ImageImageImage

No Cheesesteaks For Us! Game 4 Loss vs PHI 5/7 (Series tied 2-2)

Moderators: bisme37, Darthlukey, canman1971, Shak_Celts, Parliament10, shackles10, snowman, Froob

Homerclease
RealGM
Posts: 30,682
And1: 32,715
Joined: Dec 09, 2015

Re: No Cheesesteaks For Us! Game 4 Loss vs PHI 5/7 (Series tied 2-2) 

Post#441 » by Homerclease » Mon May 8, 2023 3:37 am

Shak_Celts wrote:
BK_2020 wrote:
Homerclease wrote:I wanted Joe to call a timeout and design a play to get us a better opportunity than this. I believe I’ve been abundantly clear on that point

Every play would have ended up looking basically the same. The Sixers are not just going to let Tatum get an open lane to the basket. They'll put two guys on him and Embiid will be parked in the lane. There's no threat of a 3 second violation. If getting a layup was so easy everyone would shoot 90%.

Joe isn't drawing up anything better than that look. This we agree on.

Then he isn’t qualified to be the head coach of the Boston Celtics.
BK_2020
RealGM
Posts: 17,088
And1: 15,821
Joined: Sep 08, 2020
 

Re: No Cheesesteaks For Us! Game 4 Loss vs PHI 5/7 (Series tied 2-2) 

Post#442 » by BK_2020 » Mon May 8, 2023 3:38 am

GoCeltics123 wrote:I still can't believe Jaylen helped off Harden.

Still in absolute disbelief he did that

A strong side double off a shooter parked in the corner spot in a 2 point game with 22 seconds left in OT. And to top it off that shooter happens to be one of top 10 best scorers in NBA history.
rd26
Junior
Posts: 382
And1: 618
Joined: Nov 20, 2017
       

Re: No Cheesesteaks For Us! Game 4 Loss vs PHI 5/7 (Series tied 2-2) 

Post#443 » by rd26 » Mon May 8, 2023 3:38 am

BK_2020 wrote:
SichtingLives wrote:Lot of flak for Mazulla (justly so) but this is the same low iq bs Tatum Brown and Smart have been doing for years. How come two superstars and the worlds greatest role player can't figure out how to get an open fn shot on the final possession by now? and btw just because 3 pointers are gods gift to basketball these days, doesn't mean settling for a three in a one point game is a good look

Eh? This wasn't open enough for ya?

Image


Had to be a defensive breakdown, no way a team intentionally leaves Smart that open /sarcasm

Just once I wish this team would take what it wants instead of what the opponent gives us.

How many shots did Tucker take down the stretch?
Hal14
RealGM
Posts: 22,433
And1: 21,350
Joined: Apr 05, 2019

Re: No Cheesesteaks For Us! Game 4 Loss vs PHI 5/7 (Series tied 2-2) 

Post#444 » by Hal14 » Mon May 8, 2023 3:38 am

Shak_Celts wrote:
BK_2020 wrote:
Shak_Celts wrote:dang, 1.8? brogs was wide open, needed 1 more swing.

Swing to Brog and Harden easily closes out.

with his back turned and he's leaning to go out to smart? meh, woulda have been a poor closeout. Didn't say it was a bad shot, just trying to get it to a better overall shooter.

Brogdon is a good shooter, but he has a slow release. Really needs lots of time/space to get his shot off. He knows it, too - so often times, if he catches it and has a defender closing out, he'll fake the shot, take a dribble and then shoot it. Obviously there wasn't enough time left (1.8 on the clock) for smart to pass it to him and then have him do all of that.

