Mr Loggins wrote:Warriorfan wrote:..Mr Loggins wrote:
I see…so because the cavs are a small market and havent historically attracted big time free agents, they should keep three picks that are likely to be late fiest round rather than trade them for a 26 year old top-15 player who is under a long term contract?
haha, makes perfect sense to me
Facts it's younger all star big. Young 6th man scorer and picks. Keep in mind Mitchell who never has been an MVP type averages 15 missed games a season.
Is 4th seed a contender
How many of those multi pick deals worked out long term.
Lakers and Mil were adding to an MVP 1 title each.
Well, the fact that you keep changing your argument suggests that your position is not a strong one.
But I’ll play along
- Markannan has missed many more games over his career compared to Mitchell. Sexton is pretty durable save for the season he missed (though meniscus tears can predispose to early arthritis).
- beyond that, numbers on a bad/mediocre team often don’t matter. I’ll wait to see what Lauri and Sexton can do on a good team.
- I think most people recognize this 4th seed on lace for 53 wins is just the start. Many feel that players ages 21, 23, 25 & 26 will continue to improve. I guess you feel they have peaked and should only decline from there
Its not changing the argument its adding reasons why it was not a good trade.
