zimpy27 wrote:CrabDribbler wrote:6/6
Ahh yes, Jordan played in only 6 NBA seasons and won a championship every year.
Yup and he definitely could’ve went 8/8 if he didn’t retire to dominate baseball too.
Moderators: bwgood77, bisme37, zimpy27, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, Domejandro, ken6199, infinite11285, Clav, Dirk
zimpy27 wrote:CrabDribbler wrote:6/6
Ahh yes, Jordan played in only 6 NBA seasons and won a championship every year.
WarriorGM wrote:Steph is the greatest playmaker of all-time.
SelfishPlayer wrote:DB23 wrote:SelfishPlayer wrote:
Richard Hamilton?
Wouldn’t really consider the wizards years as serious. But either way, Gilmore, are not close to the top talent lebron played with. Would all rank after kukoc
Why wouldn't you consider Jordan's years with the Wizards serious? Jordan was the same age Lebron is now. Lebron just took the Lakers to the western conference finals beating Steph Curry. Jordan was just a selfish scorer with the Wizards who couldn't even get them to the playoffs!
Hitachi77 wrote:DB23 wrote:Hitachi77 wrote:Every time the 6/6 finals argument is used, a kitten dies. Think about the kittens fellas.
Then think about why it’s better to lose in rounds 1-3 than it is to lose in the finals.
Now we know you have a Jordan bias, because only people with a Jordan bias would use that argument. Just focus on other arguments, because using that argument over and over only shows that bias.
There is no bigger stage than the NBA finals so it does mean something. Now Lebron has performed amazingly in some of those losses so you can’t just use how many losses, but some of the losses are inexcusable. Obviously Dallas matters, the biggest stage, the heavily favored team and just an awful performance. That matters.
Let’s go through the list:
2007: took an insane performance from LeBron to get to the finals, his team was overmatched in the finals
2011: I will give you this one of course, they lost to Dallas as a favorite.
2014: This one kind of a wash, they lost as a slight underdog.
2015: lost his 2nd and 3rd best players to injury, still took the Warriors to 6
2017-18: completely overmatched, KD Warriors
Jordan has won as a favorite every time, and lost as an underdog every time. LeBron has often won as an underdog, in many of those runs through the east, and a few times lost as a favorite.
That finals streak is an argument in Lebron’s favor, anyone saying anything otherwise is being silly or biased.
zimpy27 wrote:How many Jordan fans are reading through this thread and feeling great about the quality of data-driven arguments for Jordan as GOAT?
You can't possibly look around this thread and feel confident about your position. Not saying Jordan as GOAT is wrong but it would be cool to see some effort made in the reasoning department.

MavsDirk41 wrote:zimpy27 wrote:How many Jordan fans are reading through this thread and feeling great about the quality of data-driven arguments for Jordan as GOAT?
You can't possibly look around this thread and feel confident about your position. Not saying Jordan as GOAT is wrong but it would be cool to see some effort made in the reasoning department.
Show me some lebron james data driven stuff you guys talk about
SelfishPlayer wrote:DB23 wrote:SelfishPlayer wrote:
Richard Hamilton?
Wouldn’t really consider the wizards years as serious. But either way, Gilmore, are not close to the top talent lebron played with. Would all rank after kukoc
Why wouldn't you consider Jordan's years with the Wizards serious? Jordan was the same age Lebron is now. Lebron just took the Lakers to the western conference finals beating Steph Curry. Jordan was just a selfish scorer with the Wizards who couldn't even get them to the playoffs!
MavsDirk41 wrote:SelfishPlayer wrote:DB23 wrote:
Wouldn’t really consider the wizards years as serious. But either way, Gilmore, are not close to the top talent lebron played with. Would all rank after kukoc
Why wouldn't you consider Jordan's years with the Wizards serious? Jordan was the same age Lebron is now. Lebron just took the Lakers to the western conference finals beating Steph Curry. Jordan was just a selfish scorer with the Wizards who couldn't even get them to the playoffs!
James had Davis. Jordan had Rip Hamilton. You want to compare those two?
SelfishPlayer wrote:The Mavs won playoff games without Luka
Hitachi77 wrote:DB23 wrote:Hitachi77 wrote:Every time the 6/6 finals argument is used, a kitten dies. Think about the kittens fellas.
Then think about why it’s better to lose in rounds 1-3 than it is to lose in the finals.
Now we know you have a Jordan bias, because only people with a Jordan bias would use that argument. Just focus on other arguments, because using that argument over and over only shows that bias.
There is no bigger stage than the NBA finals so it does mean something. Now Lebron has performed amazingly in some of those losses so you can’t just use how many losses, but some of the losses are inexcusable. Obviously Dallas matters, the biggest stage, the heavily favored team and just an awful performance. That matters.
Let’s go through the list:
2007: took an insane performance from LeBron to get to the finals, his team was overmatched in the finals
2011: I will give you this one of course, they lost to Dallas as a favorite.
2014: This one kind of a wash, they lost as a slight underdog.
2015: lost his 2nd and 3rd best players to injury, still took the Warriors to 6
2017-18: completely overmatched, KD Warriors
Jordan has won as a favorite every time, and lost as an underdog every time. LeBron has often won as an underdog, in many of those runs through the east, and a few times lost as a favorite.
That finals streak is an argument in Lebron’s favor, anyone saying anything otherwise is being silly or biased.

