What's the strongest data-driven argument for Michael Jordan as GOAT?
Moderators: KingDavid, cupcakesnake, Domejandro, ken6199, infinite11285, Clav, Dirk, bwgood77, bisme37, zimpy27
Re: What's the strongest data-driven argument for Michael Jordan as GOAT?
- Capn'O
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 90,858
- And1: 111,109
- Joined: Dec 16, 2005
- Location: Bone Goal
-
Re: What's the strongest data-driven argument for Michael Jordan as GOAT?
During peak years the gap between MJ and his peers in catchall stats like PER and winshares was typically wider than LeBron's. I.e. he was the best of his era by a wider margin.
Generally, I think there's a strong argument statistically that he peaked higher and if you value peak over longevity, as I do, you would gravitate to that. Obviously there's no longevity argument.
Generally, I think there's a strong argument statistically that he peaked higher and if you value peak over longevity, as I do, you would gravitate to that. Obviously there's no longevity argument.
BAF Clippers:
UNDER CONSTRUCTION - PLEASE INQUIRE WITHIN

UNDER CONSTRUCTION - PLEASE INQUIRE WITHIN
Re: What's the strongest data-driven argument for Michael Jordan as GOAT?
- SelfishPlayer
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,550
- And1: 3,369
- Joined: May 23, 2014
Re: What's the strongest data-driven argument for Michael Jordan as GOAT?
tsherkin wrote:SelfishPlayer wrote:
Why is load management a thing if sports science is so advanced today? Players should be playing more minutes per game, more games per season, and more seasons per career. The last one may be the only one that is happening, but possibly due to players entering the league earlier.
Because the science says injuries are lower when they do it this way, and you can get better overall longevity. There's been a downward trend in MPG since at least the 80s. In the 60s and much of the 70s, 40+ mpg was more the standard, and that eroded over the years. This is the end-point of a trend much older than recent sport science/analytics-driven advancements.
It looks like playing more minutes results in less severe injuries...
SelfishPlayer wrote:The Mavs won playoff games without Luka
The Mavs missed the playoffs without Brunson.
Re: What's the strongest data-driven argument for Michael Jordan as GOAT?
- SelfishPlayer
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,550
- And1: 3,369
- Joined: May 23, 2014
Re: What's the strongest data-driven argument for Michael Jordan as GOAT?
knicksNOTslick wrote:SelfishPlayer wrote:NZB2323 wrote:
You think Lebron winning with Anthony Davis is more impressive than Jordan winning with Pippen?
In 98 Pippen only played in 44 games, has a migraine in game 6, and during the playoffs averaged 17, 7, and 5 on 50 TS%, 19.5 PER.
In 2020 AD played in 62 games during a shortened 71 game season, and during the playoffs averaged 28, 10, and 4 on 66.5 TS%, 29.6 PER.
And I know that stats don’t capture defense, but AD was phenomenal defensively during that playoff run.
And if we’re going by data, I don’t think there’s any data that puts Pippen above Wade or AD.
There is, look at how many times Pippen went to the playoffs without Jordan. AD and Wade did a lot of losing without Lebron and Shaq. Pippen makes people better. You don't have much of a team without Wade or AD as your best player. They will probably sit out injured to get a better lottery pick
The thread was asking for data. He gave you the stats and you're throwing it out.
Besides, Wade already won as the #1 guy, Shaq was already a shell of himself. You don't have to belittle AD and Wade's career to prop up Lebron. DWade showed Lebron how to win a ring, not the other way around.
Wade wasn't the #1 guy no more than Harden was the #1 guy for the Sixers in the playoffs this year. It is Embiid's team as it was Shaq's team. Wade failed to lead Lebron and Bosh so he relinquished the team to Lebron.
SelfishPlayer wrote:The Mavs won playoff games without Luka
The Mavs missed the playoffs without Brunson.
Re: What's the strongest data-driven argument for Michael Jordan as GOAT?
-
NZB2323
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,655
- And1: 11,270
- Joined: Aug 02, 2008
Re: What's the strongest data-driven argument for Michael Jordan as GOAT?
