AussieCeltic wrote:eyeatoma wrote:azcatz11 wrote:
What did he say that was bad? Looks like he was defending his calls on Twitter.
Why does the NBA promote gambling and get kids addicted and you can't have a ref defend himself? Not asking you that question...more so thinking out loud. The hypocrisy is outstanding.
I have no issue with the twitter account. I have an issue with a guy with a clear Boston bias being able to ref Boston games.
There is no clear bias. His record reffing Celtics games is .633% over 79 games. Celtics record in that time is .571%.
There will always be variance. Look at Sixers.
Ray Acosta - 15 wins, 4 losses in Sixers games
Well above Sixers win percentage in that time. Should we investigate him?
I mean I wouldn't look at win % of games with a ref vs record overall as strong evidence of bias. Though if I did I wouldn't be encouraged by finding out their win % is 6% higher.




































