ImageImageImageImageImage

Rui Hachimura 2.0

Moderators: LyricalRico, nate33, montestewart

User avatar
Kanyewest
RealGM
Posts: 10,356
And1: 2,723
Joined: Jul 05, 2004

Re: Rui Hachimura 2.0 

Post#1001 » by Kanyewest » Sun May 7, 2023 4:39 pm

nate33 wrote:
Chocolate City Jordanaire wrote:
prime1time wrote:
And this isn't even surprising. Look at all the players who have been run out of town. Javale McGee (multiple championships), Nick Young (championship), Otto Porter (championship) and Bobby Portis (championship) just to name a few. I expect that next offseason the same thing will happen with Avdija.


DeShawn Stevenson, Caron Butler, Brendan Haywood, Gary Payton III, Rip Hamilton, Rasheed Wallace.

Chris Webber deserves mention.

I agree with your prediction of Advija being next.

Nope! I'm not going to let this revisionist history stand.

McGee and Young were not good players that we gave up on who then went on to lead teams to championships. They were bad players that we gave up on, who then toiled in obscurity as bench players for years and years. They managed to land on championship teams because NOBODY wanted them after 5+ years of failure, so they were available as cheap free agents. There is no way a rational person would consider this a failure of the Wizards player development. The Wizards got 4 years out of Nene when they traded McGee. Nene was the best center we've had since Ruland. (Also, Nick Young averaged 2.6 points, 0.6 rebounds and 0.2 assists in the playoffs. McGee averaged 2.9 points and 3.1 rebounds. Let's not overstate their contribution.)

Likewise, Otto Porter's championship was after years and years of being a negative contract and a burden to the Chicago Bulls. When his contract mercifully ended, the Warriors signed him as a free agent for cheap. He had one brief year where his glass skeleton held up reasonably well in a bench role, and now he is back to being hurt all the time. Again, not a failure of player development. In hindsight, it was clearly a good move to dump him for salary relief rather than pay him the remaining 3 years on his max contract to be hurt all the time.

Bobby Portis was let go because New York signed him to a $15M contract where he went on to average just 10 points and 5 boards. Again, it was the right move. Portis was a useful rotation player, but he didn't deserve double the MLE. New York let him go after that one bad season and he found a nice home in Milwaukee, but at just $4M a year. Portis wasn't going to play in DC for $4M a year so the idea that we somehow blew it by not retaining him is absurd.

Stevenson, Butler and Haywood were let go because they were over-the-hill vets on a team that desperately needed to rebuild. I think Grunfeld did a lousy job of getting value for them in the Dallas trade, but the decision to let them go was not wrong at all. They weren't "run out of town". They were let go as part of a rebuild, which ALL intelligent teams have to do at some point. It's not like we could have won a championship here if we just retained them. Moving those guys is what landed us the #1 overall draft pick and John Wall.

I'll give you Rip Hamilton, Rasheed Wallace and Chris Webber, but that's ancient history. That was before even Ernie Grunfeld.


Young was a little more valuable than McGee in his postseason appearances. I remember rooting for Arenas/Grizzlies in the early 2010s but Young came up huge (for a role player anyways) when the Clippers managed to beat the Grizzlies.

Young was also forced to become a rotation player in the Rockets/Warriors series after that Iguodala injury and I'm not sure if the Warriors win without him given just the roster construction. Overall, a disappointing season for Young - but I think he played his role for that series well (low volume 3 point shooter that didn't get exposed defensively) playing around 15 mpg.

As for McGee, it was a good trade at the time. Although the Wizards certainly would have been off signing McGee on the cheap (or Nene) few years later rather than what they ended up doing with their cap space in 2016.

