BlacJacMac wrote:KGdaBom wrote:BlacJacMac wrote:
What if he didn't want to commit to 3 or 4 years at what appears to be low money?
Or maybe we just value flexibility more than a guy who figures to be our 8th or 9th man?
If the money is low then that brings us back to not liking him much.
9th man.
You need to fill out a roster.
Maintaining flexibility is a good thing as well.
I mean if we REALLY liked him we could've given him the full MLE.
Right. So we obviously didn't like him all that much. Looks like just a body. I was kind of hoping we would go for somebody a bit more splashy.















