ImageImageImageImageImage

2023 Draft Discussion Part 4

Moderators: DG88, niQ, Duffman100, tsherkin, Reeko, lebron stopper, HiJiNX, 7 Footer, Morris_Shatford

User avatar
Psubs
RealGM
Posts: 20,776
And1: 11,880
Joined: Nov 20, 2004
Location: Toronto

Re: 2023 Draft Discussion Part 4 

Post#81 » by Psubs » Mon Apr 24, 2023 9:27 pm

AbC? wrote:This draft sucks so just take Coulibaly - young, length, fluid athlete (not a stiff like Barnes), international. If there’s a steal in the draft it’s often the Euro guy.

Bufkin looks good too but his pencil neck gives me pause.


What if it's the other Frenchman? :D

Could if be that Coulibaly is the French Vince Carter and Cissoko only Luol Deng? I will still think that Cissoko has the higher floor even if Coulibaly has the higher ceiling. Maybe it's like Scottie vs Wagner.

Really Toronto should go with Cason Wallace, if not then Sidy Cissoko for playmaking.
Image
REJECTEDBYCLARK
Head Coach
Posts: 6,514
And1: 4,662
Joined: Jan 25, 2023

Re: 2023 Draft Discussion Part 4 

Post#82 » by REJECTEDBYCLARK » Mon Apr 24, 2023 9:47 pm

bluerap23 wrote:Just wondering how this board would react if we drafted a super raw, skinny, 6'9" 18 year old, small forward, international prospect that can't shoot, and has no real prospect of becoming a shooter?

The above being Giannis in 2013.


Giannis still can't shoot :lol:

It's attacking the hole and that .600+ FTR that makes him great on that side.
User avatar
Psubs
RealGM
Posts: 20,776
And1: 11,880
Joined: Nov 20, 2004
Location: Toronto

Re: 2023 Draft Discussion Part 4 

Post#83 » by Psubs » Mon Apr 24, 2023 9:48 pm

gbball wrote:
ItsDanger wrote:When looking at Coulibaly, got to project 2 years out, could grow still, he's got that pace and space style that works very well in any setting. If you want SGA, you're likely not getting him anytime soon. But what if there was a younger/taller version possibly available? Not saying that that he will be a 30 PPG NBA guy but style wise there are many similarities and could be a lesser version for sure. Watch this video and then watch Coulibaly.



That's who I saw too in terms of playstyle. If he's 6'8 I'd throw a young McGrady out there too minus the playmaking as I haven't seen much facilitating from him in the highlights I've seen. He's in the Shaedon mould with less shooting and more size & defense.


SGA and Coulibaly are only similar in build.

SGA had nice passes more like Cissoko. Cissoko is noticeably slower than SGA but style of play is more similar than Bilal.
Image
REJECTEDBYCLARK
Head Coach
Posts: 6,514
And1: 4,662
Joined: Jan 25, 2023

Re: 2023 Draft Discussion Part 4 

Post#84 » by REJECTEDBYCLARK » Mon Apr 24, 2023 9:50 pm

Oh yeah and the past few years he's like an 80% finisher at the rim :lol:
REJECTEDBYCLARK
Head Coach
Posts: 6,514
And1: 4,662
Joined: Jan 25, 2023

Re: 2023 Draft Discussion Part 4 

Post#85 » by REJECTEDBYCLARK » Mon Apr 24, 2023 9:51 pm

AbC? wrote:This draft sucks so just take Coulibaly - young, length, fluid athlete (not a stiff like Barnes), international. If there’s a steal in the draft it’s often the Euro guy.

Bufkin looks good too but his pencil neck gives me pause.


