
Could not have seen that coming, truly.
Moderators: Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ, trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal
ccameron wrote:Texas Chuck wrote:Dallas fans would have never forgiven Carlisle and Casey if Wade had been able to lead Miami to victory in 2011 which he very well could have. They could have handled Lebron beating them, but Wade again? After what he did in 2006 and all the **** he talked about Dirk? We'd have never gotten over it.
I'm not over it! It was the most frustrating series I ever saw to this day. It's all well and good for a team to focus their energy on Lebron, and for them to think Wade couldn't beat them (although as I said, think that is exaggerated in hindsight because of how poorly Lebron played), but if in a couple of those games rather than having an abysmal performance Lebron just had a below average one, the outcome would have been different and that strategy would have been terrible in hindsight. I don't know, the stars aligned so that the universe would be balanced or something.
On topic, I have the extremely hot take that Wade and Lebron were very close that year, Lebron being slightly better, but Wade was mentally more prepared for the playoffs. I think Wade would be a top 3-5 player in the league today.
No-more-rings wrote:Texas Chuck wrote:Don't use the Finals numbers without understanding that Dallas focused their entire defense on Lebron and let Wade go believing he wasn't good enough to beat them, but that Lebron was.
This has been debunked many times over with actual footage. You repeating it 1000 times won’t make it fact. It just makes you a serial liar.
Eagle4 wrote:Lol false. Wade was being mainly guarded by Stevenson, Matrix,and some Kidd but saw practically ever perimeter defender and torched them all. He saw multiple double and triple teams throughout the series literally any time he had the ball in the post (especially when Kidd was on him), please stop trying re-writing history. I've watched that series multiple times, Wade was just dissecting Mavs zone defense like a surgeon, zigzaging through the lane, finishing and posterizing Chandler and whoever. Lebron choked and Wade greatly outperformed him and that's fine, no need for revisionist history.
TheLand13 wrote:No-more-rings wrote:Texas Chuck wrote:Don't use the Finals numbers without understanding that Dallas focused their entire defense on Lebron and let Wade go believing he wasn't good enough to beat them, but that Lebron was.
This has been debunked many times over with actual footage. You repeating it 1000 times won’t make it fact. It just makes you a serial liar.
This has never been debunked, if anything we've gotten more evidence supporting it as time went on. Hell, Mark Cuban himself has admitted that Dallas focused their entire defensive scheme around slowing down LeBron. All they did with Wade was provide single coverage on him. You can't be serious with this statement can you?Eagle4 wrote:Lol false. Wade was being mainly guarded by Stevenson, Matrix,and some Kidd but saw practically ever perimeter defender and torched them all. He saw multiple double and triple teams throughout the series literally any time he had the ball in the post (especially when Kidd was on him), please stop trying re-writing history. I've watched that series multiple times, Wade was just dissecting Mavs zone defense like a surgeon, zigzaging through the lane, finishing and posterizing Chandler and whoever. Lebron choked and Wade greatly outperformed him and that's fine, no need for revisionist history.
You've watched the series multiple times? No you haven't. Otherwise you wouldn't have said the bolded part. It's a well known fact that Dallas frequently provided single coverage on Wade and were willing to live with letting him beat them.
HeartBreakKid wrote:What does Mark Cuban have to do with anything?
HeartBreakKid wrote:There is a video of all of Wade's field goals and assist posted on the first page and he seems appropriately guarded for a go-to scorer. '
HeartBreakKid wrote:People think that only one player can demand a double team on a team. Teams have enough fire power to guard two great scorers without leaving the other one off the hook. If that wasn't the case then teams would guard a go-to scorer with a bunch of scrubs the exact same way that they would guard that player when he has a big 3, which isn't true.
TheLand13 wrote:No-more-rings wrote:Texas Chuck wrote:Don't use the Finals numbers without understanding that Dallas focused their entire defense on Lebron and let Wade go believing he wasn't good enough to beat them, but that Lebron was.
This has been debunked many times over with actual footage. You repeating it 1000 times won’t make it fact. It just makes you a serial liar.
