Is Carmelo a top 5 Knick ever?

Moderators: Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ, trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal

scrabbarista
RealGM
Posts: 20,257
And1: 17,961
Joined: May 31, 2015

Re: Is Carmelo a top 5 Knick ever? 

Post#21 » by scrabbarista » Tue May 23, 2023 12:24 am

HeartBreakKid wrote:
scrabbarista wrote:
Colbinii wrote:You are asking if this guy is Top 5?

Minutes: 17th
Points: 7th
Assists: 24th
Rebounds: 19th

Sad to say it's close.

Ewing, Frazier and Reed are an easy Top 3. Then you have Monroe, Houston, DeBusschere and Oakley who I consider in the next tier.


For a guy known almost exclusively as a scorer to not be in the top five in points... I would have to say a hard "no."

That said, I believe that franchise-history player rankings should be confined exclusively to the fans of the team. They're the ones who really know. I can rank Rockets players, but for any other team I wouldn't expect my opinion to hold an ounce of weight. If knowledgeable, long-time Knicks fans were to agree on Melo as top five, I'd be in no position to contradict them.

You could be a Knicks fan all of your life and never have seen Patrick Ewing play. I don't think having a Knicks jersey is a great argument or credential.

See underlined.
All human life on the earth is like grass, and all human glory is like a flower in a field. The grass dries up and its flower falls off, but the Lord’s word endures forever.
User avatar
homecourtloss
RealGM
Posts: 11,378
And1: 18,776
Joined: Dec 29, 2012

Re: Is Carmelo a top 5 Knick ever? 

Post#22 » by homecourtloss » Tue May 23, 2023 12:45 am

sp6r=underrated wrote:
Grinditout wrote:What's your list? Who beats him or who does he beat?

This is taking into account only Knick tenure


Knicks list of best players is extremely disappointing given that they are a foundational franchise located in the biggest, richest city in the country. Sad to say he might be. Ewing, Frasier and Reed had better careers in NY. But after that I can't dismiss Melo.


Frankly, it’s shocking that this is the case. When I first read this question, the first in my mind that came up was “it’s the New York Knicks – it’s going to be tough.” Then I started going down the list and…
lessthanjake wrote:Kyrie was extremely impactful without LeBron, and basically had zero impact whatsoever if LeBron was on the court.

lessthanjake wrote: By playing in a way that prevents Kyrie from getting much impact, LeBron ensures that controlling for Kyrie has limited effect…
HeartBreakKid
RealGM
Posts: 22,395
And1: 18,827
Joined: Mar 08, 2012
     

Re: Is Carmelo a top 5 Knick ever? 

Post#23 » by HeartBreakKid » Tue May 23, 2023 1:10 am

scrabbarista wrote:
HeartBreakKid wrote:
scrabbarista wrote:
For a guy known almost exclusively as a scorer to not be in the top five in points... I would have to say a hard "no."

That said, I believe that franchise-history player rankings should be confined exclusively to the fans of the team. They're the ones who really know. I can rank Rockets players, but for any other team I wouldn't expect my opinion to hold an ounce of weight. If knowledgeable, long-time Knicks fans were to agree on Melo as top five, I'd be in no position to contradict them.

You could be a Knicks fan all of your life and never have seen Patrick Ewing play. I don't think having a Knicks jersey is a great argument or credential.

See underlined.

What is a long term fan? You could be a knicks fan for 25 years and that still wouldn't cover Ewing in NY much less any of the pre 90 stars.
scrabbarista
RealGM
Posts: 20,257
And1: 17,961
Joined: May 31, 2015

Re: Is Carmelo a top 5 Knick ever? 

Post#24 » by scrabbarista » Tue May 23, 2023 1:11 am

HeartBreakKid wrote:
scrabbarista wrote:
HeartBreakKid wrote:You could be a Knicks fan all of your life and never have seen Patrick Ewing play. I don't think having a Knicks jersey is a great argument or credential.

See underlined.

What is a long term fan? You could be a knicks fan for 25 years and that still wouldn't cover Ewing in NY much less any of the pre 90 stars.


See first word in underlined.
All human life on the earth is like grass, and all human glory is like a flower in a field. The grass dries up and its flower falls off, but the Lord’s word endures forever.
HeartBreakKid
RealGM
Posts: 22,395
And1: 18,827
Joined: Mar 08, 2012
     

Re: Is Carmelo a top 5 Knick ever? 

