Dundalis wrote:Young gun 6 wrote:Dinwiddie, Luka, Wood had the worst net rating in the league through the first 20 games.
They basically can’t share the court together because of how bad Wood is defensively.
Kyrie is an even worse defender than Dinwiddie …
Look up the net rating when Green, Luka, Wood and Kleber shared the court. Think you will find it's a complete 180 and it's also the best combination the Mavs have had. Give Wood a fellow big to take the responsibility of guarding the opposing teams big away from him and he's fine, because he's switchable and has very solid weak side shot blocking. Also Kyrie is NOT a worse defender than Dinwiddie. Dinwiddie was arguably the worst defensive starter on the Mavs who are already a horrible defensive team. Dinwiddie is a complete turnstile defensively who doesn't stay in front of anyone. Kyrie has actually been passable defensively this season.ElectricMayhem wrote:Even when he came to Detroit, he was known for being a talented malcontent that wasn't worth keeping around. He played great for Detroit - many fans thought he was better than Drummond and maybe he was (high bar, I know). But Weaver was not that interested in keeping him around. Just like New Orleans wasn't. Just like Milwaukee wasn't. Just like Houston wasn't. Just like Dallas isn't. I haven't been in any of those locker rooms, but I feel like he just has to be an anti-culture guy.
Luka likes him quite a bit and has not only expressed it, but you can see it on court.
It doesn't come up when looking through the lineup stats on BBall ref. I would go to nba.com but if it's not even in the highest 20 minutes of lineups then it's waaaaay too small of a sample size to be used as genuine data for a case.
You can view the 5, 4, 3, 2 man lineup stats here for the top 20 minutes of each which is far better sample size to actual garner data:
https://www.basketball-reference.com/teams/DAL/2023/lineups/
The 5 man lineups have 3 lineups playing 100+ minutes:
Dinwiddie, Luka, Bullock, DFS, Powell (+9.7)
Dinwiddie, Luka, THJ, DFS, Powell (+5.7)
Dinwiddie, Luka, THJ, Bullock, Wood (-4.2)
The common denominator is when Powell is actually in the lineup not Wood.
Look at the 4 man lineups too and you'll see the same result:
Dinwiddie, Luka, THJ, Powell is +10
Dinwiddie, Luka, Bullock, Powell is +10.3
in the same amount of minutes
Dinwiddie, Luka, THJ, Wood is -10.2
Basically a 20 point difference when you bench Wood and put Powell on with the same squad.
Dinwiddie, Bullock, DFS, Powell actually has the best 4 man net lineup being +16.1 and 210 minutes played together.
3 Man lineup:
Luka, THJ, Wood +9.4 is the 2nd highest rating (only behind swapping Wood for Powell).
However, that is the only 3 man lineup Wood is a part of in the top 20 of minutes that even has a positive net rating:
Dinwiddie, Luka, Wood (-0.2)
Bullock, THJ, Wood (-0.6)
Luka, Bullock, Wood (-4.3)
Dinwiddie, Bullock, Wood (-7.6)
The stats support the eye test that Wood is a negative for the most part unless he's paired with Powell. He's also on the court against other teams bench bigs for the most part coming off the bench in 70% of games and Dallas refusing to play him in the last 5 minutes of close games because of how bad he has been.
Your net rating stats will be inflated when you're playing with Luka against half bench unites (that come in 6 minutes into the game) and you're not in games in tight situations late. And even with that occuring his net rating stats are still shocking. I just can't see how someone can watch Wood's games and think he is good in any format. It screams looking at general box score stats and thinking a 20/10 player is a good player without watching him.
Hassan Whiteside 2.0
There's a reason why Mavs haven't extended him and he's been bounced around from 4 different teams when on paper it looks like he's performing well.