ImageImageImageImageImage

The Official 2023 Draft Thread

Moderators: nate33, montestewart, LyricalRico

payitforward
RealGM
Posts: 24,774
And1: 9,179
Joined: May 02, 2012
Location: On the Atlantic

Re: The Official 2023 Draft Thread 

Post#1481 » by payitforward » Wed Jun 21, 2023 4:31 pm

awolfinwater wrote:
payitforward wrote:Whoa, hold on there. If you're going to look at a guy's numbers & compare them either to another player's numbers or to some kind of "norm," you cannot isolate his hottest streak & say -- "here's a reason to think about drafting him."

The simple response to that is for someone to point at a different segment of his year, his coldest streak, & say -- "here's a reason to forget about drafting him."

Sure I can look at how he ended the season in NCAA. I would call it reckless not to look at how each player progressed over the year....

You bet! I would never suggest otherwise.
My comment was that "you cannot isolate his hottest streak" -- wherever it came! (we're seeing the same thing in comments about Black -- except in his case he was "better" early) -- & say, "see, that's who he really is; draft him b/c of that."

I mean... one can do that, of course. But, I'd be willing to bet that if you tracked that over a few players, you'd see a pretty high failed-prediction rate. But, that's not a point about Kobe Bufkin (or any player). & it wasn't a criticism of you either, for that matter. Just a reminder of the common human desire to isolate & favor data that confirms a thesis one finds appealing for any reason. Kobe Bufkin may turn out great or sink like a rock. Who the h#ll knows?

awolfinwater wrote:In this case, I did cherry pick a little bit but was focused on how Bufkin finished the season during peak B10 play.

For more apples-to-apples, I ran a 7-game moving average of TS% for Bufkin, Black, Dick, and Wallace to get a sense of if they progressed or any other patterns that qualitative data can help explain. Each other player tended to drift down as the season progressed except in the case of Bufkin, you can clearly see a dip mid-season and return to peak form to close out year.

Why the dip mid season? Injury? Coaching? Personal? Depending on what I hear and learn would better inform my decision on his NBA potential....

See what I mean? :) You didn't ask why the "drift down" by e.g. Black, Dick or Wallace. Instead you asked for a way to explain (hopefully to explain away) Bufkin's "dip mid-season."

That's a perfectly reasonable thing to investigate, of course. As it would be to investigate the other guys' late-season dips. In fact, it would be sensible to investigate all of those phenomena & any other that impacted any guy's overall performance. & once you got into it, you might do just that.

The truth is that it's a long shot for any one of those guys to turn out to be a really good NBA player. But that's not about the particular group this year.

It's also a long shot for you, me, or any among us to pick the winner, as it were. Despite high intelligence & passionate convictions.

H#ll, it's a lot more significant for an NBA franchise to pick the winner at #8 than it is for you or me. Yet, FOs took:

Brandon Knight in 2011, leaving Kawhi Leonard on the board
Terrence Ross in 2012, leaving Draymond Green on the board
KCP in 2013, leaving Giannis on the board
Nik Stauskas in 2014, leaving Zach Lavine on the board
Stanley Johnson in 2015, leaving Booker on the board
Marquese Chriss in 2016, leaving Malcolm Brogdon on the board
Frank Ntilikina in 2017, leaving Donovan Mitchell on the board
Collin Sexton in 2018, leaving SGA on the board
Jaxson Hayes in 2019, leaving Cam Johnson on the board
Obi Toppin in 2020, leaving Tyrese Haliburton on the board

& of course for each year I could have added several players to the list of those left on the board so as not to miss on a guy who in every case turned out to be meh or (usually) much worse.
User avatar
gambitx777
RealGM
Posts: 10,561
And1: 1,991
Joined: Dec 18, 2012

Re: The Official 2023 Draft Thread 

Post#1482 » by gambitx777 » Wed Jun 21, 2023 4:42 pm

payitforward wrote:
awolfinwater wrote:
payitforward wrote:Whoa, hold on there. If you're going to look at a guy's numbers & compare them either to another player's numbers or to some kind of "norm," you cannot isolate his hottest streak & say -- "here's a reason to think about drafting him."

The simple response to that is for someone to point at a different segment of his year, his coldest streak, & say -- "here's a reason to forget about drafting him."