Post#25 » by HeartBreakKid » Tue May 23, 2023 1:15 am

scrabbarista wrote:
HeartBreakKid wrote:
scrabbarista wrote:See underlined.

What is a long term fan? You could be a knicks fan for 25 years and that still wouldn't cover Ewing in NY much less any of the pre 90 stars.


See first word in underlined.


Then I dont get what being a Knicks fan has to do with anything. You're saying non-homer fans don't have an ounce of weight but the most important thing by far is knowledge. Even the long term fan thing seems totally irrelevant.

If someone knows a ton about the Knicks history and they're not a Knicks fan why would their opinion be worth less than a Knicks fan?

Just doesn't seem all that well thought out.
scrabbarista
RealGM
Posts: 20,257
And1: 17,961
Joined: May 31, 2015

Re: Is Carmelo a top 5 Knick ever? 

Post#26 » by scrabbarista » Tue May 23, 2023 1:21 am

HeartBreakKid wrote:
scrabbarista wrote:
HeartBreakKid wrote:What is a long term fan? You could be a knicks fan for 25 years and that still wouldn't cover Ewing in NY much less any of the pre 90 stars.


See first word in underlined.


Then I dont get what being a Knicks fan has to do with anything. You're saying non-homer fans don't have an ounce of weight but the most important thing by far is knowledge. Even the long term fan thing seems totally irrelevant.

If someone knows a ton about the Knicks history and they're not a Knicks fan why would their opinion be worth less than a Knicks fan?

Just doesn't seem all that well thought out.


Because it's their team. It's their history. The history belongs to them. Others can have opinions, of course. I expressed mine about Melo, for example.
All human life on the earth is like grass, and all human glory is like a flower in a field. The grass dries up and its flower falls off, but the Lord’s word endures forever.
sp6r=underrated
RealGM
Posts: 20,868
And1: 13,668
Joined: Jan 20, 2007
 

Re: Is Carmelo a top 5 Knick ever? 

Post#27 » by sp6r=underrated » Tue May 23, 2023 1:27 am

homecourtloss wrote:
sp6r=underrated wrote:
Grinditout wrote:What's your list? Who beats him or who does he beat?

This is taking into account only Knick tenure


Knicks list of best players is extremely disappointing given that they are a foundational franchise located in the biggest, richest city in the country. Sad to say he might be. Ewing, Frasier and Reed had better careers in NY. But after that I can't dismiss Melo.


Frankly, it’s shocking that this is the case. When I first read this question, the first in my mind that came up was “it’s the New York Knicks – it’s going to be tough.” Then I started going down the list and…


It is even more appalling when you do a quick at top players by franchise. The

NBA Active Franchises since 47 (Celtics/Warriors/Knicks). Players in no particular order

1. Celtics
Russell
Bird
Havlicek
McHale
Pierce

2. Warriors
Curry
Green
Wilt
Mullin
Thurmond

1949 (Kings/Lakers/Pistons)

3. Lakers
Kareem
Magic
Shaq
Kobe
Pau

4. Pistons
Laimbeer
Dumars
Isiah
Grant Hill
Billups

5. Kings
Oscar
Twyman
Peja
Lucas
Tiny

1950 (76ers/Hawks)

6. 76ers
Moses
Erving
Schayes
Barkley
Cheeks

7. Hawks
Pettit
Nique
Trae
Hudson
Blaylock


Boston, Golden State, Los Angeles Lakers, Philadelphia clearly crush NY.
Johnny Tomala
Analyst
Posts: 3,542
And1: 2,517
Joined: May 04, 2017
     

Re: Is Carmelo a top 5 Knick ever? 

Post#28 » by Johnny Tomala » Wed May 24, 2023 3:42 am

sp6r=underrated wrote:
homecourtloss wrote:
sp6r=underrated wrote:
Knicks list of best players is extremely disappointing given that they are a foundational franchise located in the biggest, richest city in the country. Sad to say he might be. Ewing, Frasier and Reed had better careers in NY. But after that I can't dismiss Melo.