Barnes isn't stiff for a power forward. When you play him as a shooting guard he looks stiff.
DreamTeam09
RealGM
Posts: 17,490
And1: 10,855
Joined: Jan 06, 2009
Location: Scarborough
 

Re: 2023 Draft Discussion Part 4 

Post#86 » by DreamTeam09 » Mon Apr 24, 2023 9:51 pm

George is going to get hunted on defence or he'd be my pick
Kobe doesn't have the elite 1v1 skills to be a star gaurd
JHS doesn't have the outside shot or the bounce to get to stardom potential
Sidy looks intriguing, but the lack of jumper and elite creativity or handle could put him in a box that we've seen before

I might just go for Howard or Hawkins, atleast their jumpers will translate
Image

In Raptor Ball I Trust
User avatar
HumbleRen
RealGM
Posts: 18,415
And1: 25,415
Joined: Jul 02, 2021
 

Re: 2023 Draft Discussion Part 4 

Post#87 » by HumbleRen » Mon Apr 24, 2023 9:55 pm

REJECTEDBYCLARK wrote:
AbC? wrote:This draft sucks so just take Coulibaly - young, length, fluid athlete (not a stiff like Barnes), international. If there’s a steal in the draft it’s often the Euro guy.

Bufkin looks good too but his pencil neck gives me pause.


Barnes isn't stiff for a power forward. When you play him as a shooting guard he looks stiff.


He's stiff as a main ball handler.
User avatar
Psubs
RealGM
Posts: 20,776
And1: 11,880
Joined: Nov 20, 2004
Location: Toronto

Re: 2023 Draft Discussion Part 4 

Post#88 » by Psubs » Mon Apr 24, 2023 10:00 pm

DreamTeam09 wrote:George is going to get hunted on defence or he'd be my pick
Kobe doesn't have the elite 1v1 skills to be a star gaurd
JHS doesn't have the outside shot or the bounce to get to stardom potential
Sidy looks intriguing, but the lack of jumper and elite creativity or handle could put him in a box that we've seen before

I might just go for Howard or Hawkins, atleast their jumpers will translate


We'rent those the knocks on Franze Wagner? Well I guess Franz's jumper was better than Sidy (along with FT%) but I think it can be adequate similar to OG. I would say that he has elite vision and creativity to create for others. If you mean fancy layups, then I guess he's more like Luol Deng.
Image
grant101
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,468
And1: 1,077
Joined: Feb 04, 2022
 

Re: 2023 Draft Discussion Part 4 

Post#89 » by grant101 » Mon Apr 24, 2023 10:03 pm

Jadoogar wrote:Looking at my own post, Booker dropped to 13th. He played on a very stacked Kentucky team and three other Kentucky players were selected ahead of him in that draft.

I don't follow college very much, is there anyone who's being undervalued because they were the 4th option on their college team?


Gradey Dick, Dariq Whitehead, D'moi Hodge (as a UDFA)
gbball
Starter
Posts: 2,201
And1: 2,386
Joined: Oct 23, 2009

Re: 2023 Draft Discussion Part 4 

Post#90 » by gbball » Mon Apr 24, 2023 10:07 pm

Psubs wrote:
AbC? wrote:This draft sucks so just take Coulibaly - young, length, fluid athlete (not a stiff like Barnes), international. If there’s a steal in the draft it’s often the Euro guy.

Bufkin looks good too but his pencil neck gives me pause.


What if it's the other Frenchman? :D

Could if be that Coulibaly is the French Vince Carter and Cissoko only Luol Deng? I will still think that Cissoko has the higher floor even if Coulibaly has the higher ceiling. Maybe it's like Scottie vs Wagner.

Really Toronto should go with Cason Wallace, if not then Sidy Cissoko for playmaking.


Cissoko reminds me of Wagner a bit. But Wagner's defense really impressed me in college. His development as a pro really caught me off guard I have to say. Cissoko is built like and moves like Wagner.

Coulibaly is who we should get though. We need guys who have high level athleticism and upside. If you're picking in the teens, you want to go for the raw Giannis, SGA, Kahwi, Kobe Bryant high upside pick. We had a chance to get Shaedon last year, albeit at a heavy price. If Coulibaly is available, I hope we pick him.