This has never been debunked, if anything we've gotten more evidence supporting it as time went on. Hell, Mark Cuban himself has admitted that Dallas focused their entire defensive scheme around slowing down LeBron. All they did with Wade was provide single coverage on him. You can't be serious with this statement can you?Eagle4 wrote:Lol false. Wade was being mainly guarded by Stevenson, Matrix,and some Kidd but saw practically ever perimeter defender and torched them all. He saw multiple double and triple teams throughout the series literally any time he had the ball in the post (especially when Kidd was on him), please stop trying re-writing history. I've watched that series multiple times, Wade was just dissecting Mavs zone defense like a surgeon, zigzaging through the lane, finishing and posterizing Chandler and whoever. Lebron choked and Wade greatly outperformed him and that's fine, no need for revisionist history.
You've watched the series multiple times? No you haven't. Otherwise you wouldn't have said the bolded part. It's a well known fact that Dallas frequently provided single coverage on Wade and were willing to live with letting him beat them.
Eagle4 wrote:TheLand13 wrote:No-more-rings wrote:This has been debunked many times over with actual footage. You repeating it 1000 times won’t make it fact. It just makes you a serial liar.
This has never been debunked, if anything we've gotten more evidence supporting it as time went on. Hell, Mark Cuban himself has admitted that Dallas focused their entire defensive scheme around slowing down LeBron. All they did with Wade was provide single coverage on him. You can't be serious with this statement can you?Eagle4 wrote:Lol false. Wade was being mainly guarded by Stevenson, Matrix,and some Kidd but saw practically ever perimeter defender and torched them all. He saw multiple double and triple teams throughout the series literally any time he had the ball in the post (especially when Kidd was on him), please stop trying re-writing history. I've watched that series multiple times, Wade was just dissecting Mavs zone defense like a surgeon, zigzaging through the lane, finishing and posterizing Chandler and whoever. Lebron choked and Wade greatly outperformed him and that's fine, no need for revisionist history.
You've watched the series multiple times? No you haven't. Otherwise you wouldn't have said the bolded part. It's a well known fact that Dallas frequently provided single coverage on Wade and were willing to live with letting him beat them.
Yh your statement is complete and utterly bull. As you can see, Mavs sent an extra defender practically every time Wade got the ball.
TheLand13 wrote:Eagle4 wrote:TheLand13 wrote:
This has never been debunked, if anything we've gotten more evidence supporting it as time went on. Hell, Mark Cuban himself has admitted that Dallas focused their entire defensive scheme around slowing down LeBron. All they did with Wade was provide single coverage on him. You can't be serious with this statement can you?
You've watched the series multiple times? No you haven't. Otherwise you wouldn't have said the bolded part. It's a well known fact that Dallas frequently provided single coverage on Wade and were willing to live with letting him beat them.
Yh your statement is complete and utterly bull. As you can see, Mavs sent an extra defender practically every time Wade got the ball.
Buddy, what videos are you watching?
These are the first three plays from the first video:
First play: Wade is given single coverage on a basic post up and gets the easy shot.
Second play: Wade is given single coverage again, until they decide to double on a SWITCH, which ends up going poorly anyways because Wade just passes to the open man.
Third play: Again, single coverage on the post-up, goes right into the paint where he forces them to collapse and passes out to an open James.
You said every single time Wade posted up, he got double teamed. You are full of ****.
I was going to stop there but I decided to keep watching. Let's have some fun with this shall we?
Fourth play: ONCE AGAIN, Wade is given single coverage and most of the defense isn't paying attention to him at all. He splits past Kidd and Marion who wasn't even in the play for an easy bucket. No double team.
Fifth play: fastbreak, doesn't matter.
Sixth play: Again, single coverage, gets off a very easy shot on a collapsed defense that is way too late to react.
Seventh play: **** Jason Terry of all people is guarding Wade here. Wade easily gets right past him and gets an open layup.
Eighth play: Wade gets the ball TWICE here and at no point is an extra defender sent to help. Kidd provides single coverage the entire time and offers no resistance on a wide open three from Wade.
Next two plays are fast breaks.