Frankly, it’s shocking that this is the case. When I first read this question, the first in my mind that came up was “it’s the New York Knicks – it’s going to be tough.” Then I started going down the list and…


It is even more appalling when you do a quick at top players by franchise. The

NBA Active Franchises since 47 (Celtics/Warriors/Knicks). Players in no particular order

1. Celtics
Russell
Bird
Havlicek
McHale
Pierce

2. Warriors
Curry
Green
Wilt
Mullin
Thurmond

1949 (Kings/Lakers/Pistons)

3. Lakers
Kareem
Magic
Shaq
Kobe
Pau

4. Pistons
Laimbeer
Dumars
Isiah
Grant Hill
Billups

5. Kings
Oscar
Twyman
Peja
Lucas
Tiny

1950 (76ers/Hawks)

6. 76ers
Moses
Erving
Schayes
Barkley
Cheeks

7. Hawks
Pettit
Nique
Trae
Hudson
Blaylock


Boston, Golden State, Los Angeles Lakers, Philadelphia clearly crush NY.


Mikan ahead of Pau, comfortably.
sp6r=underrated
RealGM
Posts: 20,868
And1: 13,668
Joined: Jan 20, 2007
 

Re: Is Carmelo a top 5 Knick ever? 

Post#29 » by sp6r=underrated » Wed May 24, 2023 4:49 pm

Johnny Tomala wrote:
sp6r=underrated wrote:
homecourtloss wrote:
Frankly, it’s shocking that this is the case. When I first read this question, the first in my mind that came up was “it’s the New York Knicks – it’s going to be tough.” Then I started going down the list and…


It is even more appalling when you do a quick at top players by franchise. The

NBA Active Franchises since 47 (Celtics/Warriors/Knicks). Players in no particular order

1. Celtics
Russell
Bird
Havlicek
McHale
Pierce

2. Warriors
Curry
Green
Wilt
Mullin
Thurmond

1949 (Kings/Lakers/Pistons)

3. Lakers
Kareem
Magic
Shaq
Kobe
Pau

4. Pistons
Laimbeer
Dumars
Isiah
Grant Hill
Billups

5. Kings
Oscar
Twyman
Peja
Lucas
Tiny

1950 (76ers/Hawks)

6. 76ers
Moses
Erving
Schayes
Barkley
Cheeks

7. Hawks
Pettit
Nique
Trae
Hudson
Blaylock


Boston, Golden State, Los Angeles Lakers, Philadelphia clearly crush NY.


Mikan ahead of Pau, comfortably.


You're right. I'll confess for Lakers/Celtics I just picked the first names that to mind. Those franchises are absurdly loaded. But leaving Mikan was a big error.
trex_8063
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 12,595
And1: 8,226
Joined: Feb 24, 2013
     

Re: Is Carmelo a top 5 Knick ever? 

Post#30 » by trex_8063 » Thu May 25, 2023 1:47 am

scrabbarista wrote:
Colbinii wrote:You are asking if this guy is Top 5?

Minutes: 17th
Points: 7th
Assists: 24th
Rebounds: 19th

Sad to say it's close.

Ewing, Frazier and Reed are an easy Top 3. Then you have Monroe, Houston, DeBusschere and Oakley who I consider in the next tier.


For a guy known almost exclusively as a scorer to not be in the top five in points... I would have to say a hard "no."



That was kinda my first-pass take on seeing that, too. Melo isn't particularly good at anything else [except scoring]; so if he's only 7th in Knick history in pts, his case as top 5 Knicks seems a bit shaky.
That said, Melo reached that point with only six and third seasons in a Knick uniform; I imagine most/all of the Knicks #1-6 played more seasons that that as a Knick. I will say that reaching "X" number of points in 6.3 seasons is more impressive and relevant than doing so in [for example] 12 seasons. Where does Melo rank all-time [as a Knick] in ppg, for example? Is he like #2 behind only Bernard King, perhaps???


To answer OP's question, I think very very VERY obviously #1-3 are Ewing, Frazier, and Reed. imo, in that order, with Reed a relatively distant 3rd by my criteria*.

*I find him historically overrated [because of accolades], even though I'm somewhat high on his peak. But his longevity is too decimated by injury, at least one FMVP is undeserved [clearly, imo], and his MVP is highly debatable, too.


After that it becomes unclear.
I'm not sold that Dave DeBusschere is an obvious #4. He only played 5.5 seasons as a Knick. He's far better and more important than the limited box-based metrics of the era indicate, but I'm not sure it's by enough of a margin to make him a shoe-in for #4 [with just 5.5 seasons].

