We know it's you, CT, you're not fooling anybody.
Trade/Free Agency Thread, pt 6, 2023-24
Moderators: bisme37, Darthlukey, canman1971, Shak_Celts, Parliament10, shackles10, snowman, Froob
Re: Trade/Free Agency Thread, pt 6, 2023-24
-
Bill Lumbergh
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,972
- And1: 12,170
- Joined: Jul 12, 2009
-
Re: Trade/Free Agency Thread, pt 6, 2023-24
We know it's you, CT, you're not fooling anybody.
Re: Trade/Free Agency Thread, pt 6, 2023-24
-
Scarletfire81
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,324
- And1: 4,765
- Joined: Jul 17, 2014
-
Re: Trade/Free Agency Thread, pt 6, 2023-24
Romeo Langford?
Re: Trade/Free Agency Thread, pt 6, 2023-24
-
Cricket23
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 867
- And1: 618
- Joined: Feb 21, 2022
Re: Trade/Free Agency Thread, pt 6, 2023-24
Brown to Atlanta with Brogdon into Collins TPE
Murray, Hunter, and 2 1sts to Boston, saves enough money to re-sign Grant and still use TPMLE.
Murray/White
Hunter/Pritchard/MLE
Tatum/Hauser/Walsh
Porzingis/Grant/Brissett
Rob/Al/Luke
That's a great team and they avoid the Brown supermax
Murray, Hunter, and 2 1sts to Boston, saves enough money to re-sign Grant and still use TPMLE.
Murray/White
Hunter/Pritchard/MLE
Tatum/Hauser/Walsh
Porzingis/Grant/Brissett
Rob/Al/Luke
That's a great team and they avoid the Brown supermax
Re: Trade/Free Agency Thread, pt 6, 2023-24
-
Hal14
- RealGM
- Posts: 22,421
- And1: 21,342
- Joined: Apr 05, 2019
Re: Trade/Free Agency Thread, pt 6, 2023-24
Cricket23 wrote:If Dame truly wanted to play for a winner
Brogdon/Grant S&T 14 mil per/Pritchard/Champagnie is 42.5 mil, Dame is 46.6 mil. Boston can offer plenty of picks and a 3rd team could get involved
Dame/White/vet min
Brown/vet min
Tatum/Hauser/Walsh
Porzingis/Brissett/vet min
Rob/Al/Luke
Looks good, but I don't think we can combine Grant with other players from our team going out - if doing a Grant S&T. I could be wrong, though.
I'm fine with just sending Rob to Portland instead and resigning Grant.
Nothing wrong with having a different opinion - as long as it's done respectfully. It'd be lame if we all agreed on everything 
Re: Trade/Free Agency Thread, pt 6, 2023-24
-
titlebound1
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,629
- And1: 1,625
- Joined: Feb 19, 2009
-
Re: Trade/Free Agency Thread, pt 6, 2023-24
shackles10 wrote:KamikazeK wrote:titlebound1 wrote:
Lmfao was the funniest night ever. Nothing will ever beat it
yeah it's so funny watching the whole country turn to **** because just enough morons in PA, WI, and MI decided they liked having an orange hateful dumbass in charge to ruin everything.
These convos never end well so let’s just keep them out of this thread please. Save the fireworks for our backyards and waterways…
Fair enough
Re: Trade/Free Agency Thread, pt 6, 2023-24
- GoCeltics123
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,503
- And1: 33,510
- Joined: May 05, 2015
-
Re: Trade/Free Agency Thread, pt 6, 2023-24
Celtics forward Jaylen Brown, meanwhile, is eligible for a five-year, $295 million super-max extension this offseason. League sources said the Celtics and Brown have yet to fully jump into negotiations.
From Himmelsbach
Re: Trade/Free Agency Thread, pt 6, 2023-24
-
Hal14
- RealGM
- Posts: 22,421
- And1: 21,342
- Joined: Apr 05, 2019
Re: Trade/Free Agency Thread, pt 6, 2023-24
titlebound1 wrote:Have we traded our 26 year old all NBA 2nd team SG who hasn't even hit his prime, for the 33 year old PG who has never won a damn thing and doesn't want to be here, yet?