That Mavericks trade may not have turned out even to be a tank trade if Josh Howard didn't get injured. That Wizards team was semi-entertaining maybe because my expectations were so low. Although I was rewatching the 2011 finals recently, DeShawn Stevenson was actually semi valuable- he had 3 first half 3s against the Heat in game 6, he was playing crunch time in game 4 - and even got into a physical exchange with Haslem and Chalmers that netted the Mavericks 1 more free throw.
prime1time
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,934
And1: 2,184
Joined: Nov 02, 2016
         

Re: Rui Hachimura 2.0 

Post#1002 » by prime1time » Mon May 8, 2023 3:57 pm

Kanyewest wrote:
nate33 wrote:
Chocolate City Jordanaire wrote:
DeShawn Stevenson, Caron Butler, Brendan Haywood, Gary Payton III, Rip Hamilton, Rasheed Wallace.

Chris Webber deserves mention.

I agree with your prediction of Advija being next.

Nope! I'm not going to let this revisionist history stand.

McGee and Young were not good players that we gave up on who then went on to lead teams to championships. They were bad players that we gave up on, who then toiled in obscurity as bench players for years and years. They managed to land on championship teams because NOBODY wanted them after 5+ years of failure, so they were available as cheap free agents. There is no way a rational person would consider this a failure of the Wizards player development. The Wizards got 4 years out of Nene when they traded McGee. Nene was the best center we've had since Ruland. (Also, Nick Young averaged 2.6 points, 0.6 rebounds and 0.2 assists in the playoffs. McGee averaged 2.9 points and 3.1 rebounds. Let's not overstate their contribution.)

Likewise, Otto Porter's championship was after years and years of being a negative contract and a burden to the Chicago Bulls. When his contract mercifully ended, the Warriors signed him as a free agent for cheap. He had one brief year where his glass skeleton held up reasonably well in a bench role, and now he is back to being hurt all the time. Again, not a failure of player development. In hindsight, it was clearly a good move to dump him for salary relief rather than pay him the remaining 3 years on his max contract to be hurt all the time.

Bobby Portis was let go because New York signed him to a $15M contract where he went on to average just 10 points and 5 boards. Again, it was the right move. Portis was a useful rotation player, but he didn't deserve double the MLE. New York let him go after that one bad season and he found a nice home in Milwaukee, but at just $4M a year. Portis wasn't going to play in DC for $4M a year so the idea that we somehow blew it by not retaining him is absurd.

Stevenson, Butler and Haywood were let go because they were over-the-hill vets on a team that desperately needed to rebuild. I think Grunfeld did a lousy job of getting value for them in the Dallas trade, but the decision to let them go was not wrong at all. They weren't "run out of town". They were let go as part of a rebuild, which ALL intelligent teams have to do at some point. It's not like we could have won a championship here if we just retained them. Moving those guys is what landed us the #1 overall draft pick and John Wall.

I'll give you Rip Hamilton, Rasheed Wallace and Chris Webber, but that's ancient history. That was before even Ernie Grunfeld.


Young was a little more valuable than McGee in his postseason appearances. I remember rooting for Arenas/Grizzlies in the early 2010s but Young came up huge (for a role player anyways) when the Clippers managed to beat the Grizzlies.

Young was also forced to become a rotation player in the Rockets/Warriors series after that Iguodala injury and I'm not sure if the Warriors win without him given just the roster construction. Overall, a disappointing season for Young - but I think he played his role for that series well (low volume 3 point shooter that didn't get exposed defensively) playing around 15 mpg.

As for McGee, it was a good trade at the time. Although the Wizards certainly would have been off signing McGee on the cheap (or Nene) few years later rather than what they ended up doing with their cap space in 2016.

That Mavericks trade may not have turned out even to be a tank trade if Josh Howard didn't get injured. That Wizards team was semi-entertaining maybe because my expectations were so low. Although I was rewatching the 2011 finals recently, DeShawn Stevenson was actually semi valuable- he had 3 first half 3s against the Heat in game 6, he was playing crunch time in game 4 - and even got into a physical exchange with Haslem and Chalmers that netted the Mavericks 1 more free throw.

Where do you watch old games?
User avatar
Chocolate City Jordanaire
RealGM
Posts: 54,567
And1: 10,324
Joined: Aug 05, 2001
       

Re: Rui Hachimura 2.0 

Post#1003 » by Chocolate City Jordanaire » Mon May 8, 2023 8:59 pm

nate33 wrote:
Chocolate City Jordanaire wrote:
prime1time wrote:
And this isn't even surprising. Look at all the players who have been run out of town. Javale McGee (multiple championships), Nick Young (championship), Otto Porter (championship) and Bobby Portis (championship) just to name a few. I expect that next offseason the same thing will happen with Avdija.