My dream scenario is Stackhouse as HC. Bruno Caboclo reunion. And Coulibaly as an upside prospect. Scottie initiating offense. Fred to the bench or gone. Keep Siakam or trade him for a Sharpe package. Keep everyone else and add shooting.

That to me would be the optimal scenario and we could be a contender with shrewd additions and internal growth within the next 2 - 5 years.
grant101
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,468
And1: 1,077
Joined: Feb 04, 2022
 

Re: 2023 Draft Discussion Part 4 

Post#91 » by grant101 » Mon Apr 24, 2023 10:12 pm

Psubs wrote:
gbball wrote:
ItsDanger wrote:When looking at Coulibaly, got to project 2 years out, could grow still, he's got that pace and space style that works very well in any setting. If you want SGA, you're likely not getting him anytime soon. But what if there was a younger/taller version possibly available? Not saying that that he will be a 30 PPG NBA guy but style wise there are many similarities and could be a lesser version for sure. Watch this video and then watch Coulibaly.



That's who I saw too in terms of playstyle. If he's 6'8 I'd throw a young McGrady out there too minus the playmaking as I haven't seen much facilitating from him in the highlights I've seen. He's in the Shaedon mould with less shooting and more size & defense.


SGA and Coulibaly are only similar in build.

SGA had nice passes more like Cissoko. Cissoko is noticeably slower than SGA but style of play is more similar than Bilal.


I think the Bilal/SGA comp is because of their smoothness and footwork on dribble drives (though SGA flashed a little more skill at UK, and Bilal is more athletic). Sidy, on the other hand really struggles getting by his man in the half court.

Also, the numbers may not bear it out, but Bilal has shown definite flashes of playmaking. I buy him as a secondary creator in time.
User avatar
ItsDanger
RealGM
Posts: 28,428
And1: 25,626
Joined: Nov 01, 2008

Re: 2023 Draft Discussion Part 4 

Post#92 » by ItsDanger » Mon Apr 24, 2023 10:15 pm

Jadoogar wrote:Looking at my own post, Booker dropped to 13th. He played on a very stacked Kentucky team and three other Kentucky players were selected ahead of him in that draft.

I don't follow college very much, is there anyone who's being undervalued because they were the 4th option on their college team?

Good question. I'd say Dariq Whitehead falls into this category but not sure about his shot creation skills. Wasn't really given opportunity to create much though.
Organization can be defined as an organized body of people with a particular purpose. Not random.
Mark_83
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,795
And1: 3,850
Joined: Jun 26, 2008

Re: 2023 Draft Discussion Part 4 

Post#93 » by Mark_83 » Mon Apr 24, 2023 10:21 pm

gbball wrote:
ATLTimekeeper wrote:
Psubs wrote:
Another shot at Bruno 2.0? :nod:


This board can't arrive at a consensus that Bilal should be the pick. That's almost a guarantee he'll suck :lol:


I think Demar was the last consensus pick I remember. There were a lot people skeptical of Suggs. Koloko was a bit of a consensus too.

OG
Dalek
RealGM
Posts: 13,877
And1: 10,677
Joined: Jan 24, 2005
Location: At the elbow - dropping dimes
 

Re: 2023 Draft Discussion Part 4 

Post#94 » by Dalek » Mon Apr 24, 2023 10:24 pm

OakleyDokely wrote:
Dalek wrote:I was listening to David Locke, who is the Jazz person for the Locked on Jazz podcast, and he is one of my favorite draft guys. This year he hasn't watched the prospects in depth yet, but he did do his dive into synergy stats.

