Dwight Howard vs Carmelo Anthony

Moderators: Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ, trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal

User avatar
Grinditout
RealGM
Posts: 10,618
And1: 2,752
Joined: Aug 04, 2006

Dwight Howard vs Carmelo Anthony 

Post#1 » by Grinditout » Fri Apr 28, 2023 10:23 pm

Peak to peak

Better build around player

Current NBA
No-more-rings
Head Coach
Posts: 7,104
And1: 3,912
Joined: Oct 04, 2018

Re: Dwight Howard vs Carmelo Anthony 

Post#2 » by No-more-rings » Fri Apr 28, 2023 10:24 pm

All Dwight pretty easily.
tsherkin
Forum Mod - Raptors
Forum Mod - Raptors
Posts: 92,066
And1: 31,642
Joined: Oct 14, 2003
 

Re: Dwight Howard vs Carmelo Anthony 

Post#3 » by tsherkin » Fri Apr 28, 2023 10:29 pm

Dwight, all of them, no question.
User avatar
GSP
RealGM
Posts: 19,561
And1: 16,035
Joined: Dec 12, 2011
     

Re: Dwight Howard vs Carmelo Anthony 

Post#4 » by GSP » Sat Apr 29, 2023 9:05 am

Ill take the top 75er
dooki667
Junior
Posts: 380
And1: 259
Joined: Feb 26, 2019
   

Re: Dwight Howard vs Carmelo Anthony 

Post#5 » by dooki667 » Sun Apr 30, 2023 12:26 am

Knicks fan but it's superman easy.
trex_8063
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 12,595
And1: 8,226
Joined: Feb 24, 2013
     

Re: Dwight Howard vs Carmelo Anthony 

Post#6 » by trex_8063 » Sun Apr 30, 2023 1:05 am

Dwight comfortably for all (especially peak).

Admittedly turnover-prone, but otherwise an elite-level rebounder, defensive anchor, roll man, and finisher (who as result generates massive interior gravity and puts a ton of foul-pressure on opposing defenses)......

Vs a good [not great] volume scoring (and floor spreading) combo forward who is not a good playmaker and is awful on defense.


Basically we're talking about a guy who is good on one end of the court and elite on the other.......against a guy who is good [maybe even edging toward "very good"] on one end, but awful on the other. No real contest, imo.
"The fact that a proposition is absurd has never hindered those who wish to believe it." -Edward Rutherfurd
"Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities." - Voltaire
dreamshake
Starter
Posts: 2,295
And1: 2,481
Joined: May 13, 2014
     

Re: Dwight Howard vs Carmelo Anthony 

Post#7 » by dreamshake » Mon May 1, 2023 3:45 am

I thought this was gonna be one of those threads with a twist like "offense only" or "...if Dwight were 3 inches shorter" or something. Because Dwight was way better than Melo.
Wigginstime
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,995
And1: 2,791
Joined: May 06, 2006

Re: Dwight Howard vs Carmelo Anthony 

Post#8 » by Wigginstime » Mon May 1, 2023 10:35 pm

People forget how short of a window Dwight Howard had. His offense was extremely inept his first few years in the league to the point where the Magic struggled in an extremely weak east. His back effectively went in the 2011-2012 season. Dwight was only 27 when the Kobe/Howard/Gasol combo massively failed.

Basically Dwight had 4 seasons of elite level play. 2008 - 2011 Dwight was clearly a better player during this time than Melo ever was.

Melo was capable of giving you 26/6 every year and carrying a team to the playoffs from 2006 - 2013. Pretty significant difference in longevity.
HeartBreakKid
RealGM
Posts: 22,395
And1: 18,827
Joined: Mar 08, 2012
     

Re: Dwight Howard vs Carmelo Anthony 

Post#9 » by HeartBreakKid » Tue May 2, 2023 2:16 am

Wigginstime wrote:People forget how short of a window Dwight Howard had. His offense was extremely inept his first few years in the league to the point where the Magic struggled in an extremely weak east. His back effectively went in the 2011-2012 season. Dwight was only 27 when the Kobe/Howard/Gasol combo massively failed.