DeShawn Stevenson, Caron Butler, Brendan Haywood, Gary Payton III, Rip Hamilton, Rasheed Wallace.

Chris Webber deserves mention.

I agree with your prediction of Advija being next.

Nope! I'm not going to let this revisionist history stand.

McGee and Young were not good players that we gave up on who then went on to lead teams to championships. They were bad players that we gave up on, who then toiled in obscurity as bench players for years and years. They managed to land on championship teams because NOBODY wanted them after 5+ years of failure, so they were available as cheap free agents. There is no way a rational person would consider this a failure of the Wizards player development. The Wizards got 4 years out of Nene when they traded McGee. Nene was the best center we've had since Ruland. (Also, Nick Young averaged 2.6 points, 0.6 rebounds and 0.2 assists in the playoffs. McGee averaged 2.9 points and 3.1 rebounds. Let's not overstate their contribution.)

Likewise, Otto Porter's championship was after years and years of being a negative contract and a burden to the Chicago Bulls. When his contract mercifully ended, the Warriors signed him as a free agent for cheap. He had one brief year where his glass skeleton held up reasonably well in a bench role, and now he is back to being hurt all the time. Again, not a failure of player development. In hindsight, it was clearly a good move to dump him for salary relief rather than pay him the remaining 3 years on his max contract to be hurt all the time.

Bobby Portis was let go because New York signed him to a $15M contract where he went on to average just 10 points and 5 boards. Again, it was the right move. Portis was a useful rotation player, but he didn't deserve double the MLE. New York let him go after that one bad season and he found a nice home in Milwaukee, but at just $4M a year. Portis wasn't going to play in DC for $4M a year so the idea that we somehow blew it by not retaining him is absurd.

Stevenson, Butler and Haywood were let go because they were over-the-hill vets on a team that desperately needed to rebuild. I think Grunfeld did a lousy job of getting value for them in the Dallas trade, but the decision to let them go was not wrong at all. They weren't "run out of town". They were let go as part of a rebuild, which ALL intelligent teams have to do at some point. It's not like we could have won a championship here if we just retained them. Moving those guys is what landed us the #1 overall draft pick and John Wall.

I'll give you Rip Hamilton, Rasheed Wallace and Chris Webber, but that's ancient history. That was before even Ernie Grunfeld.


Cheap free agents are wanted by teams for reasons.

I will always disagree with you on McGee.



Sent from my SM-A146U using RealGM mobile app
Tre Johnson is the future of the Wizards.
tleikheen
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,094
And1: 1,103
Joined: Feb 07, 2010

Re: Rui Hachimura 2.0 

Post#1004 » by tleikheen » Mon May 8, 2023 9:10 pm

Even when Rui doesnt get many shots he's still nailing the ones he gets and keeps solidifying his spot as one of the main guys on their team. Lakers are in position to put their foot on the defending Champions playoff neck.
payitforward
RealGM
Posts: 24,618
And1: 9,110
Joined: May 02, 2012
Location: On the Atlantic

Re: Rui Hachimura 2.0 

Post#1005 » by payitforward » Mon May 8, 2023 9:40 pm

He's shooting great! 12-19 in the series, including 5-7 on 3-pointers. That's 29 points on 19 shots!

He did miss a FT, however. Gonna have to talk to him about that! :)
User avatar
Chocolate City Jordanaire
RealGM
Posts: 54,567
And1: 10,324
Joined: Aug 05, 2001
       

Re: Rui Hachimura 2.0 

Post#1006 » by Chocolate City Jordanaire » Tue May 9, 2023 3:24 am

From what I'm seeing in this series, all Rui does is wait in the corner for the ball to reach him. He's very slow to rebound if he gives effort at all.
Tre Johnson is the future of the Wizards.
User avatar
Kanyewest
RealGM
Posts: 10,356
And1: 2,723
Joined: Jul 05, 2004

Re: Rui Hachimura 2.0 

Post#1007 » by Kanyewest » Tue May 9, 2023 5:06 am

prime1time wrote:
Kanyewest wrote:
nate33 wrote:Nope! I'm not going to let this revisionist history stand.

