Blazinaway wrote:DiegoChara wrote:Capn'O wrote:
I give Dame the benefit of the doubt here in that I think Portland was gonna sign Grant anyway. A few reasons for this.
Teams have to hit the salary floor and Grant is a solid enough player that he can still be moved. So the Blazers had incentives not to let him walk. Also, some teams don't like to go full youth when they rebuild so the young players have role models. Look at the Knicks. Blazers strike me as that sort of org.
But beyond that, simply resigning Grant with Lillard doesn't make the Blazers contenders. My guess is there were other threads out there and both parties waited until those loops were closed before Dame made the request.
The timing and optics are suspect but I don't think anyone did the other party dirty here. It's a clean break. I'm gonna miss watching him play here.
Grant on this reported contract would require multiple picks to move. He’s not a bad player but he’s a negative value contract without a doubt.
Just front load it to the max and with an 8-10% cap increase each yr in a couple of years its very tradeable. I don't like it but there will be a salary floor after the first yr or two contracts (involved in Dame trade) settle out and we'll need to meet it. Gotta have a few solid vets with the young guys.
Front loading would definitely make the best of the bad situation.



