He uses three factors and basically says that if you are in the 30 percentile or lower you are in a danger zone of guys who don't typically make it in the NBA, and in the 70th percentile or higher in these factors it makes you more likely to succeed. He doesn't think age is a factor because in the NBA young players are expected to play against vets all the time and if you are suppsoed to be a star you should be able to show well in these factors:

- Athleticism - He used transition scoring, ISO shooting, and at the rim finishing as a baseline for 'functional athleticism'
- Shooting - He used shooting factors like catch and shoot, unguarded catch and shoot spot-up shooting, and pick and roll as a play type.
- Self-creation - ability to create for yourself using jumpers off the dribble creation

In the mocks he said of the top projected lotto guys only Brandon Miller, Gradey Dick were 'green' auto-draft in the lottery and surprisingly Brice Sensabaugh was in that group. The 'light green' group for Jordan Hawkins and Taylor Hendricks.

Reds: JHS, Nick Smith Jr. while Keyonte George, Anthony Black were considered under threshold for a variety of shooting numbers that should make any person drafting them in the lottery think twice. These are players who under the 30th percentile for a range of shooting, or finishing stats that show some big issues.

For guys in the 20s range he raved about a few guys that I liked, Jett Howard for his shooting 80 transition; 68 isolations; 55 pick and roll; 86 spot-up (top four overall); 75 catch and shoot; 79 off the bounce shooting (top three only Brice and Gradey being better)

Julian Strawther was a surprise guy and despite being a junior is only 21. His numbers surprised me: 84 transition; 77 pick and roll (one of the best scorers off that); spot-up 97 ; catch and shoot 93; 71 off the bounce. He looks a bit like Trey Murphy type to me given the size and shooting.

Amari Bailey 84 transition (makes sense because he is a big dunker and athlete); 75 iso; 66 rim shot; 38 pick and roll; 33 spot-up; 77 catch and shot ; 58 dribble off the bounce.

Kobe Bufkin 81 transition; 84 iso (top three); 92 at the rim (best in class) 72 pick and roll; 59 spot up; +50 catch and shoot.

For the combos it is interesting that Bufkin and Bailey stand out over the name guys. Bufkin looks elite with his finishing and his pick and roll makes him a believable combo guard. Maybe less so with Bailey given his borderline bad pick and roll, but I really like Bailey's defense and like I constantly point out, he is a special athlete and overall progressed as the season went on.


Julian Strawther will be the Trey Murphy / Jalen Williams of this draft.

A lot of those names are also reflected positively / negatively through TS%

Freshman:
T Hendricks: .589
B Sensabaugh: .587
B Miller: .583
G Dick: .581
C Whitmore: .571
J Howard: .562
A Bailey: .553
A Black: .549
D Whitehead: .548
C Wallace: .543
J Walker: .534
K Filipowski: .533
K George: .524
J Hood-Schifino: .492
GG Jackson: .474
N Smith: .472

Soph:
B Podziemski: .602
J Hawkins: .584
K Bufkin: .578
T Alexander: .578
M Lewis: .567
T Smith: .494

Junior/Senior:
J Strawther: .602
M Sasser: .597
C Jones: .580
K Murray: 572
J Jaquez: .543
R Council: .542
J Wilson: .540
A Jackson: .509


Some interesting notes based on the names you referenced:

I really like your Jalen Williams reference, because to me Strawther is similarly impactful and has the size to defend in the NBA. He also has a sort of shotput release a bit like Jalen Williams which is not a classical form but he gets the job done and seems to elevate enough. Strawther is one of the few guys in the NCAA with a 40 point game.

Hendricks was elite in transition and his outside shooting was great, but weirdly the guy has trouble making lay-ups. Seems pretty fixable, but weird that a guy with his athleticism has a flaw like that.

Dariq Whitehead had high level outside shooting and pick and roll, but his transition and rim finishing were scary. Now, I don't know if it is the knee recovery playing a part, but his finishing was in that low 30 percentile, if I recall correctly.

Locke also raved about the value of getting Colby Jones in the 20s: 74 transition; 88 pick and roll; 64 spot-up; 91 catch and shoot.

Hood-Schifino is the guy who worries me, because you could see Bobby liking the size and PG and TS% looks good, but he can't finish at the rim or draw fouls and has only a handful of dunks so you kind of worry if he is missing functional athleticism.

