cmoss84 wrote:Victor is really good.just like chet
His Debut in SL was underwhelming.
Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks
cmoss84 wrote:Victor is really good.just like chet
jpatrick wrote:Regarding non-Wolves:
Scoot and Thompson will be good. Scoot is everything you want in a PG. but I’ve seen him before. Thompson I had not. He can’t shoot, but his athleticism is incredible. He may be the best athlete in the NBA from day one.
Victor will be fine. The skills/athleticism at that size are incredible. He’s still a future superstar. Even if game 1 wasn’t awesome.
Brandon Miller is okay. I think he’ll be good but I just don’t see superstar. Brandon Ingram is the ceiling, but I don’t know if he hits that. Ingram had better physical size/length.
Dyson Daniels: ugh. I was really high on him coming into the draft. I thought he could become an Lonzo Ball type off the ball PG who is an elite defender. He may still become an elite defender but that offense is rough. He has no confidence in the jumper. And with people able to sag off him, he doesn’t have the quickness/handle to get by people. That led him to forcing everything. It was ugly on the offensive end.
Last note, that Rockets/Blazers game was fun. So much young talent. I think Scoot is the best young guy on those teams but the Rockets have so many young guys that pop. Smith, Eason, Thompson, Sengun, Green. If either Thomson or Green can be one an offensive hub/superstar and they get a rim protector, that’s a real core.
Neeva wrote:jpatrick wrote:Regarding non-Wolves:
Scoot and Thompson will be good. Scoot is everything you want in a PG. but I’ve seen him before. Thompson I had not. He can’t shoot, but his athleticism is incredible. He may be the best athlete in the NBA from day one.
Victor will be fine. The skills/athleticism at that size are incredible. He’s still a future superstar. Even if game 1 wasn’t awesome.
Brandon Miller is okay. I think he’ll be good but I just don’t see superstar. Brandon Ingram is the ceiling, but I don’t know if he hits that. Ingram had better physical size/length.
Dyson Daniels: ugh. I was really high on him coming into the draft. I thought he could become an Lonzo Ball type off the ball PG who is an elite defender. He may still become an elite defender but that offense is rough. He has no confidence in the jumper. And with people able to sag off him, he doesn’t have the quickness/handle to get by people. That led him to forcing everything. It was ugly on the offensive end.
Last note, that Rockets/Blazers game was fun. So much young talent. I think Scoot is the best young guy on those teams but the Rockets have so many young guys that pop. Smith, Eason, Thompson, Sengun, Green. If either Thomson or Green can be one an offensive hub/superstar and they get a rim protector, that’s a real core.
I was high on Green in the draft and don’t see a superstar anymore, Thompson is like a taller westbrook but even worse shooter.


jpatrick wrote:Neeva wrote:jpatrick wrote:Regarding non-Wolves:
Scoot and Thompson will be good. Scoot is everything you want in a PG. but I’ve seen him before. Thompson I had not. He can’t shoot, but his athleticism is incredible. He may be the best athlete in the NBA from day one.
Victor will be fine. The skills/athleticism at that size are incredible. He’s still a future superstar. Even if game 1 wasn’t awesome.
Brandon Miller is okay. I think he’ll be good but I just don’t see superstar. Brandon Ingram is the ceiling, but I don’t know if he hits that. Ingram had better physical size/length.
Dyson Daniels: ugh. I was really high on him coming into the draft. I thought he could become an Lonzo Ball type off the ball PG who is an elite defender. He may still become an elite defender but that offense is rough. He has no confidence in the jumper. And with people able to sag off him, he doesn’t have the quickness/handle to get by people. That led him to forcing everything. It was ugly on the offensive end.
Last note, that Rockets/Blazers game was fun. So much young talent. I think Scoot is the best young guy on those teams but the Rockets have so many young guys that pop. Smith, Eason, Thompson, Sengun, Green. If either Thomson or Green can be one an offensive hub/superstar and they get a rim protector, that’s a real core.
I was high on Green in the draft and don’t see a superstar anymore, Thompson is like a taller westbrook but even worse shooter.
Thompson is a Westbrook level athlete, but he is an amazing passer with a really high level feel for the game, things Westbrook doesn’t have. And he’s also, probably, going to be a high level defender. For him to be a star, the shooting has to come around though. I could see him becoming a Grant Hill like playmaker.
younggunsmn wrote:jpatrick wrote:Neeva wrote:
I was high on Green in the draft and don’t see a superstar anymore, Thompson is like a taller westbrook but even worse shooter.
Thompson is a Westbrook level athlete, but he is an amazing passer with a really high level feel for the game, things Westbrook doesn’t have. And he’s also, probably, going to be a high level defender. For him to be a star, the shooting has to come around though. I could see him becoming a Grant Hill like playmaker.
Westbrook averaged a triple double for a season 4 different times, including 31-10-10, I'd say he had a feel for the game.
The big dropoff has come with age and a decline in physical skills, including inexplicably losing the ability to shoot free throws after being an 80%+ FT shooter for 10 years (vivid fantasy basketball memories on that particular subject lol).
If Thompson really is that level of athlete, he's going to be the guy Houston builds around, even if he can't shoot.
It's easy to forget just how top 1/10 of 1 percent level athletic a young westbrook was when making those kinds of comparisons though.
minimus wrote:https://youtu.be/iFKs2DaeoGg
https://youtu.be/FZNdlo9NgYU
https://youtu.be/IhXKB-J-9xk
I know he is an undersized scoring guard, who looks better in SL because he already played against NBA competition. He can struggle to score consistently against NBA defense, but he has his ability to operate in tight space, make smart reads (not only flashy), finish through contact. I think this combination of skills, basketball IQ can push to the next level.
TimberKat wrote:minimus wrote:https://youtu.be/iFKs2DaeoGg
https://youtu.be/FZNdlo9NgYU
https://youtu.be/IhXKB-J-9xk
I know he is an undersized scoring guard, who looks better in SL because he already played against NBA competition. He can struggle to score consistently against NBA defense, but he has his ability to operate in tight space, make smart reads (not only flashy), finish through contact. I think this combination of skills, basketball IQ can push to the next level.
He is listed as 6'2". Maybe he can replace JMcL or Moore on the roster. His shooting stats were terrible. Any chance he develope into a reasonable shooter?
TimberKat wrote:minimus wrote:https://youtu.be/iFKs2DaeoGg
https://youtu.be/FZNdlo9NgYU
https://youtu.be/IhXKB-J-9xk
I know he is an undersized scoring guard, who looks better in SL because he already played against NBA competition. He can struggle to score consistently against NBA defense, but he has his ability to operate in tight space, make smart reads (not only flashy), finish through contact. I think this combination of skills, basketball IQ can push to the next level.
He is listed as 6'2". Maybe he can replace JMcL or Moore on the roster. His shooting stats were terrible. Any chance he develope into a reasonable shooter?
minimus wrote:In other news: my guys Cason Wallace and Jarace Walker look very good.
minimus wrote:In other news: my guys Cason Wallace and Jarace Walker look very good.
Return to Minnesota Timberwolves