Ninth play: It took half the video for a double team to finally occur (Edit: Completely forgot about the second play, and that was on a switch). Wade is in the post, Stevenson comes over to provide help, swipes at the ball and then... he just runs away. Wait what? So a double team occurred for half of a second and then the help defender immediately abandoned the assignment. As soon as he ran away, Wade charged into the paint and got an easy bucket. That was the one and only time so far we saw double teaming occur and they didn't even commit to it.
Tenth play: WHERE IS THE DOUBLE TEAM? Wade gets a new defender on a switch, and then an additional defender tries to draw a foul. Wade notices this and just passes to the open man. No double team.
You know what I'm not continuing with this. We went through ten plays of Wade scoring/assisting to other players and not a single instance of double teaming occurs except for ONE (EDIT: Again, two, I don't know why I keep forgetting about the second play), and that lasted a grand total of .5 seconds before the defender randomly decided he didn't want to do it anymore and ran away.
I'm starting to think you guys don't know what a double team actually is. A defense collapsing on a player is not double teaming, especially when the primary defender out at the perimeter is already lost. Do not waste my time with such nonsense again.
Eagle4 wrote:You have no clue what you're talking about. If we going by that first video, you stated Wade received single coverage. That's false, almost each time he caught the ball in the post a secondary defender came to help.
Eagle4 wrote::34 double team came
Eagle4 wrote::40 Marion and Chandler come to help but Wade scores
Eagle4 wrote:1:36 HEAR WHAT BREEN SAYS. WADE MANUEVERING THROUGH THE DALLAS DEFENSE
Eagle4 wrote:2:20 again you see Terry and Chandler come to contest. How is that single coverage, so what you're saying is 2 other defender coming over to your contest a shot is normal single coverage and would have the same effect (particularly mentally) as if Kidd was purely on Wade the whole possession and the other defenders stayed at home? Get real.
Eagle4 wrote:2:32 Triple team AS SOON AS HE GOT THE BALL
Eagle4 wrote:The defense collapsing and a zone being formed to wall him in is essentially MULTIPLE defenders trying their best to prevent Wade's attack but he was always too elusive and slithery to be stopped. No "single coverage" by any stretch.
Eagle4 wrote:Again you have no clue what you're talking about. Just arguing semantics.
[/quote]Eagle4 wrote:Somehow you Lebron stans just can't get over Wade outperforming your frozen one competing against the exact same defense but it happened. It will always be a huge stain on his resume. Deal with it.
Ainosterhaspie wrote:Spoiler:
The play on the first video at 1:02 is interesting. James starts a drive. Wade's man abandons covering Wade to help on James and close the driving lanes. Even if he was slow and got by three more defenders are in the paint at the basket. Two layers of defense walling James from the paint. All five Mavericks with a foot in the paint to stop James drive when James kicks to Wade who is completely ignored at that moment.
Wade gets pass from James and capitalizes on defender recovering to him drives to hoop and benefits from the defense being about of position to stop James and needing to shift to stop Wade.
Edit. I had to add that "triple team" at 2:32. Wade's defender for whatever reason is fronting Wade way too far from the basket. Chandler and Dirk are out of position to contest. James passes over the top of the defense and there is no one between Wade and the basket. The "triple team" is defense scrambling with no player in position to contest all of them getting there too late. His man is already beat before the "triple team" comes.
Tim_Hardawayy wrote:I don't have time to analyze all those individual plays right this moment, but what I will say is from memory, my biggest criticism of LeBron in year 1 (besides unwillingness to post up) was he was a bit slower to make decisions than Wade in the halfcourt. Wade arguably dribbled the ball a bit too much at times, but LeBron just straight up waited too long holding it and I understand part of it was trying to set up the offense, but he just wasn't as forceful with his decision making.
In year 2, that changed, and really for the rest of his career (LeBron's that is), he became much more deliberate in his offensive decision making. But I say that to add that just holding the ball against a zone defense is death, the ball needs to be moving to break down a zone. So he was doing Dallas a massive favor by holding it and waiting as he was prone to do that year.
EDIT: Also more of a general offense critique and lack of spacing was probably part of it, but they almost never ran the LeBron/Wade pick and roll in year 1, and it was massively successful the next few years whenever they went to it.