Dame: 10th in the league in BPM this season
JB: 66th in the league in BPM this season
Nothing wrong with having a different opinion - as long as it's done respectfully. It'd be lame if we all agreed on everything 
Re: Trade/Free Agency Thread, pt 6, 2023-24
- Bohemian
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,503
- And1: 3,364
- Joined: Jul 24, 2012
-
Re: Trade/Free Agency Thread, pt 6, 2023-24
GoCeltics123 wrote:Celtics forward Jaylen Brown, meanwhile, is eligible for a five-year, $295 million super-max extension this offseason. League sources said the Celtics and Brown have yet to fully jump into negotiations.
From Himmelsbach
Wow
Re: Trade/Free Agency Thread, pt 6, 2023-24
-
Hal14
- RealGM
- Posts: 22,421
- And1: 21,342
- Joined: Apr 05, 2019
Re: Trade/Free Agency Thread, pt 6, 2023-24
GoCeltics123 wrote:Celtics forward Jaylen Brown, meanwhile, is eligible for a five-year, $295 million super-max extension this offseason. League sources said the Celtics and Brown have yet to fully jump into negotiations.
From Himmelsbach
Sounds like hesitation on both sides.
Perhaps there's a chance JB gets traded for Dame. Or Trae. Or Giannis. Or Embiid.
Nothing wrong with having a different opinion - as long as it's done respectfully. It'd be lame if we all agreed on everything 
Re: Trade/Free Agency Thread, pt 6, 2023-24
-
Bill Lumbergh
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,972
- And1: 12,170
- Joined: Jul 12, 2009
-
Re: Trade/Free Agency Thread, pt 6, 2023-24
Still think Atlanta would be the more likely trade partner for Jaylen, if we were moving off him.
Re: Trade/Free Agency Thread, pt 6, 2023-24
-
Hal14
- RealGM
- Posts: 22,421
- And1: 21,342
- Joined: Apr 05, 2019
Re: Trade/Free Agency Thread, pt 6, 2023-24
Cricket23 wrote:Kenyon Martin Jr going to the clips for 2 lousy 2nd round picks. He only makes 2 mil.
Hmm, let's see. Bones Hyland was a role player who was decent but not that good in Denver. Bones whined and complained about playing time, asked for a trade. Goes to clippers. They barely played him. Clippers then get bounced in the 1st round.
KJ Martin, wasn't happy with the playing time he got on the worst team in the league so he whined and complained about it. Now he goes to the clippers. Let me guess, he won't play much (cause they have a ton of other wings there and if he didn't get a lot of mins on the worst team in the league, why would he get more mins for a playoff team?) and let me guess, it'll be another early exit from the playoffs for the Clippers.
Nothing wrong with having a different opinion - as long as it's done respectfully. It'd be lame if we all agreed on everything 
Re: Trade/Free Agency Thread, pt 6, 2023-24
- Mr_Mojo_Risin
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,586
- And1: 8,088
- Joined: Jul 04, 2019
-
Re: Trade/Free Agency Thread, pt 6, 2023-24
NuckyPowell wrote:Still think Atlanta would be the more likely trade partner for Jaylen, if we were moving off him.
In this scenario, please send Trae to Portland and Dame here. I want nothing to do with Trae…
Re: Trade/Free Agency Thread, pt 6, 2023-24
- Fierce1
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,023
- And1: 17,470
- Joined: Jan 31, 2021
-
Re: Trade/Free Agency Thread, pt 6, 2023-24
The plot thickens.
So all that talk of the Celtics wanting to stick with the Jays long term was just all bark and no bite?
So all that talk of the Celtics wanting to stick with the Jays long term was just all bark and no bite?