Charles Oakley played 10 seasons as a Knick, including the majority of his prime. His one All-Star season was as a Knick, he was the starting PF on the team that nearly won the title in '94, he was a key cog in that historically great defense under Pat Riley. He needs serious consideration as #4.

Era considerations apply, but nonetheless Harry Gallatin has to be a serious contender for #4, having played 9 seasons as a Knick, 7 of those as an All-Star, once led the entire league in rpg (a league that had George Mikan and Dolph Schayes), was key kog on THREE Knick teams that made it as far as the NBA Finals (twice losing to the Mikan dynasty, once to the Davies/Wanzer/Risen Rochester Royals).

John Starks played 9 seasons as a Knick, including basically his whole prime. Not a contender for #4, imo, but probably should be considered for #5.

Earl Monroe played over 8.5 seasons as a Knick, though at least two of them as post-prime. Was a member of the '73 title team, was twice an All-Star as a Knicks [which is perhaps about right, if a pinch generous]. He's overrated historically (perhaps dramatically so), but still needs to be considered.

Bill Bradley played all 10 seasons of his career as a Knick. Was never a star or a huge-impact guy, but was decent and a key piece of both title teams.

Mark Jackson played a little less than 6.5 seasons as a Knick, including his one and only All-Star season; was the starting PG on a really good '92 squad. Don't know if he's a particularly relevant option.....probably about as much as Bill Bradley, anyway.

Dick McGuire I'll mention, but he's perhaps a lesser candidate than Jackson.


That's about all I can come up with. Julius Randle and Jalen Brunson may eventually become valid candidates. And Bernard King basically only had three seasons as a Knick.


I'd lean toward Oakley and Gallatin, along with Melo [and DeBusschere, Starks, and Monroe as a dark horse options], as my primary candidates for #4-5; but my criteria leans heavily on meaningful longevity [this works against Dave, fwiw].
"The fact that a proposition is absurd has never hindered those who wish to believe it." -Edward Rutherfurd
"Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities." - Voltaire
User avatar
spree8
RealGM
Posts: 16,329
And1: 8,964
Joined: Jun 05, 2001
     

Re: Is Carmelo a top 5 Knick ever? 

Post#31 » by spree8 » Thu May 25, 2023 2:55 am

trex_8063 wrote:
scrabbarista wrote:
Colbinii wrote:You are asking if this guy is Top 5?

Minutes: 17th
Points: 7th
Assists: 24th
Rebounds: 19th

Sad to say it's close.

Ewing, Frazier and Reed are an easy Top 3. Then you have Monroe, Houston, DeBusschere and Oakley who I consider in the next tier.


For a guy known almost exclusively as a scorer to not be in the top five in points... I would have to say a hard "no."



That was kinda my first-pass take on seeing that, too. Melo isn't particularly good at anything else [except scoring]; so if he's only 7th in Knick history in pts, his case as top 5 Knicks seems a bit shaky.
That said, Melo reached that point with only six and third seasons in a Knick uniform; I imagine most/all of the Knicks #1-6 played more seasons that that as a Knick. I will say that reaching "X" number of points in 6.3 seasons is more impressive and relevant than doing so in [for example] 12 seasons. Where does Melo rank all-time [as a Knick] in ppg, for example? Is he like #2 behind only Bernard King, perhaps???


To answer OP's question, I think very very VERY obviously #1-3 are Ewing, Frazier, and Reed. imo, in that order, with Reed a relatively distant 3rd by my criteria*.

*I find him historically overrated [because of accolades], even though I'm somewhat high on his peak. But his longevity is too decimated by injury, at least one FMVP is undeserved [clearly, imo], and his MVP is highly debatable, too.


After that it becomes unclear.
I'm not sold that Dave DeBusschere is an obvious #4. He only played 5.5 seasons as a Knick. He's far better and more important than the limited box-based metrics of the era indicate, but I'm not sure it's by enough of a margin to make him a shoe-in for #4 [with just 5.5 seasons].

Charles Oakley played 10 seasons as a Knick, including the majority of his prime. His one All-Star season was as a Knick, he was the starting PF on the team that nearly won the title in '94, he was a key cog in that historically great defense under Pat Riley. He needs serious consideration as #4.

Era considerations apply, but nonetheless Harry Gallatin has to be a serious contender for #4, having played 9 seasons as a Knick, 7 of those as an All-Star, once led the entire league in rpg (a league that had George Mikan and Dolph Schayes), was key kog on THREE Knick teams that made it as far as the NBA Finals (twice losing to the Mikan dynasty, once to the Davies/Wanzer/Risen Rochester Royals).