Basically Dwight had 4 seasons of elite level play. 2008 - 2011 Dwight was clearly a better player during this time than Melo ever was.

Melo was capable of giving you 26/6 every year and carrying a team to the playoffs from 2006 - 2013. Pretty significant difference in longevity.


The Nuggets were a good team, they were not "carried". He didn't really carry the Knicks to anything special outside of 2013 also.

Howard was still good in Houston and was likely underrated. Compared to an average Carmelo season they were not negligible.

I dont think anyone forgot that Howard's prime is 5 years, but it's a much higher level than Carmelo. Howard was a legitimate MVP candidate and probably would have won MVP if his team had better seeding.
User avatar
TheGOATRises007
RealGM
Posts: 21,471
And1: 20,134
Joined: Oct 05, 2013
         

Re: Dwight Howard vs Carmelo Anthony 

Post#10 » by TheGOATRises007 » Tue May 2, 2023 2:24 am

Dwight easily.

Not even close.
Owly
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,616
And1: 3,133
Joined: Mar 12, 2010

Re: Dwight Howard vs Carmelo Anthony 

Post#11 » by Owly » Tue May 2, 2023 5:11 pm

Wigginstime wrote:People forget how short of a window Dwight Howard had. His offense was extremely inept his first few years in the league to the point where the Magic struggled in an extremely weak east. His back effectively went in the 2011-2012 season. Dwight was only 27 when the Kobe/Howard/Gasol combo massively failed.

Basically Dwight had 4 seasons of elite level play. 2008 - 2011 Dwight was clearly a better player during this time than Melo ever was.

Melo was capable of giving you 26/6 every year and carrying a team to the playoffs from 2006 - 2013. Pretty significant difference in longevity.

So

1) You're including '09 Carmelo. 66 games (2277 minutes) of 19.0 PER, .105 WS/48, 0.5 BPM level play. Even by box composites that ignore his D and some might overvalue scoring ... he's not that special. Even on the raw slashline which is a pretty bad way of evaluating ... he's 22.8ppg, not 26 (at a mildly negative TS%, for -34.3 TS add).

2) On the impact side for the window cited he's +1.1 on-off, for RAPM via goolesites he's +1.5 for 06-11 (72nd over the span) or 0.67 in 97 to 14 RAPM (219th). It is a struggle to suggest he's carrying a team anywhere.

3) It's curious to leave out '14. Impact, certainly on-off, seems to favor that as one year that might do some heavy lifting for averages that included that in the span.
Wigginstime
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,995
And1: 2,791
Joined: May 06, 2006

Re: Dwight Howard vs Carmelo Anthony 

Post#12 » by Wigginstime » Tue May 2, 2023 5:35 pm

Owly wrote:
Wigginstime wrote:People forget how short of a window Dwight Howard had. His offense was extremely inept his first few years in the league to the point where the Magic struggled in an extremely weak east. His back effectively went in the 2011-2012 season. Dwight was only 27 when the Kobe/Howard/Gasol combo massively failed.

Basically Dwight had 4 seasons of elite level play. 2008 - 2011 Dwight was clearly a better player during this time than Melo ever was.

Melo was capable of giving you 26/6 every year and carrying a team to the playoffs from 2006 - 2013. Pretty significant difference in longevity.

So

1) You're including '09 Carmelo. 66 games (2277 minutes) of 19.0 PER, .105 WS/48, 0.5 BPM level play. Even by box composites that ignore his D and some might overvalue scoring ... he's not that special. Even on the raw slashline which is a pretty bad way of evaluating ... he's 22.8ppg, not 26 (at a mildly negative TS%, for -34.3 TS add).

2) On the impact side for the window cited he's +1.1 on-off, for RAPM via goolesites he's +1.5 for 06-11 (72nd over the span) or 0.67 in 97 to 14 RAPM (219th). It is a struggle to suggest he's carrying a team anywhere.

3) It's curious to leave out '14. Impact, certainly on-off, seems to favor that as one year that might do some heavy lifting for averages that included that in the span.