SelfishPlayer wrote:NZB2323 wrote:SelfishPlayer wrote:
Jordan got the same results before Pippen and after Pippen, no second round playoff appearance... Lebron got the same results before playing with Hall of Famers and after playing with them, DEEP PLAYOFF RUNS!
You think Lebron winning with Anthony Davis is more impressive than Jordan winning with Pippen?
In 98 Pippen only played in 44 games, has a migraine in game 6, and during the playoffs averaged 17, 7, and 5 on 50 TS%, 19.5 PER.
In 2020 AD played in 62 games during a shortened 71 game season, and during the playoffs averaged 28, 10, and 4 on 66.5 TS%, 29.6 PER.
And I know that stats don’t capture defense, but AD was phenomenal defensively during that playoff run.
And if we’re going by data, I don’t think there’s any data that puts Pippen above Wade or AD.
There is, look at how many times Pippen went to the playoffs without Jordan. AD and Wade did a lot of losing without Lebron and Shaq. Pippen makes people better. You don't have much of a team without Wade or AD as your best player. They will probably sit out injured to get a better lottery pick
Pippen won 1 playoff series in 94 without Jordan, when he had Horace Grant, Toni Kukoc, BJ Armstrong, Kerr, Paxson, Cartwright, and Longley.
Wade won a championship without Lebron.
AD was fantastic in the 2018 playoffs, he swept Dame, he just couldn’t beat the KD Warriors.
06 Wade: 28, 6, and 6, 59.3 TS%, 26.9 PER
18 AD: 30, 13, and 2, 58.4 TS%, 25.8 PER
94 Pippen: 23, 8, and 5, 52.1 TS%, 22.8 PER
I guess you could say Pippen went to the WCF in 2000, but that’s kind of like saying Love went to the Finals in 2023.
Pippen lost in the first round in 99 with Hakeem and Barkley.
Thaddy wrote:I can tell you right now the Bulls will collapse by mid season and will be fighting in or for the play in.
Remember it.
Re: What's the strongest data-driven argument for Michael Jordan as GOAT?
-
HotRocks34
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,278
- And1: 21,237
- Joined: Jun 23, 2007
Re: What's the strongest data-driven argument for Michael Jordan as GOAT?
lebootz21 wrote:I grew up watching BOTH Jordan and Lebron and I'm telling you the level of dominance Jordan had on the league was unprecedented. He dominated in every aspect of the game: scoring, defense, championship, hustle, team, longevity, etc.
Forget inflated stats man. You just got to witness the dominance. Lebron can't even do half of what Jordan did. Even in his prime, people were saying Kobe was better (which I still believe today). Then it was Giannis, then Curry, now Jokic. Y'know how many players were truly consider better than Jordan even in his late 30s? 1 ..... Karl Malone and even his mvp years were questionable since Jordan got the ring both years, and not just better on offense, but he was the best defensive player year in and year out. How many all defensive teams did Lebron have? Oh yeah 5. Jordan is tied for the highest record of 9 while being the most DOMINATE scorer in the league. In comparison to today's players, he does not only have the offensive dominance of Durant or Curry but the defensive presence of Smart and Tatum COMBINED.
You weren't there to witness the dominance. You will never understand. That is why you can only fall back on arbitrary numbers that don't tell the whole story.
Correct.
I was watching the league before Jordan, during Jordan and after Jordan.
No one matched what he did. Maybe some guys before my time, but not in the modern era.
When Jordan came around, Bird was touted as GOAT. Not temporary GOAT, THE GOAT. That's how things were trending.
MJ shifted the whole landscape. It's almost like Djokovic grabbing control of men's tennis from Federer and Nadal. Bird and Magic were the kings, and then suddenly this guy came in and just shoved everyone to the side.
LeBron is great, but it's not the same thing.
Thank you Nico!
Re: What's the strongest data-driven argument for Michael Jordan as GOAT?
-
tsherkin
- Forum Mod - Raptors

- Posts: 93,244
- And1: 32,714
- Joined: Oct 14, 2003
-
Re: What's the strongest data-driven argument for Michael Jordan as GOAT?