McGee and Young were not good players that we gave up on who then went on to lead teams to championships. They were bad players that we gave up on, who then toiled in obscurity as bench players for years and years. They managed to land on championship teams because NOBODY wanted them after 5+ years of failure, so they were available as cheap free agents. There is no way a rational person would consider this a failure of the Wizards player development. The Wizards got 4 years out of Nene when they traded McGee. Nene was the best center we've had since Ruland. (Also, Nick Young averaged 2.6 points, 0.6 rebounds and 0.2 assists in the playoffs. McGee averaged 2.9 points and 3.1 rebounds. Let's not overstate their contribution.)

Likewise, Otto Porter's championship was after years and years of being a negative contract and a burden to the Chicago Bulls. When his contract mercifully ended, the Warriors signed him as a free agent for cheap. He had one brief year where his glass skeleton held up reasonably well in a bench role, and now he is back to being hurt all the time. Again, not a failure of player development. In hindsight, it was clearly a good move to dump him for salary relief rather than pay him the remaining 3 years on his max contract to be hurt all the time.

Bobby Portis was let go because New York signed him to a $15M contract where he went on to average just 10 points and 5 boards. Again, it was the right move. Portis was a useful rotation player, but he didn't deserve double the MLE. New York let him go after that one bad season and he found a nice home in Milwaukee, but at just $4M a year. Portis wasn't going to play in DC for $4M a year so the idea that we somehow blew it by not retaining him is absurd.

Stevenson, Butler and Haywood were let go because they were over-the-hill vets on a team that desperately needed to rebuild. I think Grunfeld did a lousy job of getting value for them in the Dallas trade, but the decision to let them go was not wrong at all. They weren't "run out of town". They were let go as part of a rebuild, which ALL intelligent teams have to do at some point. It's not like we could have won a championship here if we just retained them. Moving those guys is what landed us the #1 overall draft pick and John Wall.

I'll give you Rip Hamilton, Rasheed Wallace and Chris Webber, but that's ancient history. That was before even Ernie Grunfeld.


Young was a little more valuable than McGee in his postseason appearances. I remember rooting for Arenas/Grizzlies in the early 2010s but Young came up huge (for a role player anyways) when the Clippers managed to beat the Grizzlies.

Young was also forced to become a rotation player in the Rockets/Warriors series after that Iguodala injury and I'm not sure if the Warriors win without him given just the roster construction. Overall, a disappointing season for Young - but I think he played his role for that series well (low volume 3 point shooter that didn't get exposed defensively) playing around 15 mpg.

As for McGee, it was a good trade at the time. Although the Wizards certainly would have been off signing McGee on the cheap (or Nene) few years later rather than what they ended up doing with their cap space in 2016.

That Mavericks trade may not have turned out even to be a tank trade if Josh Howard didn't get injured. That Wizards team was semi-entertaining maybe because my expectations were so low. Although I was rewatching the 2011 finals recently, DeShawn Stevenson was actually semi valuable- he had 3 first half 3s against the Heat in game 6, he was playing crunch time in game 4 - and even got into a physical exchange with Haslem and Chalmers that netted the Mavericks 1 more free throw.

Where do you watch old games?


Youtube - but it was only highlights only - not the full games. For some reason, I went into a rabbit hole of revisiting the 2011 finals.
badinage
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,747
And1: 1,228
Joined: May 09, 2002

Re: Rui Hachimura 2.0 

Post#1008 » by badinage » Wed May 10, 2023 5:20 pm

DS was great. Beyond the stats, played with fire. Didn’t give up on possessions. Got under The Bron’s skin. (Loved the t-shirts he had made up after the victory).