No one last year under 6'4 was drafted in first. Scoot will be the first in a while. Marcus Sasser at 6'2 likely won't be a first rounder based on size, but he had really good numbers: 76 transition 65 iso 76 rim finisher 89 pick and roll (scoring for himself not creating for others); 97 spot-up shooting; 95 catch and shoot.
Dalek
RealGM
Posts: 13,877
And1: 10,677
Joined: Jan 24, 2005
Location: At the elbow - dropping dimes
 

Re: 2023 Draft Discussion Part 4 

Post#95 » by Dalek » Mon Apr 24, 2023 10:39 pm

AbC? wrote:This draft sucks so just take Coulibaly - young, length, fluid athlete (not a stiff like Barnes), international. If there’s a steal in the draft it’s often the Euro guy.

Bufkin looks good too but his pencil neck gives me pause.


I think this ends up being the most overhyped draft class. I try to account for the rise of more seniors being a reason why this one and done group is so bad, but they are historically bad at this point.

Coulibaly is the biggest mystery box to me. He was unknown until his growth spurt over the past two years — going from 5’11” to 6’8″.
He plays splits with a junior and senior team and overall will be tough to draft because I think his team season ends late. Not sure if teams will get to work him out before the draft or not. If I were him, I would reclassify to 2024.
User avatar
UnbelievablyRAW
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,642
And1: 4,430
Joined: Oct 29, 2011
     

Re: 2023 Draft Discussion Part 4 

Post#96 » by UnbelievablyRAW » Mon Apr 24, 2023 11:28 pm

If you're a true sicko, here's 2 and a half hours of Bufkin tape to make your own assessment

"Above average role player is now being paid like a superstar from one good playoff series. This will end up as one of the worst contracts in the league." paulbball on Pascal Siakam
REJECTEDBYCLARK
Head Coach
Posts: 6,514
And1: 4,662
Joined: Jan 25, 2023

Re: 2023 Draft Discussion Part 4 

Post#97 » by REJECTEDBYCLARK » Tue Apr 25, 2023 12:03 am

UnbelievablyRAW wrote:If you're a true sicko, here's 2 and a half hours of Bufkin tape to make your own assessment



I hope whoever clipped together that video got paid well.
GoRapstheoriginal
Head Coach
Posts: 6,566
And1: 2,342
Joined: Oct 26, 2006
       

Re: 2023 Draft Discussion Part 4 

Post#98 » by GoRapstheoriginal » Tue Apr 25, 2023 12:19 am

When's the lottery?
Dalek
RealGM
Posts: 13,877
And1: 10,677
Joined: Jan 24, 2005
Location: At the elbow - dropping dimes
 

Re: 2023 Draft Discussion Part 4 

Post#99 » by Dalek » Tue Apr 25, 2023 12:21 am

Yallbecrazy wrote:I'm really skeptical of Strawther, he played on a loaded Gonzaga team and he put up really good shooting numbers, but offered very little in terms of playmaking or defense. He probably had more space to operate in than anyone in the draft.


Locke said he was one of the better shooters who could run pick and roll like Jett Howard. Maybe he didn't run it often enough but he was effective in that play type. He had increased usage that also points to his ball handling.

Not sure about defense and the spacing edge but he has good size and mobility. He is a guy to dive deeper into.
gha4life
Rookie
Posts: 1,245
And1: 429
Joined: Apr 18, 2007
Location: toronto

Re: 2023 Draft Discussion Part 4 

Post#100 » by gha4life » Tue Apr 25, 2023 1:27 am

REJECTEDBYCLARK wrote:
UnbelievablyRAW wrote:If you're a true sicko, here's 2 and a half hours of Bufkin tape to make your own assessment



I hope whoever clipped together that video got paid well.
Hes done a few of these in the past yup a lot of effort

Sent from my SM-S918W using RealGM mobile app

Return to Toronto Raptors