urinesane wrote:shrink wrote:NBA executives see Heat, Nets, Trail Blazers, Celtics, Knicks and Pacers as potential destinations for Karl-Anthony Towns:
I thought I’d try to use this anonymous, clickbait article for productively, to show how few teams can make a realistic offer for KAT.
1. Stars have value because they consolidate talent into one player. You can only put five players on a basketball court at once, so consolidating a 25 PPG scorer into one guy is usually more valuable than getting three 15 PPG scorers. This is especially true for MIN, who is unlikely to get stars in free agency. If MIN trades away a star, they need a star back.
2. Among these teams, I don’t see a legit package in a straight up deal. For most, the bulk of the value would have to come from a bunch of picks. Which picks have team control, I don’t see Connolly making the team worse in a win-later move. I also think that KAT isn’t a legit Batman, but on the right team, he could be one of the best Robins in NBA history. For us, that means only two teams have a headliner that would make a Towns trade appealing
BOS could pair KAT with Tatum, and base a deal on Jaylen Brown. There are several rumors that Brown may not want to stay in Boston, but nothing has been substantiated. MIN would need to know Brown wanted to be here, and would sign an extension. To me, KAT doesn’t seem like a BOS type of player, but they could probably surround him with enough defense to make him a big help for Tatum.
BRK could send out Bridges, and pair KAT with “whatever star(s) they can lure in free agency.” I haven’t heard that Towns is particularly connected with other stars (except Paul George), but any offensive-minded star could see how Towns would improve their own numbers, and make the game easier for them. Maybe it’s easier to attract a free agent star if you already have one. But if I was BRK, I’d hang onto Bridges. Maybe you can clear enough cap space to attract two stars (and not waste assets by making a trade), and Bridges can compliment any new star.
The other teams? Meh. A bunch of picks from a contender? Ick. Five minor assets? Nah. It’s better to run the experiment fully, with practices and new additions like Conley to see what this team can look like,
Good stuff as usual shrink...
...but can we stop using the Batman/Robin analogy?
It's never made sense. This isn't a 2x2 league and they aren't super heroes (or billionaire vigilantes). Also, Batman and Robin AREN'T REAL PEOPLE. We have plenty of examples of past NBA players to draw from, we don't need to compare players to a master detective and an acrobat.
Such a played out and useless analogy (especially since Robin hasn't even been in the newer movies!).
The Batman/Robin stuff may be played out but I do think we're headed down a Lillard-Aldridge path. I'll believe Towns is willing to relinquish "his" team when I see it.