Yes i'm including 09 Carmelo that put up 27/6/4 with a 24PER in the playoffs taking the Nuggets to the conference finals and would have got to the championship had Denver not botched the inbounds play two games in a row. I have Nuggets season tickets. So I remember that Melo broke his shooting hand and struggled trying to play with his off hand but returned to his normal self by the playoffs. I'm shocked that you choose to attack 09...
Owly
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,616
And1: 3,133
Joined: Mar 12, 2010

Re: Dwight Howard vs Carmelo Anthony 

Post#13 » by Owly » Tue May 2, 2023 6:17 pm

Wigginstime wrote:
Owly wrote:
Wigginstime wrote:People forget how short of a window Dwight Howard had. His offense was extremely inept his first few years in the league to the point where the Magic struggled in an extremely weak east. His back effectively went in the 2011-2012 season. Dwight was only 27 when the Kobe/Howard/Gasol combo massively failed.

Basically Dwight had 4 seasons of elite level play. 2008 - 2011 Dwight was clearly a better player during this time than Melo ever was.

Melo was capable of giving you 26/6 every year and carrying a team to the playoffs from 2006 - 2013. Pretty significant difference in longevity.

So

1) You're including '09 Carmelo. 66 games (2277 minutes) of 19.0 PER, .105 WS/48, 0.5 BPM level play. Even by box composites that ignore his D and some might overvalue scoring ... he's not that special. Even on the raw slashline which is a pretty bad way of evaluating ... he's 22.8ppg, not 26 (at a mildly negative TS%, for -34.3 TS add).

2) On the impact side for the window cited he's +1.1 on-off, for RAPM via goolesites he's +1.5 for 06-11 (72nd over the span) or 0.67 in 97 to 14 RAPM (219th). It is a struggle to suggest he's carrying a team anywhere.

3) It's curious to leave out '14. Impact, certainly on-off, seems to favor that as one year that might do some heavy lifting for averages that included that in the span.



Yes i'm including 09 Carmelo that put up 27/6/4 with a 24PER in the playoffs taking the Nuggets to the conference finals and would have got to the championship had Denver not botched the inbounds play two games in a row. I have Nuggets season tickets. So I remember that Melo broke his shooting hand and struggled trying to play with his off hand but returned to his normal self by the playoffs. I'm shocked that you choose to attack 09...

By the boxscore at least, it's not a quality year. It's a quality playoffs. If one were going exclusively or even primarily by playoffs it would be a curious decision to start the window with 2006, with a 10.7 PER, -.009 WS/48, -1.5BPM a pretty horrible outing in a small sample. I rather thought its inclusion suggested RS is the core, baseline aspect at least.

And even within this single-playoff sample carrying is inappropriate. Billups's Reference box-composites on average look a little better and fwiw, (small sample, but if one is making a big deal of playoff winning) 2 or 3 rotation players have a better on-off ... he's effective on good team but I don't see anything justifying "carrying".

It also seems odd to to highlight - in your dismissal of Howard - injury grounds but object to dismissing the value added in '09 for Carmelo on injury grounds, or highlighting that he literally wasn't "giving you" the numbers that he was said to have done "every year" nor "carrying a team to the playoffs" when - granting this is an outlier strong impact year - even just focusing on this aspect ... there are other players with a more consistent impact signal that play more than him and seem to have superior impact metrics ('09 googlesites PI RAPM [in this regard weaker priors probably hurt him ... on the other hand this just highlights the lack of evidence of earlier "carrying] has J.R. Smith (23rd, 3.3), Billups (24th, 3.2) and - narrowly - Nene (32nd, 3.0) ahead of Anthony, of the three only Smith plays fewer minutes (by 32 minutes).

Fwiw too, though I'm not sure it matters, regarding inbounding ...
1) games aren't decided on single plays but the accumulation of all play.
2) Inbound plays are part of the game of basketball ... I'm not sure what the point is here
3) So far as I can tell, these turnovers were in games 1 and 3, and therefore not consecutive.
4) From what I've seen, in both instances Denver were already 2 points down. In both instances Denver could not make it the last shot. So they would need to not only get the ball inbounds, but make 2 to tie or 3 to go ahead but then also need to prevent LA scoring to overturn the tie or 1 point deficit. To assume they certainly would have done so on both occasions ("they would have ...") seems ... off the mark.

Return to Player Comparisons