SelfishPlayer wrote:tsherkin wrote:SelfishPlayer wrote:
Why is load management a thing if sports science is so advanced today? Players should be playing more minutes per game, more games per season, and more seasons per career. The last one may be the only one that is happening, but possibly due to players entering the league earlier.
Because the science says injuries are lower when they do it this way, and you can get better overall longevity. There's been a downward trend in MPG since at least the 80s. In the 60s and much of the 70s, 40+ mpg was more the standard, and that eroded over the years. This is the end-point of a trend much older than recent sport science/analytics-driven advancements.
It looks like playing more minutes results in less severe injuries...
How about that, hey?
Re: What's the strongest data-driven argument for Michael Jordan as GOAT?
- baldur
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,030
- And1: 13,528
- Joined: Jul 12, 2015
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
-
Re: What's the strongest data-driven argument for Michael Jordan as GOAT?
Pharmcat wrote:SelfishPlayer wrote:Jordan never made it past the first round of the playoffs without Pippen...
And pippen did without Jordan . So Jordan needed pippen more than pippen needed Jordan
You guys are serious?
Re: What's the strongest data-driven argument for Michael Jordan as GOAT?
-
MavsDirk41
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,904
- And1: 4,567
- Joined: Dec 07, 2022
-
Re: What's the strongest data-driven argument for Michael Jordan as GOAT?
SelfishPlayer wrote:MavsDirk41 wrote:SelfishPlayer wrote:
There is, look at how many times Pippen went to the playoffs without Jordan. AD and Wade did a lot of losing without Lebron and Shaq. Pippen makes people better. You don't have much of a team without Wade or AD as your best player. They will probably sit out injured to get a better lottery pick
Wade won a championship and finals mvp in 06 lol what are you talking about? He was clearly the best player in the finals and probably the best player in the nba that year.
Shaq's team...
Wade failed to lead Lebron and Bosh. He relinquished the team to Lebron after failing.
Lol just stop man Wade was unbelievable in the 06 finals. Are you being serious or sarcastic? I cant tell lol
Did you watch the 2011 finals? Wade was great, your guy James not so much. Just take the L man
Re: What's the strongest data-driven argument for Michael Jordan as GOAT?
- HMFFL
- Global Mod

- Posts: 54,786
- And1: 10,727
- Joined: Mar 10, 2004
Re: What's the strongest data-driven argument for Michael Jordan as GOAT?
That's very interesting that you fins going 6 for 6 in the Finals to be "stupid af"Marrrcuss wrote:I am a bron stan who has no issue with someone feeling Mike is the goat.
I just think the finals record as proof is stupid af.
So, how about other stats, and achievements?
Sent from my SM-N975U using RealGM mobile app
Re: What's the strongest data-driven argument for Michael Jordan as GOAT?
-
kacey ring
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,687
- And1: 1,047
- Joined: May 25, 2013
Re: What's the strongest data-driven argument for Michael Jordan as GOAT?
How many more years will this be debated?
Both are GOTTs to me! Greatest of their time
!
Both are GOTTs to me! Greatest of their time
Re: What's the strongest data-driven argument for Michael Jordan as GOAT?
- Lalouie
- RealGM
- Posts: 23,591
- And1: 12,565
- Joined: May 12, 2017
Re: What's the strongest data-driven argument for Michael Jordan as GOAT?
knicksNOTslick wrote:Lalouie wrote:cant be rings cuz russell has 11
cant be scoring cuz wilt was unmatched
cant be breadth of career because kareem has that wrapped up
cant be skillset because there are many and it's all subjective anyway
cant be longevity/consistancy because lebron has that
like any GOAT criteria it's ALL a matter of the visuals, which is subjective. people get wrapped up in the visuals
So you're picking and choosing categories but measuring who is the GOAT you have to have all the stuff you mentioned plus the actual dominance during your peak, MJ has all of that.