I'm all for having Brogdon take that shot instead of Smart. But it's just tough to expect a guy to pass up a WIDE open shot, to pass to a guy who is not nearly as open, when there's only 1.8 on the clock.
Nothing wrong with having a different opinion - as long as it's done respectfully. It'd be lame if we all agreed on everything :)
User avatar
Shak_Celts
Forum Mod - Celtics
Forum Mod - Celtics
Posts: 51,327
And1: 65,518
Joined: Feb 07, 2016
     

Re: No Cheesesteaks For Us! Game 4 Loss vs PHI 5/7 (Series tied 2-2) 

Post#445 » by Shak_Celts » Mon May 8, 2023 3:39 am

Homerclease wrote:
Shak_Celts wrote:
BK_2020 wrote:Every play would have ended up looking basically the same. The Sixers are not just going to let Tatum get an open lane to the basket. They'll put two guys on him and Embiid will be parked in the lane. There's no threat of a 3 second violation. If getting a layup was so easy everyone would shoot 90%.

Joe isn't drawing up anything better than that look. This we agree on.

Then he isn’t qualified to be the head coach of the Boston Celtics.

I don't see how. That was a wide-open shot. Could have drawn it up for someone else but would the shot be that open? I doubt it.
NAME ON THE FRONT OF THE JERSEY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!(!)
Homerclease
RealGM
Posts: 30,682
And1: 32,715
Joined: Dec 09, 2015

Re: No Cheesesteaks For Us! Game 4 Loss vs PHI 5/7 (Series tied 2-2) 

Post#446 » by Homerclease » Mon May 8, 2023 3:41 am

Shak_Celts wrote:
Homerclease wrote:
Shak_Celts wrote:Joe isn't drawing up anything better than that look. This we agree on.

Then he isn’t qualified to be the head coach of the Boston Celtics.

I don't see how. That was a wide-open shot. Could have drawn it up for someone else but would the shot be that open? I doubt it.

A 3 point shot, even that open, is less than 50% chance of going in. I don’t care who takes that shot. It’s ridiculous.
User avatar
GoCeltics123
RealGM
Posts: 17,513
And1: 33,522
Joined: May 05, 2015
         

Re: No Cheesesteaks For Us! Game 4 Loss vs PHI 5/7 (Series tied 2-2) 

Post#447 » by GoCeltics123 » Mon May 8, 2023 3:42 am

Homerclease wrote:
GoCeltics123 wrote:
Homerclease wrote:Tie game. This shot is stupid. I don’t care how open Smart is

I would rather Tatum try to score there, but it's a wide open shot. I wasn't confident at all it was going in though

Logically though, you're not getting a much better shot than that

Nonsense. The clip I posted earlier shows us doing exactly that with nearly identical Personel. Joe just sucks at his job

Comparing a scenario from 2018, when they called timeout on a Marcus Morris contested mid-range, is not in the same stratosphere as a wide-open 3 from Smart at the end. And I say this as someone who is not much of a believer in Smart shooting threes at the end of games.

Realistically, 99% of coaches are not drawing up a play in less than 2 seconds that would be better than a Smart wide-open look. I don't think Joe is a very good coach, and I'm telling you that in under 2 seconds, you are getting jack **** at a look there.

The sequence at the end of OT was like 200000000000x worse than regulation. Jaylen Brown helping off Harden was 10000000000000000000000000000000x times worse than this
BK_2020
RealGM
Posts: 17,088
And1: 15,821
Joined: Sep 08, 2020
 

Re: No Cheesesteaks For Us! Game 4 Loss vs PHI 5/7 (Series tied 2-2) 

Post#448 » by BK_2020 » Mon May 8, 2023 3:42 am

rd26 wrote:
BK_2020 wrote:
SichtingLives wrote:Lot of flak for Mazulla (justly so) but this is the same low iq bs Tatum Brown and Smart have been doing for years. How come two superstars and the worlds greatest role player can't figure out how to get an open fn shot on the final possession by now? and btw just because 3 pointers are gods gift to basketball these days, doesn't mean settling for a three in a one point game is a good look

Eh? This wasn't open enough for ya?

Image


Had to be a defensive breakdown, no way a team intentionally leaves Smart that open /sarcasm

Just once I wish this team would take what it wants instead of what the opponent gives us.

