Russia-Ukraine War Part 2

[Clyde_Style]

I see Comrade Cut and Paste has been up to their old tricks of casting aspersions on aid to Ukraine

Gaslighting at its finest

Good work bot!

[HopelessKnick]

I see Comrade Cut and Paste has been up to their old tricks of casting aspersions on aid to Ukraine

Gaslighting at its finest

Good work bot!

What is pretty obvious here is that you have literally ZERO knowledge. Completely clueless, you only come up with the same boring BS. Your answers only highlight your complete ignorance, nothing more comrade.

As everyone that is only reading but not participating in this conversation--take a look at all the post. One the one hand there are loads of arguments on the other hand there is cluelessness and only some lame attempts at insults.

Thanks for underlining every single one of my points---couldn't have done it any better bot!

[DOT]

One the one hand there are loads of arguments

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gish_gallop

[HopelessKnick]

One the one hand there are loads of arguments

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gish_gallop

You guys only reinforce my point though. There is not a single argument you guys can take apart or weaken because they are 100% based in reality and factual. It has nothing to do with Gish gallop. You only make yourselves look bad because it becomes obvious to the interested reader that you guys have nothing substantial to counter with ---like contentwise. You only can come up with these weakling insults. Anyone with a semblance of intelligence can see this through---they'll look at this thread and see what side brought arguments and what side had nothing to counter with but childish weakish insults.

[DOT]

One the one hand there are loads of arguments

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gish_gallop

You guys only reinforce my point though. There is not a single argument you guys can take apart or weaken because they are 100% based in reality and factual. It has nothing to do with Gish gallop. You only make yourselves look bad because it becomes obvious to the interested reader that you guys have nothing substantial to counter with ---like contentwise. You only can come up with these weakling insults. Anyone with a semblance of intelligence can see this through---they'll look at this thread and see what side brought arguments and what side had nothing to counter with but childish weakish insults.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gish_gallop

[HopelessKnick]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gish_gallop

You guys only reinforce my point though. There is not a single argument you guys can take apart or weaken because they are 100% based in reality and factual. It has nothing to do with Gish gallop. You only make yourselves look bad because it becomes obvious to the interested reader that you guys have nothing substantial to counter with ---like contentwise. You only can come up with these weakling insults. Anyone with a semblance of intelligence can see this through---they'll look at this thread and see what side brought arguments and what side had nothing to counter with but childish weakish insults.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gish_gallop

Thanks mate, no better confirmation for the entirety of my points. Couldn't have possibly underlined and emphasized my points even more! Much appreciated!

[DOT]

You guys only reinforce my point though. There is not a single argument you guys can take apart or weaken because they are 100% based in reality and factual. It has nothing to do with Gish gallop. You only make yourselves look bad because it becomes obvious to the interested reader that you guys have nothing substantial to counter with ---like contentwise. You only can come up with these weakling insults. Anyone with a semblance of intelligence can see this through---they'll look at this thread and see what side brought arguments and what side had nothing to counter with but childish weakish insults.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gish_gallop

Thanks mate, no better confirmation for the entirety of my points. Couldn't have possibly underlined and emphasized my points even more! Much appreciated!

без проблем, товарищ.

[HopelessKnick]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gish_gallop

Thanks mate, no better confirmation for the entirety of my points. Couldn't have possibly underlined and emphasized my points even more! Much appreciated!

без проблем, товарищ.

Thanks again. I don't understand that one but again , visible for any interested reader. Zero arguments, zero knowledge, pure cluelessness. Underlined and emphasized. Thanks a lot, pure gold.

[Clyde_Style]

I see Comrade Cut and Paste has been up to their old tricks of casting aspersions on aid to Ukraine

Gaslighting at its finest

Good work bot!

What is pretty obvious here is that you have literally ZERO knowledge. Completely clueless, you only come up with the same boring BS. Your answers only highlight your complete ignorance, nothing more comrade.

As everyone that is only reading but not participating in this conversation--take a look at all the post. One the one hand there are loads of arguments on the other hand there is cluelessness and only some lame attempts at insults.

Thanks for underlining every single one of my points---couldn't have done it any better bot!

Undermining the case for supporting Ukraine is hard work, but you seem up to the task

Well done bot

[HopelessKnick]

Ad hominem (Latin for 'to the person'), short for argumentum ad hominem, is a term that refers to several types of arguments, most of which are fallacious. Typically this term refers to a rhetorical strategy where the speaker attacks the character, motive, or some other attribute of the person making an argument rather than attacking the substance of the argument itself. This avoids genuine debate by creating a diversion to some irrelevant but often highly charged issue. The most common form of this fallacy is "A makes a claim x, B asserts that A holds a property that is unwelcome, and hence B concludes that argument x is wrong".

