2023 Draft Discussion Part 4
Moderators: 7 Footer, Morris_Shatford, DG88, niQ, Duffman100, tsherkin, Reeko, lebron stopper, HiJiNX
Re: 2023 Draft Discussion Part 4
- Kevin Willis
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,681
- And1: 8,096
- Joined: Apr 17, 2009
-
Re: 2023 Draft Discussion Part 4
;ab_channel=NoCeilingsNBA
When Chuck Norris was born the doc said "Congratulations, its a man"
Re: 2023 Draft Discussion Part 4
-
billy_hoyle
- Starter
- Posts: 2,457
- And1: 1,583
- Joined: Jun 16, 2008
Re: 2023 Draft Discussion Part 4
OakleyDokely wrote:Psubs wrote:The all DND prospect team?
PG Nick Smith Jr
SG Amen Thompson
SF Emoni Bates
PF GG Jackson
C Zach Edey
It looks like they'd actually be good with Edey anchoring and being super efficient.
You can probably add K George and his 37 FG% in there as well.
That lineup would be like what a team with 4 Dillon Brooks on it would look like offensively.
TBH, I'd be surprised if none of those players ended up a good player worthy of the 13th pick
Re: 2023 Draft Discussion Part 4
- ItsDanger
- RealGM
- Posts: 28,637
- And1: 25,817
- Joined: Nov 01, 2008
Re: 2023 Draft Discussion Part 4
bboyskinnylegs wrote:5 lotto teams have requested workouts with GG
Of course. People have to remember he declared early. His shooting %'s aren't much different than Jaden Ivey's freshmen year.
Organization can be defined as an organized body of people with a particular purpose. Not random.
Re: 2023 Draft Discussion Part 4
-
Dalek
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,877
- And1: 10,677
- Joined: Jan 24, 2005
- Location: At the elbow - dropping dimes
-
Re: 2023 Draft Discussion Part 4
billy_hoyle wrote:OakleyDokely wrote:Psubs wrote:The all DND prospect team?
PG Nick Smith Jr
SG Amen Thompson
SF Emoni Bates
PF GG Jackson
C Zach Edey
It looks like they'd actually be good with Edey anchoring and being super efficient.
You can probably add K George and his 37 FG% in there as well.
That lineup would be like what a team with 4 Dillon Brooks on it would look like offensively.
TBH, I'd be surprised if none of those players ended up a good player worthy of the 13th pick
Do not draft Amen Thompson!?! Is this a parody account posting? Maybe I am missing the joke here.
I'd probably slot in Dariq Whitehead given his surgery. I don't like how he looked this year and who knows if he ever regains his athleticism.
Re: 2023 Draft Discussion Part 4
-
ATLTimekeeper
- RealGM
- Posts: 42,527
- And1: 23,730
- Joined: Apr 28, 2008
Re: 2023 Draft Discussion Part 4
BoyzNTheHood wrote:I can have it any way I want it and you don’t get a say. It’s obvious to scouts and NBA teams that there’s something with him to make them take a look in the lottery, and you know what it’s called? Potential. It’s okay that you’re wrong. No one will hold it against you.
What was I wrong about? NBA teams and scouts make huge mistakes all the time.
Re: 2023 Draft Discussion Part 4
-
Dalek
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,877
- And1: 10,677
- Joined: Jan 24, 2005
- Location: At the elbow - dropping dimes
-
Re: 2023 Draft Discussion Part 4
Yallbecrazy wrote:Psubs wrote:OakleyDokely wrote:
You can probably add K George and his 37 FG% in there as well.
That lineup would be like what a team with 4 Dillon Brooks on it would look like offensively.
That's who I forgot!!!
JHS and Maxwell Lewis.
I think Edey is a solid early to mid 2nd rounder. He also doesn't fit in that group being the best player in college basketball by a decent margin.
Also, Amen Thompson is absolutely worth a 1st round pick as a gamble, I just happen to think it's in the 20-30 range.
You do realize that LaMelo Ball and Josh Giddey all shot poorly prior to coming to the NBA. With Amen Thompson, you are talking about a bigger Ja Morant.
No normal prospect has this level of body control and handle at 6'7:
Look at the creativity with the ball:
I'd consider Amen the second pick in the draft or at least 2b to Scoot's 2a. Loads of talented guards improve their shot with NBA training: Lonzo shot 42% from three last season; Lamelo shot 38%; Giddey made a near 10% improvement in this three point shot last season. Amen even without a great jumper is going to kill on ball screens.
Re: 2023 Draft Discussion Part 4
- OakleyDokely
- RealGM
- Posts: 36,015
- And1: 68,357
- Joined: Aug 02, 2008
- Location: 416
-
Re: 2023 Draft Discussion Part 4
Lamelo and Giddey were playing against men in pro leagues though. The Thompson twins were competing against very poor, very young competition.