How many shots did Tucker take down the stretch?

They didn't intentionally leave Smart open. Tatum screens Smart's man to force a switch and get the ball in the wing against Maxey. That's how Celtics set up a lot of their half court sets. Tatum got baseline against Maxey to force the defense to collapse.

Image
User avatar
Shak_Celts
Forum Mod - Celtics
Forum Mod - Celtics
Posts: 51,327
And1: 65,518
Joined: Feb 07, 2016
     

Re: No Cheesesteaks For Us! Game 4 Loss vs PHI 5/7 (Series tied 2-2) 

Post#449 » by Shak_Celts » Mon May 8, 2023 3:43 am

Hal14 wrote:
Shak_Celts wrote:
BK_2020 wrote:Swing to Brog and Harden easily closes out.

with his back turned and he's leaning to go out to smart? meh, woulda have been a poor closeout. Didn't say it was a bad shot, just trying to get it to a better overall shooter.

Brogdon is a good shooter, but he has a slow release. Really needs lots of time/space to get his shot off. He knows it, too - so often times, if he catches it and has a defender closing out, he'll fake the shot, take a dribble and then shoot it. Obviously there wasn't enough time left (1.8 on the clock) for smart to pass it to him and then have him do all of that.

I'm all for having Brogdon take that shot instead of Smart. But it's just tough to expect a guy to pass up a WIDE open shot, to pass to a guy who is not nearly as open, when there's only 1.8 on the clock.

true.
NAME ON THE FRONT OF THE JERSEY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!(!)
Homerclease
RealGM
Posts: 30,682
And1: 32,715
Joined: Dec 09, 2015

Re: No Cheesesteaks For Us! Game 4 Loss vs PHI 5/7 (Series tied 2-2) 

Post#450 » by Homerclease » Mon May 8, 2023 3:44 am

GoCeltics123 wrote:
Homerclease wrote:
GoCeltics123 wrote:I would rather Tatum try to score there, but it's a wide open shot. I wasn't confident at all it was going in though

Logically though, you're not getting a much better shot than that

Nonsense. The clip I posted earlier shows us doing exactly that with nearly identical Personel. Joe just sucks at his job

Comparing a scenario from 2018, when they called timeout on a Marcus Morris contested mid-range, is not in the same stratosphere as a wide-open 3 from Smart at the end. And I say this as someone who is not much of a believer in Smart shooting threes at the end of games.

Realistically, 99% of coaches are not drawing up a play in less than 2 seconds that would be better than a Smart wide-open look. I don't think Joe is a very good coach, and I'm telling you that in under 2 seconds, you are getting jack **** at a look there.

The sequence at the end of Second OT was like 200000000000x worse than the first one. Jaylen Brown helping off Harden was 10000000000000000000000000000000x times worse than this

Where are you getting less than 2 seconds from? He should’ve called timeout from the onset, advanced the ball and run a play to get a quality look at the basket.

There’s no point in discussing Brown helping off Harden, everyone knows it was dumb and the wrong play. If Joe does his effing job, it may not even come to that
User avatar
Shak_Celts
Forum Mod - Celtics
Forum Mod - Celtics
Posts: 51,327
And1: 65,518
Joined: Feb 07, 2016
     

Re: No Cheesesteaks For Us! Game 4 Loss vs PHI 5/7 (Series tied 2-2) 

Post#451 » by Shak_Celts » Mon May 8, 2023 3:48 am

BK_2020 wrote:
rd26 wrote:
BK_2020 wrote:Eh? This wasn't open enough for ya?

Image


Had to be a defensive breakdown, no way a team intentionally leaves Smart that open /sarcasm

Just once I wish this team would take what it wants instead of what the opponent gives us.

How many shots did Tucker take down the stretch?

They didn't intentionally leave Smart open. Tatum screens Smart's man to force a switch and get the ball in the wing against Maxey. That's how Celtics set up a lot of their half court sets. Tatum got baseline against Maxey to force the defense to collapse.