Sure I can look at how he ended the season in NCAA. I would call it reckless not to look at how each player progressed over the year....

You bet! I would never suggest otherwise.
My comment was that "you cannot isolate his hottest streak" -- wherever it came! (we're seeing the same thing in comments about Black -- except in his case he was "better" early) -- & say, "see, that's who he really is; draft him b/c of that."

I mean... one can do that, of course. But, I'd be willing to bet that if you tracked that over a few players, you'd see a pretty high failed-prediction rate. But, that's not a point about Kobe Bufkin (or any player). & it wasn't a criticism of you either, for that matter. Just a reminder of the common human desire to isolate & favor data that confirms a thesis one finds appealing for any reason. Kobe Bufkin may turn out great or sink like a rock. Who the h#ll knows?

awolfinwater wrote:In this case, I did cherry pick a little bit but was focused on how Bufkin finished the season during peak B10 play.

For more apples-to-apples, I ran a 7-game moving average of TS% for Bufkin, Black, Dick, and Wallace to get a sense of if they progressed or any other patterns that qualitative data can help explain. Each other player tended to drift down as the season progressed except in the case of Bufkin, you can clearly see a dip mid-season and return to peak form to close out year.

Why the dip mid season? Injury? Coaching? Personal? Depending on what I hear and learn would better inform my decision on his NBA potential....

See what I mean? :) You didn't ask why the "drift down" by e.g. Black, Dick or Wallace. Instead you asked for a way to explain (hopefully to explain away) Bufkin's "dip mid-season."

That's a perfectly reasonable thing to investigate, of course. As it would be to investigate the other guys' late-season dips. In fact, it would be sensible to investigate all of those phenomena & any other that impacted any guy's overall performance. & once you got into it, you might do just that.

The truth is that it's a long shot for any one of those guys to turn out to be a really good NBA player. But that's not about the particular group this year.

It's also a long shot for you, me, or any among us to pick the winner, as it were. Despite high intelligence & passionate convictions.

H#ll, it's a lot more significant for an NBA franchise to pick the winner at #8 than it is for you or me. Yet, FOs took:

Brandon Knight in 2011, leaving Kawhi Leonard on the board
Terrence Ross in 2012, leaving Draymond Green on the board
KCP in 2013, leaving Giannis on the board
Nik Stauskas in 2014, leaving Zach Lavine on the board
Stanley Johnson in 2015, leaving Booker on the board
Marquese Chriss in 2016, leaving Malcolm Brogdon on the board
Frank Ntilikina in 2017, leaving Donovan Mitchell on the board
Collin Sexton in 2018, leaving SGA on the board
Jaxson Hayes in 2019, leaving Cam Johnson on the board
Obi Toppin in 2020, leaving Tyrese Haliburton on the board

& of course for each year I could have added several players to the list of those left on the board so as not to miss on a guy who in every case turned out to be meh or (usually) much worse.
That's why I'm afraid is gonna happen if we take black and leave Bilal on the board.

Sent from my SM-G991U1 using RealGM mobile app
closg00
RealGM
Posts: 24,612
And1: 4,517
Joined: Nov 21, 2004

Re: The Official 2023 Draft Thread 

Post#1483 » by closg00 » Wed Jun 21, 2023 5:24 pm

Apparently Charlotte will take Henderson @ 2, therefore Portlands proper tanking is going to net them Scoot Henderson, it will be good to be Portland on draft night.
The Consiglieri
Veteran
Posts: 2,870
And1: 1,048
Joined: May 09, 2007

Re: The Official 2023 Draft Thread 

Post#1484 » by The Consiglieri » Wed Jun 21, 2023 7:33 pm

closg00 wrote:
FAH1223 wrote:
closg00 wrote:Re Utah looking to jump a couple of spots to get Black, how-many spots did we drop in the draft due to the stupid wins at the end of the season?

Just needed to lose one more to be lower than Indiana

Lose 2 more to be tied with Portland


:( :banghead:


The tank was actually fine, 5-15 in our last 20 was pretty good tank execution.

If you really want to be incensed, it should be at the delusional nonsense that lead to that 19-11 run between Christmas Break and the All Star Break. That was a cataclysm because not only did it totally and completely sabotage the tank (6 weeks where we accumulated more than 50% of our wins in a nearly 6 month long season) but it also deluded the morons into keeping Kuzma and Beal at the deadline before they finished the season on a 7-17 post allstar break run. The ugly truth is that if not for the early sucking post all star break, they might have kept fighting for the play in tournament and if they had, we'd be picking 11th-13th instead of 7th or 8th pending that coin toss (which we of course lost).