Re: 2023 Draft Discussion Part 4
- Psubs
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,829
- And1: 11,899
- Joined: Nov 20, 2004
- Location: Toronto
Re: 2023 Draft Discussion Part 4
ItsDanger wrote:bboyskinnylegs wrote:5 lotto teams have requested workouts with GG
Of course. People have to remember he declared early. His shooting %'s aren't much different than Jaden Ivey's freshmen year.
and Ivey was drafted after his sophomore breakout year. GG is still HS freshman aged.
The Thompsons are sophomores still playing against AAU players.

Re: 2023 Draft Discussion Part 4
- BoyzNTheHood
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,220
- And1: 6,813
- Joined: Apr 19, 2015
Re: 2023 Draft Discussion Part 4
ATLTimekeeper wrote:BoyzNTheHood wrote:I can have it any way I want it and you don’t get a say. It’s obvious to scouts and NBA teams that there’s something with him to make them take a look in the lottery, and you know what it’s called? Potential. It’s okay that you’re wrong. No one will hold it against you.
What was I wrong about? NBA teams and scouts make huge mistakes all the time.
You’re wrong about so harshly judging a player before he has a chance to prove himself. A lot of us are fans of Kobe Bufkin but would have barfed at the thought of taking him as a young freshman, much like GG.
deeps6x wrote:I guarantee you that (Jaylen) Brown and (Kris) Dunn are drafted OUT of the top 5.
Re: 2023 Draft Discussion Part 4
- Psubs
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,829
- And1: 11,899
- Joined: Nov 20, 2004
- Location: Toronto
Re: 2023 Draft Discussion Part 4
-
DreamTeam09
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,581
- And1: 10,948
- Joined: Jan 06, 2009
- Location: Scarborough
-
Re: 2023 Draft Discussion Part 4
Psubs wrote:The all DND prospect team?
PG Nick Smith Jr
SG Amen Thompson
SF Emoni Bates
PF GG Jackson
C Zach Edey
It looks like they'd actually be good with Edey anchoring and being super efficient.
This is actually a good team. I think those guys will all out perform their draft slots

In Raptor Ball I Trust
Re: 2023 Draft Discussion Part 4
- WuTang_CMB
- RealGM
- Posts: 41,518
- And1: 51,941
- Joined: Sep 26, 2017
-
Re: 2023 Draft Discussion Part 4
Psubs wrote:OakleyDokely wrote:Psubs wrote:The all DND prospect team?
PG Nick Smith Jr
SG Amen Thompson
SF Emoni Bates
PF GG Jackson
C Zach Edey
It looks like they'd actually be good with Edey anchoring and being super efficient.
You can probably add K George and his 37 FG% in there as well.
That lineup would be like what a team with 4 Dillon Brooks on it would look like offensively.
That's who I forgot!!!
Add Max lewis to this
Re: 2023 Draft Discussion Part 4
-
ATLTimekeeper
- RealGM
- Posts: 42,527
- And1: 23,730
- Joined: Apr 28, 2008
Re: 2023 Draft Discussion Part 4
BoyzNTheHood wrote:ATLTimekeeper wrote:BoyzNTheHood wrote:I can have it any way I want it and you don’t get a say. It’s obvious to scouts and NBA teams that there’s something with him to make them take a look in the lottery, and you know what it’s called? Potential. It’s okay that you’re wrong. No one will hold it against you.
What was I wrong about? NBA teams and scouts make huge mistakes all the time.
You’re wrong about so harshly judging a player before he has a chance to prove himself. A lot of us are fans of Kobe Bufkin but would have barfed at the thought of taking him as a young freshman, much like GG.
That's because Kobe went out and proved something, though. I'm not arguing that development doesn't ever occur
Re: 2023 Draft Discussion Part 4
- ItsDanger
- RealGM
- Posts: 28,637
- And1: 25,817
- Joined: Nov 01, 2008
Re: 2023 Draft Discussion Part 4
Jaden Hardy fell to 2nd round, in a redraft he goes much higher. His % last year were bad. This season, he showed huge improvement in G league and NBA. However, many prospects pull out of draft if there isn't guaranteed money after freshmen year. It's just makes projection for NBA teams incredibly difficult.
That video of Amen, he uses his right hand way too often. If you're in this development program, should be using both hands to finish.
That video of Amen, he uses his right hand way too often. If you're in this development program, should be using both hands to finish.
Organization can be defined as an organized body of people with a particular purpose. Not random.
Re: 2023 Draft Discussion Part 4
-
Yallbecrazy
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,809
- And1: 5,491
- Joined: Nov 25, 2013
-
Re: 2023 Draft Discussion Part 4
ATLTimekeeper wrote:BoyzNTheHood wrote:ATLTimekeeper wrote:
What was I wrong about? NBA teams and scouts make huge mistakes all the time.
You’re wrong about so harshly judging a player before he has a chance to prove himself. A lot of us are fans of Kobe Bufkin but would have barfed at the thought of taking him as a young freshman, much like GG.
