TheNetsFan wrote:MrDollarBills wrote:TheNetsFan wrote:Marks started in a severely negative, asset poor territory. King started with an asset trove in place.
Marks took a gamble on an injured star that couldn't even play for a year. That gamble paid off.
Marks also had to navigate a pandemic and local legal issues associated with it.
I consider Marks one of the better GMs in the league. Teams would scoop him up in an instant if he was available.
Vaughn sucks. He can go.
Meet the new boss, same as the old boss.
I feel like everyone is resting on the laurels with Marks' first few years of fixing King's mess, but remember this guy offered huge contracts to Allen Crabbe and Tyler Johnson. Gave Steve Nash a job.
He's overrated
Those deals were matched, Marks had to overpay to get talent in given our situation, and he had to put out a talented team to attract FAs. Deals need to be looked at within a grand scheme instead of in isolation.
such crazy offer sheets all those teams gm's matched them!
nobody is going to bat 1.000 but im quite confident MDB won't be able to name an available GM with a resume half as good as marks.




















. Then he helps the Celtics build there contender gifting them tatum n brown. So we can win a couple playoff games with a 39yr old KG, Pierce and Jason Terry 