My bitterness lands squarely on that horrific run from the game before Christmas till the All Star Break. That run pretty much guaranteed no Beal trade, no Kuzma trade, no tanking, and a drop in potential draft slotting from top 4 to 7th-14th. One of the worst, most destructive runs and impacts on a team I've seen in a long, long time. Hell it became a subject on Bill Simmons podcast at one point (as in, WTF are the Wizards doing?!?!?! do they not understand this is Wembanyama draft? Totally incredulous).

It may take years of building and tanking to make up for just a 6 week, total mirage of a run in the deep winter of '22-'23. From picking high in the top 3 potentially of the last loaded top of a draft for 3 years, and getting assets for our most valuable pieces, to self deluding run to guarantee next to no return at all for our assets and no chance to land a top 3 pick (for the most part).

Wuff. So brutal.
Jay81
Veteran
Posts: 2,609
And1: 576
Joined: Nov 10, 2010

Re: The Official 2023 Draft Thread 

Post#1485 » by Jay81 » Wed Jun 21, 2023 10:49 pm

I hope we can package all these picks to move up in the first
NatP4
RealGM
Posts: 14,779
And1: 6,011
Joined: Jul 24, 2016
         

Re: The Official 2023 Draft Thread 

Post#1486 » by NatP4 » Wed Jun 21, 2023 10:49 pm

Still think we get 35 back from Boston. If not, package 42&52/57 for pick 35ish.

CP3 for Bamba/Beasley/17

8: Coulibaly
17: Podziemski
30: Clowney
35: Cissoko
42: Adama Sanogo
52/57: Nadir Hifi

Stash Hifi, let Sanogo play for the Go-Go for a year.
NatP4
RealGM
Posts: 14,779
And1: 6,011
Joined: Jul 24, 2016
         

Re: The Official 2023 Draft Thread 

Post#1487 » by NatP4 » Wed Jun 21, 2023 10:53 pm

Podziemski
Davis Jackson
Kispert Cissoko
Avdija Coulibaly
Gafford Clowney

Also create an expiring contract lineup that plays every Thursday consisting of Morris-Shamet-Coffey-Morris-Gallo-Wright-Bamba-Beasley.
User avatar
long suffrin' boulez fan
General Manager
Posts: 7,880
And1: 3,657
Joined: Nov 18, 2005
Location: Just above Ted's double bottom line
       

Re: The Official 2023 Draft Thread 

Post#1488 » by long suffrin' boulez fan » Wed Jun 21, 2023 10:55 pm

Let’s be real here. We’re drafting for the Go Go now. We’ll have a great summer league and g league team.
In Rizzo we trust
User avatar
long suffrin' boulez fan
General Manager
Posts: 7,880
And1: 3,657
Joined: Nov 18, 2005
Location: Just above Ted's double bottom line
       

Re: The Official 2023 Draft Thread 

Post#1489 » by long suffrin' boulez fan » Wed Jun 21, 2023 10:55 pm

Double post.
In Rizzo we trust
Jay81
Veteran
Posts: 2,609
And1: 576
Joined: Nov 10, 2010

Re: The Official 2023 Draft Thread 

Post#1490 » by Jay81 » Thu Jun 22, 2023 12:46 am

How was Brunson mocked as a 2nd rounder

https://www.tankathon.com/players/jalen-brunson
User avatar
gambitx777
RealGM
Posts: 10,561
And1: 1,991
Joined: Dec 18, 2012

Re: The Official 2023 Draft Thread 

Post#1491 » by gambitx777 » Thu Jun 22, 2023 12:48 am

Still on the quest to make piff happy at 7+ rookies. Lol.

Sent from my SM-G991U1 using RealGM mobile app
User avatar
Chocolate City Jordanaire
RealGM
Posts: 54,811
And1: 10,437
Joined: Aug 05, 2001
       

Re: The Official 2023 Draft Thread 

Post#1492 » by Chocolate City Jordanaire » Thu Jun 22, 2023 1:09 am

Jay81 wrote:How was Brunson mocked as a 2nd rounder

https://www.tankathon.com/players/jalen-brunson
I remember that draft. Brunson and another undersized and older PG, Jevon Carter, both were drafted in round two.

