-Star team, All-NBA Defense Team or led the league in rebounds compared to Dennis Rodman, a **** Hall of Famer.
Tyus Jones has led the league in Assist-to-Turnover ratio for a couple years. He's John Stockton 2.0, everyone! They both get assists and protect the ball!
I'm assuming the reason "modern day" is used is because the video maker is acknowledging that the prized defensive skills for today are different than in Rodman's day. Man to man post defense is not as sought after because there is less focus on post scoring, while defensive versatility, ability to switch and defend in space is more valued.
So modern day is probably saying that this is the type of defender that a Rodman type would or could be in the current NBA, the multiple position guy who rebounds and is energetic on the floor.
Vanderbilt of course has not found a way to get teams to keep him in the floor for starters minutes, but of course Vanderbilt is also younger than rookie Rodman, and Rodman (on a good team) played 24.4 mpg his first 4 seasons (25-28 years old) averaging 9 ppg/8rpg, and his rebound rate didn't become the legendary level until he was 30 years old. Vanderbilt so far in his career (ages 19-23) has had a 17.3% TRB%. Rodman was at 17.5% his first two seasons at 25 and 26 years old.
I'm not suggesting Vanderbilt will become what Rodman was, but what Rodman is known for as a rebounder and even all he became known for defensively didn't fully surface until he was 30 years and older, so technically, Vanderbilt still has 7 years.
Anyways, I think people always try to overanalyze when comparisons are made and need it to be almost exact, but comparisons many times are just to give people a reference point of how to think about the player.
It's just the tendency for people to compare players to ATG's that's annoying in general.

Kilroy wrote:He's way better at man defense on the perimeter than Rodman was, but he's not close to being the physical defender and rebounder Rodman was in the paint... So that said, in a way, maybe Vande is a 'modern Rodman' because Rodman would not be nearly as effective in this era, with the restrictions on physical play in the paint. He was always a foul away from fouling out in the 80s/90s as it was, he'd have a hell of a time staying on the court today. And because the focus today is more on the perimeter...
They're very different players in very different eras... But they are to their eras, providing similar services, if that makes sense... That said, I think Rodman had much more impact in his era than Vande has had so far in his.