He was a VITAL piece.
payitforward
RealGM
Posts: 24,618
And1: 9,110
Joined: May 02, 2012
Location: On the Atlantic

Re: Rui Hachimura 2.0 

Post#1009 » by payitforward » Wed May 10, 2023 9:51 pm

I wonder what Deshaun Stevenson is doing these days. I couldn't find much current information.

He's married, has a net worth of @$10m, sold his championship ring last year (2011 w/ Dallas).
tleikheen
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,094
And1: 1,103
Joined: Feb 07, 2010

Re: Rui Hachimura 2.0 

Post#1010 » by tleikheen » Fri May 12, 2023 3:16 am

and they traded KCP for Wil Barton , that hurts ....KCP and Rui probably playing for the western conf title and who's team were they on
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,144
And1: 22,575
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: Rui Hachimura 2.0 

Post#1011 » by nate33 » Fri May 12, 2023 6:08 pm

tleikheen wrote:and they traded KCP for Wil Barton , that hurts ....KCP and Rui probably playing for the western conf title and who's team were they on

I'm not bothered by it. KCP is a perfect fit alongside Jokic because he is good with off ball cuts and not so good as a ball handler. His production would not have been as good if he stayed here.

And we got Morris in the deal, and Morris was a serviceable starting PG for us.

It's a trade that helped both teams.
payitforward
RealGM
Posts: 24,618
And1: 9,110
Joined: May 02, 2012
Location: On the Atlantic

Re: Rui Hachimura 2.0 

Post#1012 » by payitforward » Fri May 12, 2023 7:30 pm

Agreed -- although it's fair to say that Will Barton's precipitous decline was both a surprise & quite disappointing.
User avatar
gambitx777
RealGM
Posts: 10,543
And1: 1,988
Joined: Dec 18, 2012

Re: Rui Hachimura 2.0 

Post#1013 » by gambitx777 » Sun May 14, 2023 8:27 am

payitforward wrote:Agreed -- although it's fair to say that Will Barton's precipitous decline was both a surprise & quite disappointing.
Yeah even if you like KCP more than Barton no one saw him being unplayable out of no where like that .

Sent from my SM-G991U1 using RealGM mobile app
tleikheen
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,094
And1: 1,103
Joined: Feb 07, 2010

Re: Rui Hachimura 2.0 

Post#1014 » by tleikheen » Mon May 15, 2023 7:42 pm

(Yeah even if you like KCP more than Barton no one saw him being unplayable out of no where like that .)

yeah you saw alot of that if you watched Nuggets BB ,Denver got rid of Barton because they wanted more touches for MPJ. Denver fans were glad to see him go and I knew right away he wasnt going to be good for the Wiz.
payitforward
RealGM
Posts: 24,618
And1: 9,110
Joined: May 02, 2012
Location: On the Atlantic

Re: Rui Hachimura 2.0 

Post#1015 » by payitforward » Mon May 15, 2023 9:31 pm

tleikheen wrote:(Yeah even if you like KCP more than Barton no one saw him being unplayable out of no where like that .)

yeah you saw alot of that if you watched Nuggets BB ,Denver got rid of Barton because they wanted more touches for MPJ. Denver fans were glad to see him go and I knew right away he wasnt going to be good for the Wiz.

Is that right? Well how about that...!

So, you saw in your crystal ball that Barton's TS% would decline from just about average for a wing on his long career all the way down to .491 -- is that it? Wow....

& your magic mirror enabled you to see that his steals & blocks were sure to decline some, while his turnovers were destined to go up a bit, & his rebounds were guaranteed to drop a little?

Is that it? You saw all that. In advance. Because... well, because you have the gift to see what others are unable to see. Right?

Yet, somehow I recall... weren't you the one who asserted that Barton "pounds the rock" & never passes? Even though, daring to disobey you, both on his career & in his year with us (the one thing that did not go downhill) was that Will Barton delivered 35% more assists than an average wing?

That is what you said, isn't it? Yes or no? Did you or didn't you?

& you saw it right away because, you know, you just have the gift to see things like that, right? Things that others -- NBA GMs & guys like that -- just can't see.