Image

that's horrible defense, why did every1 need to collapse? Not nearly as dumb as what JB did but where was Niang going and why? I don't think it was because it was Smart because brogs is also wide open.

edit: that's Tobias, even worse.

the more I look, it could have gone to al in the corner for three but he wasn't in the spot that has won us games (maybe thinking rb but too little time). Brown too for that matter? could have given tat 4 people with a clear pass to, 3 better shooters. Maybe they thought tat was going to take it? I dunno.

It's not that serious, it was WIDE OPEN AND A GOOD SHOT.
NAME ON THE FRONT OF THE JERSEY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!(!)
rd26
Junior
Posts: 382
And1: 618
Joined: Nov 20, 2017
       

Re: No Cheesesteaks For Us! Game 4 Loss vs PHI 5/7 (Series tied 2-2) 

Post#452 » by rd26 » Mon May 8, 2023 3:56 am

BK_2020 wrote:
rd26 wrote:
BK_2020 wrote:Eh? This wasn't open enough for ya?

Image


Had to be a defensive breakdown, no way a team intentionally leaves Smart that open /sarcasm

Just once I wish this team would take what it wants instead of what the opponent gives us.

How many shots did Tucker take down the stretch?

They didn't intentionally leave Smart open. Tatum screens Smart's man to force a switch and get the ball in the wing against Maxey. That's how Celtics set up a lot of their half court sets. Tatum got baseline against Maxey to force the defense to collapse.

Image


So the guy in a dead sprint running away from Smart and toward Tatum sn't doing that intentionally?

Thanks for the analysis, I must really suck at this watching basketball thing
User avatar
GoCeltics123
RealGM
Posts: 17,513
And1: 33,522
Joined: May 05, 2015
         

Re: No Cheesesteaks For Us! Game 4 Loss vs PHI 5/7 (Series tied 2-2) 

Post#453 » by GoCeltics123 » Mon May 8, 2023 3:57 am

Homerclease wrote:
GoCeltics123 wrote:
Homerclease wrote:Nonsense. The clip I posted earlier shows us doing exactly that with nearly identical Personel. Joe just sucks at his job

Comparing a scenario from 2018, when they called timeout on a Marcus Morris contested mid-range, is not in the same stratosphere as a wide-open 3 from Smart at the end. And I say this as someone who is not much of a believer in Smart shooting threes at the end of games.

Realistically, 99% of coaches are not drawing up a play in less than 2 seconds that would be better than a Smart wide-open look. I don't think Joe is a very good coach, and I'm telling you that in under 2 seconds, you are getting jack **** at a look there.

The sequence at the end of Second OT was like 200000000000x worse than the first one. Jaylen Brown helping off Harden was 10000000000000000000000000000000x times worse than this

Where are you getting less than 2 seconds from? He should’ve called timeout from the onset, advanced the ball and run a play to get a quality look at the basket.

There’s no point in discussing Brown helping off Harden, everyone knows it was dumb and the wrong play. If Joe does his effing job, it may not even come to that

Smart caught the ball with 2 seconds left. What I'm saying was that all that play had, if Tatum was going to pass out of a shot, then that's all that play had.

If your point is they should've called timeout from the beginning, I don't think that's true either because Joe's not Brad. If we'd call timeout in the regulation, then the play we would've run the same ISO for Tatum that most rookie coaches (especially ones lacking ability to push the right buttons in clutch time) and the defense could go zone and/or sub out their worst defenders. That doesn't give you any advantage at all, if anything it helps the defense gets set.

Tatum on the play has a lane and decided to pass to Smart. While the "right play" you want to see him score there.