John Starks played 9 seasons as a Knick, including basically his whole prime. Not a contender for #4, imo, but probably should be considered for #5.

Earl Monroe played over 8.5 seasons as a Knick, though at least two of them as post-prime. Was a member of the '73 title team, was twice an All-Star as a Knicks [which is perhaps about right, if a pinch generous]. He's overrated historically (perhaps dramatically so), but still needs to be considered.

Bill Bradley played all 10 seasons of his career as a Knick. Was never a star or a huge-impact guy, but was decent and a key piece of both title teams.

Mark Jackson played a little less than 6.5 seasons as a Knick, including his one and only All-Star season; was the starting PG on a really good '92 squad. Don't know if he's a particularly relevant option.....probably about as much as Bill Bradley, anyway.

Dick McGuire I'll mention, but he's perhaps a lesser candidate than Jackson.


That's about all I can come up with. Julius Randle and Jalen Brunson may eventually become valid candidates. And Bernard King basically only had three seasons as a Knick.


I'd lean toward Oakley and Gallatin, along with Melo [and DeBusschere, Starks, and Monroe as a dark horse options], as my primary candidates for #4-5; but my criteria leans heavily on meaningful longevity [this works against Dave, fwiw].



I think most if not all Knick fans have King in there at #4. Toughest spot is #5. My two favorite Knicks of all time growing up were Starks & Spree, but I dunno if they can beat out Pearl with his accolades and contribution to a title.
Colbinii
RealGM
Posts: 34,243
And1: 21,854
Joined: Feb 13, 2013

Re: Is Carmelo a top 5 Knick ever? 

Post#32 » by Colbinii » Thu May 25, 2023 4:20 am

spree8 wrote:
trex_8063 wrote:
scrabbarista wrote:
For a guy known almost exclusively as a scorer to not be in the top five in points... I would have to say a hard "no."



That was kinda my first-pass take on seeing that, too. Melo isn't particularly good at anything else [except scoring]; so if he's only 7th in Knick history in pts, his case as top 5 Knicks seems a bit shaky.
That said, Melo reached that point with only six and third seasons in a Knick uniform; I imagine most/all of the Knicks #1-6 played more seasons that that as a Knick. I will say that reaching "X" number of points in 6.3 seasons is more impressive and relevant than doing so in [for example] 12 seasons. Where does Melo rank all-time [as a Knick] in ppg, for example? Is he like #2 behind only Bernard King, perhaps???


To answer OP's question, I think very very VERY obviously #1-3 are Ewing, Frazier, and Reed. imo, in that order, with Reed a relatively distant 3rd by my criteria*.

*I find him historically overrated [because of accolades], even though I'm somewhat high on his peak. But his longevity is too decimated by injury, at least one FMVP is undeserved [clearly, imo], and his MVP is highly debatable, too.


After that it becomes unclear.
I'm not sold that Dave DeBusschere is an obvious #4. He only played 5.5 seasons as a Knick. He's far better and more important than the limited box-based metrics of the era indicate, but I'm not sure it's by enough of a margin to make him a shoe-in for #4 [with just 5.5 seasons].

Charles Oakley played 10 seasons as a Knick, including the majority of his prime. His one All-Star season was as a Knick, he was the starting PF on the team that nearly won the title in '94, he was a key cog in that historically great defense under Pat Riley. He needs serious consideration as #4.

Era considerations apply, but nonetheless Harry Gallatin has to be a serious contender for #4, having played 9 seasons as a Knick, 7 of those as an All-Star, once led the entire league in rpg (a league that had George Mikan and Dolph Schayes), was key kog on THREE Knick teams that made it as far as the NBA Finals (twice losing to the Mikan dynasty, once to the Davies/Wanzer/Risen Rochester Royals).

John Starks played 9 seasons as a Knick, including basically his whole prime. Not a contender for #4, imo, but probably should be considered for #5.

Earl Monroe played over 8.5 seasons as a Knick, though at least two of them as post-prime. Was a member of the '73 title team, was twice an All-Star as a Knicks [which is perhaps about right, if a pinch generous]. He's overrated historically (perhaps dramatically so), but still needs to be considered.

Bill Bradley played all 10 seasons of his career as a Knick. Was never a star or a huge-impact guy, but was decent and a key piece of both title teams.

