Bucks Offseason Thread - Trade, news, re-tool discussion
Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25
Re: Bucks Offseason Thread - Trade, news and re-tool discussion
- JayMKE
- RealGM
- Posts: 29,378
- And1: 17,245
- Joined: Jun 21, 2010
- Location: LA
-
Re: Bucks Offseason Thread - Trade, news and re-tool discussion
Next offseason pairing Beauchamp with a couple FRP might be a decent enough package to bring back a core piece
FREE GIANNIS
Re: Bucks Offseason Thread - Trade, news and re-tool discussion
- Willie Colon
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,569
- And1: 1,250
- Joined: Feb 25, 2010
- Location: Greek bias
-
Re: Bucks Offseason Thread - Trade, news and re-tool discussion
MissKhriddleton wrote:Pretty good chance we wasted Brook's last elite season. Could see him falling off a cliff fast. Who's the last 7 footer to play at a high level at 36 years old?
Hakeem fell off a cliff after his age 34 season.

Re: Bucks Offseason Thread - Trade, news and re-tool discussion
- Siefer
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,425
- And1: 6,954
- Joined: Nov 05, 2006
-
Re: Bucks Offseason Thread - Trade, news and re-tool discussion
Okay, this is how I cope so bear with me:

- Wolves immediately make a ton more sense, get a prospect, and reload the draft cupboard.
- Blazers have to ship 2 picks, but get a younger star on a better contract, and an asset they can flip.
- Bucks get the dynamic copilot Giannis desperately needs, and I'll admit I'm just sneaking McDaniels in there.

- Wolves immediately make a ton more sense, get a prospect, and reload the draft cupboard.
- Blazers have to ship 2 picks, but get a younger star on a better contract, and an asset they can flip.
- Bucks get the dynamic copilot Giannis desperately needs, and I'll admit I'm just sneaking McDaniels in there.
Re: Bucks Offseason Thread - Trade, news and re-tool discussion
-
Antinomy
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,786
- And1: 7,618
- Joined: Mar 18, 2017
Re: Bucks Offseason Thread - Trade, news and re-tool discussion
Serge28 wrote:
I think Bud threw in the towel mentally after the lead got blown.
I was screaming at my TV to call a timeout lol.
Re: Bucks Offseason Thread - Trade, news and re-tool discussion
-
ABucksFan
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,831
- And1: 1,594
- Joined: Apr 26, 2019
-
Re: Bucks Offseason Thread - Trade, news and re-tool discussion
Siefer wrote:Okay, this is how I cope so bear with me:
- Wolves immediately make a ton more sense, get a prospect, and reload the draft cupboard.
- Blazers have to ship 2 picks, but get a younger star on a better contract, and an asset they can flip.
- Bucks get the dynamic copilot Giannis desperately needs, and I'll admit I'm just sneaking McDaniels in there.
Giving Up Dame + Sharpe + 2 FRP's for KAT is kind of low key crazy. Sorry.
Re: Bucks Offseason Thread - Trade, news and re-tool discussion
- Willie Colon
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,569
- And1: 1,250
- Joined: Feb 25, 2010
- Location: Greek bias
-
Re: Bucks Offseason Thread - Trade, news and re-tool discussion
Antinomy wrote:Brewhoopfan wrote:It's really hard to evaluate Bucks players in the context of Bud's disaster of a playoff system. He made (past tense) it so easy for opposing teams to magnify every player's weaknesses with very little team concept on both ends. I'm not as down on Horst as some of you. Plenty of talent there for a competent coach.
He minimized Gianni’s’ role & made us susceptible to giving up easy baskets in the 15 foot range.
Are people aware that Butler DESTROYED us even worse than Durant did.
Like if you’re gonna go with the 1 on 1 approach, actually hold the other players down.
But nope, we nearly lost to Brooklyn because of it & we got embarrassed this year because of it.
Even if we had somehow gotten past the Heat and Knicks, Boston would've probably shattered the all time series score differential record in a sweep.