TheLand13 wrote:Eagle4 wrote:You have no clue what you're talking about. If we going by that first video, you stated Wade received single coverage. That's false, almost each time he caught the ball in the post a secondary defender came to help.
I really should just ignore you at this point, but I'll play along.Eagle4 wrote::34 double team came
We already acknowledged this one but the problem with your logic is that this is off of a switch, not because Wade had the ball. Double team off high switches are very common.Eagle4 wrote::40 Marion and Chandler come to help but Wade scores
Bro, Marion and Chandler aren't anywhere close to Wade when he takes his shot attempt. In fact neither of them bothered putting a hand up because they were so far away that it didn't matter. Wade received single coverage this entire play. Don't bull **** me.Eagle4 wrote:1:36 HEAR WHAT BREEN SAYS. WADE MANUEVERING THROUGH THE DALLAS DEFENSE
![]()
![]()
![]()
Yeah, and watch what is happening. Single coverage on Kidd, he loses him, single coverage on Chandler, he scores on him. At no point is he double teamed.
How long have you been watching basketball for? You're saying a guy out at the top of the key getting blown by on defense and then the offensive player being met with resistance after the fact at the rim is a double team. No it's not, that's one of the dumbest takes I've ever heard.Eagle4 wrote:2:20 again you see Terry and Chandler come to contest. How is that single coverage, so what you're saying is 2 other defender coming over to your contest a shot is normal single coverage and would have the same effect (particularly mentally) as if Kidd was purely on Wade the whole possession and the other defenders stayed at home? Get real.
Wade didn't even know Terry was contesting his shotand to be frank, calling it a contest is being kind. Again, I don't think you understand what a double team is if you're choosing to count that. The whole point of a double team is that you are cutting off someone's path to the hoop or impacting their ability to make a play. A coach would immediately sit you for an entire game if you called that a legitimate double team.
Eagle4 wrote:2:32 Triple team AS SOON AS HE GOT THE BALL
I'm starting to think I'm getting trolled.
I'm going to assume the three people you are referring to are Terry, Chandler, and Dirk.
Terry: Not even close to Wade, as Wade loses him almost immediately and at that point, Terry is out of the play completely.
Dirk: Is literally on the other side of the basket and not in the play at all.
Chandler: He is the only one who is actually there to contest, and he ends up fouling Wade.
This is single coverage. No one in their right mind would ever call this a triple team.Eagle4 wrote:The defense collapsing and a zone being formed to wall him in is essentially MULTIPLE defenders trying their best to prevent Wade's attack but he was always too elusive and slithery to be stopped. No "single coverage" by any stretch.
Except no wall is being formed at any point. You just laid it out yourself for us all to see. Every time Wade beat his man, only a single player provided help after the fact. There's no such wall to speak of here. Why? Because they weren't worried about Wade getting his points. They were willing to live with that. Again, this is outlined by Cuban himself.
Again ,learn what single coverage and double teaming are. You sound like you don't even have a basic understanding of how basketball works. Here, maybe this can help you.
;ab_channel=ATTACKBballEagle4 wrote:Again you have no clue what you're talking about. Just arguing semantics.
No I'm not. You're trying to claim something that isn't double teaming is double teaming. I can't help it if you don't understand the basics of the sport.Eagle4 wrote:Somehow you Lebron stans just can't get over Wade outperforming your frozen one competing against the exact same defense but it happened. It will always be a huge stain on his resume. Deal with it.
Now you're trying to argue that this is a case of me being a LeBron stan? Just when I thought your logic couldn't get any worse. Buddy, I'm one of the guys who frequently **** on LeBron the most about that series. It's the entire reason I don't consider him the GOAT and never will. Just when I thought your post couldn't get any stupider, you pull this out of your ass. Anyone who actually watched this series knows that Dallas had an entire defensive scheme dedicated to slowing down LeBron, not Wade. This isn't difficult to see just by paying attention to how Dallas constructs its defense. If you can't understand that, then it's clear I'm wasting my time.
Off to the ignore list you go. I expect low IQ takes like these on GB but not here.