People can talk about player A or player B as the GOAT all they want. But for me, the true measure is how well you stacked up against your peers and your dominance in your era. Because those really all that we can see. We will never see prime MJ vs prime Lebron but we have seen the games of MJ against his peers as well as Lebron against his peers. Who truly dominated their era? Those are tangible things that can be measured. The rest is just speculation.
MJ dominated his era, he won 6 rings and denied a lot of HOFers from getting a ring. Lebron's era, would you say he was as dominant? Because he only ruled half the league, the East. He lost to the Mavs in 2011 as the favorite and he ran into the Spurs. The Warriors was unfair matchup, I'll give him that. But Lebron really didn't dominate his era if you want to compare him against his peers. That's really all we can measure. Everything else you can't.
i agree with you that players should be judged by their dominance in ther era.
but i wasnt picking or choosing. i threw all the stats out the window and basically i meant "the eye test" which is just another way of saying what you just said
i find it inconceivable that with all the computer data and analytics, no one has done a simple comparison based on what you just said.
that is for me .........
player versus the 5 or 10 of his time AND versus the league as a whole. this has always been my metric in these cross era discussions
Re: What's the strongest data-driven argument for Michael Jordan as GOAT?
-
payton2kemp
- Starter
- Posts: 2,340
- And1: 4,362
- Joined: Dec 15, 2014
- Location: I can't tell you. I'm an investigator.
-
Re: What's the strongest data-driven argument for Michael Jordan as GOAT?
Ray Donovan wrote:6 championships in 6 trips to Finals
So is it better to not make the finals and lose in the earlier rounds? If Lebron only made to four finals and won all four, would that be better?
4-6 looks bad, but its better than being 4-0 and losing before ever making it to the finals.
Re: What's the strongest data-driven argument for Michael Jordan as GOAT?
- durden_tyler
- RealGM
- Posts: 21,590
- And1: 10,847
- Joined: Jun 04, 2003
- Location: 537 Paper Street, Bradford
-
Re: What's the strongest data-driven argument for Michael Jordan as GOAT?
therealozzykhan wrote:Ray Donovan wrote:6 championships in 6 trips to Finals
So is it better to not make the finals and lose in the earlier rounds? If Lebron only made to four finals and won all four, would that be better?
4-6 looks bad, but its better than being 4-0 and losing before ever making it to the finals.
No 4-6 IS bad, that's a career loser if i see one.
Free Gaza.
Re: What's the strongest data-driven argument for Michael Jordan as GOAT?
- hyper316
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,805
- And1: 10,115
- Joined: Dec 23, 2006
-
Re: What's the strongest data-driven argument for Michael Jordan as GOAT?
Raw numbers comparison between eras is so misleading. Should be adjusted player ppg to average total points per game
Re: What's the strongest data-driven argument for Michael Jordan as GOAT?
-
Taj FTW
- Starter
- Posts: 2,060
- And1: 2,851
- Joined: Oct 28, 2022
Re: What's the strongest data-driven argument for Michael Jordan as GOAT?
It's quite simple. Both were similarly dominant for their career. LeBron. Simply did it longer. If you put them in the exact same team for 20 years and want to maximize championships, LeBron is the obvious choice.
Re: What's the strongest data-driven argument for Michael Jordan as GOAT?
-
Taj FTW
- Starter
- Posts: 2,060
- And1: 2,851
- Joined: Oct 28, 2022
Re: What's the strongest data-driven argument for Michael Jordan as GOAT?
MavsDirk41 wrote:IG2 wrote:Taj FTW wrote:
'07 Spurs and '15 Warriors as well.
Yep, those 2 seasons as well.
Lol young james fan boys
Lol! Imagine thinking MJ faced better teams in the finals then the 07 Spurs or 15 Warriors. Lol MavsDirk, just lol.
Re: What's the strongest data-driven argument for Michael Jordan as GOAT?
- durden_tyler
- RealGM
- Posts: 21,590
- And1: 10,847
- Joined: Jun 04, 2003
- Location: 537 Paper Street, Bradford
-
Re: What's the strongest data-driven argument for Michael Jordan as GOAT?
