ImageImageImageImageImage

Early discussion on the 2023 offseason

Moderators: Rich Rane, NyCeEvO

User avatar
Netaman
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,272
And1: 1,323
Joined: Jun 04, 2004

Re: Early discussion on the 2023 offseason 

Post#1041 » by Netaman » Fri Jun 30, 2023 10:07 pm

wish him well, think he got more than MLE and he deserves it.

Read on Twitter
Papi_swav
General Manager
Posts: 9,301
And1: 4,880
Joined: Jan 03, 2016
     

Re: Early discussion on the 2023 offseason 

Post#1042 » by Papi_swav » Fri Jun 30, 2023 10:15 pm

Netaman wrote:would be a good add if they think he can continue expanding his range. career 77% ft shooter. positive impact defender.

Read on Twitter

Yes perfect backup center for us IMO
User avatar
Netaman
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,272
And1: 1,323
Joined: Jun 04, 2004

Re: Early discussion on the 2023 offseason 

Post#1043 » by Netaman » Fri Jun 30, 2023 10:19 pm

bruce got paid!

Read on Twitter
User avatar
Netaman
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,272
And1: 1,323
Joined: Jun 04, 2004

Re: Early discussion on the 2023 offseason 

Post#1044 » by Netaman » Fri Jun 30, 2023 10:22 pm

welp dame got jerami grant paid too.

Read on Twitter
Decipher
Analyst
Posts: 3,285
And1: 3,773
Joined: May 13, 2022
 

Re: Early discussion on the 2023 offseason 

Post#1045 » by Decipher » Fri Jun 30, 2023 10:35 pm

Cam should fire his agent if he doesn’t get big money
ecuhus1981
RealGM
Posts: 16,928
And1: 1,590
Joined: Jun 19, 2007
       

Re: Early discussion on the 2023 offseason 

Post#1046 » by ecuhus1981 » Fri Jun 30, 2023 10:54 pm

Decipher wrote:Cam should fire his agent if he doesn’t get big money

I hear Johnson and the Nets just agreed to a 4yr, $108mil contract. A bit rich, but I'm good with it. Welcome back, Cam!!!
Some people really have a way with words. Other people... not... have... way.
-- Steve Martin
Decipher
Analyst
Posts: 3,285
And1: 3,773
Joined: May 13, 2022
 

Re: Early discussion on the 2023 offseason 

Post#1047 » by Decipher » Fri Jun 30, 2023 10:57 pm

ecuhus1981 wrote:
Decipher wrote:Cam should fire his agent if he doesn’t get big money

I hear Johnson and the Nets just agreed to a 4yr, $108mil contract. A bit rich, but I'm good with it. Welcome back, Cam!!!


Yep

Market price when you look at deals for Grant & Kuzma

[/tweet]
Read on Twitter
?s=46&t=tK49mD68OHDgCSiwhr8Uug[/tweet]
User avatar
Netaman
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,272
And1: 1,323
Joined: Jun 04, 2004

Re: Early discussion on the 2023 offseason 

Post#1048 » by Netaman » Fri Jun 30, 2023 10:57 pm

big #. elite 3 and good d but thats big $.

Read on Twitter
Tha King
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,760
And1: 933
Joined: Apr 11, 2007
 

Re: Early discussion on the 2023 offseason 

Post#1049 » by Tha King » Fri Jun 30, 2023 11:02 pm

He needs to improve a bit for that not to be terrible.

Based on that is Clax getting the max next year? About to be a very expensive team without a star
User avatar
Netaman
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,272
And1: 1,323
Joined: Jun 04, 2004

Re: Early discussion on the 2023 offseason 

Post#1050 » by Netaman » Fri Jun 30, 2023 11:06 pm

Tha King wrote:He needs to improve a bit for that not to be terrible.

Based on that is Clax getting the max next year? About to be a very expensive team without a star


he averaged 16 ppg and played good D in 30mph with nets. he only shot 37% from 3, so biggest thing is nets need him to go back to 40%+. need a player to draw more gravity to help that probably.
User avatar
Netaman
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,272
And1: 1,323
Joined: Jun 04, 2004

Re: Early discussion on the 2023 offseason 

Post#1051 » by Netaman » Fri Jun 30, 2023 11:10 pm

hollinger's model had him as his 9th best FA worth almost exactly what he got. i think this is a lot for a role player but considering the character and everything else i get it. just a big #.

9. Cam Johnson, PF, 27, Brooklyn (restricted): $26,368,306
Don’t be surprised if the bidding on Johnson gets a little wacky, simply because rival teams know they might be able to spook the Nets from matching if they can present a strong offer sheet. Brooklyn enters the offseason just $10 million from the projected tax line; matching a strong sheet for Johnson would push the Nets past the first tax apron unless they can ditch salary someplace else. (Joe Harris and Patty Mills would be the likely places to start.)

