ceiling raiser wrote:No-more-rings wrote:ceiling raiser wrote:I’ve said very recently I have LeBron as my GOAT, mostly on the basis of his career in Cleveland (first stint) and Miami, and given how long he’s been a top 5 player. Doesn’t mean I have to think he’s better post-peak than peak Curry, who I have as a borderline top five player all-time.
Calling Curry a borderline top 5 all time player is a bit of a hot take though, even among hardcore Curry fans. Even setting aside Lebron and Jordan who are clearly better, he has a tall order getting there when you look at all the bigs like Wilt, Duncan, Kareem, Shaq, Hakeem and Russell. Curry is not clearly better than Bird or Magic either for that matter.
I’ve become a bit lower on a lot of the bigs recently. Current top 5 all-time for me is probably
LeBron
Jordan
Duncan
Kareem
Magic
with Curry knocking on the door.
Care to elaborate on why? Bigs consistently look the most valuable and paint-protection is the skill that seems to mantain the best year to year and context to context(Kareem, Lebron, and Russell do the best in terms of individual "replication", Russell and Duncan experienced the most consistent team success).
If anything it's scoring guards who seem to perform the worst relative to their box-profiles and require specific situations to maximize their potential.
As it is, post-peak Lebron(30-32) and post-post peak Lebron(2020) still looks like the most valuable player since Kareem/Russell emperically and post-post-post-post peak Lebron(2023) basically swept steph in all the regular season stuff as 21-23 Lebron generally looks comparable per-possession as 21-23 Steph. No "post-peak" Lebron does not have to be better than steph, but I'd like a case for it beyond "he's old".
Honestly, I'd be impressed if you could make a solid case for steph against
2020 Lebron who looked all-time valuable in the regular season before scaling up in the postseason.