Mark Jackson played a little less than 6.5 seasons as a Knick, including his one and only All-Star season; was the starting PG on a really good '92 squad. Don't know if he's a particularly relevant option.....probably about as much as Bill Bradley, anyway.

Dick McGuire I'll mention, but he's perhaps a lesser candidate than Jackson.


That's about all I can come up with. Julius Randle and Jalen Brunson may eventually become valid candidates. And Bernard King basically only had three seasons as a Knick.


I'd lean toward Oakley and Gallatin, along with Melo [and DeBusschere, Starks, and Monroe as a dark horse options], as my primary candidates for #4-5; but my criteria leans heavily on meaningful longevity [this works against Dave, fwiw].



I think most if not all Knick fans have King in there at #4. Toughest spot is #5. My two favorite Knicks of all time growing up were Starks & Spree, but I dunno if they can beat out Pearl with his accolades and contribution to a title.


Earl Monroe is the most overrated player in NBA History.

Dude averaged 6 points in the 1972 Finals as the Knicks were obliterated.

He was much better in 1973.

Then was bad again in 1974 only to fully embrace the chucking role starting in 1975 as the team faded while hit shot attempts grew over the next half decade.
User avatar
spree8
RealGM
Posts: 16,329
And1: 8,964
Joined: Jun 05, 2001
     

Re: Is Carmelo a top 5 Knick ever? 

Post#33 » by spree8 » Thu May 25, 2023 4:43 am

Colbinii wrote:
spree8 wrote:
trex_8063 wrote:
That was kinda my first-pass take on seeing that, too. Melo isn't particularly good at anything else [except scoring]; so if he's only 7th in Knick history in pts, his case as top 5 Knicks seems a bit shaky.
That said, Melo reached that point with only six and third seasons in a Knick uniform; I imagine most/all of the Knicks #1-6 played more seasons that that as a Knick. I will say that reaching "X" number of points in 6.3 seasons is more impressive and relevant than doing so in [for example] 12 seasons. Where does Melo rank all-time [as a Knick] in ppg, for example? Is he like #2 behind only Bernard King, perhaps???


To answer OP's question, I think very very VERY obviously #1-3 are Ewing, Frazier, and Reed. imo, in that order, with Reed a relatively distant 3rd by my criteria*.

*I find him historically overrated [because of accolades], even though I'm somewhat high on his peak. But his longevity is too decimated by injury, at least one FMVP is undeserved [clearly, imo], and his MVP is highly debatable, too.


After that it becomes unclear.
I'm not sold that Dave DeBusschere is an obvious #4. He only played 5.5 seasons as a Knick. He's far better and more important than the limited box-based metrics of the era indicate, but I'm not sure it's by enough of a margin to make him a shoe-in for #4 [with just 5.5 seasons].

Charles Oakley played 10 seasons as a Knick, including the majority of his prime. His one All-Star season was as a Knick, he was the starting PF on the team that nearly won the title in '94, he was a key cog in that historically great defense under Pat Riley. He needs serious consideration as #4.

Era considerations apply, but nonetheless Harry Gallatin has to be a serious contender for #4, having played 9 seasons as a Knick, 7 of those as an All-Star, once led the entire league in rpg (a league that had George Mikan and Dolph Schayes), was key kog on THREE Knick teams that made it as far as the NBA Finals (twice losing to the Mikan dynasty, once to the Davies/Wanzer/Risen Rochester Royals).

John Starks played 9 seasons as a Knick, including basically his whole prime. Not a contender for #4, imo, but probably should be considered for #5.

Earl Monroe played over 8.5 seasons as a Knick, though at least two of them as post-prime. Was a member of the '73 title team, was twice an All-Star as a Knicks [which is perhaps about right, if a pinch generous]. He's overrated historically (perhaps dramatically so), but still needs to be considered.

Bill Bradley played all 10 seasons of his career as a Knick. Was never a star or a huge-impact guy, but was decent and a key piece of both title teams.

Mark Jackson played a little less than 6.5 seasons as a Knick, including his one and only All-Star season; was the starting PG on a really good '92 squad. Don't know if he's a particularly relevant option.....probably about as much as Bill Bradley, anyway.

Dick McGuire I'll mention, but he's perhaps a lesser candidate than Jackson.