In OT, they showed no urgency at all at the end and Joe stood there and didn't call a timeout when it was obvious they needed one, which was idiotic and dumb as hell. That's the one you should be focusing on
BK_2020
RealGM
Posts: 17,088
And1: 15,821
Joined: Sep 08, 2020
 

Re: No Cheesesteaks For Us! Game 4 Loss vs PHI 5/7 (Series tied 2-2) 

Post#454 » by BK_2020 » Mon May 8, 2023 3:58 am

Shak_Celts wrote:the more I look, it could have gone to al in the corner for three but he wasn't in the spot that has won us games (maybe thinking rb but too little time). Brown too for that matter? could have given tat 4 people with a clear pass to, all better shooters. Maybe they thought tat was going to take it? I dunno.

It's not that serious, it was WIDE OPEN AND A GOOD SHOT.

Al was in the dunker spot. No chance for Tatum to pass to him unless he can somehow put the ball through Embiid's body.
Jaylen was leaking in for an interior pass but Tucker was ready to pounce on the pass and there was no way he would've gotten a good shot off with Embiid waiting there.
Image
User avatar
Shak_Celts
Forum Mod - Celtics
Forum Mod - Celtics
Posts: 51,327
And1: 65,518
Joined: Feb 07, 2016
     

Re: No Cheesesteaks For Us! Game 4 Loss vs PHI 5/7 (Series tied 2-2) 

Post#455 » by Shak_Celts » Mon May 8, 2023 4:05 am

BK_2020 wrote:
Shak_Celts wrote:the more I look, it could have gone to al in the corner for three but he wasn't in the spot that has won us games (maybe thinking rb but too little time). Brown too for that matter? could have given tat 4 people with a clear pass to, all better shooters. Maybe they thought tat was going to take it? I dunno.

It's not that serious, it was WIDE OPEN AND A GOOD SHOT.

Al was in the dunker spot. No chance for Tatum to pass to him unless he can somehow put the ball through Embiid's body.
Jaylen was leaking in for an interior pass but Tucker was ready to pounce on the pass and there was no way he would've gotten a good shot off with Embiid waiting there.
Image

I need to see it again. It looks like both Al and JB could have stayed out to give him more options. this was the right play by tatum but i don't know if it had to be the only option if jb and al stayed out. Really looks like the same scenario al missed the 3 earlier.

you know what, again, it doesn't even matter, it was a good pass and look! joe isn't getting us a better look in 5 seconds.

could have dropped it for brown for the dunk and maybe a foul by embiid if he sorta recovered.
NAME ON THE FRONT OF THE JERSEY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!(!)
exculpatory
RealGM
Posts: 15,203
And1: 11,396
Joined: Nov 10, 2008

Re: No Cheesesteaks For Us! Game 4 Loss vs PHI 5/7 (Series tied 2-2) 

Post#456 » by exculpatory » Mon May 8, 2023 4:07 am

I would fire Bumblegum Bubblegum TONIGHT.

UTTERLY INCOMPETENT.
SamIam 2010: Truth's ability to play so incredibly efficiently is so UNDERAPPRECIATED. Bballcool 2012: Amazing how great Pierce has been for so long. Continues to defy age! KG 2013: P is original Celtic. Wherever he goes, we go. This is The Truth's house.
BK_2020
RealGM
Posts: 17,088
And1: 15,821
Joined: Sep 08, 2020
 

Re: No Cheesesteaks For Us! Game 4 Loss vs PHI 5/7 (Series tied 2-2) 

Post#457 » by BK_2020 » Mon May 8, 2023 4:08 am

GoCeltics123 wrote:
Homerclease wrote:
GoCeltics123 wrote:Comparing a scenario from 2018, when they called timeout on a Marcus Morris contested mid-range, is not in the same stratosphere as a wide-open 3 from Smart at the end. And I say this as someone who is not much of a believer in Smart shooting threes at the end of games.

Realistically, 99% of coaches are not drawing up a play in less than 2 seconds that would be better than a Smart wide-open look. I don't think Joe is a very good coach, and I'm telling you that in under 2 seconds, you are getting jack **** at a look there.