zimpy27 wrote:MavsDirk41 wrote:zimpy27 wrote:How many Jordan fans are reading through this thread and feeling great about the quality of data-driven arguments for Jordan as GOAT?
You can't possibly look around this thread and feel confident about your position. Not saying Jordan as GOAT is wrong but it would be cool to see some effort made in the reasoning department.
Show me some lebron james data driven stuff you guys talk about
viewtopic.php?f=64&t=2301003
SelfishPlayer wrote:MavsDirk41 wrote:SelfishPlayer wrote:
Why wouldn't you consider Jordan's years with the Wizards serious? Jordan was the same age Lebron is now. Lebron just took the Lakers to the western conference finals beating Steph Curry. Jordan was just a selfish scorer with the Wizards who couldn't even get them to the playoffs!
James had Davis. Jordan had Rip Hamilton. You want to compare those two?
Jordan got the same results before Pippen and after Pippen, no second round playoff appearance... Lebron got the same results before playing with Hall of Famers and after playing with them, DEEP PLAYOFF RUNS!
DB23 wrote:[tweet][/tweet]SelfishPlayer wrote:DB23 wrote:
Wouldn’t really consider the wizards years as serious. But either way, Gilmore, are not close to the top talent lebron played with. Would all rank after kukoc
Why wouldn't you consider Jordan's years with the Wizards serious? Jordan was the same age Lebron is now. Lebron just took the Lakers to the western conference finals beating Steph Curry. Jordan was just a selfish scorer with the Wizards who couldn't even get them to the playoffs!
What lebron is doing now is amazing but sports science and load management has also changed the game and athlete performance considerably over the last 25-30 years.
SelfishPlayer wrote:The Mavs won playoff games without Luka
MavsDirk41 wrote:SelfishPlayer wrote:MavsDirk41 wrote:
James had Davis. Jordan had Rip Hamilton. You want to compare those two?
Jordan got the same results before Pippen and after Pippen, no second round playoff appearance... Lebron got the same results before playing with Hall of Famers and after playing with them, DEEP PLAYOFF RUNS!
Lol he has stacked the deck in his favor since leaving Cleveland in 2010 pal
SelfishPlayer wrote:The Mavs won playoff games without Luka

CrabDribbler wrote:zimpy27 wrote:CrabDribbler wrote:6/6
Ahh yes, Jordan played in only 6 NBA seasons and won a championship every year.
Yup and he definitely could’ve went 8/8 if he didn’t retire to dominate baseball too.
zimpy27 wrote:How many Jordan fans are reading through this thread and feeling great about the quality of data-driven arguments for Jordan as GOAT?
You can't possibly look around this thread and feel confident about your position. Not saying Jordan as GOAT is wrong but it would be cool to see some effort made in the reasoning department.
SelfishPlayer wrote:MavsDirk41 wrote:SelfishPlayer wrote:
Why wouldn't you consider Jordan's years with the Wizards serious? Jordan was the same age Lebron is now. Lebron just took the Lakers to the western conference finals beating Steph Curry. Jordan was just a selfish scorer with the Wizards who couldn't even get them to the playoffs!
James had Davis. Jordan had Rip Hamilton. You want to compare those two?
Jordan got the same results before Pippen and after Pippen, no second round playoff appearance... Lebron got the same results before playing with Hall of Famers and after playing with them, DEEP PLAYOFF RUNS!
Thaddy wrote:I can tell you right now the Bulls will collapse by mid season and will be fighting in or for the play in.
Remember it.
Lalouie wrote:cant be rings cuz russell has 11
cant be scoring cuz wilt was unmatched
cant be breadth of career because kareem has that wrapped up
cant be skillset because there are many and it's all subjective anyway
cant be longevity/consistancy because lebron has that
like any GOAT criteria it's ALL a matter of the visuals, which is subjective. people get wrapped up in the visuals
Wingy wrote:Sure you’ve seen this one. Give Lebron KD’s career accolades. Still not equal to Jordan.