That's about all I can come up with. Julius Randle and Jalen Brunson may eventually become valid candidates. And Bernard King basically only had three seasons as a Knick.


I'd lean toward Oakley and Gallatin, along with Melo [and DeBusschere, Starks, and Monroe as a dark horse options], as my primary candidates for #4-5; but my criteria leans heavily on meaningful longevity [this works against Dave, fwiw].



I think most if not all Knick fans have King in there at #4. Toughest spot is #5. My two favorite Knicks of all time growing up were Starks & Spree, but I dunno if they can beat out Pearl with his accolades and contribution to a title.


Earl Monroe is the most overrated player in NBA History.

Dude averaged 6 points in the 1972 Finals as the Knicks were obliterated.

He was much better in 1973.

Then was bad again in 1974 only to fully embrace the chucking role starting in 1975 as the team faded while hit shot attempts grew over the next half decade.



That seems a bit hyperbolic no? I mean when Kareem says you’re one of the greatest players he ever saw and played against and they dubb you “Black Jesus” and you’re a multi-time All-Star, NBA Champion, and Hall of Famer, can you really be the most overrated in history?

Monroe got hurt in Game 1 of the 1972 Finals, that’s why he only played 15 minutes. DeBusschere got hurt in Game 2. After taking Game 1 in LA against Wilt n West, they never recovered because they were hobbled. I don’t think that constitutes as obliterated. Monroe didn’t play a whole lot of minutes either, so it’s a little misleading to say he just averaged 6ppg, when he played no more than 25 minutes in any game and as little as 9 minutes in one.
User avatar
Jaivl
Head Coach
Posts: 7,042
And1: 6,702
Joined: Jan 28, 2014
Location: A Coruña, Spain
Contact:
   

Re: Is Carmelo a top 5 Knick ever? 

Post#34 » by Jaivl » Thu May 25, 2023 8:31 am

spree8 wrote:That seems a bit hyperbolic no? I mean when Kareem says you’re one of the greatest players he ever saw and played against and they dubb you “Black Jesus” and you’re a multi-time All-Star, NBA Champion, and Hall of Famer, can you really be the most overrated in history?

I mean, yes, it would only add fuel to the fire, in fact.
This place is a cesspool of mindless ineptitude, mental decrepitude, and intellectual lassitude. I refuse to be sucked any deeper into this whirlpool of groupthink sewage. My opinions have been expressed. I'm going to go take a shower.
User avatar
spree8
RealGM
Posts: 16,329
And1: 8,964
Joined: Jun 05, 2001
     

Re: Is Carmelo a top 5 Knick ever? 

Post#35 » by spree8 » Thu May 25, 2023 9:55 am

Jaivl wrote:
spree8 wrote:That seems a bit hyperbolic no? I mean when Kareem says you’re one of the greatest players he ever saw and played against and they dubb you “Black Jesus” and you’re a multi-time All-Star, NBA Champion, and Hall of Famer, can you really be the most overrated in history?

I mean, yes, it would only add fuel to the fire, in fact.


How profound
penbeast0
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Posts: 30,310
And1: 9,873
Joined: Aug 14, 2004
Location: South Florida
 

Re: Is Carmelo a top 5 Knick ever? 

Post#36 » by penbeast0 » Thu May 25, 2023 11:35 am

When you play with Bill Bradley, also a HOF player for far less reasons, can you really be the most overrated in history?
“Most people use statistics like a drunk man uses a lamppost; more for support than illumination,” Andrew Lang.
sp6r=underrated
RealGM
Posts: 20,868
And1: 13,668
Joined: Jan 20, 2007
 

Re: Is Carmelo a top 5 Knick ever? 

Post#37 » by sp6r=underrated » Thu May 25, 2023 12:52 pm

penbeast0 wrote:When you play with Bill Bradley, also a HOF player for far less reasons, can you really be the most overrated in history?


Those Knicks getting so many HOFers is a good example of NY bias. And I say this as someone who loves New York and the Knicks. Being the media capital of the world helps for being remembered and recognition
MrIrrelevant
Freshman
Posts: 50
And1: 38
Joined: Jan 07, 2017

Re: Is Carmelo a top 5 Knick ever? 