Re: Bucks Offseason Thread - Trade, news and re-tool discussion
-
Antinomy
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,786
- And1: 7,618
- Joined: Mar 18, 2017
Re: Bucks Offseason Thread - Trade, news and re-tool discussion
WeekapaugGroove wrote:If Phoenix flames out I could see something like Ayton for Holliday being available. Ayton would absolutely drive the fan base insane but he'd also be an interesting young building block with Giannis.
Sent from my SM-G986U using RealGM mobile app
I don’t want a max salary spot being occupied by a Center in today’s NBA.
Especially when he’d inevitably get played off the floor due to lack of spacing with Giannis.
Re: Bucks Offseason Thread - Trade, news and re-tool discussion
- JayMKE
- RealGM
- Posts: 29,378
- And1: 17,245
- Joined: Jun 21, 2010
- Location: LA
-
Re: Bucks Offseason Thread - Trade, news and re-tool discussion
Siefer wrote:Okay, this is how I cope so bear with me:
- Wolves immediately make a ton more sense, get a prospect, and reload the draft cupboard.
- Blazers have to ship 2 picks, but get a younger star on a better contract, and an asset they can flip.
- Bucks get the dynamic copilot Giannis desperately needs, and I'll admit I'm just sneaking McDaniels in there.
Sure we wouldn't rather have KAT in this scenario? Not a big fan but he's way younger and opens up options with Brook and Bobby. Things could go south for Lillard very quickly at his age.
FREE GIANNIS
Re: Bucks Offseason Thread - Trade, news and re-tool discussion
- Siefer
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,425
- And1: 6,954
- Joined: Nov 05, 2006
-
Re: Bucks Offseason Thread - Trade, news and re-tool discussion
ABucksFan wrote:Siefer wrote:Okay, this is how I cope so bear with me:
- Wolves immediately make a ton more sense, get a prospect, and reload the draft cupboard.
- Blazers have to ship 2 picks, but get a younger star on a better contract, and an asset they can flip.
- Bucks get the dynamic copilot Giannis desperately needs, and I'll admit I'm just sneaking McDaniels in there.
Giving Up Dame + Sharpe + 2 FRP's for KAT is kind of low key crazy. Sorry.
"Kind of low key crazy" is just a really funny phrase.
Re: Bucks Offseason Thread - Trade, news and re-tool discussion
-
Couch Potato
- Rookie
- Posts: 1,111
- And1: 222
- Joined: Jun 01, 2020
Re: Bucks Offseason Thread - Trade, news and re-tool discussion
I doubt we have a chance for DAME. Unless he flat out says he wants out. Next option is to trade Middleton and Bobby and 2029 first to Blazers for Grant and Simons. Then we still trade Holiday,Allen,Pat yet. Sign Lopez to a two year deal. Fire Bud. So it be moreless Simons,Grant,Giannis,Lopez. Besides whatever PG we get in the Holiday,Pat,Allen trade....
Re: Bucks Offseason Thread - Trade, news and re-tool discussion
- paulpressey25
- Senior Mod - Bucks