Brunson is a beast, and Carter is having a solid journeyman career.

Jalen Pickett seems like a good selection to do the same.



Sent from my SM-A146U using RealGM mobile app
Tre Johnson is the future of the Wizards.
NatP4
RealGM
Posts: 14,779
And1: 6,011
Joined: Jul 24, 2016
         

Re: The Official 2023 Draft Thread 

Post#1493 » by NatP4 » Thu Jun 22, 2023 1:12 am

Yes! good call CCJ. Pickett is such a throwback player. Plays like Andre Miller. I have no idea if that can work in the modern NBA, but if it does, he will be a steal.
dckingsfan
RealGM
Posts: 35,050
And1: 20,530
Joined: May 28, 2010

Re: The Official 2023 Draft Thread 

Post#1494 » by dckingsfan » Thu Jun 22, 2023 1:26 am

Wrong thread... moved
User avatar
daSwami
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,284
And1: 563
Joined: Jun 14, 2002
Location: Charlottesville
         

Re: The Official 2023 Draft Thread 

Post#1495 » by daSwami » Thu Jun 22, 2023 12:39 pm

dobrojim wrote:re tankathon

interesting that months ago, before the college season, Scoot was considered
a bit of a lock for number 2 overall. Then he slipped. But now he's back to #2
in Tankathon anyway. I guess he's never been lower than 3 in most mocks.


I think he slipped, in part, because Charlotte got the #2 and they already have their "franchise" PG.
:banghead:
NatP4
RealGM
Posts: 14,779
And1: 6,011
Joined: Jul 24, 2016
         

Re: The Official 2023 Draft Thread 

Post#1496 » by NatP4 » Thu Jun 22, 2023 12:48 pm

Cool, so we have 35 now. The only pick we have added in the 2023 draft despite a full tear down. Who are picking here? Podziemski is surely gone by then.

Cissoko? Clowney?
closg00
RealGM
Posts: 24,612
And1: 4,517
Joined: Nov 21, 2004

Re: The Official 2023 Draft Thread 

Post#1497 » by closg00 » Thu Jun 22, 2023 12:51 pm

Tonight is going to be nuts, I wonder if we'll hold onto CP and trade him later
NatP4
RealGM
Posts: 14,779
And1: 6,011
Joined: Jul 24, 2016
         

Re: The Official 2023 Draft Thread 

Post#1498 » by NatP4 » Thu Jun 22, 2023 12:57 pm

closg00 wrote:Tonight is going to be nuts, I wonder if we'll hold onto CP and trade him later


Yeah right. This new FO is going to panic and trade him for pennies on the dollar.

I’m guessing a top 48 protected future 2nd from the Lakers+filler.

Also still going to take Marcus Morris from the Clippers in exchange for Monte Morris, but we bring back pick 48 instead of 30.

Then we’ll condense all those R2 picks: 35, 42, 48, 52, to move up to 21 and take Nick Smith Jr.
DCZards
RealGM
Posts: 11,157
And1: 5,006
Joined: Jul 16, 2005
Location: The Streets of DC
     

Re: The Official 2023 Draft Thread 

Post#1499 » by DCZards » Thu Jun 22, 2023 1:16 pm

The Zards likely now pass on Black and start Jones at PG. So if Whitmore is there at 8 (and the Thompsons are gone) I predict either he or Bilal will be the pick.
The Consiglieri
Veteran
Posts: 2,870
And1: 1,048
Joined: May 09, 2007

Re: The Official 2023 Draft Thread 

Post#1500 » by The Consiglieri » Thu Jun 22, 2023 2:51 pm

DCZards wrote:The Zards likely now pass on Black and start Jones at PG. So if Whitmore is there at 8 (and the Thompsons are gone) I predict either he or Bilal will be the pick.

I don’t have a strong opinion on Black, sounds like everything’s great except the shot which is kind of a Mrs. Lincoln, how’d you like the show issue. That being said, this pile of totally irrelevant point guards to our long term build is just that, totally irrelevant. None will be here long term. If Black is the best guy on the board. Take him. None of the current rostered players should dictate anything long term.

Return to Washington Wizards