AingesBurner wrote:Inigo Montoya wrote:I think unprotected picks are more valuable the further away they are, or if it's possible to have an indication on what will happen to the team that owes the pick, in cases of shorter term picks. So yes, a pick like the Knicks gave up (turned into Hayward) was valuable, but I would venture a guess that a 2025 pick from the Wolves or the Cavs isn't as valuable, as they are less likely to fall apart in that timespan, and so I'd be more willing to give those up for the right player or to move up in the draft in a significant way. I'd be more hesitant parting with 2026 picks and beyond, but still, picks are meant to be used one way or another.
Bingo. When is Mitchell a FA? In 25? If so, trade the Cleveland pick over the Minny pick because Mitchell will want to get paid.
Actually, Mitchell could walk or force his way to New York. But even before they got him they were pretty good so with Garland, Allen and the continued improvement of Mobley their pick at that time will still probably not be in the lottery.