The other consideration, of course, is that Johnson is such a plug-and-play fit in most systems because he can competently guard both forward spots, runs the floor and shoots 39.3 percent career from 3. There isn’t enough shot creation here for star-level upside, which is why teams should be careful going too high up the salary ladder, but Johnson is a valuable piece who seems likely to have multiple suitors.
User avatar
Stone
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,476
And1: 1,784
Joined: Dec 26, 2005
Location: Jersey
 

Re: Early discussion on the 2023 offseason 

Post#1052 » by Stone » Fri Jun 30, 2023 11:14 pm

Fair deal for both sides, Can is young enough to fit into our timeline.
The man who sleeps on the floor can never fall out of bed........Martin Lawrence
Marvin Martian
General Manager
Posts: 9,319
And1: 7,636
Joined: Aug 13, 2012

Re: Early discussion on the 2023 offseason 

Post#1053 » by Marvin Martian » Fri Jun 30, 2023 11:15 pm

Massive overpay on Cam. His deal is more than what Bridges got for being an inferior player.
Marvin Martian
General Manager
Posts: 9,319
And1: 7,636
Joined: Aug 13, 2012

Re: Early discussion on the 2023 offseason 

Post#1054 » by Marvin Martian » Fri Jun 30, 2023 11:16 pm

Stone wrote:Fair deal for both sides, Can is young enough to fit into our timeline.

And not good enough to be the 3rd best player on a playoff team. Marks better bring in a star this offseason
User avatar
Netaman
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,272
And1: 1,323
Joined: Jun 04, 2004

Re: Early discussion on the 2023 offseason 

Post#1055 » by Netaman » Fri Jun 30, 2023 11:20 pm

Marvin Martian wrote:Massive overpay on Cam. His deal is more than what Bridges got for being an inferior player.


Bridges got $90m in October 2021 and at the time he'd never averaged more than 14 ppg and only had 1 year over 40% from 3.

Cam Johnson turned down 78m from Phoenix in Oct 2022. The Nets gave Joe Harris 4 x 75m and he was a total 1 trick pony. 80-100m was where he was going to get paid and the fact that the RFA system is what it is pushed him to the top end.

Comparing any FA deal the day it's signed to one of the best contracts in the nba is not rational.
TheNetsFan
Head Coach
Posts: 7,424
And1: 2,823
Joined: Feb 11, 2007
   

Re: Early discussion on the 2023 offseason 

Post#1056 » by TheNetsFan » Fri Jun 30, 2023 11:39 pm

Scotto says the max value is $108mil for Cam. There are bonuses and incentives in the deal. It'll be interesting to see what the realistic value is.
Decipher
Analyst
Posts: 3,285
And1: 3,773
Joined: May 13, 2022
 

Re: Early discussion on the 2023 offseason 

Post#1057 » by Decipher » Fri Jun 30, 2023 11:42 pm

I have no idea why we just let guys like Bruce & Yuta walk for free when they were perfectly fine for us

Can’t blame Yuta as JV didn’t seem to rate him

Read on Twitter
CalamityX12
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 15,818
And1: 2,535
Joined: Mar 15, 2012
         

Re: Early discussion on the 2023 offseason 

Post#1058 » by CalamityX12 » Sat Jul 1, 2023 12:17 am

Personally think it's rather high but if Cam does take his game to another level, it'll even out. He has the tools so that's why I can see it was done at that price

Plus if no bueno, we trade.
The ModFather

My sports teams are currently experiencing suckiness. Please pardon the mess.
CalamityX12
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 15,818
And1: 2,535
Joined: Mar 15, 2012
         

Re: Early discussion on the 2023 offseason 

Post#1059 » by CalamityX12 » Sat Jul 1, 2023 12:18 am

Decipher wrote:I have no idea why we just let guys like Bruce & Yuta walk for free when they were perfectly fine for us

Can’t blame Yuta as JV didn’t seem to rate him

Read on Twitter

Yea seeing Yuta dropped out like that is one of the reasons I don't back JV anymore
The ModFather

My sports teams are currently experiencing suckiness. Please pardon the mess.
User avatar
Netaman
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,272
And1: 1,323
Joined: Jun 04, 2004

Re: Early discussion on the 2023 offseason 

Post#1060 » by Netaman » Sat Jul 1, 2023 12:46 am

CalamityX12 wrote:Personally think it's rather high but if Cam does take his game to another level, it'll even out. He has the tools so that's why I can see it was done at that price

Plus if no bueno, we trade.


agreed. to me it's the Joe Harris or Crabbe contract, but with a little more upside since he's more dynamic than either of them were. If the first 2 guys shot 37% they were close to useless, Cam was still a useful player putting up 16 ppg as a net not shooting his best.

it's not a great value unless he hits another level but he's useful.

Return to Brooklyn Nets