SWedd523 wrote:yosemiteben wrote:SWedd523 wrote:To reiterate the point: their percentages were close but one did it on much higher volume so they need to be taken with a grain of salt. It's entirely plausible that had Scoot shot as much, his numbers would've dropped, which means it's not as simple as saying "the shooting isn't a ton different"
I think it's a fair point comparing him to Ant. A massive difference for me though is that Scoot was an 18 year old figuring out how to be the PG and primary distributor for a professional team and shot just 16% of his team's FGAs, whereas Ant was in college, played next to a PG, and shot 27% of his team's FGAs.
Ant was much more about hunting his shot generally against inferior talent, whereas Scoot had PG responsibilities, shot less generally, and was playing against superior talent.
You say it's a fair point and then immediately counter it by laying out why they're completely different situations
Correct. It's worth considering, but it's also worth taking context into account.