Re: Trade/Free Agency Thread, pt 6, 2023-24
-
darrendaye
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 17,301
- And1: 10,480
- Joined: May 06, 2001
- Location: Pollard Powered, in Yonkers, NY
-
Re: Trade/Free Agency Thread, pt 6, 2023-24
We can start the Celtics South End transition with trading Grant there.
Member of the following organizations:
YPSS: Yes, Pritchard Should Start
RWIT: Rebounding Wing Is a Thing
AAH: All About Hugo
YPSS: Yes, Pritchard Should Start
RWIT: Rebounding Wing Is a Thing
AAH: All About Hugo
Re: Trade/Free Agency Thread, pt 6, 2023-24
-
The Corey's
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,794
- And1: 8,581
- Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Re: Trade/Free Agency Thread, pt 6, 2023-24
There's no negotiations needed. He's getting the max or he's gone.
Probably both.
Probably both.
Re: Trade/Free Agency Thread, pt 6, 2023-24
-
watsonthedragon
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,656
- And1: 2,327
- Joined: Jun 25, 2015
-
Re: Trade/Free Agency Thread, pt 6, 2023-24
Which team do you guys think would need to include more in a Dame for JB swap?
Re: Trade/Free Agency Thread, pt 6, 2023-24
-
WeLikeOurGuys
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,860
- And1: 8,046
- Joined: May 18, 2010
-
Re: Trade/Free Agency Thread, pt 6, 2023-24
GoCeltics123 wrote:Celtics forward Jaylen Brown, meanwhile, is eligible for a five-year, $295 million super-max extension this offseason. League sources said the Celtics and Brown have yet to fully jump into negotiations.
From Himmelsbach
That’s just really weird..
Re: Trade/Free Agency Thread, pt 6, 2023-24
- GoCeltics123
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,503
- And1: 33,510
- Joined: May 05, 2015
-
Re: Trade/Free Agency Thread, pt 6, 2023-24
Bohemian wrote:GoCeltics123 wrote:Celtics forward Jaylen Brown, meanwhile, is eligible for a five-year, $295 million super-max extension this offseason. League sources said the Celtics and Brown have yet to fully jump into negotiations.
From Himmelsbach
Wow
FWIW they do have all off season and he’s currently speaking at some New Orleans festival (he posted it on IG) could just be waiting on that to end
Re: Trade/Free Agency Thread, pt 6, 2023-24
-
Cricket23
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 867
- And1: 618
- Joined: Feb 21, 2022
Re: Trade/Free Agency Thread, pt 6, 2023-24
Hal14 wrote:Cricket23 wrote:If Dame truly wanted to play for a winner
Brogdon/Grant S&T 14 mil per/Pritchard/Champagnie is 42.5 mil, Dame is 46.6 mil. Boston can offer plenty of picks and a 3rd team could get involved
Dame/White/vet min
Brown/vet min
Tatum/Hauser/Walsh
Porzingis/Brissett/vet min
Rob/Al/Luke
Looks good, but I don't think we can combine Grant with other players from our team going out - if doing a Grant S&T. I could be wrong, though.
I'm fine with just sending Rob to Portland instead and resigning Grant.
Not sure either, but Sexton was a S & T last year combined with Markkanen in the Mitchell trade. I'm sure there's a way to do it especially with the ability to add other teams.
Re: Trade/Free Agency Thread, pt 6, 2023-24
-
titlebound1
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,629
- And1: 1,625
- Joined: Feb 19, 2009
-
Re: Trade/Free Agency Thread, pt 6, 2023-24
Hal14 wrote:titlebound1 wrote:Have we traded our 26 year old all NBA 2nd team SG who hasn't even hit his prime, for the 33 year old PG who has never won a damn thing and doesn't want to be here, yet?
Dame: 10th in the league in BPM this season
JB: 66th in the league in BPM this season
Yeah let's revisit that in 3 years when Dame is nearly 40 and Brown has hit his prime.
I'm not impressed with the career loser score first PG. They're both super expensive. But one is old, has never been a winning player and will not improve