Taj FTW wrote:It's quite simple. Both were similarly dominant for their career. LeBron. Simply did it longer. If you put them in the exact same team for 20 years and want to maximize championships, LeBron is the obvious choice.
What maximize championships are you talking about? He couldn't deliver!
If you put Jordan on same timeline and length of LeBron, he'd have more than 6 championships. Heck if he did not get suspended and played baseball, realistic chance is that he would have had eight.
LeBron is a great, great player but just fell a bit short when compared to the GOAT. He can settle for #2, and that's okay LeBron fans.
Free Gaza.
Re: What's the strongest data-driven argument for Michael Jordan as GOAT?
-
JRoy
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,044
- And1: 14,407
- Joined: Feb 27, 2019
-
Re: What's the strongest data-driven argument for Michael Jordan as GOAT?
He sold a lot of sneakers.
Edrees wrote:JRoy wrote:Monta Ellis have it all
I was hoping and expecting this to be one of the first replies. You did not disappoint. Jroy have it all.
Re: What's the strongest data-driven argument for Michael Jordan as GOAT?
-
Taj FTW
- Starter
- Posts: 2,060
- And1: 2,851
- Joined: Oct 28, 2022
Re: What's the strongest data-driven argument for Michael Jordan as GOAT?
durden_tyler wrote:Taj FTW wrote:It's quite simple. Both were similarly dominant for their career. LeBron. Simply did it longer. If you put them in the exact same team for 20 years and want to maximize championships, LeBron is the obvious choice.
What maximize championships are you talking about? He couldn't deliver!
If you put Jordan on same timeline and length of LeBron, he'd have more than 6 championships. Heck if he did not get suspended and played baseball, realistic chance is that he would have had eight.
LeBron is a great, great player but just fell a bit short when compared to the GOAT. He can settle for #2, and that's okay LeBron fans.
Which of LeBron's teams would MJ win a championship with if you replaced LeBron with him? Durden, your arguments have been extremely weak tbh.
Re: What's the strongest data-driven argument for Michael Jordan as GOAT?
-
Hitachi77
- Rookie
- Posts: 1,035
- And1: 818
- Joined: Apr 22, 2021
Re: What's the strongest data-driven argument for Michael Jordan as GOAT?
Wingy wrote:Hitachi77 wrote:DB23 wrote:
There is no bigger stage than the NBA finals so it does mean something. Now Lebron has performed amazingly in some of those losses so you can’t just use how many losses, but some of the losses are inexcusable. Obviously Dallas matters, the biggest stage, the heavily favored team and just an awful performance. That matters.
Let’s go through the list:
2007: took an insane performance from LeBron to get to the finals, his team was overmatched in the finals
2011: I will give you this one of course, they lost to Dallas as a favorite.
2014: This one kind of a wash, they lost as a slight underdog.
2015: lost his 2nd and 3rd best players to injury, still took the Warriors to 6
2017-18: completely overmatched, KD Warriors
Jordan has won as a favorite every time, and lost as an underdog every time. LeBron has often won as an underdog, in many of those runs through the east, and a few times lost as a favorite.
That finals streak is an argument in Lebron’s favor, anyone saying anything otherwise is being silly or biased.
Overcame the Pistons that one series otherwise when were they an underdog and won? You used the word “often” during that weak LEastern Conference era? Warriors too, right? When Steph was dinged, Bogut was out as moron Draymond ’kicked’ the series to them? If you are going to call out the weakened state of the Cavs in 2015, then you must also recognize injury also helped deliver Lebron’s greatest achievement.
2006: had the 64 win Pistons on the ropes with a scrub Cavs team
2007: won vs the Pistons, like you mentioned
2008: had the Celtics on the ropes with that scrub of a Cavs team
2012: they were underdogs vs the Thunder
2016: I’ll admit, this win it very overrated and talked about way too much, and was aided by injuries and suspensions, like you mentioned, but still worth a note
2018: they were underdogs vs the Raptors, can’t remember if they were underdogs vs the Celtics in the series, but they were in game 7






