WeekapaugGroove wrote:Biggest complaints I see is a 5th rd QB and 6th round kicker and I just can't get worked up about that.
A very measured and reasonable take.
Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25, humanrefutation
WeekapaugGroove wrote:Biggest complaints I see is a 5th rd QB and 6th round kicker and I just can't get worked up about that.
M-C-G wrote:WeekapaugGroove wrote:Biggest complaints I see is a 5th rd QB and 6th round kicker and I just can't get worked up about that.
A very measured and reasonable take.
Mags FTW wrote:Is Silverstein's pod worth listening to?
Iheartfootball wrote:stillgotgame wrote:B
I like the draft a lot. The only hang up I have is I thought a good GM always drafted the BPA. Gute clearly drafted for NEED.
I don’t think it’s quite so black and white. It’s the fine art of combining both.
stillgotgame wrote:Iheartfootball wrote:stillgotgame wrote:B
I like the draft a lot. The only hang up I have is I thought a good GM always drafted the BPA. Gute clearly drafted for NEED.
I don’t think it’s quite so black and white. It’s the fine art of combining both.
It is. But when your decisions are clouded by a second variable - in this case need - it greatly reduces the chances of success.
As a comparison in my 25 years at my engineering firm I've seen many coincidences like this. A cheaper process or a more convenient method comes up and shortcuts are taken.
I have no idea how our draft will come out though. We'll see.
ReasonablySober wrote:paulpressey25 wrote:Don't understand the Kicker and QB picks. Both seem to have massive red flags.
There has to be some "we see something others don't" going on here.
To me this is a key as to whether Gutey is a long-term success or not. Does he mine great value out of something that isn't obvious to the rest of the league.
Kicker has a history with our ST coach. QB is one of the best athletes at his position. Easy to understand the picks with that context.
Gery Woelfel wrote:Got a time big boy?
MVP2110 wrote:stillgotgame wrote:Iheartfootball wrote:
I don’t think it’s quite so black and white. It’s the fine art of combining both.
It is. But when your decisions are clouded by a second variable - in this case need - it greatly reduces the chances of success.
As a comparison in my 25 years at my engineering firm I've seen many coincidences like this. A cheaper process or a more convenient method comes up and shortcuts are taken.
I have no idea how our draft will come out though. We'll see.
It really isn't black and white. You'll notice when I put out my top 102 board I had tiers of players. Those were all players I had graded roughly similar value, when the Packers are up its perfectly logical to select within that tier of players and go based on positional need. Now if you start reaching into a different tier to grab a player then it becomes an issue but without seeing the Packers board we have no idea if that's what they did.
MartyConlonOnTheRun wrote:ReasonablySober wrote:paulpressey25 wrote:Don't understand the Kicker and QB picks. Both seem to have massive red flags.
There has to be some "we see something others don't" going on here.
To me this is a key as to whether Gutey is a long-term success or not. Does he mine great value out of something that isn't obvious to the rest of the league.
Kicker has a history with our ST coach. QB is one of the best athletes at his position. Easy to understand the picks with that context.
I only know 3 things about this QB based on reading this board.
1. He objectively sucks
2. He is one of the most athletic QBs.
3. He is the smartest QB in the draft (or whatever wording was in the quote).
Lol I don't understand anything about this pick
HammyTime wrote:MartyConlonOnTheRun wrote:ReasonablySober wrote:
Kicker has a history with our ST coach. QB is one of the best athletes at his position. Easy to understand the picks with that context.
I only know 3 things about this QB based on reading this board.
1. He objectively sucks
2. He is one of the most athletic QBs.
3. He is the smartest QB in the draft (or whatever wording was in the quote).
Lol I don't understand anything about this pick
I don' get it either,
How can he be so smart and athletic but still suck?
Perplexing.
Mags FTW wrote:Is Silverstein's pod worth listening to?
VooDoo7 wrote:JEIS wrote:
Kidd would have curb stomped him.
Maybe if his name was Denise instead of Dennis.
Fotis St wrote:Wherever you are David, I love you man.
TroyD92 wrote:Mags FTW wrote:Is Silverstein's pod worth listening to?
I like Andy Herman’s podcast. Think he’s one of the most measured and even keeled packers reporter out there. Does a ton of tape study as well and just off the top of my head Is generally pretty accurate with his quantifiable takes.
MoMM wrote:HammyTime wrote:MartyConlonOnTheRun wrote:I only know 3 things about this QB based on reading this board.
1. He objectively sucks
2. He is one of the most athletic QBs.
3. He is the smartest QB in the draft (or whatever wording was in the quote).
Lol I don't understand anything about this pick
I don' get it either,
How can he be so smart and athletic but still suck?
Perplexing.
Arm is super bad? He knows what and when to do, but just can't do it.
Profound23 wrote:Also (as MD stated) not only will Van Ness and Will McDonald will always be linked together because of the Rodgers trade but Brian Branch and Reed will too because of the Lions trade.
I really hope we got the best of those trades.
Gery Woelfel wrote:Got a time big boy?