But you see them. Is that about right?
payitforward
RealGM
Posts: 24,618
And1: 9,110
Joined: May 02, 2012
Location: On the Atlantic

Re: Rui Hachimura 2.0 

Post#1016 » by payitforward » Mon May 15, 2023 9:32 pm

gambitx777 wrote:
payitforward wrote:Agreed -- although it's fair to say that Will Barton's precipitous decline was both a surprise & quite disappointing.

Yeah even if you like KCP more than Barton no one saw him being unplayable out of no where like that .

We didn't trade KCP for Will Barton. We traded him for Monte Morris & Will Barton.
User avatar
gambitx777
RealGM
Posts: 10,543
And1: 1,988
Joined: Dec 18, 2012

Re: Rui Hachimura 2.0 

Post#1017 » by gambitx777 » Tue May 16, 2023 6:56 am

payitforward wrote:
gambitx777 wrote:
payitforward wrote:Agreed -- although it's fair to say that Will Barton's precipitous decline was both a surprise & quite disappointing.

Yeah even if you like KCP more than Barton no one saw him being unplayable out of no where like that .

We didn't trade KCP for Will Barton. We traded him for Monte Morris & Will Barton.
Morris was pretty solid this year

Sent from my SM-G991U1 using RealGM mobile app
tleikheen
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,094
And1: 1,103
Joined: Feb 07, 2010

Re: Rui Hachimura 2.0 

Post#1018 » by tleikheen » Tue May 16, 2023 7:41 pm

We didn't trade KCP for Will Barton. We traded him for Monte Morris & Will Barton.


And NOBODY is talking about keeping MMorris . Its like every trade discussion Morris is a tossin . KCP is ready to drain 3's in the Western Conf Finals .
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,144
And1: 22,575
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: Rui Hachimura 2.0 

Post#1019 » by nate33 » Tue May 16, 2023 8:09 pm

tleikheen wrote:
We didn't trade KCP for Will Barton. We traded him for Monte Morris & Will Barton.


And NOBODY is talking about keeping MMorris . Its like every trade discussion Morris is a tossin . KCP is ready to drain 3's in the Western Conf Finals .

I don't think anybody would dispute that KCP in Denver is better than Monte Morris in Washington. But the issue is, we never had the option of having the same KCP we currently see in Denver because we don't have Jokic. KCP wasn't the same player as a Wizard. His skillset just isn't maximized in our pick-and-roll system.

Basically:
Denver KCP > Washington Morris > Washington KCP

And I'm totally fine with keeping Morris if we are continuing to try and compete and not rebuild. If we are rebuilding, then I would want him traded (just as I would want KCP traded if we still had him).
User avatar
Kanyewest
RealGM
Posts: 10,356
And1: 2,723
Joined: Jul 05, 2004

Re: Rui Hachimura 2.0 

Post#1020 » by Kanyewest » Tue May 16, 2023 10:44 pm

nate33 wrote:
tleikheen wrote:
We didn't trade KCP for Will Barton. We traded him for Monte Morris & Will Barton.


And NOBODY is talking about keeping MMorris . Its like every trade discussion Morris is a tossin . KCP is ready to drain 3's in the Western Conf Finals .

I don't think anybody would dispute that KCP in Denver is better than Monte Morris in Washington. But the issue is, we never had the option of having the same KCP we currently see in Denver because we don't have Jokic. KCP wasn't the same player as a Wizard. His skillset just isn't maximized in our pick-and-roll system.

Basically:
Denver KCP > Washington Morris > Washington KCP

And I'm totally fine with keeping Morris if we are continuing to try and compete and not rebuild. If we are rebuilding, then I would want him traded (just as I would want KCP traded if we still had him).



I would still probably take Washington's KCP over Morris only because he would still be a 4th (probably 3rd because someone was out missing) and Delon Wright and Jordan Goodwin could hold down the fort. KCP after all was still a 39 3P% shooter last season and I would figure he would take some of those 3s instead of Kuzma. Maybe that is the benefit of 20/20 hindsight on how Jordan Goodwin worked out.

Although maybe the Wizards did the trade because they wanted to save money for this offseason/avoid luxury tax payments.

Return to Washington Wizards