[Clyde_Style]

Ad hominem (Latin for 'to the person'), short for argumentum ad hominem, is a term that refers to several types of arguments, most of which are fallacious. Typically this term refers to a rhetorical strategy where the speaker attacks the character, motive, or some other attribute of the person making an argument rather than attacking the substance of the argument itself. This avoids genuine debate by creating a diversion to some irrelevant but often highly charged issue. The most common form of this fallacy is "A makes a claim x, B asserts that A holds a property that is unwelcome, and hence B concludes that argument x is wrong".

Bot Mad

[thebuzzardman]

I see Comrade Cut and Paste has been up to their old tricks of casting aspersions on aid to Ukraine

Gaslighting at its finest

Good work bot!

What is pretty obvious here is that you have literally ZERO knowledge. Completely clueless, you only come up with the same boring BS. Your answers only highlight your complete ignorance, nothing more comrade.

As everyone that is only reading but not participating in this conversation--take a look at all the post. One the one hand there are loads of arguments on the other hand there is cluelessness and only some lame attempts at insults.

Thanks for underlining every single one of my points---couldn't have done it any better bot!

Undermining the case for supporting Ukraine is hard work, but you seem up to the task

Well done bot

Putin's Bot Boy?

[HopelessKnick]

I see Comrade Cut and Paste has been up to their old tricks of casting aspersions on aid to Ukraine

Gaslighting at its finest

Good work bot!

What is pretty obvious here is that you have literally ZERO knowledge. Completely clueless, you only come up with the same boring BS. Your answers only highlight your complete ignorance, nothing more comrade.

As everyone that is only reading but not participating in this conversation--take a look at all the post. One the one hand there are loads of arguments on the other hand there is cluelessness and only some lame attempts at insults.

Thanks for underlining every single one of my points---couldn't have done it any better bot!

Undermining the case for supporting Ukraine is hard work, but you seem up to the task

Well done bot

I've got to say this is interesting---You take substancelessness to a whole different level. It's kinda getting boring but I find it amusing that there is not even the semblance of an argument just the same immature repetition.

I will speak slow so it becomes easy to follow: You are not supporting Ukraine in any meaningful way in providing weapons which are proscribed internationally and will ultimately only increase ukrainian casualties in a higher ratio compared to russian casualties. Providing cluster munition would have only made sense if the west had vastly more amounts so Ukraine would have been at an advantage. Supplying a munition which the russians possess in a vastly superior amount and which was designed to stop attacking forces and not fortified defensive positions, is not going to support Ukraine in any real, meaningful way bot.

[HopelessKnick]

What is pretty obvious here is that you have literally ZERO knowledge. Completely clueless, you only come up with the same boring BS. Your answers only highlight your complete ignorance, nothing more comrade.

As everyone that is only reading but not participating in this conversation--take a look at all the post. One the one hand there are loads of arguments on the other hand there is cluelessness and only some lame attempts at insults.

Thanks for underlining every single one of my points---couldn't have done it any better bot!

Undermining the case for supporting Ukraine is hard work, but you seem up to the task

Well done bot

Putin's Bot Boy?

Ladies and gentlemen, the arrival of the sparrowboy.

[HopelessKnick]

Ad hominem (Latin for 'to the person'), short for argumentum ad hominem, is a term that refers to several types of arguments, most of which are fallacious. Typically this term refers to a rhetorical strategy where the speaker attacks the character, motive, or some other attribute of the person making an argument rather than attacking the substance of the argument itself. This avoids genuine debate by creating a diversion to some irrelevant but often highly charged issue. The most common form of this fallacy is "A makes a claim x, B asserts that A holds a property that is unwelcome, and hence B concludes that argument x is wrong".

Bot Mad

Clueless Bot mad.

[thebuzzardman]

Undermining the case for supporting Ukraine is hard work, but you seem up to the task

Well done bot

Putin's Bot Boy?

Ladies and gentlemen, the arrival of the sparrowboy.

Watch on YouTube

[Clyde_Style]

What is pretty obvious here is that you have literally ZERO knowledge. Completely clueless, you only come up with the same boring BS. Your answers only highlight your complete ignorance, nothing more comrade.

As everyone that is only reading but not participating in this conversation--take a look at all the post. One the one hand there are loads of arguments on the other hand there is cluelessness and only some lame attempts at insults.

Thanks for underlining every single one of my points---couldn't have done it any better bot!

Undermining the case for supporting Ukraine is hard work, but you seem up to the task

Well done bot

Putin's Bot Boy?

Putin's Bot Boy Mad

[HopelessKnick]

Undermining the case for supporting Ukraine is hard work, but you seem up to the task

Well done bot

Putin's Bot Boy?

Putin's Bot Boy Mad

Boring stuff sonny, boring stuff.

Don't get mad, although intelligence is mainly genetic, there are ways to maximize what you have. The world is not fair.

[Clyde_Style]

Bot Madder

[HopelessKnick]

Bot Madder

You know I can't do it for you. I can instruct you, but you have to show some willingness to work on what you are lacking sonny. Staying on realgm is not gonna solve it for you. Gotta be willing to do your homework pumpkin.

Your entire vocabulary consisting of 2 words should ring some alarm bells....