The sequence at the end of Second OT was like 200000000000x worse than the first one. Jaylen Brown helping off Harden was 10000000000000000000000000000000x times worse than this

Where are you getting less than 2 seconds from? He should’ve called timeout from the onset, advanced the ball and run a play to get a quality look at the basket.

There’s no point in discussing Brown helping off Harden, everyone knows it was dumb and the wrong play. If Joe does his effing job, it may not even come to that

Smart caught the ball with 2 seconds left. What I'm saying was that all that play had, if Tatum was going to pass out of a shot, then that's all that play had.

If your point is they should've called timeout from the beginning, I don't think that's true either because Joe's not Brad. If we'd call timeout in the regulation, then the play we would've run the same ISO for Tatum that most rookie coaches (especially ones lacking ability to push the right buttons in clutch time) and the defense could go zone and/or sub out their worst defenders. That doesn't give you any advantage at all, if anything it helps the defense gets set.

Tatum on the play has a lane and decided to pass to Smart. While the "right play" you want to see him score there.

In OT, they showed no urgency at all at the end and Joe stood there and didn't call a timeout when it was obvious they needed one, which was idiotic and dumb as hell. That's the one you should be focusing on

Tatum should've passed quickly to White for an open three or a swing to Smart for an open three. Full three seconds left, there was a good chance at scoring. Instead he tried to have a go at scoring at the rim then forced an awkward slow lob that didn't reach Smart in time. I don't think either Joe or Tatum is at fault, though, at least not for that final play. He did have a step on Maxey and if Tatum's pass is to his usual standard, Smart gets the shot off in time.

Image
User avatar
Shak_Celts
Forum Mod - Celtics
Forum Mod - Celtics
Posts: 51,327
And1: 65,518
Joined: Feb 07, 2016
     

Re: No Cheesesteaks For Us! Game 4 Loss vs PHI 5/7 (Series tied 2-2) 

Post#458 » by Shak_Celts » Mon May 8, 2023 4:10 am

WE SHOULD HAVE WON THAT 1.

Oh well, I learned a new word, PUSILLANIMOUS (pew sound btw)!
NAME ON THE FRONT OF THE JERSEY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!(!)
exculpatory
RealGM
Posts: 15,203
And1: 11,396
Joined: Nov 10, 2008

Re: No Cheesesteaks For Us! Game 4 Loss vs PHI 5/7 (Series tied 2-2) 

Post#459 » by exculpatory » Mon May 8, 2023 4:14 am

Shak_Celts wrote:WE SHOULD HAVE WON THAT 1.

Oh well, I learned a new word, PUSILLANIMOUS!


I knew that one 100 years ago for SATs.

Think stingy.

And Bubbles is not just randomly stingy.
He is a mother **** incompetent moron.
SamIam 2010: Truth's ability to play so incredibly efficiently is so UNDERAPPRECIATED. Bballcool 2012: Amazing how great Pierce has been for so long. Continues to defy age! KG 2013: P is original Celtic. Wherever he goes, we go. This is The Truth's house.
User avatar
Shak_Celts
Forum Mod - Celtics
Forum Mod - Celtics
Posts: 51,327
And1: 65,518
Joined: Feb 07, 2016
     

Re: No Cheesesteaks For Us! Game 4 Loss vs PHI 5/7 (Series tied 2-2) 

Post#460 » by Shak_Celts » Mon May 8, 2023 4:17 am

exculpatory wrote:
Shak_Celts wrote:WE SHOULD HAVE WON THAT 1.

Oh well, I learned a new word, PUSILLANIMOUS!


I knew that one 100 years ago for SATs.

Think stingy.

And Bubbles is not just randomly stingy.
He is a mother **** incompetent moron.

Hehe I was calling him soft b/c the woman said it means what we use the p-word for, I mean, that's a word I could get behind, no bleeping! :lol:
NAME ON THE FRONT OF THE JERSEY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!(!)

Return to Boston Celtics