- Posts: 62,763
- And1: 30,003
- Joined: Oct 27, 2002
-
Re: Bucks Offseason Thread - Trade, news and re-tool discussion
All for going big on the trades.
That said, here's my effort on something realistic.
Fire the entire staff - replace with either Nurse, Lue or Atkinson (don't care which one).
Sign Khris to 3/$90
Sign Brook to 3/$50
Keep Ingles
Trade Bobby and Pat to CHA for Rozier and two 2nds.
None of that requires huge contortions or pipe dreams. Not my first choice, but again, achievable.
That said, here's my effort on something realistic.
Fire the entire staff - replace with either Nurse, Lue or Atkinson (don't care which one).
Sign Khris to 3/$90
Sign Brook to 3/$50
Keep Ingles
Trade Bobby and Pat to CHA for Rozier and two 2nds.
None of that requires huge contortions or pipe dreams. Not my first choice, but again, achievable.
Re: Bucks Offseason Thread - Trade, news and re-tool discussion
- FrieAaron
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,188
- And1: 5,695
- Joined: Mar 25, 2010
Re: Bucks Offseason Thread - Trade, news and re-tool discussion
I believe Jrue has said in the past he prefers playing SG to PG. It's possible if we get a true PG next to him his shooting in the playoffs picks up with him being off the ball more.
Re: Bucks Offseason Thread - Trade, news and re-tool discussion
-
ABucksFan
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,831
- And1: 1,594
- Joined: Apr 26, 2019
-
Re: Bucks Offseason Thread - Trade, news and re-tool discussion
JayMKE wrote:Siefer wrote:Okay, this is how I cope so bear with me:
- Wolves immediately make a ton more sense, get a prospect, and reload the draft cupboard.
- Blazers have to ship 2 picks, but get a younger star on a better contract, and an asset they can flip.
- Bucks get the dynamic copilot Giannis desperately needs, and I'll admit I'm just sneaking McDaniels in there.
Sure we wouldn't rather have KAT in this scenario? Not a big fan but he's way younger and opens up options with Brook and Bobby. Things could go south for Lillard very quickly at his age.
Honestly, not a bad idea. Jrue for KAT kind of makes sense for both teams.
MN signing Gobert (and stuck with him) sped their timeline up like crazy, clear it doesn't work with 2 bigs, getting Jrue + Edwards backcourt would be one of the best defensiviely. Only issue is if MN would have enough offense with that team.
KAT would take the Brook role + give us more firepower. We get a trad PG and we got something cooking.
Re: Bucks Offseason Thread - Trade, news and re-tool discussion
-
Milbucks96
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,364
- And1: 2,740
- Joined: Mar 10, 2019
-
Re: Bucks Offseason Thread - Trade, news and re-tool discussion
I’m definitely in favor of keeping Khris on a team friendly deal. Don’t know if that’s realistic but I think he’s still a really good player even though I do think he’s done as an elite player. Still think he’s a plus starter in this league and we need his shot making.
Re: Bucks Offseason Thread - Trade, news and re-tool discussion
- Ron Swanson
- RealGM
- Posts: 26,008
- And1: 29,978
- Joined: May 15, 2013
Re: Bucks Offseason Thread - Trade, news and re-tool discussion
The whole team looked like they quit the second they saw yet another huge 4th quarter lead start to evaporate. I don't think I've ever seen a group of such veteran experienced, championship winning players just completely fold like that.
This is why I really don't know how to evaluate this squad. We know they tend to have these moments of fleeting *insert more appropriate word here* when the intensity ramps up, but there's no way looking at the last 6-playoff series before this that you conclude that this group as a whole is this bad in the clutch. Hell, they had the best W/L record in the entire league by a country mile in clutch situations this year (27-8). It almost defies logic how they could meltdown like this.
This is why I really don't know how to evaluate this squad. We know they tend to have these moments of fleeting *insert more appropriate word here* when the intensity ramps up, but there's no way looking at the last 6-playoff series before this that you conclude that this group as a whole is this bad in the clutch. Hell, they had the best W/L record in the entire league by a country mile in clutch situations this year (27-8). It almost defies logic how they could meltdown like this.
Re: Bucks Offseason Thread - Trade, news and re-tool discussion
- Baddy Chuck
- RealGM
- Posts: 51,360
- And1: 25,546
- Joined: Apr 18, 2006
-
Re: Bucks Offseason Thread - Trade, news and re-tool discussion
Bobby for Monte Morris
John Henson wrote:This lady just asked me who I play for and I said the Milwaukee Bucks, she quickly replied “oh the highschool across the street?”
Re: Bucks Offseason Thread - Trade, news and re-tool discussion
-
ABucksFan
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,831
- And1: 1,594
- Joined: Apr 26, 2019
-
Re: Bucks Offseason Thread - Trade, news and re-tool discussion
Khris 3/$90 would be huge, would do that in a heartbeat.
I'd sit down with Brook, NO BS, ask him his plans and how long he thinks he wants to continue playing. Workout a team friendly deal, Brook seems like the type of guy who'd be okay walking away. I think he has 1 good year left in him.
I'd sit down with Brook, NO BS, ask him his plans and how long he thinks he wants to continue playing. Workout a team friendly deal, Brook seems like the type of guy who'd be okay walking away. I think he has 1 good year left in him.
Re: Bucks Offseason Thread - Trade, news and re-tool discussion
- Turk Nowitzki
- RealGM
- Posts: 34,590
- And1: 11,599
- Joined: Feb 26, 2010
- Location: on the Hellmouth
-
Re: Bucks Offseason Thread - Trade, news and re-tool discussion
Ron Swanson wrote:The whole team looked like they quit the second they saw yet another huge 4th quarter lead start to evaporate. I don't think I've ever seen a group of such veteran experienced, championship winning players just completely fold like that.
This is why I really don't know how to evaluate this squad. We know they tend to have these moments of fleeting *insert more appropriate word here* when the intensity ramps up, but there's no way looking at the last 6-playoff series before this that you conclude that this group as a whole is this bad in the clutch. Hell, they had the best W/L record in the entire league by a country mile in clutch situations this year (27-8). It almost defies logic how they could meltdown like this.
It was truly some twilight zone ****. Like, the worst tanking teams in the league could not have duplicated some of the stuff we were doing in the 4th quarters of games 4 and 5.
Re: Bucks Offseason Thread - Trade, news and re-tool discussion
- emunney
- RealGM
- Posts: 63,104
- And1: 41,612
- Joined: Feb 22, 2005
- Location: where takes go to be pampered
Re: Bucks Offseason Thread - Trade, news and re-tool discussion
Now that the series is over if we can get Portis and Haslem in the ring, I'd like to see Bobby teach that dusty old man about Father Time.
Here are more legal notices regarding the Posts
Re: Bucks Offseason Thread - Trade, news and re-tool discussion
-
Milbucks96
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,364
- And1: 2,740
- Joined: Mar 10, 2019
-
Re: Bucks Offseason Thread - Trade, news and re-tool discussion
Jrue’s problem come playoff time is simple. He’s not a good shooter, finisher, and not quick so when the defensive intensity inevitably ratchets up, he can’t score. I don’t think its a matchup, or energy thing, he’s just not a good offensive player when teams try really hard.
It’s funny that his best role on the team has been a facilitator instead of trying to be that third scorer. I don’t think a position change is the key, but a complete role change. It’s hard to change his role because he makes too much to allow another competent scorer to come in. I think a clarkson trade could’ve got us closer to that but that still might’ve not been enough to get out of this round
It’s funny that his best role on the team has been a facilitator instead of trying to be that third scorer. I don’t think a position change is the key, but a complete role change. It’s hard to change his role because he makes too much to allow another competent scorer to come in. I think a clarkson trade could’ve got us closer to that but that still might’ve not been enough to get out of this round