That's because Kobe went out and proved something, though. I'm not arguing that development doesn't ever occurYou're arguing that level of development (negative BPM to superstar or even just star) could happen in the NBA. I'm telling you it hasn't. Or at least I haven't found a record yet. So, GG would be the first. It's fine to judge harshly based on something that's never been done.
Evaluating prospects is a guessing game, but one can still use data to make educated guesses and determine probability of success. I'm not saying GG Jackson has a 0% chance of success in the NBA, I'm saying it's well under 5% based on what we've seen and there are other prospects where that number is much higher.
Re: 2023 Draft Discussion Part 4
-
Yallbecrazy
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,809
- And1: 5,491
- Joined: Nov 25, 2013
-
Re: 2023 Draft Discussion Part 4
Dalek wrote:Yallbecrazy wrote:Psubs wrote:
That's who I forgot!!!
JHS and Maxwell Lewis.
I think Edey is a solid early to mid 2nd rounder. He also doesn't fit in that group being the best player in college basketball by a decent margin.
Also, Amen Thompson is absolutely worth a 1st round pick as a gamble, I just happen to think it's in the 20-30 range.
You do realize that LaMelo Ball and Josh Giddey all shot poorly prior to coming to the NBA. With Amen Thompson, you are talking about a bigger Ja Morant.
No normal prospect has this level of body control and handle at 6'7:
Look at the creativity with the ball:
I'd consider Amen the second pick in the draft or at least 2b to Scoot's 2a. Loads of talented guards improve their shot with NBA training: Lonzo shot 42% from three last season; Lamelo shot 38%; Giddey made a near 10% improvement in this three point shot last season. Amen even without a great jumper is going to kill on ball screens.
We differ greatly in our approaches to scouting, I strongly disagree with most of the players you've hyped up in this thread.
Re: 2023 Draft Discussion Part 4
- BoyzNTheHood
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,220
- And1: 6,813
- Joined: Apr 19, 2015
Re: 2023 Draft Discussion Part 4
ATLTimekeeper wrote:BoyzNTheHood wrote:ATLTimekeeper wrote:
What was I wrong about? NBA teams and scouts make huge mistakes all the time.
You’re wrong about so harshly judging a player before he has a chance to prove himself. A lot of us are fans of Kobe Bufkin but would have barfed at the thought of taking him as a young freshman, much like GG.
That's because Kobe went out and proved something, though. I'm not arguing that development doesn't ever occurYou're arguing that level of development (negative BPM to superstar or even just star) could happen in the NBA. I'm telling you it hasn't. Or at least I haven't found a record yet. So, GG would be the first. It's fine to judge harshly based on something that's never been done.
It’s never been done based on the statistics available to you. That doesn’t mean it’s never actually been done. He’s basically a high school senior going up against college kids. If he sucked in his 2nd year I’d say there was no chance at success for him. As is, there’s a low chance, but that still doesn’t mean there’s 0 chance and that’s all I’m saying.
deeps6x wrote:I guarantee you that (Jaylen) Brown and (Kris) Dunn are drafted OUT of the top 5.
Re: 2023 Draft Discussion Part 4
-
Dalek
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,877
- And1: 10,677
- Joined: Jan 24, 2005
- Location: At the elbow - dropping dimes
-
Re: 2023 Draft Discussion Part 4
OakleyDokely wrote:Lamelo and Giddey were playing against men in pro leagues though. The Thompson twins were competing against very poor, very young competition.
Regardless of comps the twins athleticism is top-tier. The NBA fixes shots especially with highly talented players.
I think scout/draft guys like Givony and Schmidt have Amen in the top 5 at least so I am going to lean with the consensus and my eye test on this one.
Re: 2023 Draft Discussion Part 4
- JShuttlesworth
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,210
- And1: 13,417
- Joined: Dec 09, 2013
- Location: Toronto
-
Re: 2023 Draft Discussion Part 4
Is the combine next week?
I'm really interested to see a lot of these guys measurements, specifically wingspan and barefoot height
I'm really interested to see a lot of these guys measurements, specifically wingspan and barefoot height
Re: 2023 Draft Discussion Part 4
-
KL78192020
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,839
- And1: 14,788
- Joined: Apr 19, 2009
Re: 2023 Draft Discussion Part 4
Dalek wrote:OakleyDokely wrote:Lamelo and Giddey were playing against men in pro leagues though. The Thompson twins were competing against very poor, very young competition.
Regardless of comps the twins athleticism is top-tier. The NBA fixes shots especially with highly talented players.
I think scout/draft guys like Givony and Schmidt have Amen in the top 5 at least so I am going to lean with the consensus and my eye test on this one.
They also have the biggest bust potential. Elite athleticism can only carry you so far, guys like Josh Jackson, Stromile Swift, Fultz and Bagley were also consensus top picks.