Post#38 » by MrIrrelevant » Thu May 25, 2023 5:10 pm

I don't see how Melo is over any of these 5:
1. Walt Frazier
2. Patrick Ewing
3. Willis Reed
4. Charles Oakley
5. Harry Gallatin

I'd put Melo in the 8-12 range:
6. Dave DeBusschere
7. Bill Cartwright
8. Earl Monroe
9. Allan Houston
10. Melo
11. Bill Bradley
12. Carl Braun
trex_8063
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 12,595
And1: 8,226
Joined: Feb 24, 2013
     

Re: Is Carmelo a top 5 Knick ever? 

Post#39 » by trex_8063 » Thu May 25, 2023 9:44 pm

trex_8063 wrote:
That was kinda my first-pass take on seeing that, too. Melo isn't particularly good at anything else [except scoring]; so if he's only 7th in Knick history in pts, his case as top 5 Knicks seems a bit shaky.
That said, Melo reached that point with only six and third seasons in a Knick uniform; I imagine most/all of the Knicks #1-6 played more seasons that that as a Knick. I will say that reaching "X" number of points in 6.3 seasons is more impressive and relevant than doing so in [for example] 12 seasons. Where does Melo rank all-time [as a Knick] in ppg, for example? Is he like #2 behind only Bernard King, perhaps???


To answer OP's question, I think very very VERY obviously #1-3 are Ewing, Frazier, and Reed. imo, in that order, with Reed a relatively distant 3rd by my criteria*.

*I find him historically overrated [because of accolades], even though I'm somewhat high on his peak. But his longevity is too decimated by injury, at least one FMVP is undeserved [clearly, imo], and his MVP is highly debatable, too.


After that it becomes unclear.
I'm not sold that Dave DeBusschere is an obvious #4. He only played 5.5 seasons as a Knick. He's far better and more important than the limited box-based metrics of the era indicate, but I'm not sure it's by enough of a margin to make him a shoe-in for #4 [with just 5.5 seasons].

Charles Oakley played 10 seasons as a Knick, including the majority of his prime. His one All-Star season was as a Knick, he was the starting PF on the team that nearly won the title in '94, he was a key cog in that historically great defense under Pat Riley. He needs serious consideration as #4.

Era considerations apply, but nonetheless Harry Gallatin has to be a serious contender for #4, having played 9 seasons as a Knick, 7 of those as an All-Star, once led the entire league in rpg (a league that had George Mikan and Dolph Schayes), was key kog on THREE Knick teams that made it as far as the NBA Finals (twice losing to the Mikan dynasty, once to the Davies/Wanzer/Risen Rochester Royals).

John Starks played 9 seasons as a Knick, including basically his whole prime. Not a contender for #4, imo, but probably should be considered for #5.

Earl Monroe played over 8.5 seasons as a Knick, though at least two of them as post-prime. Was a member of the '73 title team, was twice an All-Star as a Knicks [which is perhaps about right, if a pinch generous]. He's overrated historically (perhaps dramatically so), but still needs to be considered.

Bill Bradley played all 10 seasons of his career as a Knick. Was never a star or a huge-impact guy, but was decent and a key piece of both title teams.

Mark Jackson played a little less than 6.5 seasons as a Knick, including his one and only All-Star season; was the starting PG on a really good '92 squad. Don't know if he's a particularly relevant option.....probably about as much as Bill Bradley, anyway.

Dick McGuire I'll mention, but he's perhaps a lesser candidate than Jackson.


That's about all I can come up with. Julius Randle and Jalen Brunson may eventually become valid candidates. And Bernard King basically only had three seasons as a Knick.


I'd lean toward Oakley and Gallatin, along with Melo [and DeBusschere, Starks, and Monroe as a dark horse options], as my primary candidates for #4-5; but my criteria leans heavily on meaningful longevity [this works against Dave, fwiw].



I forgot Carl Braun. He would need considering, too.
Also maybe Bill Cartwright: basically 7 seasons (not counting '86) collectively averaging 17/7 on somewhere between +4-5% rTS, one All-Star selection.

I'm still leaning toward Oakley and Gallatin, though.
"The fact that a proposition is absurd has never hindered those who wish to believe it." -Edward Rutherfurd
"Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities." - Voltaire
User avatar
prolific passer
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,149
And1: 1,459
Joined: Mar 11, 2009
     

Re: Is Carmelo a top 5 Knick ever? 

Post#40 » by prolific passer » Thu May 25, 2023 10:25 pm

For me in no order: Ewing, Frazier, Reed, Gallatin, and Guerin.

Return to Player Comparisons