Jdiddy701 wrote:SunsRback4Good wrote:Slim Charless wrote:
......vs a team missing both their 1st and 2nd best players. With their 3rd playing like garbage...at home and needing our guys to shoot 50% from deep.
We won by 5. That one game they won was probably the one game Kawhi was truly healthy. That lasted not very long.
My dad said with a healthy Kawhi and George the Clippers would prevail in 6 games. He’s a very very wise man.
I agree with your dad, but to be even more honest, a healthy Clipper team probably wins it all. The reason I wanted to play the Clippers was because you can never rely on their star players to see the court. We took advantage and closed early. It was not easy though.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yeah, in theory, a healthy Clippers team can definitely beat anyone, not that I think they would have beaten us for sure, but they would have been a tougher matchup than anyone else in either conference.
Of course a healthy Clippers team IS just that...a crazy theory at this point.
But I think the best two teams just met in the first round. They just happened to not be healthy so the series wasn't as good as it could have been. It would have been really fun to watch that battle.
I just don't see how Denver defends us, or the Kings. The Warriors could do better with Wiggins and Draymond and also can get hot. Then of course if we meet the Kings we may need to be the ones stopping them, but I wouldn't really fear them. Not sure what to think of Memphis. They scared me too if healthy a bit..probably 2nd most in west, but that was in part because of Adams.
But if they can get by the Lakers and Kings/Warriors, they could defend us well too, with JJJ on KD and Bane/Brooks taking turns on Book. Ja could be hard to guard, but sometimes Brooks and JJJ shoot them out of games. Ja shot poorly the other night too.
I kind of didn't want to match up with the Lakers in the first round, but they probably scare me the least out of the remaining teams (not that any of them particularly scare me).